Discretionary sentencing guidelines; written explanation, appeal.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 137 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 137.
You're tracking SB 137
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 137 — Discretionary sentencing guidelines; written explanation, appeal.
Last action — Left in Courts of Justice
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House of Delegates
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2022 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Sentencing guidelines; written explanation; appeal. Requires that the written explanation the court files with the record of a case when departing from the sentencing guidelines adequately explains the sentence imposed to promote fair sentencing. The bill also provides that the failure to follow any of the required sentencing provisions, including the failure to provide a written explanation that adequately explains the sentence imposed, shall be reviewable on appeal or may the basis of any other post-conviction relief. The bill also provides that the failure to provide a written explanation that adequately explains the sentence imposed is error that may constitute a basis for resentencing by the trial judge. Under current law, the failure to follow any or all of the provisions of the sentencing guidelines or the failure to follow any or all of such provisions in the prescribed manner is not reviewable on appeal and cannot be the basis of any other post-conviction relief. The provisions of the bill apply only to those sentencing hearings conducted and such sentences imposed on or after July 1, 2022.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
38 added · 38 removedPlain-language change summary
The amendment to SB 137 changes the procedure for preparing discretionary sentencing guidelines in felony cases, particularly clarifying the role of probation officers. It establishes that in felony cases not involving Class 1 felonies, when the court imposes a different sentence than suggested by the guidelines, the court must provide a written explanation for that decision. Additionally, it specifies the forwarding of relevant documentation to the Virginia Criminal Sentencing Commission after a final order of conviction. These changes aim to enhance transparency in the sentencing process.
SESSION SENATEENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE 22106160D SENATE BILL NO.
137 AMENDMENT IN THE NATURE OF A SUBSTITUTE (Proposed by the Senate Committee on the JudiciaryJudiciary) onSenate Amendments in [ ] - February 7,11, 2022) (PatronA PriorBILL to Substitute––Senatoramend Edwards)and Areenact Bguidelines;§ 19.2-298.01 of the Code of Virginia, relating to discretionary sentencing guidelines;
appeal.fappeal. the Code of Virginia, relating to discretionary sentencing Be it enacted by the General Assembly of Virginia:
1.Be it enacted by the General Assembly of Virginia:
E 1.
N A.
In all felony cases, other than Class 1 felonies, the court shall (i) have presented to itiG the theappropriate applicable discretionary sentencing guidelines establishedworksheets pursuantand to(ii) Chapterreview 8and (§consider 17.1-800the etsuitability seq.)fof of Title 17.1.
Before imposing sentence, the court shall state for the record that such review andandt seq.) consideration have been accomplished and shall make the completed worksheets a part of the record of the case and open for inspection.
In cases tried by a jury, the jury shall not be presented anyEany information regarding sentencing guidelines.
NS isB. either greater or less than that indicated by the discretionary sentencing guidelines, the court shall file with the record of the case a written explanation of such departure.
TheIn writtenany explanationfelony shAllcase, adequatelyother explainthan Class 1 felonies, in which the court imposes a sentence imposedwhSch tothat promoteis faireither sentencing.greater or less than that indicated by the discretionary sentencing guidelines, the court shall file with the record of the case a written explanation of such departure.
C.The written explanation shall adequately explain the sentence imposed to promote fair sentencing.
InD felony cases, other than Class 1 felonies, tried by a jury and in felony cases tried bT the court without a jury upon a plea of not guilty, the court shall direct a probation officer of such court totocourt including cases which are the subject of a plea agreement, the court shall direct a probation officer of such court to prepare the discretionary sentencing guidelines worksheets,worksheets. or, with the concurrence of the accused, the court and the attorney for the Commonwealth, the worksheets shall be prepared by the attorney for the Commonwealth.
SIn D.felony cases tried upon a plea of guilty, including cases which are the subject of a plea agreement, the court shall direct a probation officer of such court to prepare the discretionary sentencing guidelines worksheets, or, with the concurrence of the accused, the court and the attorney for the Commonwealth, the worksheets shall be prepared by the attorney for the Commonwealth.
ExceptD. as provided in subsection E, discretionary sentencing guidelines worksheets prepared prepared pursuant to subsection A of § 19.2-299.
Except as provided in subsection E, discretionary sentencing guidelines worksheets preparBd pursuant to this section shall be subject to the same distribution as presentence investigationUreportsinvestigation1reports E.preE.
Following the entry of a final order of conviction and sentence in a felony case, the clerk of the circuit court in which the case was tried shall cause a copy of such order or orders, the origiSaloriginal of the discretionary sentencing guidelines worksheets prepared in the case, and a copy of any departure 35 explanation prepared pursuant to subsection B to be forwarded to the Virginia Criminal Sentencing 37: regarding departure from or modification of a sentence fixed by a jury shall be forwarded to the / 38 Virginia Criminal Sentencing Commission.
T36 /Commission 39within F.five days.
ASimilarly, court'sthe rulingstatement onrequired aby defendant's§§ objection19.2-295 toand the19.2-303 calculationand 37 regarding departure from or modification of thea discretionarysentence sentencingfixed 40by guidelinesa isjury reviewableshall uponbe appeal.forwarded to the 38 Virginia Criminal Sentencing Commission.
The39 failureF. to follow any or all of the provisions of this section or the failure to follow any or all of the provisions of this section in the prescribed manner shaTl not, shall be reviewable on appeal or may be the basis of any other post-conviction relief.
TheA failErecourt's ruling on a defendant's objection to the calculation of the discretionary sentencing the failure to follow any or all of the provisions of this section in the prescribed manner shall not,on or including the failure to provide a written explanation that adequately explains the sentence imposedimposed, isshall reversiblebe error.reviewable on appeal or may be the basis of any other post-conviction relief.
The failure to provide a written explanation that adequately explains the sentence imposed is [ reversible ] error [ that may constitute a basis for resentencing by the trial judge ] .
S 7 1
View plain text versions (3)
- Engrossed Printed as engrossed 22106160D-ES1 Current pdf February 11, 2022
- Committee Substitute Committee substitute printed 22106160D-S1 pdf February 07, 2022
- Prefiled Prefiled and ordered printed; offered 01/12/22 22100360D pdf January 08, 2022
Action History
-
Left in Courts of Justice
-
Subcommittee recommends passing by indefinitely (5-Y 3-N)
-
Assigned Courts sub: Subcommittee #1
-
Referred to Committee for Courts of Justice
-
Read first time
-
Placed on Calendar
-
Impact statement from DPB (SB137ES1)
-
Passed Senate (23-Y 17-N)
-
Constitutional reading dispensed (40-Y 0-N)
-
Printed as engrossed 22106160D-ES1
-
Engrossed by Senate - committee substitute with amendments SB137ES1
-
Amendments by Senator Edwards agreed to (24-Y 16-N)
-
Reading of amendments waived
-
Engrossment reconsidered by Senate (40-Y 0-N)
-
Impact statement from DPB (SB137S1)
-
Passed by for the day
-
Reconsideration of defeated action agreed to by Senate (40-Y 0-N)
-
Chair votes No
-
Read third time and defeated by Senate (20-Y 20-N)
-
Engrossed by Senate - committee substitute SB137S1
-
Committee substitute agreed to 22106160D-S1
-
Reading of substitute waived
-
Read second time
-
Constitutional reading dispensed (40-Y 0-N)
-
Committee substitute printed 22106160D-S1
-
Reported from Judiciary with substitute (9-Y 4-N)
-
Senate committee, floor amendments and substitutes offered
-
Senate subcommittee amendments and substitutes offered
-
Assigned Judiciary sub: Criminal Law
-
Referred to Committee on the Judiciary
-
Prefiled and ordered printed; offered 01/12/22 22100360D
Sponsors
- John S. Edwards · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 147 not signed on · 23 voted No
Sponsors (1)
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (147)
147 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 147 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 63% | 38% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (8)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Adams, Les R. | — | Yea |
| Bell, Robert B. | — | Yea |
| Campbell, Ronnie R. | — | Yea |
| Charniele L. Herring | — | Nay |
| Karrie K. Delaney | — | Nay |
| Ransone, Margaret B. | — | Yea |
| Vivian E. Watts | — | Nay |
| Wren M. Williams | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 23 | 17 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 23 | 17 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 58% | 43% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (40)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 24 | 16 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 24 | 16 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 60% | 40% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (40)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (40)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (40)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 20 | 20 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 20 | 20 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (40)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (40)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (40)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 69% | 31% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| McClellan, Jennifer L. | — | Yea |
| Morrissey, Joseph D. | — | Yea |
| Edwards, John S. | — | Yea |
| Jennifer B. Boysko | — | Yea |
| L. Louise Lucas | — | Yea |
| Mark D. Obenshain | — | Nay |
| Mark J. Peake | — | Nay |
| Norment, Thomas K., Jr. | — | Nay |
| Petersen, J. Chapman | — | Yea |
| R. Creigh Deeds | — | Yea |
| Ryan T. McDougle | — | Nay |
| Saslaw, Richard L. | — | Yea |
| Scott A. Surovell | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 137 do?
- Sentencing guidelines; written explanation; appeal. Requires that the written explanation the court files with the record of a case when departing from the sentencing guidelines adequately explains the sentence imposed to promote fair sentencing. The bill also provides that the failure to follow any of the required sentencing provisions, including the failure to provide a written explanation that adequately explains the sentence imposed, shall be reviewable on appeal or may the basis of any other post-conviction relief. The bill also provides that the failure to provide a written explanation that adequately explains the sentence imposed is error that may constitute a basis for resentencing by the trial judge. Under current law, the failure to follow any or all of the provisions of the sentencing guidelines or the failure to follow any or all of such provisions in the prescribed manner is not reviewable on appeal and cannot be the basis of any other post-conviction relief. The provisions of the bill apply only to those sentencing hearings conducted and such sentences imposed on or after July 1, 2022.
- Who sponsors SB 137?
- SB 137 is sponsored by Edwards, John S..
- What is the current status of SB 137?
- This bill died with 2022 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 137?
- Track SB 137 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 137
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 137
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →