Home health workers providing agency-directed services; employer to provide paid sick leave, clause.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 624 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 624.
You're tracking SB 624
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 624 — Home health workers providing agency-directed services; employer to provide paid sick leave, clause.
Last action — Tabled in Commerce and Energy (12-Y 10-N)
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House of Delegates
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2022 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Paid sick leave; home health workers providing agency-directed services. Requires employers to provide paid sick leave to home health workers who provide agency-directed services. Under current law, employers are only required to provide paid sick leave to home health workers who provide consumer-directed services. The bill provides that "employer" includes the Commonwealth, any of its agencies, institutions, or political subdivisions, and any public body. The provisions of the bill are contingent on funding in a general appropriation act.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
38 added · 36 removedPlain-language change summary
The amendments to SB 624 clarify the definitions of "employee," "employer," and "family member" within the context of paid sick leave for home health workers. Notably, the revised definition of "family member" has been modified to include less ambiguous language regarding individuals to whom an employee stands in loco parentis, while the structure of the definitions remains largely intact. These changes may improve the understanding of who qualifies for leave under the law, which could affect how benefits are administered.
SESSION INTRODUCEDENGROSSED 22103398D I SENATE BILL NO.
624 NSenate OfferedAmendments Januaryin [ ] - February 14, 2022 A BhealthBILL workersto providingamend agency-directedand services.freenact § 40.1-33.3 of the Code of Virginia, relating to paid sick leave;
hTmehome ––––––––––health Rworkers Patrons––Favola,providing Boyskoagency-direct––––––––––s. and McClellan –––––––––– O Referred to Committee on Commerce and Labor D –––––––––– Be it enacted by the General Assembly of Virginia:
UPatron 1.Prior to Engrossment––Senator Favola and McClellan –––––––––– Referred to Committee on Commerce and Labor E –––––––––– Be it enacted by the General Assembly of Virginia:
§N 40.1-33.3.1.
Definitions.odeThat § 40.1-33.3 of the Code of Virginia is amended and reenacted as follows:
CG As§ used40.1-33.3. in this article, unless the context requires a different meaning:
EDefinitions. "Employee" means a home health worker who works on average at least 20 hours per week or 90 hours per month.
"Employee" means a home health worker who works on average at least 20 hours per week or 90 R hours per month.
"Employer" has the same meaning as provided in § 40.1-2 except that, notwithstanding the proSisions of § 40.1-2.1, "employer" includes the Commonwealth, any of its agencies, institutions, or political subdivisions, and any public body.
"Employer" does not include any agency of the federal or government.
1.D the employee stands in loco parentis, or individual to whom an employee stood in loco parentis whento whom the individual was a minor;
Regardless2. of age, a biological child, adopted or foster child, stepchild, legal ward, chSld to whom the employee stands in loco parentis, or individual to whom an employee stood in loco parentis 6hen the individual was a minor;
4A 2.biological parent, foster parent, stepparent, adoptive parent, legal guardian of an employee or an employee's spouse, or individual who stood in loco parentis to an employee when the employee or employee's spouse was a minor child;
A3. biological parent, foster parent, stepparent, adoptive parent, legal guardian of an employee or an employee's spouse was a minor child;
stood in loco parentis to an employee when the employee or 3.
A grandparent, grandchild, or sibling, whether of a biological, foster, adoptive, or stepstepBrelationship, relationship, of an employee or the employee's spouse;
5.6 helping that individual obtain diagnostic, preventive, routine, or therapeutic health treatment;
An individual for whom an employee is responsible for providing or arranging care, including helping that individual obtain diagnostic, preventive, routine, or therapeutic health treatment;
Any other individual related by blood or affinity whose close association with an employee is the :equivalent of a family relationship.
35"Home equ"Home health worker" means an individual who provides personal care, respite, or companion 3635 services to an individual who receives consumer-directed services or agency-directed services under the /36 37 state plan for medical assistance services.
/37 38 "Paid sick leave" means leave that is compensated at the same hourly rate and with the same 3938 benefits, including health care benefits, as an employee normally earns during hours worked and is providedhourly byrate anshall employernot tobe anless employeethan for the purposesminimum describedwage amount set forth in § 40.1-33.5;40.1-28.10 without reduction for any tip credit that the employer would otherwise be permitted to claim.
however,[ such2. hourly rate shall not be less than the minimum wage amount set forth in § 40.1-28.10 without reduction for any tip credit that the employer would otherwise be permitted to claim.
That the provisions of this act shall not become effective unless an appropriation effectuating the purposes of this act is included in a general appropriation act passed in 2022 by the General Assembly that becomes law.
View plain text versions (2)
- Engrossed Printed as engrossed 22103398D-E Current pdf February 14, 2022
- Presented and ordered printed 22103398D View text pdf January 14, 2022
Action History
-
Tabled in Commerce and Energy (12-Y 10-N)
-
Referred to Committee on Commerce and Energy
-
Read first time
-
Placed on Calendar
-
Impact statement from DPB (SB624E)
-
Read third time and passed Senate (22-Y 18-N)
-
Printed as engrossed 22103398D-E
-
Engrossed by Senate as amended SB624E
-
Committee amendment agreed to
-
Reading of amendment waived
-
Read second time
-
Constitutional reading dispensed (40-Y 0-N)
-
Reported from Finance and Appropriations with amendment (13-Y 2-N)
-
Rereferred to Finance and Appropriations
-
Reported from Commerce and Labor (12-Y 3-N)
-
Impact statement from DPB (SB624)
-
Assigned C&L sub: Labor and Employment
-
Referred to Committee on Commerce and Labor
-
Presented and ordered printed 22103398D
Sponsors
- Barbara A. Favola · Primary
- Jennifer B. Boysko · Cosponsor
- Jennifer L. McClellan · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 2 co-sponsors · 145 not signed on · 28 voted No
Sponsors (1)
Co-sponsors (2)
- Jennifer B. Boysko
- Jennifer L. McClellan
Not signed on (145)
145 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 145 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 12 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 12 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 55% | 45% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (22)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Adams, Les R. | — | Yea |
| Alfonso H. Lopez | — | Nay |
| Batten, Amanda E. | — | Yea |
| Byron, Kathy J. | — | Yea |
| Christopher T. Head | — | Yea |
| Don Scott | — | Nay |
| Gooditis, Wendy W. | — | Nay |
| Guzman, Elizabeth R. | — | Nay |
| Israel D. O'Quinn | — | Yea |
| Jeion A. Ward | — | Nay |
| Joseph P. McNamara | — | Yea |
| Keam, Mark L. | — | Nay |
| Kory, Kaye | — | Nay |
| Lamont Bagby | — | Nay |
| Marshall, Daniel W., III | — | Yea |
| Michael J. Webert | — | Yea |
| Mullin, Michael P. | — | Nay |
| R. Lee Ware | — | Yea |
| Ransone, Margaret B. | — | Yea |
| Richard C. "Rip" Sullivan, Jr. | — | Nay |
| Terry G. Kilgore | — | Yea |
| Tony O. Wilt | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 22 | 18 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 22 | 18 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 55% | 45% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (40)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (40)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 13 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 13 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 87% | 13% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (15)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| McClellan, Jennifer L. | — | Yea |
| Barker, George L. | — | Yea |
| David W. Marsden | — | Yea |
| Ebbin, Adam P. | — | Yea |
| Edwards, John S. | — | Yea |
| Hanger, Emmett W., Jr. | — | Yea |
| Howell, Janet D. | — | Yea |
| L. Louise Lucas | — | Yea |
| Mamie E. Locke | — | Yea |
| Newman, Stephen D. | — | Nay |
| Petersen, J. Chapman | — | Yea |
| R. Creigh Deeds | — | Yea |
| Ruff, Frank M., Jr. | — | Nay |
| Saslaw, Richard L. | — | Yea |
| Vogel, Jill Holtzman | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 12 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 12 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 80% | 20% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (15)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Spruill, Lionell, Sr. | — | Yea |
| Barker, George L. | — | Yea |
| Bell, John J. | — | Yea |
| David W. Marsden | — | Yea |
| Ebbin, Adam P. | — | Yea |
| Edwards, John S. | — | Yea |
| L. Louise Lucas | — | Yea |
| Lewis, Lynwood W., Jr. | — | Yea |
| Mark D. Obenshain | — | Nay |
| Mason, T. Montgomery "Monty" | — | Yea |
| Newman, Stephen D. | — | Nay |
| Norment, Thomas K., Jr. | — | Nay |
| R. Creigh Deeds | — | Yea |
| Saslaw, Richard L. | — | Yea |
| Scott A. Surovell | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 624 do?
- Paid sick leave; home health workers providing agency-directed services. Requires employers to provide paid sick leave to home health workers who provide agency-directed services. Under current law, employers are only required to provide paid sick leave to home health workers who provide consumer-directed services. The bill provides that "employer" includes the Commonwealth, any of its agencies, institutions, or political subdivisions, and any public body. The provisions of the bill are contingent on funding in a general appropriation act.
- Who sponsors SB 624?
- SB 624 is sponsored by Barbara A. Favola, Jennifer B. Boysko, and Jennifer L. McClellan.
- What is the current status of SB 624?
- This bill died with 2022 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 624?
- Track SB 624 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 624
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 624
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →