Analysis of breath to determine alcoholic content of blood; failure to advise person of rights.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 642 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 642.
You're tracking SB 642
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 642 — Analysis of breath to determine alcoholic content of blood; failure to advise person of rights.
Last action — Left in Courts of Justice
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House of Delegates
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2022 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Preliminary analysis of breath to determine alcoholic content of blood; failure to advise person of rights. Provides that if a police officer or a member of any sheriff's department fails to adequately advise a person of his rights to refuse a preliminary breath test, any preliminary breath test sample shall not be admissible for the purpose of determining probable cause.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
27 added · 26 removedPlain-language change summary
The amendment to SB 642 clarifies that if a police officer or sheriff's department member fails to adequately advise a person of their rights before conducting a breath analysis for alcohol content, any breath sample taken will not be admissible in court. Additionally, it specifies that the results of the breath analysis cannot be used as evidence in prosecutions for certain offenses. This change emphasizes the importance of informing individuals of their rights during the preliminary analysis process.
SESSION INTRODUCEDENGROSSED 22103755D ISENATE Offered January 17, 2022 N A BILL toNO. amend and reenact § 18.2-267 of the Code of Virginia, relating to preliminary analysis of breath to determine alcoholic content of blood;
failure642 Senate Amendments in [ ] - February 11, 2022 A Bbreath to advisedetermine personalcoholic content of rights.blood;
Tfailure to advise person of rights.y analysis of –––––––––– RPatron Patron––MorrisseyPrior Oto Engrossment––Senator Morrissey –––––––––– Referred to Committee on the Judiciary DE –––––––––– Be it enacted by the General Assembly of Virginia:
UN 1.
That § 18.2-267 of the Code of Virginia is amended and reenacted as follows:
CG A.
Any person who is suspected of a violation of § 18.2-266, 18.2-266.1, subsection B of § 1E.2-272,1R.2-272, or a similar ordinance shall be entitled, if such equipment is available, to have his breath analyzed to determine the probable alcoholic content of his blood.
The person shall also be entitled, upon request, to observe the process of analysis and to see the blood-alcohol reading on the equipment used to pSrform the breath test.
His breath may be analyzed by any police officer of the Commonwealth, or of anyrformany county, city or town, or by any member of a sheriff's department in the normal discharge of hishisSduties. duties.
B.in analyzing breath samples taken pursuant to this section and shall advise the respective police and sheriff's departments of the same.
The Department of Forensic Science shall determine the proper method and equipment to be used in analyzing breath samples taken pursuant to this section and shall advise the respective police and sheriff's departments of the same.
Any person who has been stopped by a police officer of the Commonwealth, or of any county, city or town, or by any member of a sheriff's department and is suspected by such officer to be guilty of an offense listed in subsection A, shall have the right to refuse to permit his breath to be so analyzed, and his failure to permit such analysis shall not be evidence in any prosecution for an offense listed in subsection A.
2officer D.may charge the person with a violation of an offense listed in subsection A.
WheneverThe theperson breathso samplethe analysischarged indicatesshall thatthen alcoholbe issubject presentto in the person'sprovisions blood,of the§§ officer18.2-268.1 maythrough charge18.2-268.12, theor personof with a violationsSmilar ofordinance. an offense listed in subsection A.
TheB personE. so charged shall then be subject to the provisions of §§ 18.2-268.1 through 18.2-268.12, or of a similar ordE.
The results of the breath analysis shall not be admitted into evidence in any prosecutionprosecution4for for an offense listed in subsection A, the purpose of this section being to permit a preliminary analysisanalyEis of the alcoholic content of the blood of a person suspected of having committed an offense listed in subsection A.
F.35 of having committed an offense listed in subsection A, [ adequately ] advise the person of his rightsd 36 under the provisions of this section.
PoliceIf officersa police officer or membersa member of any sheriff's department shall,fails uponto stopping[ any/ person37 suspectedadequately 35] of having committed an offense listed in subsection A, advise thea person of his rights under the 37 person of his rights under the provisions of this section, any breath sample / 38 obtained pursuant to thisethis a 38 section shall not be admissible for the purpose of determining probable cause 39 [ or used in evidence at 39 any hearing or trial.trial ] .
View plain text versions (2)
- Engrossed Printed as engrossed 22103755D-E Current pdf February 11, 2022
- Presented and ordered printed 22103755D View text pdf January 17, 2022
Action History
-
Left in Courts of Justice
-
Subcommittee recommends laying on the table (4-Y 3-N)
-
Assigned Courts sub: Subcommittee #1
-
Referred to Committee for Courts of Justice
-
Read first time
-
Placed on Calendar
-
Passed Senate (40-Y 0-N)
-
Constitutional reading dispensed (40-Y 0-N)
-
Printed as engrossed 22103755D-E
-
Engrossed by Senate as amended SB642E
-
Committee amendments agreed to
-
Reading of amendments waived
-
Read second time
-
Constitutional reading dispensed (40-Y 0-N)
-
Reported from Judiciary with amendments (13-Y 0-N)
-
Senate committee, floor amendments and substitutes offered
-
Referred to Committee on the Judiciary
-
Presented and ordered printed 22103755D
Sponsors
- Joseph D. Morrissey · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 147 not signed on · 3 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Joseph D. Morrissey
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (147)
147 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 147 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 50% | 38% | 0% | 13% |
How each member voted (8)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Adams, Les R. | — | Yea |
| Bell, Robert B. | — | Not Voting |
| Campbell, Ronnie R. | — | Yea |
| Charniele L. Herring | — | Nay |
| Karrie K. Delaney | — | Nay |
| Ransone, Margaret B. | — | Yea |
| Vivian E. Watts | — | Nay |
| Wren M. Williams | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (40)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (40)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (40)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| McClellan, Jennifer L. | — | Yea |
| Morrissey, Joseph D. | — | Yea |
| Edwards, John S. | — | Yea |
| Jennifer B. Boysko | — | Yea |
| L. Louise Lucas | — | Yea |
| Mark J. Peake | — | Yea |
| Norment, Thomas K., Jr. | — | Yea |
| Petersen, J. Chapman | — | Yea |
| R. Creigh Deeds | — | Yea |
| Ryan T. McDougle | — | Yea |
| Saslaw, Richard L. | — | Yea |
| Scott A. Surovell | — | Yea |
| William M. Stanley, Jr. | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 642 do?
- Preliminary analysis of breath to determine alcoholic content of blood; failure to advise person of rights. Provides that if a police officer or a member of any sheriff's department fails to adequately advise a person of his rights to refuse a preliminary breath test, any preliminary breath test sample shall not be admissible for the purpose of determining probable cause.
- Who sponsors SB 642?
- SB 642 is sponsored by Joseph D. Morrissey.
- What is the current status of SB 642?
- This bill died with 2022 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 642?
- Track SB 642 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 642
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 642
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →