Virginia 2022 Regular Session Status: Passed Senate

SB 642 — Analysis of breath to determine alcoholic content of blood; failure to advise person of rights.

Last action — Left in Courts of Justice

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House of Delegates
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2022 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Preliminary analysis of breath to determine alcoholic content of blood; failure to advise person of rights. Provides that if a police officer or a member of any sheriff's department fails to adequately advise a person of his rights to refuse a preliminary breath test, any preliminary breath test sample shall not be admissible for the purpose of determining probable cause.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

27 added · 26 removed

Plain-language change summary

The amendment to SB 642 clarifies that if a police officer or sheriff's department member fails to adequately advise a person of their rights before conducting a breath analysis for alcohol content, any breath sample taken will not be admissible in court. Additionally, it specifies that the results of the breath analysis cannot be used as evidence in prosecutions for certain offenses. This change emphasizes the importance of informing individuals of their rights during the preliminary analysis process.

→
Previous
Latest
SESSION INTRODUCED 22103755D I Offered January 17, 2022 N A BILL to amend and reenact § 18.2-267 of the Code of Virginia, relating to preliminary analysis of breath to determine alcoholic content of blood;
SESSION ENGROSSED 22103755D SENATE BILL NO.
failure to advise person of rights.
642 Senate Amendments in [ ] - February 11, 2022 A Bbreath to determine alcoholic content of blood;
T –––––––––– R Patron––Morrissey O –––––––––– Referred to Committee on the Judiciary D Be it enacted by the General Assembly of Virginia:
failure to advise person of rights.y analysis of –––––––––– Patron Prior to Engrossment––Senator Morrissey –––––––––– Referred to Committee on the Judiciary E –––––––––– Be it enacted by the General Assembly of Virginia:
U 1.
N 1.
That § 18.2-267 of the Code of Virginia is amended and reenacted as follows:
C A.
G A.
Any person who is suspected of a violation of § 18.2-266, 18.2-266.1, subsection B of § 1E.2-272, or a similar ordinance shall be entitled, if such equipment is available, to have his breath analyzed to determine the probable alcoholic content of his blood.
Any person who is suspected of a violation of § 18.2-266, 18.2-266.1, subsection B of § 1R.2-272, or a similar ordinance shall be entitled, if such equipment is available, to have his breath analyzed to determine the probable alcoholic content of his blood.
The person shall also be entitled, upon request, to the breath test.
The person shall also be entitled, upon request, to observe the process of analysis and to see the blood-alcohol reading on the equipment used to pSrform the breath test.
His breath may be analyzed by any police officer of the Commonwealth, or of anyrform county, city or town, or by any member of a sheriff's department in the normal discharge of his duties.
His breath may be analyzed by any police officer of the Commonwealth, or of any county, city or town, or by any member of a sheriff's department in the normal discharge of hisSduties.
B.
in analyzing breath samples taken pursuant to this section and shall advise the respective police and sheriff's departments of the same.
The Department of Forensic Science shall determine the proper method and equipment to be used in analyzing breath samples taken pursuant to this section and shall advise the respective police and sheriff's departments of the same.
Any person who has been stopped by a police officer of the Commonwealth, or of any county, of an offense listed in subsection A, shall have the right to refuse to permit his breath to be so analyzed, and his failure to permit such analysis shall not be evidence in any prosecution for an offense listed in subsection A.
Any person who has been stopped by a police officer of the Commonwealth, or of any county, city or town, or by any member of a sheriff's department and is suspected by such officer to be guilty of an offense listed in subsection A, shall have the right to refuse to permit his breath to be so analyzed, and his failure to permit such analysis shall not be evidence in any prosecution for an offense listed in subsection A.
2 D.
officer may charge the person with a violation of an offense listed in subsection A.
Whenever the breath sample analysis indicates that alcohol is present in the person's blood, the officer may charge the person with a violation of an offense listed in subsection A.
The person so the charged shall then be subject to the provisions of §§ 18.2-268.1 through 18.2-268.12, or of a sSmilar ordinance.
The person so charged shall then be subject to the provisions of §§ 18.2-268.1 through 18.2-268.12, or of a similar ordE.
B E.
The results of the breath analysis shall not be admitted into evidence in any prosecution for an offense listed in subsection A, the purpose of this section being to permit a preliminary analysis of the alcoholic content of the blood of a person suspected of having committed an offense listed in subsection A.
The results of the breath analysis shall not be admitted into evidence in any prosecution4for an offense listed in subsection A, the purpose of this section being to permit a preliminary analyEis of the alcoholic content of the blood of a person suspected of having committed an offense listed in subsection A.
F.
35 of having committed an offense listed in subsection A, [ adequately ] advise the person of his rightsd 36 under the provisions of this section.
Police officers or members of any sheriff's department shall, upon stopping any person suspected 35 of having committed an offense listed in subsection A, advise the person of his rights under the 37 person of his rights under the provisions of this section, any breath sample obtained pursuant to thise a 38 section shall not be admissible for the purpose of determining probable cause or used in evidence at 39 any hearing or trial.
If a police officer or a member of any sheriff's department fails to [ / 37 adequately ] advise a person of his rights under the provisions of this section, any breath sample / 38 obtained pursuant to this section shall not be admissible for the purpose of determining probable cause 39 [ or used in evidence at any hearing or trial ] .
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. Left in Courts of Justice

  2. Subcommittee recommends laying on the table (4-Y 3-N)

  3. Assigned Courts sub: Subcommittee #1

  4. Referred to Committee for Courts of Justice

  5. Read first time

  6. Placed on Calendar

  7. Passed Senate (40-Y 0-N)

  8. Constitutional reading dispensed (40-Y 0-N)

  9. Printed as engrossed 22103755D-E

  10. Engrossed by Senate as amended SB642E

  11. Committee amendments agreed to

  12. Reading of amendments waived

  13. Read second time

  14. Constitutional reading dispensed (40-Y 0-N)

  15. Reported from Judiciary with amendments (13-Y 0-N)

  16. Senate committee, floor amendments and substitutes offered

  17. Referred to Committee on the Judiciary

  18. Presented and ordered printed 22103755D

Sponsors

  • Joseph D. Morrissey · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 147 not signed on · 3 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Joseph D. Morrissey

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (147)

147 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 147 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed Senate (40-Y 0-N)

Passed 40 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 40000
Total 40000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
McClellan, Jennifer L. — Yea
Morrissey, Joseph D. — Yea
Spruill, Lionell, Sr. — Yea
Barbara A. Favola — Yea
Barker, George L. — Yea
Bell, John J. — Yea
Bill DeSteph — Yea
Bryce E. Reeves — Yea
Chase, Amanda F. — Yea
Cosgrove, John A., Jr. — Yea
David R. Suetterlein — Yea
David W. Marsden — Yea
Dunnavant, Siobhan S. — Yea
Ebbin, Adam P. — Yea
Edwards, John S. — Yea
Hanger, Emmett W., Jr. — Yea
Hashmi, Ghazala F. — Yea
Howell, Janet D. — Yea
Jennifer B. Boysko — Yea
Jeremy S. McPike — Yea
Kiggans, Jennifer A. — Yea
L. Louise Lucas — Yea
Lewis, Lynwood W., Jr. — Yea
Mamie E. Locke — Yea
Mark D. Obenshain — Yea
Mark J. Peake — Yea
Mason, T. Montgomery "Monty" — Yea
Newman, Stephen D. — Yea
Norment, Thomas K., Jr. — Yea
Petersen, J. Chapman — Yea
R. Creigh Deeds — Yea
Richard H. Stuart — Yea
Ruff, Frank M., Jr. — Yea
Ryan T. McDougle — Yea
Saslaw, Richard L. — Yea
Scott A. Surovell — Yea
T. Travis Hackworth — Yea
Todd E. Pillion — Yea
Vogel, Jill Holtzman — Yea
William M. Stanley, Jr. — Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 40 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 40000
Total 40000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
McClellan, Jennifer L. — Yea
Morrissey, Joseph D. — Yea
Spruill, Lionell, Sr. — Yea
Barbara A. Favola — Yea
Barker, George L. — Yea
Bell, John J. — Yea
Bill DeSteph — Yea
Bryce E. Reeves — Yea
Chase, Amanda F. — Yea
Cosgrove, John A., Jr. — Yea
David R. Suetterlein — Yea
David W. Marsden — Yea
Dunnavant, Siobhan S. — Yea
Ebbin, Adam P. — Yea
Edwards, John S. — Yea
Hanger, Emmett W., Jr. — Yea
Hashmi, Ghazala F. — Yea
Howell, Janet D. — Yea
Jennifer B. Boysko — Yea
Jeremy S. McPike — Yea
Kiggans, Jennifer A. — Yea
L. Louise Lucas — Yea
Lewis, Lynwood W., Jr. — Yea
Mamie E. Locke — Yea
Mark D. Obenshain — Yea
Mark J. Peake — Yea
Mason, T. Montgomery "Monty" — Yea
Newman, Stephen D. — Yea
Norment, Thomas K., Jr. — Yea
Petersen, J. Chapman — Yea
R. Creigh Deeds — Yea
Richard H. Stuart — Yea
Ruff, Frank M., Jr. — Yea
Ryan T. McDougle — Yea
Saslaw, Richard L. — Yea
Scott A. Surovell — Yea
T. Travis Hackworth — Yea
Todd E. Pillion — Yea
Vogel, Jill Holtzman — Yea
William M. Stanley, Jr. — Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 40 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 40000
Total 40000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
McClellan, Jennifer L. — Yea
Morrissey, Joseph D. — Yea
Spruill, Lionell, Sr. — Yea
Barbara A. Favola — Yea
Barker, George L. — Yea
Bell, John J. — Yea
Bill DeSteph — Yea
Bryce E. Reeves — Yea
Chase, Amanda F. — Yea
Cosgrove, John A., Jr. — Yea
David R. Suetterlein — Yea
David W. Marsden — Yea
Dunnavant, Siobhan S. — Yea
Ebbin, Adam P. — Yea
Edwards, John S. — Yea
Hanger, Emmett W., Jr. — Yea
Hashmi, Ghazala F. — Yea
Howell, Janet D. — Yea
Jennifer B. Boysko — Yea
Jeremy S. McPike — Yea
Kiggans, Jennifer A. — Yea
L. Louise Lucas — Yea
Lewis, Lynwood W., Jr. — Yea
Mamie E. Locke — Yea
Mark D. Obenshain — Yea
Mark J. Peake — Yea
Mason, T. Montgomery "Monty" — Yea
Newman, Stephen D. — Yea
Norment, Thomas K., Jr. — Yea
Petersen, J. Chapman — Yea
R. Creigh Deeds — Yea
Richard H. Stuart — Yea
Ruff, Frank M., Jr. — Yea
Ryan T. McDougle — Yea
Saslaw, Richard L. — Yea
Scott A. Surovell — Yea
T. Travis Hackworth — Yea
Todd E. Pillion — Yea
Vogel, Jill Holtzman — Yea
William M. Stanley, Jr. — Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 13 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 13000
Total 13000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (13)
Member Party Vote
McClellan, Jennifer L. — Yea
Morrissey, Joseph D. — Yea
Edwards, John S. — Yea
Jennifer B. Boysko — Yea
L. Louise Lucas — Yea
Mark J. Peake — Yea
Norment, Thomas K., Jr. — Yea
Petersen, J. Chapman — Yea
R. Creigh Deeds — Yea
Ryan T. McDougle — Yea
Saslaw, Richard L. — Yea
Scott A. Surovell — Yea
William M. Stanley, Jr. — Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 642 do?
Preliminary analysis of breath to determine alcoholic content of blood; failure to advise person of rights. Provides that if a police officer or a member of any sheriff's department fails to adequately advise a person of his rights to refuse a preliminary breath test, any preliminary breath test sample shall not be admissible for the purpose of determining probable cause.
Who sponsors SB 642?
SB 642 is sponsored by Joseph D. Morrissey.
What is the current status of SB 642?
This bill died with 2022 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 642?
Track SB 642 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 642

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 642

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →