Virginia 2022 Regular Session Status: In Committee

SB 203 — Casino gaming; eligible host cities, limits on local referendums.

Last action — Failed to report (defeated) in Finance and Appropriations (7-Y 9-N)

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House of Delegates
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2022 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Casino gaming; eligible host cities; limitson local referendums. Adds Petersburg to the list of cities eligibleto host a casino in the Commonwealth. The bill also provides thatthe governing body of any eligible host city that holds a local referendumon the question of whether casino gaming should be permitted in suchcity that subsequently fails shall be prohibited from holding anotherlocal referendum on the same question for a period of five yearsfrom the date of the last referendum.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

131 added · 127 removed

Plain-language change summary

The amendment to SB 203 modifies the criteria for eligible host cities where casino gaming can occur. Specifically, it adds that a city must be located adjacent to a state that has adopted a specific tourism development act to qualify, and it changes the population decrease requirement for certain cities from 20 percent to 4 percent. These changes could broaden the range of cities eligible for casino gaming by considering additional factors and lowering the threshold for population decline.

→
Previous
Latest
SESSION INTRODUCED 22100709D I SENATE BILL NO.
SESSION SENATE SUBSTITUTE 22105509D SENATE BILL NO.
203 Offered January 12, 2022 N Prefiled January 10, 2022 T A Bgaming;
203 AMENDMENT IN THE NATURE OF A SUBSTITUTE (Proposed by the Senate Committee on General Laws and Technology on February 2, 2022) (Patron Prior to Substitute––Senator Morrissey) A BILL to amend and reenact §§ 58.1-4107 and 58.1-4123 of the Code of Virginia, relating to casino Be it enacted by the General Assembly of Virginia:referendums.
eligible host cities;
1.
limitation on local referendums.e of Virginia, relating to casRno –––––––––– Patrons––Morrissey;
Delegate:
Taylor O –––––––––– D Referred to Committee on General Laws and Technology –––––––––– U Be it enacted by the General Assembly of Virginia:
C 1.
§ 58.1-4107.
Eligible host city;
certification of preferred casino gaming operator.
E 1.
1.
Any city (i) in which at least 40 percent of the assessed value of all real estate in such city is exempt from local property taxation, according to the Virginia Department of Taxation Annual Report for Fiscal Year 2018, and (ii) that experienced a population decrease of at least seven percent from 1990 to 2016, according to data provided by the U.S.
Any city (i) in which at least 40 percent of the assessed value of all real estate in such city is for Fiscal Year 2018, and (ii) that experienced a population decrease of at least seven percent from 1990 to 2016, according to data provided by the U.S.
and (iii) a population decrease of at least 20 3.
and (iii) a population decrease of at least 20 percent from 1990 to 2016, according to data provided by the U.S.
Any city that (i) had an annual unemployment rate of at least 3.6 percent in 2018, according to data provided by the U.S.
Census Bureau;
data provided by the U.S.
(ii) had an annual poverty rate of at least 20 percent in 2017, according to data provided by the U.S.
(ii) had an annual poverty rate of at least 20o percent in 2017, according to data provided by the U.S.
(iii) experienced a population decrease of at least four percent from 1990 to 2016, according to data provided by the U.S.
(iii) experienced a popuTation decrease of at least four percent from 1990 to 2016, according to data provided by the U.S.
and (iv) is located adjacent to a state that has adopted a Border Region Retail Tourism Development District Act;
and (iv) is located adjacent to a state that has adopted a Border Region Retail TourismE Development District Act;
Any city (i) with a population greater than 200,000 according to the 2018 population estimates from the Weldon Cooper Center for Public Service of the University of Virginia;
Any city (i) with a population greater than 200,000 according to the 2018 population estimates 24 percent of the assessed value of all real estate in such city is exempt from local property taxation, according to the Virginia Department of Taxation Annual Report for Fiscal Year 2018;
(ii) in which at least according to the Virginia Department of Taxation Annual Report for Fiscal Year 2018;
and (iii) that experienced a population decrease of at least five percent from 1990 to 2016, according to dataUprovided by the U.S.
and (iii) thattion, experienced a population decrease of at least five percent from 1990 to 2016, according to data provided by the U.S.
and 5.
and B 5.
Any city (i) with a population greater than 200,000 according to the 2018 population estimates :
a.
35 from the Weldon Cooper Center for Public Service of the University of Virginia;
Any city (i) with a population greater than 200,000 according to the 2018 population estimates 24 percent of the assessed value of all real estate in such city is exempt from local property taxation, according to the Virginia Department of Taxation Annual Report for Fiscal Year 2018;
(ii) in which at least 36 24 percent of the assessed value of all real estate in such city is exempt from local property taxation, 37 according to the Virginia Department of Taxation Annual Report for Fiscal Year 2018;
and (iii) that had 36 a poverty rate of at least 24 percent in 2017, according to data provided by the U.S.
and (iii) that had 38 a poverty rate of at least 24 percent in 2017, according to data provided by the U.S.
and6.
or 37 b.
Any city (i) in which at least 17 percent of the assessed value of all real estate in such city is exempt from local property taxation, according to the Virginia Department of Taxation Annual Report for Fiscal Year 2016;
Any city (i) in which at least 17 percent of the assessed value of all real estate in such city is 38 exempt from local property taxation, according to the Virginia Department of Taxation Annual ReTort 39 for Fiscal Year 2016;
(ii) that had a poverty rate of at least 24 percent in 2019, according to data provided by the U.S.
(ii) that had a poverty rate of at least 21 percent in 2019, according toUdata percent in 2020, according to data provided by the U.S.
Census Bureau;
Bureau of Labor Statistics.of at least 13 B.
and (iii) that had an annual unemployment rate of at least 13 percent in 2020, according to data provided by the U.S.
Bureau of Labor Statistics.
B.
1.
E 1.
3.
2.
The proposed capital investment and the financial health of the proposer and any proposed development partners.
The total value of the proposed casino gaming establishment.
4.
development partners.pital investment and the financial health of the proposer and any proposed 4.
The economic development value of the proposed casino gaming establishment and the potential for community reinvestment and redevelopment in an area in need of such.
The economic development value of the proposed casino gaming establishment and the potentSal for community reinvestment and redevelopment in an area in need of such.
7.
2 where there is only one location practicably available or land under a development agreement between a potential operator and the city, incorporated in the proposal.
Availability of city-owned assets and privately owned assets, such as real property, including potential operator and the city, incorporated in the proposal.
1 8.
Show all 49 changed rows (9 more)
Previous
Latest
under a development agreement between a SB203 2 of 3 8.
The proposer's status as a minority-owned business as defined in § 2.2-1604 or the proposer's commitment to solicit equity investment in the proposed casino gaming establishment from one or more minority-owned businesses and the proposer's commitment to solicit contracts with minority-owned businesses for the purchase of goods and services.
The proposer's status as a minority-owned business as defined in § 2.2-1604 or the proposer's commitment to solicit equity investment in the proposed casino gaming establishment from one or more minority-owned businesses and the proposer's commitment to solicit contracts with minority-owned SB203S1 2 of 3 businesses for the purchase of goods and services.
The eligible host city described in subdivision A 5 may provide preferred consideration to a proposer who is a Virginia Indian tribe recognized in House Joint Resolution No.
The eligible host city described in subdivision A 5 a may provide preferred consideration to a proposer who is a Virginia Indian tribe recognized in House Joint Resolution No.
Thereupon, such court shall enter an of 3 order proclaiming the results of such election and a duly certified copy of such order shall be traF.
Thereupon, such court shall enter an order proclaiming the results of such election and a duly certified copy of such order shall be transmitted to the Department and to the governing body of such city.
A subsequent local referendum shall be required if a license has not been granted by the Board witG.
F.
The governing body of any eligible host city that holds a local referendum pursuant to this section that subsequently fails shall be prohibited from holding another local referendum on the same question for a period of five years from the date of the last referendum.
The governing body of any city containing an eligible host city that holds a local referendum pursuant to this section that subsequently fails shall be prohibited from holding another local of 3 refG.
R O D U C E D B 3
A subsequent local referendum shall be required if a license has not been granted by the Board 2.
That for the purposes of subsection F of § 58.1-4123 of the Code of Virginia, as amended by this act, the local referendum held on November 2, 2021, by the eligible host city described in the most recent local referendum such that such eligible host city shall be prohibited from holding another local referendum on the same question until after November 2, 2026.
S E N A T E S U B S T I U T E S 1
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. Failed to report (defeated) in Finance and Appropriations (7-Y 9-N)

  2. Impact statement from DPB (SB203S1)

  3. Rereferred to Finance and Appropriations

  4. Committee substitute printed 22105509D-S1

  5. Reported from General Laws and Technology with substitute (15-Y 0-N)

  6. Senate committee, floor amendments and substitutes offered

  7. Senate subcommittee amendments and substitutes offered

  8. Impact statement from DPB (SB203)

  9. Assigned GL&T sub: Gaming

  10. Referred to Committee on General Laws and Technology

  11. Prefiled and ordered printed; offered 01/12/22 22100709D

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 146 not signed on · 9 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Joseph D. Morrissey

Co-sponsors (1)

Not signed on (146)

146 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 146 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Failed 7 Yea · 9 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 7900
Total 7900
% of votes cast 44%56%0%0%
How each member voted (16)
Member Party Vote
McClellan, Jennifer L. — Yea
Barker, George L. — Nay
David W. Marsden — Yea
Ebbin, Adam P. — Yea
Edwards, John S. — Nay
Hanger, Emmett W., Jr. — Nay
Howell, Janet D. — Nay
L. Louise Lucas — Nay
Mamie E. Locke — Nay
Newman, Stephen D. — Nay
Norment, Thomas K., Jr. — Yea
Petersen, J. Chapman — Yea
R. Creigh Deeds — Nay
Ruff, Frank M., Jr. — Yea
Saslaw, Richard L. — Yea
Vogel, Jill Holtzman — Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 15 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 15000
Total 15000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (15)

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 203 do?
Casino gaming; eligible host cities; limitson local referendums. Adds Petersburg to the list of cities eligibleto host a casino in the Commonwealth. The bill also provides thatthe governing body of any eligible host city that holds a local referendumon the question of whether casino gaming should be permitted in suchcity that subsequently fails shall be prohibited from holding anotherlocal referendum on the same question for a period of five yearsfrom the date of the last referendum.
Who sponsors SB 203?
SB 203 is sponsored by Joseph D. Morrissey and Taylor, Kim A..
What is the current status of SB 203?
This bill died with 2022 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 203?
Track SB 203 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 203

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 203

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →