Casino gaming; eligible host cities, limits on local referendums.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 203 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 203.
You're tracking SB 203
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 203 — Casino gaming; eligible host cities, limits on local referendums.
Last action — Failed to report (defeated) in Finance and Appropriations (7-Y 9-N)
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House of Delegates
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2022 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Casino gaming; eligible host cities; limitson local referendums. Adds Petersburg to the list of cities eligibleto host a casino in the Commonwealth. The bill also provides thatthe governing body of any eligible host city that holds a local referendumon the question of whether casino gaming should be permitted in suchcity that subsequently fails shall be prohibited from holding anotherlocal referendum on the same question for a period of five yearsfrom the date of the last referendum.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
131 added · 127 removedPlain-language change summary
The amendment to SB 203 modifies the criteria for eligible host cities where casino gaming can occur. Specifically, it adds that a city must be located adjacent to a state that has adopted a specific tourism development act to qualify, and it changes the population decrease requirement for certain cities from 20 percent to 4 percent. These changes could broaden the range of cities eligible for casino gaming by considering additional factors and lowering the threshold for population decline.
SESSION INTRODUCEDSENATE 22100709DSUBSTITUTE I22105509D SENATE BILL NO.
203 OfferedAMENDMENT JanuaryIN 12,THE 2022NATURE NOF PrefiledA JanuarySUBSTITUTE 10,(Proposed 2022by Tthe Senate Committee on General Laws and Technology on February 2, 2022) (Patron Prior to Substitute––Senator Morrissey) A Bgaming;BILL to amend and reenact §§ 58.1-4107 and 58.1-4123 of the Code of Virginia, relating to casino Be it enacted by the General Assembly of Virginia:referendums.
eligible1. host cities;
limitation on local referendums.e of Virginia, relating to casRno –––––––––– Patrons––Morrissey;
Delegate:
Taylor O –––––––––– D Referred to Committee on General Laws and Technology –––––––––– U Be it enacted by the General Assembly of Virginia:
C 1.
§ 58.1-4107.
Eligible host city;
certification of preferred casino gaming operator.
E 1.
Any city (i) in which at least 40 percent of the assessed value of all real estate in such city is exempt from local property taxation, according to the Virginia Department of Taxation Annual Report for Fiscal Year 2018, and (ii) that experienced a population decrease of at least seven percent from 1990 to 2016, according to data provided by the U.S.
and (iii) a population decrease of at least 20 3.percent from 1990 to 2016, according to data provided by the U.S.
AnyCensus cityBureau; that (i) had an annual unemployment rate of at least 3.6 percent in 2018, according to data provided by the U.S.
data provided by the U.S.
(ii) had an annual poverty rate of at least 2020o percent in 2017, according to data provided by the U.S.
(iii) experienced a populationpopuTation decrease of at least four percent from 1990 to 2016, according to data provided by the U.S.
and (iv) is located adjacent to a state that has adopted a Border Region Retail TourismTourismE Development District Act;
Any city (i) with a population greater than 200,000 according to the 2018 population estimates from24 percent of the Weldonassessed Coopervalue Centerof forall Publicreal Serviceestate ofin such city is exempt from local property taxation, according to the UniversityVirginia Department of Virginia;Taxation Annual Report for Fiscal Year 2018;
(ii)and in(iii) whichthat experienced a population decrease of at least accordingfive topercent thefrom Virginia1990 Departmentto of2016, Taxationaccording Annualto ReportdataUprovided forby Fiscalthe YearU.S. 2018;
and (iii) thattion, experienced a population decrease of at least five percent from 1990 to 2016, according to data provided by the U.S.
and B 5.
Anya. city (i) with a population greater than 200,000 according to the 2018 population estimates :
35Any fromcity (i) with a population greater than 200,000 according to the Weldon2018 Cooperpopulation Centerestimates for24 Publicpercent Serviceof the assessed value of all real estate in such city is exempt from local property taxation, according to the UniversityVirginia Department of Virginia;Taxation Annual Report for Fiscal Year 2018;
(ii)and in(iii) whichthat athad least 36 24a percentpoverty ofrate the assessed value of allat realleast estate24 percent in such2017, city is exempt from local property taxation, 37 according to thedata Virginiaprovided Departmentby ofthe TaxationU.S. Annual Report for Fiscal Year 2018;
and (iii) that had 38 a poverty rate of at least 24 percent in 2017, according to data provided by the U.S.
and6.or 37 b.
Any city (i) in which at least 17 percent of the assessed value of all real estate in such city is 38 exempt from local property taxation, according to the Virginia Department of Taxation Annual ReportReTort 39 for Fiscal Year 2016;
(ii) that had a poverty rate of at least 2421 percent in 2019, according toUdata percent in 2020, according to data provided by the U.S.
CensusBureau Bureau;of Labor Statistics.of at least 13 B.
and (iii) that had an annual unemployment rate of at least 13 percent in 2020, according to data provided by the U.S.
Bureau of Labor Statistics.
B.
E 1.
3.2.
The proposedtotal capitalvalue investment and the financial health of the proposer and any proposed developmentcasino partners.gaming establishment.
development partners.pital investment and the financial health of the proposer and any proposed 4.
The economic development value of the proposed casino gaming establishment and the potentialpotentSal for community reinvestment and redevelopment in an area in need of such.
7.2 where there is only one location practicably available or land under a development agreement between a potential operator and the city, incorporated in the proposal.
Availability1 of8. city-owned assets and privately owned assets, such as real property, including potential operator and the city, incorporated in the proposal.
Show all 49 changed lines (9 more)
under a development agreement between a SB203 2 of 3 8.
The proposer's status as a minority-owned business as defined in § 2.2-1604 or the proposer's commitment to solicit equity investment in the proposed casino gaming establishment from one or more minority-owned businesses and the proposer's commitment to solicit contracts with minority-owned SB203S1 2 of 3 businesses for the purchase of goods and services.
The eligible host city described in subdivision A 5 a may provide preferred consideration to a proposer who is a Virginia Indian tribe recognized in House Joint Resolution No.
Thereupon, such court shall enter an of 3 order proclaiming the results of such election and a duly certified copy of such order shall be traF.transmitted to the Department and to the governing body of such city.
AF. subsequent local referendum shall be required if a license has not been granted by the Board witG.
The governing body of any city containing an eligible host city that holds a local referendum pursuant to this section that subsequently fails shall be prohibited from holding another local referendum on the same question for a period of five3 yearsrefG. from the date of the last referendum.
RA Osubsequent Dlocal Ureferendum Cshall Ebe Drequired Bif 3a license has not been granted by the Board 2.
That for the purposes of subsection F of § 58.1-4123 of the Code of Virginia, as amended by this act, the local referendum held on November 2, 2021, by the eligible host city described in the most recent local referendum such that such eligible host city shall be prohibited from holding another local referendum on the same question until after November 2, 2026.
S E N A T E S U B S T I U T E S 1
Show all 49 changed rows (9 more)
View plain text versions (2)
- Committee Substitute Committee substitute printed 22105509D-S1 Current pdf February 02, 2022
- Prefiled Prefiled and ordered printed; offered 01/12/22 22100709D pdf January 10, 2022
Action History
-
Failed to report (defeated) in Finance and Appropriations (7-Y 9-N)
-
Impact statement from DPB (SB203S1)
-
Rereferred to Finance and Appropriations
-
Committee substitute printed 22105509D-S1
-
Reported from General Laws and Technology with substitute (15-Y 0-N)
-
Senate committee, floor amendments and substitutes offered
-
Senate subcommittee amendments and substitutes offered
-
Impact statement from DPB (SB203)
-
Assigned GL&T sub: Gaming
-
Referred to Committee on General Laws and Technology
-
Prefiled and ordered printed; offered 01/12/22 22100709D
Sponsors
- Joseph D. Morrissey · Primary
- Kim A. Taylor · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 146 not signed on · 9 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Joseph D. Morrissey
Co-sponsors (1)
Not signed on (146)
146 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 146 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 9 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 9 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 44% | 56% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (16)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| McClellan, Jennifer L. | — | Yea |
| Barker, George L. | — | Nay |
| David W. Marsden | — | Yea |
| Ebbin, Adam P. | — | Yea |
| Edwards, John S. | — | Nay |
| Hanger, Emmett W., Jr. | — | Nay |
| Howell, Janet D. | — | Nay |
| L. Louise Lucas | — | Nay |
| Mamie E. Locke | — | Nay |
| Newman, Stephen D. | — | Nay |
| Norment, Thomas K., Jr. | — | Yea |
| Petersen, J. Chapman | — | Yea |
| R. Creigh Deeds | — | Nay |
| Ruff, Frank M., Jr. | — | Yea |
| Saslaw, Richard L. | — | Yea |
| Vogel, Jill Holtzman | — | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (15)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Barker, George L. | — | Yea |
| Bell, John J. | — | Yea |
| Bryce E. Reeves | — | Yea |
| Dunnavant, Siobhan S. | — | Yea |
| Ebbin, Adam P. | — | Yea |
| Hashmi, Ghazala F. | — | Yea |
| Jennifer B. Boysko | — | Yea |
| Jeremy S. McPike | — | Yea |
| Kiggans, Jennifer A. | — | Yea |
| Mamie E. Locke | — | Yea |
| Mason, T. Montgomery "Monty" | — | Yea |
| Richard H. Stuart | — | Yea |
| Ruff, Frank M., Jr. | — | Yea |
| Todd E. Pillion | — | Yea |
| Vogel, Jill Holtzman | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 203 do?
- Casino gaming; eligible host cities; limitson local referendums. Adds Petersburg to the list of cities eligibleto host a casino in the Commonwealth. The bill also provides thatthe governing body of any eligible host city that holds a local referendumon the question of whether casino gaming should be permitted in suchcity that subsequently fails shall be prohibited from holding anotherlocal referendum on the same question for a period of five yearsfrom the date of the last referendum.
- Who sponsors SB 203?
- SB 203 is sponsored by Joseph D. Morrissey and Taylor, Kim A..
- What is the current status of SB 203?
- This bill died with 2022 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 203?
- Track SB 203 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 203
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 203
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →