Eminent domain; redefines lost access and lost profits.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 666 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 666.
You're tracking SB 666
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 666 — Eminent domain; redefines lost access and lost profits.
Last action — Enacted, Chapter 734 (effective 7/1/22)
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House of Delegates
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 19, 2022. Enacted.
Signed by Governor Glenn Youngkin (Republican) on April 27, 2022.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
2 sponsors
1 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 11 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Eminent domain; lost profits. Redefines "lost profits" for the purposes of determining just compensation in eminent domain cases.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
136 added · 139 removedPlain-language change summary
The recent amendments to SB 666 clarify definitions related to eminent domain in Virginia, specifically regarding property values and lost access to properties. The updates include defining "lost access" as a significant loss of direct access to a property that has been partially taken or damaged. This change is important because it provides clearer guidelines for property owners, ensuring they are better informed about their rights and potential compensation when their access to property is impacted. These definitions help create a fairer process for determining just compensation in eminent domain cases.
RECONVENED SESSION REENROLLED VIRGINIA ACTS OF ASSEMBLY --–– 2022 RECONVENED SESSION CHAPTER 734R An Act to amend and reenact §§ 25.1-100 and 25.1-230.1 of the Code of Virginia, relating to eminent domain;
E N [S 666] Approved AprilR 27,O 20221. Be it enacted by the General Assembly of Virginia:
1.
L As used in this title, unless the context requires a different meaning:
L "Appraisal" means a written statement independently and impartially prepared by a qualified E appraiser setting forth an opinion of defined value of an adequately described property as of a specific date, supported by the presentation and analysis of relevant market information.
§D 25.1-227.2,"Body jurydetermining selectedjust compensation" means a panel of commissioners empaneled pursuant to jury is appointed or empaneled.suant to § 25.1-229, or the court if neither a panel of commissioners nor a jury"Court" ismeans appointedthe orcourt empaneled.having jurisdiction as provided in § 25.1-201.
"Court" means the court having jurisdiction as provided in § 25.1-201.
S "Land" means real estate and all rights and appurtenances thereto, together with the structuresstructu6es and otheroth"Locality" improvementsor thereon,"local andgovernment" anymeans right,a title,county, interest,city, estate or claimtown, inas orthe tocontext realmay estate.require.te.
"Locality" or "local government" means a county, city, or town, as the context may require.
"Lost profits" means a loss of business profits, as defined in § 25.1-230.1, that is suffered or expected profits suffered by a business or farm operation as a result of a taking or damaging of the property on which a the business or farm operation is located, subject to adjustment using generally accepted accounting principles consistently applied, from a business or farm operation operated for a period not to exceed three years from the later of (i) the date of valuation or (ii) the date the state agency or its contractor prevents the owner from using the land or any of the owner's other property rights are taken.
(a) the business is owned by the owner of the property taken, or by a tenant whose leasehold interest grants the tenant exclusive possession of substantially all the property taken, or (b) the farm operation is operated by the owner of the property taken, or by a tenant using for a farm operation the property taken, to the extent that the loss is determined and proven pursuant to or damaged, and bears the burden of proving lost profits in accordance with the requirements of subsection C of § 25.1-230.1.
"Owner" means any person who owns property, provided that the person's ownership of the property is of record in the land records of the clerk's office of the circuit court of the county or city where the property is located.
trustee in bankruptcy or any other person acting in a fiduciary or representative capacity, whether appointed by a courtany department, agency or otherwise;instrumentality thereof;
club, society or other group or combination acting as a unit;
the Commonwealth or any department, agency or instrumentality thereof;
or any interstate body to which the of 3 Commonwealth is a party.
"Petitioner" or "condemnor" means any person who possesses the power to exercise the right of of 3 eminent domain and who seeks to exercise such power.
In any proceeding in which the owner of a business or farm operation seeks to recover lost profits, the owner shall provide the condemning authority with all federal income tax returns, if any, relating to the business or farm operation for which the owner seeks lost profits for a period of three years prior to the later of (i) the valuation date or (ii) the date the state agency or its contractor prevents the owner from using the land or any of the owner's other property rights are taken, and for each year of 3 thereafter during the pendency of the condemnation proceeding.
The condemning authority shall not divulge the information provided pursuant to this subsection except in connection with the condemnationcondRmnation proceeding.business or farm operation may intervene in the proceeding by filing a motion to intervene accompanied by a petition for intervention setting forth the basis for the lost profits claim under this chEpter.
Additionally,Proceedings unlessto alreadyadjudicate namedlost inprofits themay, petitionupon formotion condemnation,of the owner of the business or farm operationoperation, maywill intervenenot inexpire theuntil proceedingone byyear filingor alater motionfrom tothe intervenedate accompaniedof bythe afiling of the petition for interventioncondemnation, settingbut forthsuch bifurcation shall not prevent the basisentry forof an order confirming indefeasible title to the lostland profitsinterests claimacquired underby thisthe chapter.condemning authority.
ofO 3for Proceedingslost toprofits adjudicateor lost profitsaccess may,for upontemporary motioninterference ofwith theor ownerinterruption of thea business oroL farm operation,operation be bifurcated from the other proceedingsthan tothat determinewhich justis compensationdirectly ifand theproximately lostcaused profitsby claima periodtaking willor notdamaging expireof untilproperty onethrough year or later from the dateexercise of theeminent filingdomain ofwhere the petitionimpact forto condemnation,the butproperty suchis bifurcationfor shalla notperiod prevent the entry of anfewer orderthan confirmingseven indefeasibledays. title to the land interests acquired by the condemning authority.
G.E petitioner filed prior to July 1, 2022, (i) a petition in condemnation pursuant to Chapter 2 D (§ 25.1-200 et seq.) of Title 25.1 of the Code of Virginia or (ii) a certificate of take or deposit pursuant to Chapter 3 (§ 25.1-300 et seq.) of Title 25.1 or Title 33.2 of the Code of Virginia.
NothingAny in(i) this section is intended to provide for compensation for inverse condemnation claims for lost profits or lost(ii) accessshall forbe temporarygoverned interference with or interruption of a business or farm operation other than that which is directly and proximately caused by athe takingprovisions or damaging of property through the exerciseCode of eminentVirginia domainin whereeffect theprior impact to theJuly property1,se is2022. for a period of fewer than seven days.
2.B R 2
That the provisions of this act shall not apply to condemnation proceedings in which the petitioner filed prior to July 1, 2022, (i) a petition in condemnation pursuant to Chapter 2 (§ 25.1-200 et seq.) of Title 25.1 of the Code of Virginia or (ii) a certificate of take or deposit pursuant to Chapter 3 (§ 25.1-300 et seq.) of Title 25.1 or Title 33.2 of the Code of Virginia.
Any condemnation proceedings in which the petitioner filed a petition or certificate described in clause (i) or (ii) shall be governed by the provisions of the Code of Virginia in effect prior to July 1, 2022.
View plain text versions (6)
- SB666ER2 View text pdf April 27, 2022
- CHAP0734 View text Current pdf April 27, 2022
- SB666ER View text pdf March 09, 2022
- Committee Substitute Committee substitute printed 22106867D-H1 pdf February 25, 2022
- Committee Substitute Committee substitute printed 22105606D-S1 pdf February 02, 2022
- Presented and ordered printed 22104185D View text pdf January 19, 2022
Action History
-
Enacted, Chapter 734 (effective 7/1/22)
-
Signed by Speaker as reenrolled
-
Signed by President as reenrolled
-
Reenrolled bill text (SB666ER2)
-
Reenrolled
-
Governor's recommendation adopted
-
VOTE: Adoption (96-Y 1-N)
-
House concurred in Governor's recommendation (96-Y 1-N)
-
Senate concurred in Governor's recommendation (40-Y 0-N)
-
Governor's recommendation received by Senate
-
Governor's Action Deadline 11:59 p.m., April 11, 2022
-
Enrolled Bill Communicated to Governor on March 22, 2022
-
Signed by President
-
Impact statement from DPB (SB666ER)
-
Signed by Speaker
-
Enrolled
-
Title replaced 22106867D-H1
-
House substitute agreed to by Senate (39-Y 0-N)
-
VOTE: Passage (99-Y 1-N)
-
Passed House with substitute (99-Y 1-N)
-
Engrossed by House - committee substitute SB666H1
-
Committee substitute agreed to 22106867D-H1
-
Read third time
-
Read second time
-
Reported from Appropriations (20-Y 2-N)
-
Referred to Committee on Appropriations
-
Committee substitute printed 22106867D-H1
-
Reported from Courts of Justice with substitute (20-Y 0-N)
-
Subcommittee recommends referring to Committee on Appropriations
-
Subcommittee recommends reporting with substitute (8-Y 0-N)
-
House subcommittee amendments and substitutes offered
-
Assigned Courts sub: Subcommittee #2
-
Referred to Committee for Courts of Justice
-
Read first time
-
Placed on Calendar
-
Read third time and passed Senate (40-Y 0-N)
-
Engrossed by Senate - committee substitute SB666S1
-
Committee substitute agreed to 22105606D-S1
-
Reading of substitute waived
-
Read second time
-
Constitutional reading dispensed (40-Y 0-N)
-
Reported from Finance and Appropriations (12-Y 4-N)
-
Impact statement from DPB (SB666S1)
-
Rereferred to Finance and Appropriations
-
Committee substitute printed 22105606D-S1
-
Reported from Judiciary with substitute (14-Y 0-N)
-
Senate committee, floor amendments and substitutes offered
-
Assigned Judiciary sub: Civil Law
-
Referred to Committee on the Judiciary
-
Presented and ordered printed 22104185D
Sponsors
- Mark D. Obenshain · Cosponsor
- J. Chapman Petersen · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 146 not signed on · 8 voted No
Sponsors (1)
Co-sponsors (1)
Not signed on (146)
146 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 146 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 95 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Total | 95 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 96% | 1% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (99)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (40)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 39 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 39 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 98% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (40)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 98 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 98 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 99% | 1% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (99)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 20 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 20 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 91% | 9% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (22)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Betsy B. Carr | — | Yea |
| Bulova, David L. | — | Yea |
| C.E. Cliff Hayes, Jr. | — | Yea |
| Coyner, Carrie E. | — | Yea |
| David A. Reid | — | Yea |
| Davis, Glenn R. | — | Yea |
| Delores L. McQuinn | — | Yea |
| Emily M. Jordan | — | Yea |
| Fariss, C. Matthew | — | Yea |
| James W. Morefield | — | Yea |
| Knight, Barry D. | — | Yea |
| Luke E. Torian | — | Nay |
| M. Keith Hodges | — | Yea |
| Marshall, Daniel W., III | — | Yea |
| Paul E. Krizek | — | Yea |
| Plum, Kenneth R. | — | Yea |
| Robert S. Bloxom, Jr. | — | Yea |
| Sam Rasoul | — | Yea |
| Scott A. Wyatt | — | Yea |
| Sickles, Mark D. | — | Nay |
| Terry L. Austin | — | Yea |
| Wampler, William C., III | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (20)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Adams, Les R. | — | Yea |
| Bell, Robert B. | — | Yea |
| Bourne, Jeffrey M. | — | Yea |
| Campbell, Jeffrey L. | — | Yea |
| Campbell, Ronnie R. | — | Yea |
| Charniele L. Herring | — | Yea |
| Don Scott | — | Yea |
| Freitas, Nicholas J. | — | Yea |
| James A. "Jay" Leftwich | — | Yea |
| Jason S. Ballard | — | Yea |
| Jessica L. Anderson | — | Yea |
| Karrie K. Delaney | — | Yea |
| Keam, Mark L. | — | Yea |
| Marcus B. Simon | — | Yea |
| Patrick A. Hope | — | Yea |
| Ransone, Margaret B. | — | Yea |
| Richard C. "Rip" Sullivan, Jr. | — | Yea |
| Terry G. Kilgore | — | Yea |
| Vivian E. Watts | — | Yea |
| Wren M. Williams | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 89% | 0% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bell, Robert B. | — | Not Voting |
| Bourne, Jeffrey M. | — | Yea |
| Campbell, Jeffrey L. | — | Yea |
| James A. "Jay" Leftwich | — | Yea |
| Jason S. Ballard | — | Yea |
| Jessica L. Anderson | — | Yea |
| Marcus B. Simon | — | Yea |
| Patrick A. Hope | — | Yea |
| Terry G. Kilgore | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (40)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (40)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 12 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 12 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 75% | 25% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (16)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| McClellan, Jennifer L. | — | Yea |
| Barker, George L. | — | Yea |
| David W. Marsden | — | Yea |
| Ebbin, Adam P. | — | Yea |
| Edwards, John S. | — | Yea |
| Hanger, Emmett W., Jr. | — | Yea |
| Howell, Janet D. | — | Yea |
| L. Louise Lucas | — | Nay |
| Mamie E. Locke | — | Nay |
| Newman, Stephen D. | — | Yea |
| Norment, Thomas K., Jr. | — | Nay |
| Petersen, J. Chapman | — | Yea |
| R. Creigh Deeds | — | Yea |
| Ruff, Frank M., Jr. | — | Nay |
| Saslaw, Richard L. | — | Yea |
| Vogel, Jill Holtzman | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (14)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| McClellan, Jennifer L. | — | Yea |
| Morrissey, Joseph D. | — | Yea |
| Edwards, John S. | — | Yea |
| Jennifer B. Boysko | — | Yea |
| L. Louise Lucas | — | Yea |
| Mark D. Obenshain | — | Yea |
| Mark J. Peake | — | Yea |
| Norment, Thomas K., Jr. | — | Yea |
| Petersen, J. Chapman | — | Yea |
| R. Creigh Deeds | — | Yea |
| Richard H. Stuart | — | Yea |
| Ryan T. McDougle | — | Yea |
| Scott A. Surovell | — | Yea |
| William M. Stanley, Jr. | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 666 do?
- Eminent domain; lost profits. Redefines "lost profits" for the purposes of determining just compensation in eminent domain cases.
- Who sponsors SB 666?
- SB 666 is sponsored by Mark D. Obenshain and Petersen, J. Chapman.
- What is the current status of SB 666?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 19, 2022. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 666?
- Track SB 666 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 666
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 666
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →