Portsmouth, City of; amending charter, city council, noninterference.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 58 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 58.
You're tracking SB 58
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 58 — Portsmouth, City of; amending charter, city council, noninterference.
Last action — Left in Counties, Cities and Towns
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House of Delegates
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2022 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Charter; City of Portsmouth; city council; noninterference. Provides that any member of the Portsmouth City Council who violates certain charter provisions related to noninterference in appointments or removals of officers and employees of the city, upon motion of another member of the City Council and a majority vote of all members of the City Council, shall be subject to public censure and a fine not to exceed $100.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
30 added · 26 removedPlain-language change summary
The recent amendment to SB 58 removes the potential criminal penalty for City Council members who interfere with administrative appointments or removals. Instead of classifying such actions as a misdemeanor that could result in losing their office, the revised bill allows for public censure and a fine of up to $100. This change may make it easier for council members to navigate their roles without the fear of serious legal repercussions, potentially encouraging more collaboration between the City Council and the City Manager.
SESSION INTRODUCEDENGROSSED 22101373D I SENATE BILL NO.
58 OfferedSenate JanuaryAmendments 12,in 2022[ N] - February 2, 2022 Prefiled January 1, 2022 T A BcharterBILL forto theamend Cityand ofreenact Portsmouth,§ relating3.11 to recall of electiveChapter officers.11,640 whichof providRdthe aActs ––––––––––of Patron––LockeAssembly Oof ––––––––––2011, Dwhich Referredprovided toa Committeecharter onfor Localthe GovernmentCity Uof BePortsmouth, itrelating enactedto by[ therecall Generalof Assemblyelective ofofficers Virginia:city council;
1.noninterference ] .
That–––––––––– §Patron 3.11Prior ofto ChapterEngrossment––Senator 640Locke ofE the–––––––––– ActsReferred ofto AssemblyCommittee ofon 2011Local isGovernment amendedN and–––––––––– reenactedG as1. C follows:
EThat § 3.11.3.11 of Chapter 640 of the Acts of Assembly of 2011 is amended and reenacted as R follows:
§ 3.11.
personO toNeither or the removalCity ofCouncil nor any personof fromits anymembers officeshall direct or employmentrequest by the Cityappointment Managerof oraSy byperson anyto ofor the Manager'sremoval subordinates,of orany inperson from any wayoffice takeor partemployment inby the appointmentCity ofManager or removalby ofany officers and employees of the city except as specifically provided in this Charter.
Neither the City Council nor any member thereof shall give orders either publiclypublDcly or sectionprivately orto votingany forsubordinate a motion, resolution or ordinance in violation of thisthe sectionCity shallManager. be guilty of a class three misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall forfeit office as a Council Member.
ASy[ Any Council Member violating the provisions of this section or voting for a motion, resolution or ordinance in violation of this section shall be guilty of a Council Member who violates this section, upon motion of another member of the City Council and5aand any majority vote of all members of the City Council, shall be subject to public censure and a fine not to exceed $100.
B E / / 7
View plain text versions (2)
- Engrossed Printed as engrossed 22101373D-E Current pdf February 02, 2022
- Prefiled Prefiled and ordered printed; offered 01/12/22 22101373D pdf January 01, 2022
Action History
-
Left in Counties, Cities and Towns
-
Rereferred to Counties, Cities and Towns
-
VOTE: Agree To (52-Y 46-N)
-
Motion to rerefer to committee agreed to (52-Y 46-N)
-
Read second time
-
Reported from Counties, Cities and Towns (13-Y 7-N)
-
Assigned CC & T sub: Subcommittee #2
-
Referred to Committee on Counties, Cities and Towns
-
Read first time
-
Placed on Calendar
-
Read third time and passed Senate (40-Y 0-N)
-
Printed as engrossed 22101373D-E
-
Engrossed by Senate as amended SB58E
-
Committee amendments agreed to
-
Reading of amendments waived
-
Read second time
-
Constitutional reading dispensed (40-Y 0-N)
-
Reported from Local Government with amendments (15-Y 0-N)
-
Senate committee, floor amendments and substitutes offered
-
Senate subcommittee amendments and substitutes offered
-
Assigned Local Gov sub: Charters
-
Referred to Committee on Local Government
-
Prefiled and ordered printed; offered 01/12/22 22101373D
Sponsors
- Mamie E. Locke · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 147 not signed on · 53 voted No
Sponsors (1)
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (147)
147 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 147 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 51 | 46 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 51 | 46 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 52% | 46% | 0% | 2% |
How each member voted (99)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 13 | 7 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 13 | 7 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 59% | 32% | 0% | 9% |
How each member voted (22)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| March, Marie E. | — | Not Voting |
| Angelia Williams Graves | — | Yea |
| Avoli, G. "John" | — | Yea |
| Briana D. Sewell | — | Yea |
| Cordoza, A.C. | — | Nay |
| Danica A. Roem | — | Yea |
| Elizabeth B. Bennett-Parker | — | Yea |
| Gooditis, Wendy W. | — | Yea |
| H. Otto Wachsmann, Jr. | — | Not Voting |
| Irene Shin | — | Yea |
| James W. Morefield | — | Yea |
| Jason S. Ballard | — | Nay |
| Jenkins, Clinton L. | — | Yea |
| Joseph P. McNamara | — | Nay |
| Kory, Kaye | — | Yea |
| LaRock, Dave A. | — | Nay |
| M. Keith Hodges | — | Yea |
| Mike A. Cherry | — | Nay |
| Mullin, Michael P. | — | Yea |
| Phillip A. Scott | — | Nay |
| Scott A. Wyatt | — | Nay |
| Subramanyam, Suhas | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (40)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (40)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (15)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Spruill, Lionell, Sr. | — | Yea |
| Morrissey, Joseph D. | — | Yea |
| Barbara A. Favola | — | Yea |
| Bell, John J. | — | Yea |
| Bill DeSteph | — | Yea |
| Bryce E. Reeves | — | Yea |
| Dunnavant, Siobhan S. | — | Yea |
| Hanger, Emmett W., Jr. | — | Yea |
| Hashmi, Ghazala F. | — | Yea |
| Howell, Janet D. | — | Yea |
| Jeremy S. McPike | — | Yea |
| Kiggans, Jennifer A. | — | Yea |
| Lewis, Lynwood W., Jr. | — | Yea |
| T. Travis Hackworth | — | Yea |
| William M. Stanley, Jr. | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 58 do?
- Charter; City of Portsmouth; city council; noninterference. Provides that any member of the Portsmouth City Council who violates certain charter provisions related to noninterference in appointments or removals of officers and employees of the city, upon motion of another member of the City Council and a majority vote of all members of the City Council, shall be subject to public censure and a fine not to exceed $100.
- Who sponsors SB 58?
- SB 58 is sponsored by Mamie E. Locke.
- What is the current status of SB 58?
- This bill died with 2022 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 58?
- Track SB 58 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 58
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 58
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →