Public defender; supplementing compensation.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 282 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 282.
You're tracking SB 282
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 282 — Public defender; supplementing compensation.
Last action — Incorporated by Finance and Appropriations (SB475-McClellan) (16-Y 0-N)
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House of Delegates
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2022 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Supplementing compensation of public defender.Requires the governing body of any county or city that elects tosupplement the compensation of the attorney for the Commonwealth,or any of his deputies or his employees, above the salary of any such officer, deputy, or employee to supplement the compensation ofthe public defender, or any of his deputies or employees. The billprovides that such supplemental compensation is proportional if thepublic defender, his deputies, and his other employees are each paidin amounts commensurate to the closest equivalent position in thelocal Office of the Commonwealth's Attorney, as adjusted for seniorityand experience level. The bill has a delayed effective date of July1, 2024.
Bill Text
- Prefiled Prefiled and ordered printed; offered 01/12/22 22103779D Current pdf January 11, 2022
Action History
-
Incorporated by Finance and Appropriations (SB475-McClellan) (16-Y 0-N)
-
Impact statement from DPB (SB282)
-
Impact statement from DHCD/CLG (SB282)
-
Rereferred to Finance and Appropriations
-
Reported from Judiciary (8-Y 7-N)
-
Referred to Committee on the Judiciary
-
Prefiled and ordered printed; offered 01/12/22 22103779D
Sponsors
- Adam P. Ebbin · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 147 not signed on · 7 voted No
Sponsors (1)
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (147)
147 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 147 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (16)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| McClellan, Jennifer L. | — | Yea |
| Barker, George L. | — | Yea |
| David W. Marsden | — | Yea |
| Ebbin, Adam P. | — | Yea |
| Edwards, John S. | — | Yea |
| Hanger, Emmett W., Jr. | — | Yea |
| Howell, Janet D. | — | Yea |
| L. Louise Lucas | — | Yea |
| Mamie E. Locke | — | Yea |
| Newman, Stephen D. | — | Yea |
| Norment, Thomas K., Jr. | — | Yea |
| Petersen, J. Chapman | — | Yea |
| R. Creigh Deeds | — | Yea |
| Ruff, Frank M., Jr. | — | Yea |
| Saslaw, Richard L. | — | Yea |
| Vogel, Jill Holtzman | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 7 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 8 | 7 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 53% | 47% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (15)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| McClellan, Jennifer L. | — | Yea |
| Morrissey, Joseph D. | — | Yea |
| Edwards, John S. | — | Yea |
| Jennifer B. Boysko | — | Yea |
| L. Louise Lucas | — | Yea |
| Mark D. Obenshain | — | Nay |
| Mark J. Peake | — | Nay |
| Norment, Thomas K., Jr. | — | Nay |
| Petersen, J. Chapman | — | Nay |
| R. Creigh Deeds | — | Yea |
| Richard H. Stuart | — | Nay |
| Ryan T. McDougle | — | Nay |
| Saslaw, Richard L. | — | Yea |
| Scott A. Surovell | — | Yea |
| William M. Stanley, Jr. | — | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 282 do?
- Supplementing compensation of public defender.Requires the governing body of any county or city that elects tosupplement the compensation of the attorney for the Commonwealth,or any of his deputies or his employees, above the salary of any such officer, deputy, or employee to supplement the compensation ofthe public defender, or any of his deputies or employees. The billprovides that such supplemental compensation is proportional if thepublic defender, his deputies, and his other employees are each paidin amounts commensurate to the closest equivalent position in thelocal Office of the Commonwealth's Attorney, as adjusted for seniorityand experience level. The bill has a delayed effective date of July1, 2024.
- Who sponsors SB 282?
- SB 282 is sponsored by Adam P. Ebbin.
- What is the current status of SB 282?
- This bill died with 2022 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 282?
- Track SB 282 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 282
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 282
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →