Clerk of the court; copies of appointment order to counsel.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 392 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 392.
You're tracking SB 392
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 392 — Clerk of the court; copies of appointment order to counsel.
Last action — Approved by Governor-Chapter 543 (effective 7/1/22)
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House of Delegates
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 11, 2022. Enacted.
Signed by Governor Glenn Youngkin (Republican) on April 11, 2022.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 6 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Copies of orders to counsel. Provides thatthe clerk of the court shall provide a copy of the appointment orderof a qualified expert to an indigent defendant or his attorney andto the appointed expert. The bill also provides that the chief judgeof each juvenile and domestic relations district court may provide for an alternative means of copying and distributing certain juvenileinvestigative reports or evaluations to counsel.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
86 added · 84 removedPlain-language change summary
The revised bill SB 392 changes the timeframe for when attorneys must receive copies of court investigation reports. Previously, attorneys were to be given these reports no later than 72 hours before the court hearing, and 15 days for child custody cases. Now, the bill specifies that reports must always be provided to attorneys 15 days before the hearing. This change matters because it allows for more time for attorneys to review important information related to their cases, which can lead to better preparation and potentially fairer outcomes in court.
SESSION ENROLLED VIRGINIA ACTS OF ASSEMBLY ––-- 2022 SESSION CHAPTER E543 An Act to amend and reenact §§ 16.1-274 and 19.2-266.4 of the Code of Virginia, relating to copies of orders to counsel.
R O [S 392] Approved LApril L11, 2022 Be it enacted by the General Assembly of Virginia:
That §§ 16.1-274 and 19.2-266.4 of the Code of Virginia is amended and reenacted as follows:Efollows: § 16.1-274.
§ 16.1-274.
feesDfees. § 16.1-273 or 9.1-153, or an evaluation pursuant to § 16.1-278.5, the probation officer, court-appointed special advocate, or other agency conducting such investigation shall file such report with the clerk of the court directing the investigation.
TheA. clerk shall furnish a copy of such report to all attorneys representing parties in the matter before the court no later than 72 hours, and in cases of child custody, 15 days, prior to the time set by the court for hearing the matter.
IfWhenever suchany probationcourt officerdirects oran otherinvestigation agencypursuant discoversto additionalsubdivision informationA of § 16.1-237 or a§ change16.1-273 inor circumstance9.1-153, afteror thean filingevaluation ofpursuant theto report,§ an16.1-278.5, amendedthe reportprobation shallofficer, becourt-appointed filedspecial forthwithadvocate, andor aother copyagency sentconducting tosuch eachinvestigation personshall whofile receivedsuch areport copywith the clerk of tBethe originalcourt report.directing the investigation.
WheneverThe suchclerk ashall reportfurnish isa notcopy filedof orsuch an amended report isto filed,all theattorneys courtdays, s9allprior grant report shall return such to the clerktime uponset by the conclusioncourt offor the hearing andthe shallmatter. not make copEes ofed such report or amended report or any portion thereof.
If such probation officer or otherody, agency discovers additional information or a change in circumstance after the filing of the report, an amended report shall be filed forthwith and a copy sent to each person who received a copy of the original report.
Whenever such a report is not filed or an amended report is filed, the court shall grant such continuance of the proceedings as justice requires.
All attorneys receiving such report or amended report shall return such to the clerk upon the conclusion of the hearing and shall not make copies of such report or amended report or any portion thereof.
Notwithstanding the provisions of §§ 16.1-69.48:2 and 17.1-275, when the court directs the appropriate local department of social services to conduct supervised visitation or directs the appropriate local department of social services or court services unit to conduct an investigation pursuant to § 16.1-273 or to provide mediation services in matters involving a child's custody, visitation, or support, the court shall assess a fee against the petitioner, the respondent, or both, in accordance with fee schedules established by the appropriate local board of social services when the service is provided by a local department of social services or by a court services unit.
The method and medium for payment for such services shall be determined by the unitlocal thatdepartment providedof thesocial services.ces,services, Department of Juvenile Justice, or the locally operated court services C.unit that provided the services.
C.
adD. litem shall conduct an investigation in accordance with the Standards to Govern the Performance ofan Guardians Ad Litem for Children established by the Judicial Council of Virginia.
In any matter in which the court appoints a guardian ad litem to represent a child, such guardian ad litem shall conduct an investigation in accordance with the Standards to Govern the Performance of Guardians Ad Litem for Children established by the Judicial Council of Virginia.
The guardian ad litem shall document the hours spent satisfying such face-to-face in-courtcontact service.ntsrequirements in such certification, which shall be compensated at the same rate as that for §in-court 19.2-266.4.service.
§ 19.2-266.4.
of 2 A.
In any case in which a defendant is (i) charged with a felony offense or a Class 1 misdemeanor and (ii) determined to be indigent by the court pursuant to § 19.2-159, the defendant or his attorney of 2 may, upon notice to the Commonwealth, move the circuit court to designate another judge in the same circuit to hear an ex parte request for appointment of a qualified expert to assist in the preparation of the defendant's defense.
View plain text versions (3)
- CHAP0543 View text Current pdf April 11, 2022
- SB392ER View text pdf March 10, 2022
- Prefiled Prefiled and ordered printed; offered 01/12/22 22100037D pdf January 11, 2022
Action History
-
Approved by Governor-Chapter 543 (effective 7/1/22)
-
Impact statement from DPB (SB392ER)
-
Governor's Action Deadline 11:59 p.m., April 11, 2022
-
Enrolled Bill Communicated to Governor on March 22, 2022
-
Signed by Speaker
-
Signed by President
-
Enrolled
-
VOTE: Block Vote Passage (98-Y 0-N)
-
Passed House BLOCK VOTE (98-Y 0-N)
-
Read third time
-
Read second time
-
Reported from Courts of Justice (20-Y 0-N)
-
Subcommittee recommends reporting (8-Y 0-N)
-
Assigned Courts sub: Subcommittee #1
-
Referred to Committee for Courts of Justice
-
Read first time
-
Placed on Calendar
-
Read third time and passed Senate (39-Y 0-N)
-
Read second time and engrossed
-
Constitutional reading dispensed (38-Y 0-N)
-
Passed by for the day
-
Reported from Judiciary (15-Y 0-N)
-
Impact statement from DPB (SB392)
-
Referred to Committee on the Judiciary
-
Prefiled and ordered printed; offered 01/12/22 22100037D
Sponsors
- Scott A. Surovell · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 147 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (147)
147 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 147 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 97 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 97 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 98% | 0% | 0% | 2% |
How each member voted (99)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (20)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Adams, Les R. | — | Yea |
| Bell, Robert B. | — | Yea |
| Bourne, Jeffrey M. | — | Yea |
| Campbell, Jeffrey L. | — | Yea |
| Campbell, Ronnie R. | — | Yea |
| Charniele L. Herring | — | Yea |
| Don Scott | — | Yea |
| Freitas, Nicholas J. | — | Yea |
| James A. "Jay" Leftwich | — | Yea |
| Jason S. Ballard | — | Yea |
| Jessica L. Anderson | — | Yea |
| Karrie K. Delaney | — | Yea |
| Keam, Mark L. | — | Yea |
| Marcus B. Simon | — | Yea |
| Patrick A. Hope | — | Yea |
| Ransone, Margaret B. | — | Yea |
| Richard C. "Rip" Sullivan, Jr. | — | Yea |
| Terry G. Kilgore | — | Yea |
| Vivian E. Watts | — | Yea |
| Wren M. Williams | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (8)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Adams, Les R. | — | Yea |
| Bell, Robert B. | — | Yea |
| Campbell, Ronnie R. | — | Yea |
| Charniele L. Herring | — | Yea |
| Karrie K. Delaney | — | Yea |
| Ransone, Margaret B. | — | Yea |
| Vivian E. Watts | — | Yea |
| Wren M. Williams | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 39 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 39 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 98% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (40)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 38 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 38 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 95% | 0% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (40)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (15)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| McClellan, Jennifer L. | — | Yea |
| Morrissey, Joseph D. | — | Yea |
| Edwards, John S. | — | Yea |
| Jennifer B. Boysko | — | Yea |
| L. Louise Lucas | — | Yea |
| Mark D. Obenshain | — | Yea |
| Mark J. Peake | — | Yea |
| Norment, Thomas K., Jr. | — | Yea |
| Petersen, J. Chapman | — | Yea |
| R. Creigh Deeds | — | Yea |
| Richard H. Stuart | — | Yea |
| Ryan T. McDougle | — | Yea |
| Saslaw, Richard L. | — | Yea |
| Scott A. Surovell | — | Yea |
| William M. Stanley, Jr. | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 392 do?
- Copies of orders to counsel. Provides thatthe clerk of the court shall provide a copy of the appointment orderof a qualified expert to an indigent defendant or his attorney andto the appointed expert. The bill also provides that the chief judgeof each juvenile and domestic relations district court may provide for an alternative means of copying and distributing certain juvenileinvestigative reports or evaluations to counsel.
- Who sponsors SB 392?
- SB 392 is sponsored by Scott A. Surovell.
- What is the current status of SB 392?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 11, 2022. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 392?
- Track SB 392 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 392
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 392
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →