Virginia 2022 Regular Session Status: In Committee

SB 255 — Zoning; wireless communications infrastructure, application process.

Last action — Continued to 2023 in Local Government (15-Y 0-N)

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House of Delegates
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2022 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Zoning; wireless communications infrastructure;application process. Provides that in its consideration of certaincommunications infrastructure applications, a locality shall notdisapprove an application if (i) the proposed new structure providesadditional wireless coverage or capacity for first responders or(ii) the proposed tower is not within a four-mile radius of an existingtower that is part of the applicant's network. Additional changesin the bill provide that a locality shall not be prohibited fromdisapproving certain applications for any zoning approval requiredfor non-administrative review-eligible projects on the basis of the fact that the proposed height of any wireless support structure,wireless facility, or wireless support structure with attached wirelessfacilities exceeds 200 feet above ground level. Current law setsthe limit at 50 feet above ground level.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

53 added · 56 removed

Plain-language change summary

The amended version of SB 255 now allows localities to impose certain requirements, such as requiring applicants to provide documentation from federal agencies and enabling them to establish reasonable rules for existing wireless structures. Additionally, it removes the prior prohibition against localities requiring proprietary information to justify a project's necessity. These changes matter because they potentially give local governments more authority in the zoning process for wireless facilities, which could affect how quickly and smoothly new telecommunications projects can be approved and implemented in their areas.

→
Previous
Latest
SESSION INTRODUCED 22103784D I SENATE BILL NO.
SESSION SENATE SUBSTITUTE 22105096D SENATE BILL NO.
255 Offered January 12, 2022 N Prefiled January 11, 2022 T A Bcommunications infrastructure;
SB 255 AMENDMENT IN THE NATURE OF A SUBSTITUTE (Proposed by the Senate Committee on Local Government on January 24, 2022) (Patron Prior to Substitute––Senator Bell) A BILL to amend and reenact § 15.2-2316.4:2 of the Code of Virginia, relating to zoning;
application process.e of Virginia, relating to zoning;
wireless Be it enacted by the General Assembly of Virginia:.
wireleRs –––––––––– Patron––Bell O –––––––––– D Referred to Committee on Local Government –––––––––– U Be it enacted by the General Assembly of Virginia:
1.
C 1.
§ 15.2-2316.4:2.
Application reviews.
In its receiving, consideration, and processing of a complete application submitted underE subsection A of § 15.2-2316.4:1 or for any zoning approval required for a standard process project, a locality shall not:
In its receiving, consideration, and processing of a complete application submitted under subsection A of § 15.2-2316.4:1 or for any zoning approval required for a standard process project, a loc1.
1.
a.
S a.
b.
E b.
or 2.
or N c.
Require an applicant to provide proprietary, confidential, or other business information to justify the need for the project, including propagation maps and telecommunications traffic studies, orB information reviewed by a federal agency as part of the approval process for the same structure and wireless facility, provided that a locality may require an applicant to provide a copy of any approval granted by a federal agency, including conditions imposed by that agency;
The wireless facility technology selected by the applicant for use at the project;
3.
the need for the project, including propagation maps and telecommunications traffic studies, orAo justify information reviewed by a federal agency as part of the approval process for the same structureTand wireless facility, provided that a locality may require an applicant to provide a copy of any approval granted by a federal agency, including conditions imposed by that agency;
E 3.
A locality may adopt reasonable rules with respect to the removal of abandoned wireless support structures or wireless facilities;
A locality may adopt reasonable rules with respect to the rem4.
of financial surety, to ensure that abandoned or unused wireless facilities can be removed, unless thepes locality imposes similar requirements on other permits for other types of similar commercial development.
Impose surety requirements, including bonds, escrow deposits, letters of credit, or any other types of financial surety, to ensure that abandoned or unused wireless facilities can be removed, unless the locality imposes similar requirements on other permits for other types of similar commercial U development.
Any such instrument shall not exceed a reasonable estimate of the direct cost of the removal of the wireless facilities;
Any such instrument shall not exceed a reasonable estimate of the direct cost of tBe removal of the wireless facilities;
35 5.
locality, of any property, structure, base station, or wireless support structure, when promulgating rules or procedures for siting wireless facilities or for evaluating applications;
Discriminate or create a preference on the basis of the ownership, including ownership by the 36 locality, of any property, structure, base station, or wireless support structure, when promulgating rules / 37 or procedures for siting wireless facilities or for evaluating applications;
T 36 6.
38 6.
Impose any unreasonable requirements or obligations regarding the presentation or appearance of a 37 project, including unreasonable requirements relating to (i) the kinds of materials used or (ii) the / 38 arranging, screening, or landscaping of wireless facilities or wireless structures;
Impose any unreasonable requirements or obligations regarding the presentation or appearance of a arranging, screening, or landscaping of wireless facilities or wireless structures;
T 39 7.
used or (ii) the 7.
Impose any requirement that an applicant purchase, subscribe to, use, or employ facilitieU, which a locality has a competitive, economic, financial, governance, or other interest;or by any entity in 8.
Impose any requirement that an applicant purchase, subscribe to, use, or employ facilities, networks, or services owned, provided, or operated by a locality, in whole or in part, or by any entity in which a locality has a competitive, economic, financial, governance, or other interest;
Condition or require the approval of an application solely on the basis of the applicant's agreement to allow any wireless facilities provided or operated, in whole or in part, by a locality or byEany other entity, to be placed at or co-located with the applicant's project;
8.
Condition or require the approval of an application solely on the basis of the applicant's agreement to allow any wireless facilities provided or operated, in whole or in part, by a locality or by any other entity, to be placed at or co-located with the applicant's project;
12.
S 12.
Disapprove an application if the proposed new structure provides additional wireless coverage or capacity for first responders;
Subject to subsections B and D, disapprove an application submitted on or after July 1, 2022, if the13.
or 13.
Subject to subsections B and D, disapprove an application submitted on or after July 1, 2022, if the proposed wireless support structure is not within a four-mile radius of an existing wireless support structure.
Disapprove an application if the proposed tower is not within a four-mile radius of an existing towB.
The provisions of subdivisions 12 and 13 shall expire on July 1, 2024.
Nothing in this article shall prohibit a locality from disapproving an application submitted under SB255 2 of 2 subsection A of § 15.2-2316.4:1 or for any zoning approval required for a standard process project:
B.
1.
Nothing in this article shall prohibit a locality from disapproving an application submitted under subsection A of § 15.2-2316.4:1 or for any zoning approval required for a standard process project:
On the basis of the fact that the proposed height of any wireless support structure, wireless facility, or wireless support structure with attached wireless facilities exceeds 50 200 feet above ground level, provided that the locality follows a local ordinance or regulation that does not unreasonably discriminate between the applicant and other wireless services providers, wireless infrastructure providers, providers of telecommunications services, and other providers of functionally equivalent services;
SB255S1 2 of 2 1.
On the basis of the fact that the proposed height of any wireless support structure, wireless facility, or wireless support structure with attached wireless facilities exceeds 50 150 feet above ground level, provided that the locality follows a local ordinance or regulation that does not unreasonably discriminate between the applicant and other wireless services providers, wireless infrastructure providers, providers of telecommunications services, and other providers of functionally equivalent services;
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. Continued to 2023 in Local Government (15-Y 0-N)

  2. Recommitted to Local Government

  3. Motion to recommit to committee agreed to

  4. Constitutional reading dispensed (38-Y 0-N)

  5. Passed by for the day

  6. Committee substitute printed 22105096D-S1

  7. Reported from Local Government with substitute (9-Y 6-N)

  8. Senate committee, floor amendments and substitutes offered

  9. Referred to Committee on Local Government

  10. Prefiled and ordered printed; offered 01/12/22 22103784D

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 147 not signed on · 6 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (147)

147 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 147 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 15 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 15000
Total 15000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (15)
Member Party Vote
Spruill, Lionell, Sr. — Yea
Morrissey, Joseph D. — Yea
Barbara A. Favola — Yea
Bell, John J. — Yea
Bill DeSteph — Yea
Bryce E. Reeves — Yea
Dunnavant, Siobhan S. — Yea
Hanger, Emmett W., Jr. — Yea
Hashmi, Ghazala F. — Yea
Howell, Janet D. — Yea
Jeremy S. McPike — Yea
Kiggans, Jennifer A. — Yea
Lewis, Lynwood W., Jr. — Yea
T. Travis Hackworth — Yea
William M. Stanley, Jr. — Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 38 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 38002
Total 38002
% of votes cast 95%0%0%5%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
McClellan, Jennifer L. — Yea
Morrissey, Joseph D. — Yea
Spruill, Lionell, Sr. — Yea
Barbara A. Favola — Yea
Barker, George L. — Yea
Bell, John J. — Yea
Bill DeSteph — Yea
Bryce E. Reeves — Yea
Chase, Amanda F. — Yea
Cosgrove, John A., Jr. — Yea
David R. Suetterlein — Yea
David W. Marsden — Yea
Dunnavant, Siobhan S. — Yea
Ebbin, Adam P. — Yea
Edwards, John S. — Yea
Hanger, Emmett W., Jr. — Yea
Hashmi, Ghazala F. — Yea
Howell, Janet D. — Not Voting
Jennifer B. Boysko — Yea
Jeremy S. McPike — Yea
Kiggans, Jennifer A. — Yea
L. Louise Lucas — Yea
Lewis, Lynwood W., Jr. — Yea
Mamie E. Locke — Yea
Mark D. Obenshain — Yea
Mark J. Peake — Yea
Mason, T. Montgomery "Monty" — Yea
Newman, Stephen D. — Yea
Norment, Thomas K., Jr. — Yea
Petersen, J. Chapman — Yea
R. Creigh Deeds — Yea
Richard H. Stuart — Yea
Ruff, Frank M., Jr. — Yea
Ryan T. McDougle — Yea
Saslaw, Richard L. — Yea
Scott A. Surovell — Yea
T. Travis Hackworth — Yea
Todd E. Pillion — Yea
Vogel, Jill Holtzman — Not Voting
William M. Stanley, Jr. — Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 9 Yea · 6 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 9600
Total 9600
% of votes cast 60%40%0%0%
How each member voted (15)
Member Party Vote
Spruill, Lionell, Sr. — Yea
Morrissey, Joseph D. — Yea
Barbara A. Favola — Yea
Bell, John J. — Yea
Bill DeSteph — Nay
Bryce E. Reeves — Nay
Dunnavant, Siobhan S. — Nay
Hanger, Emmett W., Jr. — Nay
Hashmi, Ghazala F. — Yea
Howell, Janet D. — Yea
Jeremy S. McPike — Yea
Kiggans, Jennifer A. — Nay
Lewis, Lynwood W., Jr. — Nay
T. Travis Hackworth — Yea
William M. Stanley, Jr. — Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 255 do?
Zoning; wireless communications infrastructure;application process. Provides that in its consideration of certaincommunications infrastructure applications, a locality shall notdisapprove an application if (i) the proposed new structure providesadditional wireless coverage or capacity for first responders or(ii) the proposed tower is not within a four-mile radius of an existingtower that is part of the applicant's network. Additional changesin the bill provide that a locality shall not be prohibited fromdisapproving certain applications for any zoning approval requiredfor non-administrative review-eligible projects on the basis of the fact that the proposed height of any wireless support structure,wireless facility, or wireless support structure with attached wirelessfacilities exceeds 200 feet above ground level. Current law setsthe limit at 50 feet above ground level.
Who sponsors SB 255?
SB 255 is sponsored by Bell, John J..
What is the current status of SB 255?
This bill died with 2022 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 255?
Track SB 255 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 255

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 255

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →