Zoning; wireless communications infrastructure, application process.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 255 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 255.
You're tracking SB 255
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 255 — Zoning; wireless communications infrastructure, application process.
Last action — Continued to 2023 in Local Government (15-Y 0-N)
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House of Delegates
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2022 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Zoning; wireless communications infrastructure;application process. Provides that in its consideration of certaincommunications infrastructure applications, a locality shall notdisapprove an application if (i) the proposed new structure providesadditional wireless coverage or capacity for first responders or(ii) the proposed tower is not within a four-mile radius of an existingtower that is part of the applicant's network. Additional changesin the bill provide that a locality shall not be prohibited fromdisapproving certain applications for any zoning approval requiredfor non-administrative review-eligible projects on the basis of the fact that the proposed height of any wireless support structure,wireless facility, or wireless support structure with attached wirelessfacilities exceeds 200 feet above ground level. Current law setsthe limit at 50 feet above ground level.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
53 added · 56 removedPlain-language change summary
The amended version of SB 255 now allows localities to impose certain requirements, such as requiring applicants to provide documentation from federal agencies and enabling them to establish reasonable rules for existing wireless structures. Additionally, it removes the prior prohibition against localities requiring proprietary information to justify a project's necessity. These changes matter because they potentially give local governments more authority in the zoning process for wireless facilities, which could affect how quickly and smoothly new telecommunications projects can be approved and implemented in their areas.
SESSION INTRODUCEDSENATE 22103784DSUBSTITUTE I22105096D SENATE BILL NO.
SB 255 OfferedAMENDMENT JanuaryIN 12,THE 2022NATURE NOF PrefiledA SUBSTITUTE (Proposed by the Senate Committee on Local Government on January 11,24, 20222022) T(Patron Prior to Substitute––Senator Bell) A BcommunicationsBILL infrastructure;to amend and reenact § 15.2-2316.4:2 of the Code of Virginia, relating to zoning;
applicationwireless process.eBe ofit Virginia,enacted relatingby tothe zoning;General Assembly of Virginia:.
wireleRs1. –––––––––– Patron––Bell O –––––––––– D Referred to Committee on Local Government –––––––––– U Be it enacted by the General Assembly of Virginia:
C 1.
§ 15.2-2316.4:2.
Application reviews.
In its receiving, consideration, and processing of a complete application submitted underEunder subsection A of § 15.2-2316.4:1 or for any zoning approval required for a standard process project, a localityloc1. shall not:
1.
S a.
E b.
or 2.N c.
RequireThe anwireless applicantfacility totechnology provideselected proprietary,by confidential, or other business information to justify the needapplicant for theuse project,at including propagation maps and telecommunications traffic studies, orB information reviewed by a federal agency as part of the approvalproject; process for the same structure and wireless facility, provided that a locality may require an applicant to provide a copy of any approval granted by a federal agency, including conditions imposed by that agency;
3.the need for the project, including propagation maps and telecommunications traffic studies, orAo justify information reviewed by a federal agency as part of the approval process for the same structureTand wireless facility, provided that a locality may require an applicant to provide a copy of any approval granted by a federal agency, including conditions imposed by that agency;
E 3.
A locality may adopt reasonable rules with respect to the removalrem4. of abandoned wireless support structures or wireless facilities;
Impose surety requirements, including bonds, escrow deposits, letters of credit, or any other types of financial surety, to ensure that abandoned or unused wireless facilities can be removed, unless thepesthe locality imposes similar requirements on other permits for other types of similar commercial U development.
Any such instrument shall not exceed a reasonable estimate of the direct cost of thetBe removal of the wireless facilities;
35locality, 5.of any property, structure, base station, or wireless support structure, when promulgating rules or procedures for siting wireless facilities or for evaluating applications;
DiscriminateT or create a preference on the basis of the ownership, including ownership by the 36 locality,6. of any property, structure, base station, or wireless support structure, when promulgating rules / 37 or procedures for siting wireless facilities or for evaluating applications;
Impose any unreasonable requirements or obligations regarding the presentation or appearance of a 37 project, including unreasonable requirements relating to (i) the kinds of materials used or (ii) the / 38 6.arranging, screening, or landscaping of wireless facilities or wireless structures;
ImposeT any39 unreasonable7. requirements or obligations regarding the presentation or appearance of a arranging, screening, or landscaping of wireless facilities or wireless structures;
usedImpose any requirement that an applicant purchase, subscribe to, use, or (ii)employ thefacilitieU, 7.which a locality has a competitive, economic, financial, governance, or other interest;or by any entity in 8.
ImposeCondition anyor requirementrequire thatthe anapproval applicantof purchase,an subscribeapplication to,solely use,on orthe employbasis facilities,of networks,the orapplicant's servicesagreement owned,to provided,allow orany operatedwireless byfacilities aprovided locality,or operated, in whole or in part, or by anya entitylocality inor whichbyEany aother localityentity, hasto abe competitive,placed economic,at financial,or governance,co-located orwith otherthe interest;applicant's project;
8.
Condition or require the approval of an application solely on the basis of the applicant's agreement to allow any wireless facilities provided or operated, in whole or in part, by a locality or by any other entity, to be placed at or co-located with the applicant's project;
S 12.
DisapproveSubject anto applicationsubsections ifB theand proposedD, newdisapprove structurean providesapplication additionalsubmitted wirelesson coverage or capacityafter forJuly first1, responders;2022, if the13.
Subject to subsections B and D, disapprove an application submitted on or 13.after July 1, 2022, if the proposed wireless support structure is not within a four-mile radius of an existing wireless support structure.
DisapproveThe anprovisions applicationof ifsubdivisions the12 proposedand tower13 isshall notexpire withinon aJuly four-mile1, radius2024. of an existing towB.
NothingB. in this article shall prohibit a locality from disapproving an application submitted under SB255 2 of 2 subsection A of § 15.2-2316.4:1 or for any zoning approval required for a standard process project:
1.Nothing in this article shall prohibit a locality from disapproving an application submitted under subsection A of § 15.2-2316.4:1 or for any zoning approval required for a standard process project:
OnSB255S1 the2 basis of the2 fact1. that the proposed height of any wireless support structure, wireless facility, or wireless support structure with attached wireless facilities exceeds 50 200 feet above ground level, provided that the locality follows a local ordinance or regulation that does not unreasonably discriminate between the applicant and other wireless services providers, wireless infrastructure providers, providers of telecommunications services, and other providers of functionally equivalent services;
On the basis of the fact that the proposed height of any wireless support structure, wireless facility, or wireless support structure with attached wireless facilities exceeds 50 150 feet above ground level, provided that the locality follows a local ordinance or regulation that does not unreasonably discriminate between the applicant and other wireless services providers, wireless infrastructure providers, providers of telecommunications services, and other providers of functionally equivalent services;
View plain text versions (2)
- Committee Substitute Committee substitute printed 22105096D-S1 Current pdf January 24, 2022
- Prefiled Prefiled and ordered printed; offered 01/12/22 22103784D pdf January 11, 2022
Action History
-
Continued to 2023 in Local Government (15-Y 0-N)
-
Recommitted to Local Government
-
Motion to recommit to committee agreed to
-
Constitutional reading dispensed (38-Y 0-N)
-
Passed by for the day
-
Committee substitute printed 22105096D-S1
-
Reported from Local Government with substitute (9-Y 6-N)
-
Senate committee, floor amendments and substitutes offered
-
Referred to Committee on Local Government
-
Prefiled and ordered printed; offered 01/12/22 22103784D
Sponsors
- John J. Bell · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 147 not signed on · 6 voted No
Sponsors (1)
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (147)
147 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 147 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (15)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Spruill, Lionell, Sr. | — | Yea |
| Morrissey, Joseph D. | — | Yea |
| Barbara A. Favola | — | Yea |
| Bell, John J. | — | Yea |
| Bill DeSteph | — | Yea |
| Bryce E. Reeves | — | Yea |
| Dunnavant, Siobhan S. | — | Yea |
| Hanger, Emmett W., Jr. | — | Yea |
| Hashmi, Ghazala F. | — | Yea |
| Howell, Janet D. | — | Yea |
| Jeremy S. McPike | — | Yea |
| Kiggans, Jennifer A. | — | Yea |
| Lewis, Lynwood W., Jr. | — | Yea |
| T. Travis Hackworth | — | Yea |
| William M. Stanley, Jr. | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 38 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 38 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 95% | 0% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (40)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 60% | 40% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (15)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Spruill, Lionell, Sr. | — | Yea |
| Morrissey, Joseph D. | — | Yea |
| Barbara A. Favola | — | Yea |
| Bell, John J. | — | Yea |
| Bill DeSteph | — | Nay |
| Bryce E. Reeves | — | Nay |
| Dunnavant, Siobhan S. | — | Nay |
| Hanger, Emmett W., Jr. | — | Nay |
| Hashmi, Ghazala F. | — | Yea |
| Howell, Janet D. | — | Yea |
| Jeremy S. McPike | — | Yea |
| Kiggans, Jennifer A. | — | Nay |
| Lewis, Lynwood W., Jr. | — | Nay |
| T. Travis Hackworth | — | Yea |
| William M. Stanley, Jr. | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 255 do?
- Zoning; wireless communications infrastructure;application process. Provides that in its consideration of certaincommunications infrastructure applications, a locality shall notdisapprove an application if (i) the proposed new structure providesadditional wireless coverage or capacity for first responders or(ii) the proposed tower is not within a four-mile radius of an existingtower that is part of the applicant's network. Additional changesin the bill provide that a locality shall not be prohibited fromdisapproving certain applications for any zoning approval requiredfor non-administrative review-eligible projects on the basis of the fact that the proposed height of any wireless support structure,wireless facility, or wireless support structure with attached wirelessfacilities exceeds 200 feet above ground level. Current law setsthe limit at 50 feet above ground level.
- Who sponsors SB 255?
- SB 255 is sponsored by Bell, John J..
- What is the current status of SB 255?
- This bill died with 2022 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 255?
- Track SB 255 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 255
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 255
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →