MEI Project Approval Commission; incentives requiring review.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HB 458 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HB 458.
You're tracking HB 458
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HB 458 — MEI Project Approval Commission; incentives requiring review.
Last action — Continued to 2023 in Finance and Appropriations (15-Y 0-N)
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed House of Delegates
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2022 Regular Session. It reached “Passed House of Delegates” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
MEI Project Approval Commission; incentivesrequiring review. Adds to the incentive packages for economic development, film, and episodic television projects that requireMEI Project Approval Commission (the Commission) review and approvalany incentive package in which one of the incentives being soughtincludes a cash payment of more than $3.5 million from any fund priorto any performance metrics being met by the proposed project. Thebill clarifies that in calculating whether the value of proposed incentives exceeds $10 million and thus requires review under current law,the value of applicable existing tax credits and incentives shall not be considered, with the exception of the sales tax exemptionfor data centers and the motion picture tax credit. Finally, the billprovides that economic development projects that propose to relocateor expand operations in one area of the Commonwealth while closingor reducing operations in another area of the Commonwealth shallbe subject to Commission review only if the value of the proposedincentives exceeds $2.5 million.
Bill Text
- Prefiled Prefiled and ordered printed; offered 01/12/22 22100646D Current pdf January 11, 2022
Action History
-
Continued to 2023 in Finance and Appropriations (15-Y 0-N)
-
Referred to Committee on Finance and Appropriations
-
Constitutional reading dispensed
-
VOTE: Block Vote Passage #2 (99-Y 0-N)
-
Passed House BLOCK VOTE (99-Y 0-N)
-
Reconsideration of passage agreed to by House
-
VOTE: Block Vote Passage (98-Y 0-N)
-
Read third time and passed House BLOCK VOTE (98-Y 0-N)
-
Read second time and engrossed
-
Read first time
-
Reported from Appropriations (22-Y 0-N)
-
Subcommittee recommends reporting (8-Y 0-N)
-
Impact statement from DPB (HB458)
-
Assigned App. sub: Commerce Agriculture & Natural Resources
-
Referred to Committee on Appropriations
-
Prefiled and ordered printed; offered 01/12/22 22100646D
Sponsors
- David L. Bulova · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 147 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (147)
147 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 147 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (15)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| McClellan, Jennifer L. | — | Yea |
| Barker, George L. | — | Yea |
| David W. Marsden | — | Yea |
| Ebbin, Adam P. | — | Yea |
| Edwards, John S. | — | Yea |
| Hanger, Emmett W., Jr. | — | Yea |
| Howell, Janet D. | — | Yea |
| L. Louise Lucas | — | Yea |
| Mamie E. Locke | — | Yea |
| Newman, Stephen D. | — | Yea |
| Norment, Thomas K., Jr. | — | Yea |
| Petersen, J. Chapman | — | Yea |
| R. Creigh Deeds | — | Yea |
| Ruff, Frank M., Jr. | — | Yea |
| Saslaw, Richard L. | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 98 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 98 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 99% | 0% | 0% | 1% |
How each member voted (99)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 97 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 97 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 98% | 0% | 0% | 2% |
How each member voted (99)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 89% | 0% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bulova, David L. | — | Yea |
| David A. Reid | — | Yea |
| Fariss, C. Matthew | — | Yea |
| Knight, Barry D. | — | Not Voting |
| Marshall, Daniel W., III | — | Yea |
| Plum, Kenneth R. | — | Yea |
| Robert S. Bloxom, Jr. | — | Yea |
| Scott A. Wyatt | — | Yea |
| Wampler, William C., III | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 22 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 22 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (22)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Betsy B. Carr | — | Yea |
| Bulova, David L. | — | Yea |
| C.E. Cliff Hayes, Jr. | — | Yea |
| Coyner, Carrie E. | — | Yea |
| David A. Reid | — | Yea |
| Davis, Glenn R. | — | Yea |
| Delores L. McQuinn | — | Yea |
| Emily M. Jordan | — | Yea |
| Fariss, C. Matthew | — | Yea |
| James W. Morefield | — | Yea |
| Knight, Barry D. | — | Yea |
| Luke E. Torian | — | Yea |
| M. Keith Hodges | — | Yea |
| Marshall, Daniel W., III | — | Yea |
| Paul E. Krizek | — | Yea |
| Plum, Kenneth R. | — | Yea |
| Robert S. Bloxom, Jr. | — | Yea |
| Sam Rasoul | — | Yea |
| Scott A. Wyatt | — | Yea |
| Sickles, Mark D. | — | Yea |
| Terry L. Austin | — | Yea |
| Wampler, William C., III | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HB 458 do?
- MEI Project Approval Commission; incentivesrequiring review. Adds to the incentive packages for economic development, film, and episodic television projects that requireMEI Project Approval Commission (the Commission) review and approvalany incentive package in which one of the incentives being soughtincludes a cash payment of more than $3.5 million from any fund priorto any performance metrics being met by the proposed project. Thebill clarifies that in calculating whether the value of proposed incentives exceeds $10 million and thus requires review under current law,the value of applicable existing tax credits and incentives shall not be considered, with the exception of the sales tax exemptionfor data centers and the motion picture tax credit. Finally, the billprovides that economic development projects that propose to relocateor expand operations in one area of the Commonwealth while closingor reducing operations in another area of the Commonwealth shallbe subject to Commission review only if the value of the proposedincentives exceeds $2.5 million.
- Who sponsors HB 458?
- HB 458 is sponsored by David L. Bulova.
- What is the current status of HB 458?
- This bill died with 2022 Regular Session. It reached “Passed House of Delegates” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track HB 458?
- Track HB 458 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 458
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 458
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →