SB 5171 — Addressing consumer gender discrimination.
Last action — Senate Rules "X" file.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2023-2024 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
118 added · 66 removedPlain-language change summary
The amendment to SB 5171 includes the addition of a new section that outlines specific protections against gender-based price discrimination. While the previous version broadly prohibited businesses from charging different prices based on gender, the new amendment explicitly states that businesses cannot charge differently for similar goods based on gender, and it provides more detailed criteria for allowable price differences, including production time and material costs. This change matters because it clarifies the intent of the bill and strengthens protections against discriminatory pricing practices, ensuring consumers are treated fairly regardless of gender.
S-0761.1S-0143.1 SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 5171 State of Washington 68th Legislature 2023 Regular Session By Senate Law & Justice (originally sponsored by Senators Dhingra, Trudeau, Hunt, Lovelett, Cleveland, Keiser, C.
Wilson, Hasegawa, Saldaña, Conway, Frame, Kuderer, Nguyen, Nobles, Pedersen, Stanford, Valdez, and Wellman)Wellman READPrefiled FIRST01/05/23. TIME 01/20/23.
Read first time 01/09/23.
Referred to Committee on Law & Justice.
andamending addingRCW a19.86.140; new chapter to Title 19 RCW.
adding a new section to chapter 19.86 RCW;
and prescribing penalties.
A new section is added to chapter 19.86 RCW to read as follows:
(3)(a) Notwithstanding any other law, whenever the attorney general has cause to believe that a violation of this section has occurred, the attorney general may, upon notice to the defendant of p.
1 SSBSB 5171 (3)(a) Notwithstanding any other law, whenever the attorney general has cause to believe that a violation of this section has occurred, the attorney general may, upon notice to the defendant of not less than five days, petition thea court for an order to enjoin and restrain the continuance of those violations.
(c)(i) "Substantially similar" means two goods that exhibit noall substantialof differencethe in:following characteristics:
(A) TheNo substantial differences in the materials used in production;
(B) The intended use ofis thesimilar; good;
(C) The functional design of and features ofare thesimilar; good;
and (D) The brand ofis the good.same or both brands are owned by the same individual or entity.
(5) The legislature finds that the acts or practices covered by this section are matters vitally affecting the public interest for the purposes of applying the consumer protection act, chapter 19.86 RCW.
A violation of this section is not reasonable in relation to the development and preservation of business and is an unfair or deceptive act in trade or commerce and an unfair method of competition for the purpose of applying the consumer protection act, chapter 19.86 RCW.
NEW SECTION.
SectionRCW 119.86.140 ofand this2021 actc constitutes228 as new2 chapterare ineach Titleamended 19to RCW.read as follows:
(1) Every person who shall violate the terms of any injunction issued as in this chapter provided, shall forfeit and pay a civil penalty of not more than $125,000.
(2) Every individual who violates RCW 19.86.030 or 19.86.040 shall pay a civil penalty of not more than $180,000.
Every person, p.
2 SB 5171 other than an individual, who violates RCW 19.86.030 or 19.86.040 shall pay a civil penalty of not more than $900,000.
(3) Every person who violates RCW 19.86.020 shall forfeit and pay a civil penalty of not more than $7,500 for each violation:
PROVIDED, That nothing in this paragraph shall apply to any radio or television broadcasting station which broadcasts, or to any publisher, printer or distributor of any newspaper, magazine, billboard or other advertising medium who publishes, prints or distributes, advertising in good faith without knowledge of its false, deceptive or misleading character.
(4) For unlawful acts or practices that target or impact specific individuals or communities based on demographic characteristics including, but not limited to, age, race, national origin, citizenship or immigration status, sex, sexual orientation, presence of any sensory, mental, or physical disability, religion, veteran status, or status as a member of the armed forces, as that term is defined in 10 U.S.C.
Sec.
101, an enhanced penalty of $5,000 shall apply.
(5)(a) Every defendant who violates section 1 of this act shall pay a civil penalty not to exceed $10,000 for the first violation, and a civil penalty not to exceed $1,000 for each subsequent violation.
The total civil penalty imposed shall not exceed $100,000.
(b) Notwithstanding (a) of this subsection, a court may impose additional civil penalties upon a defendant exceeding $100,000 if the person subsequently violates this section with respect to the same goods for which the maximum civil penalty has been previously imposed under a separate civil action or for any good for which the attorney general has not brought civil action pursuant to this section.
(c) Each instance of charging a different price for two goods that are substantially similar, as specified in section 1(4) of this act shall constitute a single violation.
(d) This subsection does not limit liability under chapter 49.60 RCW, the law against discrimination, or any other law.
(6) For the purpose of this section the superior court issuing any injunction shall retain jurisdiction, and the cause shall be continued, and in such cases the attorney general acting in the name of the state may petition for the recovery of civil penalties.
(7) With respect to violations of RCW 19.86.030 and 19.86.040, the attorney general, acting in the name of the state, may seek recovery of such penalties in a civil action.
p.
3 SB 5171 (8) By December 1, 2022, and every five years thereafter, the office of the attorney general shall evaluate the efficacy of the maximum civil penalty amounts established in this section in deterring violations of the consumer protection act and the difference, if any, between the current penalty amounts and the penalty amounts adjusted for inflation, and provide the legislature with a report of its findings and any recommendations in compliance with RCW 43.01.036.
24 SSBSB 5171
View plain text versions (2)
- Bill View text Current pdf
- Substitute Substitute Bill pdf
Action History
-
Senate Rules "X" file.
-
By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.
-
By resolution, returned to Senate Rules Committee for third reading.
-
Executive session scheduled, but no action was taken in the House Committee on Consumer Protection & Business at 1:30 PM.
-
Public hearing in the House Committee on Consumer Protection & Business at 1:30 PM.
-
First reading, referred to Consumer Protection & Business.
-
Third reading, passed; yeas, 27; nays, 21; absent, 0; excused, 1.
-
Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.
-
1st substitute bill substituted (LAW 23).
-
Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.
-
Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.
-
Minority; do not pass.
-
WM - Majority; do pass 1st substitute bill proposed by Law & Justice.
-
Executive action taken in the Senate Committee on Ways & Means at 9:00 AM.
-
Public hearing in the Senate Committee on Ways & Means at 1:30 PM.
-
On motion, referred to Ways & Means.
-
Minority; do not pass.
-
LAW - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.
-
Executive action taken in the Senate Committee on Law & Justice at 8:00 AM.
-
Public hearing in the Senate Committee on Law & Justice at 10:30 AM.
-
First reading, referred to Law & Justice.
-
Prefiled for introduction.
Sponsors
- Lisa Wellman · Cosponsor
- Javier Valdez · Cosponsor
- Derek Stanford · Cosponsor
- Jamie Pedersen · Cosponsor
- T'wina Nobles · Cosponsor
- Kuderer · Cosponsor
- Noel Frame · Cosponsor
- Steve Conway · Cosponsor
- Rebecca Saldaña · Cosponsor
- Bob Hasegawa · Cosponsor
- Claire Wilson · Cosponsor
- Keiser · Cosponsor
- Annette Cleveland · Cosponsor
- Liz Lovelett · Cosponsor
- Yasmin Trudeau · Cosponsor
- Manka Dhingra · Primary
- Victoria Hunt · Cosponsor
- Joe Nguyen · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 17 co-sponsors · 133 not signed on · 18 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Manka Dhingra Democrat
Co-sponsors (17)
- Lisa Wellman Democrat
- Javier Valdez Democrat
- Derek Stanford Democrat
- Jamie Pedersen Democrat
- T'wina Nobles Democrat
- Kuderer
- Noel Frame Democrat
- Steve Conway Democrat
- Rebecca Saldaña Democrat
- Bob Hasegawa Democrat
- Claire Wilson Democrat
- Keiser
- Annette Cleveland Democrat
- Liz Lovelett Democrat
- Yasmin Trudeau Democrat
- Victoria Hunt Democrat
- Joe Nguyen Democrat
Not signed on (133)
133 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 133 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 16 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 20 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 27 | 21 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 55% | 43% | 0% | 2% |
How each member voted (49)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Billig | — | Yea |
| Hawkins | — | Nay |
| Keiser | — | Yea |
| Kuderer | — | Yea |
| Mullet | — | Yea |
| Padden | — | Nay |
| Randall | — | Yea |
| Rivers | — | Nay |
| Rolfes | — | Yea |
| Van De Wege | — | Yea |
| Wilson, L. | — | Nay |
| Annette Cleveland | Democrat | Yea |
| Bob Hasegawa | Democrat | Yea |
| Claire Wilson | Democrat | Yea |
| Claudia Kauffman | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Derek Stanford | Democrat | Yea |
| Jamie Pedersen | Democrat | Yea |
| Javier Valdez | Democrat | Yea |
| Jesse Salomon | Democrat | Yea |
| Joe Nguyen | Democrat | Yea |
| John Lovick | Democrat | Yea |
| June Robinson | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Wellman | Democrat | Yea |
| Liz Lovelett | Democrat | Yea |
| Manka Dhingra | Democrat | Yea |
| Marko Liias | Democrat | Yea |
| Noel Frame | Democrat | Yea |
| Rebecca Saldaña | Democrat | Yea |
| Sharon Shewmake | Democrat | Nay |
| Steve Conway | Democrat | Yea |
| T'wina Nobles | Democrat | Yea |
| Victoria Hunt | Democrat | Yea |
| Yasmin Trudeau | Democrat | Yea |
| Chris Gildon | Republican | Nay |
| Curtis King | Republican | Nay |
| Drew MacEwen | Republican | Nay |
| Jeff Holy | Republican | Nay |
| Jeff Wilson | Republican | Nay |
| Jim McCune | Republican | Nay |
| John Braun | Republican | Nay |
| Judy Warnick | Republican | Nay |
| Keith Wagoner | Republican | Nay |
| Mark Schoesler | Republican | Nay |
| Matt Boehnke | Republican | Nay |
| Nikki Torres | Republican | Nay |
| Perry Dozier | Republican | Nay |
| Phil Fortunato | Republican | Nay |
| Ron Muzzall | Republican | Nay |
| Shelly Short | Republican | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 5171?
- SB 5171 is sponsored by Lisa Wellman (Democrat), Javier Valdez (Democrat), Derek Stanford (Democrat), Jamie Pedersen (Democrat), T'wina Nobles (Democrat), Kuderer, Noel Frame (Democrat), Steve Conway (Democrat), Rebecca Saldaña (Democrat), Bob Hasegawa (Democrat), Claire Wilson (Democrat), Keiser, Annette Cleveland (Democrat), Liz Lovelett (Democrat), Yasmin Trudeau (Democrat), Manka Dhingra (Democrat), Victoria Hunt (Democrat), and Joe Nguyen (Democrat).
- What is the current status of SB 5171?
- This bill died with 2023-2024 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 5171?
- Track SB 5171 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 5171
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 5171
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →