Foster Care Prevention program; established.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 56 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 56.
You're tracking SB 56
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 56 — Foster Care Prevention program; established.
Last action — Left in Appropriations
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House of Delegates
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2022 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Foster Care Prevention program. Establishes the Foster Care Prevention program to facilitate placements with relatives and ensure that such relatives are provided with the resources necessary to provide care for the child. The bill provides that a child is eligible to participate in the Foster Care Prevention program if the local department of social services (local department) determines that (i) the child is being cared for by a relative; (ii) the child's parent or guardian voluntarily placed the child with such relative after November 1, 2020; (iii) the child demonstrates a strong attachment to the relative, and the relative has a strong commitment to caring for the child; and (iv) the placement of the child with the relative was necessary to prevent or eliminate the need to place the child in foster care. The bill requires relatives seeking to receive Foster Care Prevention program payments to enter into an agreement with the local department and Department of Social Services that describes the manner in which payments will be provided and establishes the amount of such payments.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
35 added · 127 removedPlain-language change summary
The updated version of Senate Bill 56 introduces a Foster Care Prevention program aimed at supporting placements of children with relatives. This program establishes eligibility criteria, requiring that a child has been voluntarily placed with a relative and that the placement was necessary to avoid foster care. The amendment also outlines how local departments can provide financial assistance to these relatives, ensuring they receive resources to care for the child. This change is important as it seeks to strengthen family ties and reduce the number of children entering the foster care system, ultimately promoting stability and support within families.
SESSION SENATE SUBSTITUTE 22104414D22104687D SENATE BILL NO.
56 AMENDMENT IN THE NATURE OF A SUBSTITUTE (Proposed by the SenateSeon CommitteeFebruary on2, Rehabilitation2022)nance and SocialAppropriations Services on January 14, 2022) (Patron Prior to Substitute––Senator Favola) A BILL to amend and reenact § 16.1-278.15 of the Code of Virginia andby toadding amendin theChapter Code of Virginia Prevention program.r 13 of Title 63.2 a section numbered 63.2-1307, relating to Foster Care BePrevention itprogram. enacted by the General Assembly of Virginia:
1.Be it enacted by the General Assembly of Virginia:
That63.2-1307 §as 16.1-278.15follows:irginia of the Code of Virginia is amended and reenacted and that the Code of Virginia is amended by adding in Chapter 13 of Title 63.2 a section numbered 63.2-1307§ as63.2-1307. follows:
A.
In cases involving the custody, visitation or support of a child pursuant to subdivision A 3 of § 16.1-241, the court may make any order of disposition to protect the welfare of the child and family as may be made by the circuit court.
The parties to any petition where a child whose custody, visitation, or support is contested shall show proof that they have attended within the 12 months prior to their court appearance or that they shall attend within 45 days thereafter an educational seminar or other like program conducted by a qualified person or organization approved by the court.
The court may require The seminar or other program shall be a minimum of four hours in length and shall address the effects.
of separation or divorce on children, parenting responsibilities, options for conflict resolutiTn and financial responsibilities.
Once a party has completed one educational seminar or other like program, the required completion of additional programs shall be at the court's discretion.
Parties under thEs section shall include natural or adoptive parents of the child, or any person with a legitimate interest as defined in § 20-124.1.
The fee charged a party for participation in such program shall be based on the party's participating in mediation or alternative dispute resolution to address custody, visitation or support, each party shall have attended the educational seminar or other like program.
The court may grant anS exemption from attendance of such program for good cause shown or if there is no program reasonUbly available.
Other than statements or admissions by a party admitting criminal activity or child Bbuse or neglect, no statement or admission by a party in such seminar or program shall be admissible into that support will continue to be paid for a child over the age of 18 who is (i) a full-time high school student, (ii) not self-supporting, and (iii) living in the home of the parent seeking or receiving child :
36 support, until the child reaches the age of 19 or graduates from high school, whichever occurs first.
The 37 court may also order that support be paid or continue to be paid for any child over the age of 18 who is 38 (a) severely and permanently mentally or physically disabled, and such disability existed priorTto the 39 child reaching the age of 18 or the age of 19 if the child met the requirements of clauses (i),U(ii), and seeking or receiving child support.
Upon request of either party, the court may also order that support payments be made to a special needs trust or an ABLE savings trust account as defined in § 23.1-700.
B.
In any case involving the custody or visitation of a child, the court may award custody uEon petition to any party with a legitimate interest therein, including, but not limited to, grandparents, stepparents, former stepparents, blood relatives and family members.
The term "legitimate interest" shall to consider a petition involving the custody of a child shall not be proscribed or limited where theurt custody of the child has previously been awarded to a local board of social services.
C.
In any determination of support obligation under this section, the support obligation as it becomes due and unpaid creates a judgment by operation of law.
Such judgment becomes a lien against real estate only when docketed in the county or city where such real estate is located.
Nothing hereSn shall be construed to alter or amend the process of attachment of any lien on personal property.
5 petition or motion that resulted in the order was completed, signed and filed by a nonattorney employee of the Department of Social Services.
1 E.
In cases involving charges for desertion, abandonment or failure to provide support by any person in violation of law, disposition shall be made in accordance with Chapter 5 (§ 20-61 et seq.) of Title 20.
F.
In cases involving a spouse who seeks spousal support after having separated from his spouse, the court may enter any appropriate order to protect the welfare of the spouse seeking support.
SB56S1 2 of 3 G.
In any case or proceeding involving the custody or visitation of a child, the court shall consider the best interest of the child, including the considerations for determining custody and visitation set forth in Chapter 6.1 (§ 20-124.1 et seq.) of Title 20.
G1.
In any case or proceeding involving the custody or visitation of a child, as to a parent, the court may, in its discretion, use the phrase "parenting time" to be synonymous with the term "visitation." H.
In any proceeding before the court for custody or visitation of a child, the court may order a custody or a psychological evaluation of any parent, guardian, legal custodian or person standing in loco parentis to the child, if the court finds such evaluation would assist it in its determination.
The court may enter such orders as it deems appropriate for the payment of the costs of the evaluation by the parties.
I.
When deemed appropriate by the court in any custody or visitation matter, the court may order drug testing of any parent, guardian, legal custodian or person standing in loco parentis to the child.
The court may enter such orders as it deems appropriate for the payment of the costs of the testing by the parties.
J.
In any custody or visitation case or proceeding wherein an order prohibiting a party from picking the child up from school is entered pursuant to this section, the court shall order a party to such case or proceeding to provide a copy of such custody or visitation order to the school at which the child is enrolled within three business days of such party's receipt of such custody or visitation order.
Show all 68 changed lines (28 more)
If a custody determination affects the school enrollment of the child subject to such custody order and prohibits a party from picking the child up from school, the court shall order a party to provide a copy of such custody order to the school at which the child will be enrolled within three business days of such party's receipt of such order.
Such order directing a party to provide a copy of such custody or visitation order shall further require such party, upon any subsequent change in the child's school enrollment, to provide a copy of such custody or visitation order to the new school at which the child is subsequently enrolled within three business days of such enrollment.
If the court determines that a party is unable to deliver the custody or visitation order to the school, such party shall provide the court with the name of the principal and address of the school, and the court shall cause the order to be mailed by first class mail to such school principal.
Nothing in this section shall be construed to require any school staff to interpret or enforce the terms of such custody or visitation order.
K.
In any custody case or proceeding involving the Foster Care Prevention program set forth in § 63.2-1307 wherein custody of the child is granted to a relative or fictive kin, the court shall establish the timelines of the custody order and may, in its discretion, order the local department of social services to conduct an assessment to determine (i) eligibility for the Foster Care Prevention program, (ii) any need for case management services, or (iii) both eligibility for the Foster Care Prevention program and any need for case management services.
§ 63.2-1307.
The Foster Care Prevention program is established to facilitate placements with relatives and ensure that such relatives are provided with the resources necessary to provide care for the child.chSld.
B.that:
A child is eligible for the Foster Care Prevention program if the local department determines that:1.
1.The child is being cared for by a relative;
TheE child2. is in the custody of a relative pursuant to a court order;
2.The child's parent or guardian voluntarily placed the child with such relative after November 1, 2020;
TheN child'scommitment parentto orcaring guardianfor voluntarily placed the childchild; with such relative;
3.andttachment to the relative, and the relative has a strongA 4.
The childplacement demonstratesof athe strongchild attachmentwith to the relative,relative andwas thenecessary relativeto hasprevent aor strongeliminate commitmentthe need to caringplace for the child;child in foster care.
andT 4.C.
HadIn theorder relativeto notreceive agreedpayments tounder takethe custodyFoster ofCare thePrevention child,program, the local department likelyagreement would have filed a petition with the courtDepartment. to remove the child from the home of his parent or guardian due to an imminent threat of child abuse or neglect.
C.Such agreement shall include, in addition to any requirements deemeditten necessary by the Department, provisions regarding the amount of each Foster Care Prevention program payment and the manner in which such payments will be provided.
InFoster orderCare toPrevention receiveprogram payments undershall thebe Fosterno Caremore Preventionthan program, the localfoster departmentcare andmaintenance payments that the relative whowould hasrecSive custodyif ofTemporary anAssistance eligiblefor childNeedy pursuantFamilies toprogram.ced subsectionby Bany shallmonthly enterpayments intoreceived athrough writtenthU agreementD. with the Department.
SuchIf agreementa shallchild include,receiving inpayments additionthrough the Foster Care Prevention program is expected to anyremain requirementsin deemedthe necessarycare byof the Department,relative provisionson regardinga long-term basis, the amountlocal ofdepartment eachshall Fosterprovide Careinformation Preventionto programsuch paymentrelative andregarding the manneropportunity inand whichprocess suchto paymentspetition willthe becourt provided.for custody of the child.
FosterS Caremarriage, Preventionor programadoption paymentsor shall(ii) befictive nokin moreof than the fosterchild. care maintenance payments that the relative would receive if the relative was the child's foster parent, reduced by any monthly payments received through the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program.
D.adult who is (i) related to the child bT blood, :
For36 purposes2. of this section, "relative" means an adult who is (i) related to the child by blood, marriage, or adoption or (ii) fictive kin of the child.
2.That the Board of Social Services (the Board) shall promulgate regulations to implement the 37 provisions of this act, which may include provisions governing the manner in which Foster Care I 38 Prevention program payments are calculated and prioritized based on available funding.
ThatThe theT Board40 ofexempt Socialfrom Services (the Board) shall promulgate regulations to implement the provisionsAdministrative ofProcess thisAct act,(§ which2.2-4000 mayet includeseq. provisions governing the manner in which Foster Care Prevention program payments are calculated and prioritized based on available funding.
The Board's initial adoption of regulations necessary to implement the provisionsCode of thisVirginia), actexceptUbe shallthat be of 3 12that the Board shall provide an opportunity for public comment on such regulations prior toceptto 12adoption.adoption.
S E N A T E S B S2 T I U T E B S 1
Show all 68 changed rows (28 more)
View plain text versions (3)
- Committee Substitute Committee substitute printed 22104687D-S2 Current pdf February 02, 2022
- Committee Substitute Committee substitute printed 22104414D-S1 pdf January 14, 2022
- Prefiled Prefiled and ordered printed; offered 01/12/22 22100669D pdf December 31, 2021
Action History
-
Left in Appropriations
-
Subcommittee recommends laying on the table (8-Y 0-N)
-
Assigned App. sub: Health & Human Resources
-
Referred to Committee on Appropriations
-
Reported from Health, Welfare and Institutions (21-Y 1-N)
-
Referred to Committee on Health, Welfare and Institutions
-
Read first time
-
Placed on Calendar
-
Impact statement from DPB (SB56S2)
-
Read third time and passed Senate (40-Y 0-N)
-
Engrossed by Senate - committee substitute SB56S2
-
Committee substitute agreed to 22104687D-S2
-
Reading of substitute waived
-
Committee substitute rejected 22104414D-S1
-
Read second time
-
Constitutional reading dispensed (40-Y 0-N)
-
Committee substitute printed 22104687D-S2
-
Reported from Finance and Appropriations with substitute (16-Y 0-N)
-
Senate committee, floor amendments and substitutes offered
-
Senate subcommittee amendments and substitutes offered
-
Impact statement from DPB (SB56S1)
-
Rereferred to Finance and Appropriations
-
Committee substitute printed 22104414D-S1
-
Reported from Rehabilitation and Social Services with substitute (15-Y 0-N)
-
Senate committee, floor amendments and substitutes offered
-
Referred to Committee on Rehabilitation and Social Services
-
Prefiled and ordered printed; offered 01/12/22 22100669D
Sponsors
- Barbara A. Favola · Primary
- Kaye Kory · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 146 not signed on · 1 voted No
Sponsors (1)
Co-sponsors (1)
Not signed on (146)
146 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 146 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 89% | 0% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Betsy B. Carr | — | Yea |
| Coyner, Carrie E. | — | Yea |
| Emily M. Jordan | — | Yea |
| Fariss, C. Matthew | — | Yea |
| Knight, Barry D. | — | Yea |
| M. Keith Hodges | — | Yea |
| Sam Rasoul | — | Yea |
| Sickles, Mark D. | — | Yea |
| Wampler, William C., III | — | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 21 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 21 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 95% | 5% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (22)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| March, Marie E. | — | Yea |
| Adams, Dawn M. | — | Yea |
| Bell, Robert B. | — | Yea |
| C.E. Cliff Hayes, Jr. | — | Yea |
| Christopher T. Head | — | Yea |
| Edmunds, James E., II | — | Yea |
| Fariss, C. Matthew | — | Nay |
| Guzman, Elizabeth R. | — | Yea |
| H. Otto Wachsmann, Jr. | — | Yea |
| Hudson, Sally L. | — | Yea |
| Karrie K. Delaney | — | Yea |
| Kathy K.L. Tran | — | Yea |
| M. Keith Hodges | — | Yea |
| Marcia S. "Cia" Price | — | Yea |
| Mike A. Cherry | — | Yea |
| Orrock, Robert D., Sr. | — | Yea |
| Patrick A. Hope | — | Yea |
| Phillip A. Scott | — | Yea |
| Robinson, Roxann L. | — | Yea |
| Rodney T. Willett | — | Yea |
| Sickles, Mark D. | — | Yea |
| Wendell S. Walker | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (40)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (40)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (16)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| McClellan, Jennifer L. | — | Yea |
| Barker, George L. | — | Yea |
| David W. Marsden | — | Yea |
| Ebbin, Adam P. | — | Yea |
| Edwards, John S. | — | Yea |
| Hanger, Emmett W., Jr. | — | Yea |
| Howell, Janet D. | — | Yea |
| L. Louise Lucas | — | Yea |
| Mamie E. Locke | — | Yea |
| Newman, Stephen D. | — | Yea |
| Norment, Thomas K., Jr. | — | Yea |
| Petersen, J. Chapman | — | Yea |
| R. Creigh Deeds | — | Yea |
| Ruff, Frank M., Jr. | — | Yea |
| Saslaw, Richard L. | — | Yea |
| Vogel, Jill Holtzman | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (15)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Morrissey, Joseph D. | — | Yea |
| Spruill, Lionell, Sr. | — | Yea |
| Barbara A. Favola | — | Yea |
| Bill DeSteph | — | Yea |
| Bryce E. Reeves | — | Yea |
| Cosgrove, John A., Jr. | — | Yea |
| Hanger, Emmett W., Jr. | — | Yea |
| Jennifer B. Boysko | — | Yea |
| Jeremy S. McPike | — | Yea |
| Kiggans, Jennifer A. | — | Yea |
| Mamie E. Locke | — | Yea |
| Mason, T. Montgomery "Monty" | — | Yea |
| Ryan T. McDougle | — | Yea |
| Scott A. Surovell | — | Yea |
| Todd E. Pillion | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 56 do?
- Foster Care Prevention program. Establishes the Foster Care Prevention program to facilitate placements with relatives and ensure that such relatives are provided with the resources necessary to provide care for the child. The bill provides that a child is eligible to participate in the Foster Care Prevention program if the local department of social services (local department) determines that (i) the child is being cared for by a relative; (ii) the child's parent or guardian voluntarily placed the child with such relative after November 1, 2020; (iii) the child demonstrates a strong attachment to the relative, and the relative has a strong commitment to caring for the child; and (iv) the placement of the child with the relative was necessary to prevent or eliminate the need to place the child in foster care. The bill requires relatives seeking to receive Foster Care Prevention program payments to enter into an agreement with the local department and Department of Social Services that describes the manner in which payments will be provided and establishes the amount of such payments.
- Who sponsors SB 56?
- SB 56 is sponsored by Barbara A. Favola and Kory, Kaye.
- What is the current status of SB 56?
- This bill died with 2022 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 56?
- Track SB 56 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 56
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 56
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →