Washington 2023-2024 Regular Session Status: Passed House 13 D cosponsors

HB 1994 — Concerning judicial dismissal of a misdemeanor following completion of court-ordered conditions.

Last action — House Rules "X" file.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed House
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2023-2024 Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

67 added · 141 removed

Plain-language change summary

The updated version of HB 1994 introduces some changes to how misdemeanors can be dismissed in court. Previously, a defendant had to show substantial compliance with court-ordered conditions, but the new language emphasizes "meaningful progress," making it a bit easier for individuals to qualify for dismissal. Additionally, the requirement for the court to make its ruling in open court has been removed, simplifying the process. These changes are important because they aim to provide a more fair and accessible pathway for individuals facing misdemeanor charges, especially for those who may struggle with fulfilling all terms due to financial constraints.

→
Previous
Latest
H-2727.2 SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1994 State of Washington 68th Legislature 2024 Regular Session By House Community Safety, Justice, & Reentry (originally sponsored by Representatives Farivar, Goodman, Reed, Alvarado, Ramos, Cortes, Morgan, Reeves, Simmons, Ormsby, Macri, Street, Fosse, and Pollet) READ FIRST TIME 01/22/24.
H-2203.2 HOUSE BILL 1994 State of Washington 68th Legislature 2024 Regular Session By Representatives Farivar, Goodman, Reed, Alvarado, Ramos, Cortes, Morgan, Reeves, Simmons, Ormsby, Macri, Street, Fosse, and Pollet Prefiled 12/20/23.
Read first time 01/08/24.
Referred to Committee on Community Safety, Justice, & Reentry.
amending RCW 46.20.270;
(1) In a court of limited jurisdiction, the court may, in its discretion, or upon motion of either party, offer to dismiss a defendant's simple misdemeanor or gross misdemeanor charge pursuant to the following:
(1) The court may, in its discretion, or upon motion of either party, offer to dismiss a defendant's simple misdemeanor or gross misdemeanor charge pursuant to the following:
The court shall rule on the motion in open court.
(b)(i) If the defendant has made meaningful progress towards complying with the imposed terms and conditions, either at the end of or at any point during the continuance period, the court shall dismiss the charges pending against the defendant.
(b)(i) If the defendant has substantially complied with the imposed terms and conditions, either at the end of or at any point during the continuance period, the court shall dismiss the charges pending against the defendant.
However, a defendant's inability to pay restitution due to indigence may not be grounds for denial of this p.
However, a defendant's inability to pay restitution due to indigence may not be grounds for denial of this dismissal following progress towards complying with court-ordered p.
1 SHB 1994 dismissal following progress towards complying with court-ordered conditions or as a basis for finding that the defendant has failed to substantially comply with the court's conditions.
1 HB 1994 conditions or as a basis for finding that the defendant has failed to make meaningful progress in complying with the court's conditions.
(c) If it appears to the prosecuting attorney that the defendant is not substantially complying with the terms and conditions, after providing the defendant with written notice of the alleged violations and disclosure of all evidence to be offered against the defendant, the court shall hold a hearing to determine whether the defendant has, by a preponderance of the evidence, willfully failed to substantially comply with the terms and conditions set by the court.
(c) If it appears to the prosecuting attorney that the defendant is not meaningfully engaged with the terms and conditions, after providing the defendant with written notice of the alleged violations and disclosure of all evidence to be offered against the defendant, the court shall hold a hearing to determine whether the defendant has, by clear and convincing evidence, willfully failed to meaningfully engage with the terms and conditions set by the court.
and (iii) If the court finds by a preponderance of the evidence that the defendant is willfully failing to substantially comply with the terms and conditions, the court may continue the hearing to provide additional time for substantial compliance or may end the period of continuance pending dismissal.
(iii) To protect both service providers' efficacy and the privacy of provider-client relationships, service providers may not be subpoenaed by the prosecution or the court to provide records or testimony in any revocation proceeding;
(d) If the court offers to dismiss a defendant's simple misdemeanor or gross misdemeanor charge, any written confirmation of completion of an assessment or statement indicating the defendant's enrollment or referral to a specific service or program, or any written updates regarding treatment or services, must be considered a treatment evaluation or compliance form ordered by the court.
and (iv) If the court finds by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant is willfully failing to meaningfully engage with the terms and conditions, the court may continue the hearing to provide additional time for meaningful engagement or may end the period of continuance pending dismissal.
(e) Admissions made by the defendant in the course of receiving treatment or services pursuant to the offer to dismiss may not be used against the defendant in the prosecution's case in chief.
(a) A violation of RCW 46.61.502 or 46.61.504;
(a) A violation of RCW 46.61.502 where a person has a previous conviction under RCW 46.61.502 or the person has one or more prior offenses within 10 years as described in RCW 46.61.5055(4), or the person has ever previously been convicted of:
(b) A domestic violence offense involving an intimate partner as defined in RCW 7.105.010;
(i) Vehicular homicide while under the influence of intoxicating liquor or any drug, RCW 46.61.520(1)(a);
(c) Stalking under RCW 9A.46.110(5)(a);
or (ii) Vehicular assault while under the influence of intoxicating liquor or any drug, RCW 46.61.522(1)(b);
(d) A violation of RCW 9.41.230;
or (b) A domestic violence offense involving an intimate partner as defined in RCW 7.105.010.
(e) Animal cruelty in the second degree committed under the circumstances described in RCW 16.52.207(1);
2 SHB 1994 (f) Assault in the fourth degree under RCW 9A.36.041;
2 HB 1994 NEW SECTION.
(g) Any offense with a finding of sexual motivation under RCW 9.94A.835 or 13.40.135;
(h) Communication with a minor or someone believed to be a minor for immoral purposes under RCW 9.68A.090(1);
(i) Any traffic offense involving a commercial driver's license or a commercial learner's permit, or involving the operation of a commercial motor vehicle;
or (j) Any offense that was originally filed as a felony charge and subsequently amended to, or refiled as, a gross misdemeanor or misdemeanor charge.
RCW 46.20.270 and 2015 c 189 s 1 are each amended to read as follows:
(1) Every court having jurisdiction over offenses committed under this chapter, or any other act of this state or municipal ordinance adopted by a local authority regulating the operation of motor vehicles on highways, or any federal authority having jurisdiction over offenses substantially the same as those set forth in this title which occur on federal installations within this state, shall immediately forward to the department a forfeiture of bail or collateral deposited to secure the defendant's appearance in court, a payment of a fine, penalty, or court cost, a plea of guilty or nolo contendere or a finding of guilt, or a finding that any person has committed a traffic infraction an abstract of the court record in the form prescribed by rule of the supreme court, showing the conviction of any person or the finding that any person has committed a traffic infraction in said court for a violation of any said laws other than regulations governing standing, stopping, parking, and pedestrian offenses.
(2) Every state agency or municipality having jurisdiction over offenses committed under this chapter, or under any other act of this state or municipal ordinance adopted by a state or local authority regulating the operation of motor vehicles on highways, may forward to the department within ten days of failure to respond, failure to pay a penalty, failure to appear at a hearing to contest the determination that a violation of any statute, ordinance, or regulation relating to standing, stopping, parking, or civil penalties issued under RCW 46.63.160 has been committed, or failure to appear at a hearing to explain mitigating circumstances, an p.
3 SHB 1994 abstract of the citation record in the form prescribed by rule of the department, showing the finding by such municipality that two or more violations of laws governing standing, stopping, and parking or one or more civil penalties issued under RCW 46.63.160 have been committed and indicating the nature of the defendant's failure to act.
Such violations or infractions may not have occurred while the vehicle is stolen from the registered owner.
The department may enter into agreements of reciprocity with the duly authorized representatives of the states for reporting to each other violations of laws governing standing, stopping, and parking.
(3) For the purposes of this title and except as defined in RCW 46.25.010, "conviction" means a final conviction in a state or municipal court or by any federal authority having jurisdiction over offenses substantially the same as those set forth in this title which occur on federal installations in this state, an unvacated forfeiture of bail or collateral deposited to secure a defendant's appearance in court, the payment of a fine or court cost, a plea of guilty or nolo contendere, or a finding of guilt on a traffic law violation charge, regardless of whether the imposition of sentence or sanctions are deferred or the penalty is suspended, but not including entry into a deferred prosecution agreement under chapter 10.05 RCW or entry into a judicially authorized dismissal of a misdemeanor or gross misdemeanor following substantial compliance with court-ordered conditions under section 1 of this act.
(4) Perfection of a notice of appeal shall stay the execution of the sentence pertaining to the withholding of the driving privilege.
(5) For the purposes of this title, "finding that a traffic infraction has been committed" means a failure to respond to a notice of infraction or a determination made by a court pursuant to this chapter.
Payment of a monetary penalty made pursuant to RCW 46.63.070(2) is deemed equivalent to such a finding.
NEW SECTION.
Sec.
3.
4 SHB 1994
3 HB 1994
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. House Rules "X" file.

  2. Returned to Rules Committee for second reading.

  3. Rules Committee relieved of further consideration. Placed on second reading.

  4. Referred to Rules 2 Review.

  5. Minority; do not pass.

  6. CSJR - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.

  7. Executive action taken in the House Committee on Community Safety at 8:00 AM.

  8. Public hearing in the House Committee on Community Safety at 4:00 PM.

  9. First reading, referred to Community Safety, Justice, & Reentry.

  10. Prefiled for introduction.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 13 co-sponsors · 137 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (13)

Not signed on (137)

137 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 137 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors HB 1994?
HB 1994 is sponsored by Gerry Pollet (Democrat), Mary Fosse (Democrat), Chipalo Street (Democrat), Nicole Macri (Democrat), Timm Ormsby (Democrat), Tarra Simmons (Democrat), Kristine Reeves (Democrat), Melanie Morgan (Democrat), Julio Cortes (Democrat), Ramos, Emily Alvarado (Democrat), Julia Reed (Democrat), Roger Goodman (Democrat), and Darya Farivar (Democrat).
What is the current status of HB 1994?
This bill died with 2023-2024 Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track HB 1994?
Track HB 1994 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HB 1994

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HB 1994

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →