Disclosure in land use proceedings; statewide application.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HB 626 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HB 626.
You're tracking HB 626
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HB 626 — Disclosure in land use proceedings; statewide application.
Last action — Failed to report (defeated) in Counties, Cities and Towns (11-Y 11-N)
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed House of Delegates
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2022 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Disclosure in land use proceedings; statewideapplication. Alters certain land use disclosure requirementsapplicable to officials in any county with the urban county executiveform of government (Fairfax County) by replacing "relationship ofemployee-employer, agent-principal, or attorney-client" with thebroader phrase of "business or financial interest." The same changeis made to existing provisions that currently apply only to LoudounCounty but will now apply statewide.
Bill Text
- Prefiled Prefiled and ordered printed; offered 01/12/22 22101241D Current pdf January 11, 2022
Action History
-
Failed to report (defeated) in Counties, Cities and Towns (11-Y 11-N)
-
House committee, floor amendments and substitutes offered
-
Subcommittee recommends reporting (6-Y 3-N)
-
House subcommittee amendments and substitutes offered
-
Impact statement from DPB (HB626)
-
Assigned CC & T sub: Subcommittee #2
-
Referred to Committee on Counties, Cities and Towns
-
Prefiled and ordered printed; offered 01/12/22 22101241D
Sponsors
- Danica A. Roem · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 147 not signed on · 11 voted No
Sponsors (1)
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (147)
147 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 147 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 11 | 11 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 11 | 11 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (22)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| March, Marie E. | — | Nay |
| Angelia Williams Graves | — | Nay |
| Avoli, G. "John" | — | Nay |
| Briana D. Sewell | — | Yea |
| Cordoza, A.C. | — | Nay |
| Danica A. Roem | — | Yea |
| Elizabeth B. Bennett-Parker | — | Nay |
| Gooditis, Wendy W. | — | Yea |
| H. Otto Wachsmann, Jr. | — | Nay |
| Irene Shin | — | Yea |
| James W. Morefield | — | Yea |
| Jason S. Ballard | — | Nay |
| Jenkins, Clinton L. | — | Yea |
| Joseph P. McNamara | — | Yea |
| Kory, Kaye | — | Yea |
| LaRock, Dave A. | — | Yea |
| M. Keith Hodges | — | Nay |
| Mike A. Cherry | — | Nay |
| Mullin, Michael P. | — | Yea |
| Phillip A. Scott | — | Nay |
| Scott A. Wyatt | — | Nay |
| Subramanyam, Suhas | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 6 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 60% | 30% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (10)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Angelia Williams Graves | — | Yea |
| Briana D. Sewell | — | Yea |
| Cordoza, A.C. | — | Yea |
| H. Otto Wachsmann, Jr. | — | Nay |
| Irene Shin | — | Yea |
| James W. Morefield | — | Nay |
| LaRock, Dave A. | — | Yea |
| M. Keith Hodges | — | Not Voting |
| Mullin, Michael P. | — | Yea |
| Scott A. Wyatt | — | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HB 626 do?
- Disclosure in land use proceedings; statewideapplication. Alters certain land use disclosure requirementsapplicable to officials in any county with the urban county executiveform of government (Fairfax County) by replacing "relationship ofemployee-employer, agent-principal, or attorney-client" with thebroader phrase of "business or financial interest." The same changeis made to existing provisions that currently apply only to LoudounCounty but will now apply statewide.
- Who sponsors HB 626?
- HB 626 is sponsored by Danica A. Roem.
- What is the current status of HB 626?
- This bill died with 2022 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track HB 626?
- Track HB 626 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 626
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 626
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →