SB 702 — Civil procedure: foreclosure; foreclosure or garnishment of wages for medical debt; prohibit. Creates new act. TIE BAR WITH: SB 0701'25
Last action — referred to second reading
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has passed the Senate. Introduced June 17, 2026. It now moves to the second chamber.
Next likely step: consideration and a floor vote in the House.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
ModerateHow often bills like it became law.
-
Passed Senate
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 D).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 2 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
In plain language
The bill prohibits foreclosure or wage garnishment due to medical debt.
This bill aims to protect individuals from losing their homes or having their wages garnished as a result of medical debt. It creates a new act focused on these protections.
What this means for you
- Families: This means families can have peace of mind knowing their homes and wages cannot be taken due to medical debt.
Summary
Civil procedure: foreclosure; foreclosure or garnishment of wages for medical debt; prohibit. Creates new act. TIE BAR WITH: SB 0701'25
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
8 added · 7 removedPlain-language change summary
The latest version of SB 702 has added several lines that likely introduce new provisions or clarify existing ones while removing some outdated or unnecessary language. This change is important because it might enhance the bill's effectiveness or address concerns raised during earlier discussions. By streamlining the text, the bill could become clearer and easier to understand for those affected by it. Ultimately, these updates are intended to strengthen the legislation and ensure it serves its intended purpose better.
SB-702, As Passed Senate, March 11, 2026 SUBSTITUTE FOR SENATE BILL NO.
(b) "Emergency medical condition" means, regardless of the final diagnosis rendered, the condition of an emergency patient, as that term is defined in section 20904 of the public health code, TDR S04262'25 (S-1)(S-1)_SB702_APS_1 yw35gz13wfgj 1 1978 PA 368, MCL 333.20904.
(i) The action involves reporting adverse information about an TDR S04262'25 (S-1)(S-1)_SB702_APS_1 yw35gz13wfgj 1 individual to consumer reporting agencies.
(h) "Medical creditor" means the person that provided TDR S04262'25 (S-1)(S-1)_SB702_APS_1 yw35gz13wfgj 1 healthcare services, products, or transportation that gave rise to the medical debt and to which the medical debt is owed or, if the medical debt has been sold, to which the medical debt was previously owed.
(1) A large healthcare facility or medical debt buyer TDR S04262'25 (S-1)(S-1)_SB702_APS_1 yw35gz13wfgj 1 shall not charge a patient interest or a late fee on medical debt until 90 days after the due date applicable to the final invoice for the medical debt.
(d) The medical debt buyer is required to adhere to specified TDR S04262'25 (S-1)(S-1)_SB702_APS_1 yw35gz13wfgj 1 procedures that ensure that the individual does not pay, and has no obligation to pay, the medical debt buyer more than the individual is responsible for paying in compliance with this act.
(8) If a patient has paid any part of a medical debt in excess TDR S04262'25 (S-1)(S-1)_SB702_APS_1 yw35gz13wfgj 1 of the amount owed after receiving any financial assistance offered by a large healthcare facility, the large healthcare facility or medical debt collector, as specified in the agreement required by subsection (4), shall refund the excess amount to the patient not later than 60 days after the excess payment is determined.
Final Page TDR S04262'25 (S-1)(S-1)_SB702_APS_1 yw35gz13wfgj
View plain text versions (4)
- As Passed by the Senate View text Current pdf
- Substitute Substitute (S-1) pdf
- Substitute Substitute (S-1) - 2 pdf
- Introduced Senate Introduced Bill pdf
Action History
-
6/17/2026 - referred to second reading
Sponsors
- Sarah Anthony · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 146 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Sarah Anthony Democrat
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (146)
146 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 146 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 16 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democrat | 18 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Unaffiliated | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 35 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 95% | 0% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (37)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Outman | — | Yea |
| Darrin Camilleri | Democrat | Yea |
| Dayna Polehanki | Democrat | Yea |
| Erika Geiss | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Jeff Irwin | Democrat | Yea |
| Jeremy Moss | Democrat | Yea |
| John Cherry | Democrat | Yea |
| Kevin Hertel | Democrat | Yea |
| Mallory McMorrow | Democrat | Yea |
| Mary Cavanagh | Democrat | Yea |
| Paul Wojno | Democrat | Yea |
| Rosemary Bayer | Democrat | Yea |
| Sam Singh | Democrat | Yea |
| Sarah Anthony | Democrat | Yea |
| Sean McCann | Democrat | Yea |
| Stephanie Chang | Democrat | Yea |
| Sue Shink | Democrat | Yea |
| Sylvia Santana | Democrat | Yea |
| Veronica Klinefelt | Democrat | Yea |
| Winnie Brinks | Democrat | Yea |
| Aric Nesbitt | Republican | Yea |
| Dan Lauwers | Republican | Not Voting |
| Edward McBroom | Republican | Yea |
| Jim Runestad | Republican | Yea |
| John Damoose | Republican | Yea |
| Jon Bumstead | Republican | Yea |
| Jonathan Lindsey | Republican | Yea |
| Joseph Bellino Jr. | Republican | Yea |
| Kevin Daley | Republican | Yea |
| Lana Theis | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Huizenga | Republican | Yea |
| Michael Webber | Republican | Yea |
| Michele Hoitenga | Republican | Yea |
| Roger Hauck | Republican | Yea |
| Roger Victory | Republican | Yea |
| Ruth Johnson | Republican | Yea |
| Thomas Albert | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 17 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democrat | 18 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 35 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 95% | 0% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (37)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Darrin Camilleri | Democrat | Yea |
| Dayna Polehanki | Democrat | Yea |
| Erika Geiss | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Jeff Irwin | Democrat | Yea |
| Jeremy Moss | Democrat | Yea |
| John Cherry | Democrat | Yea |
| Kevin Hertel | Democrat | Yea |
| Mallory McMorrow | Democrat | Yea |
| Mary Cavanagh | Democrat | Yea |
| Paul Wojno | Democrat | Yea |
| Rosemary Bayer | Democrat | Yea |
| Sam Singh | Democrat | Yea |
| Sarah Anthony | Democrat | Yea |
| Sean McCann | Democrat | Yea |
| Stephanie Chang | Democrat | Yea |
| Sue Shink | Democrat | Yea |
| Sylvia Santana | Democrat | Yea |
| Veronica Klinefelt | Democrat | Yea |
| Winnie Brinks | Democrat | Yea |
| Aric Nesbitt | Republican | Yea |
| Dan Lauwers | Republican | Not Voting |
| Edward McBroom | Republican | Yea |
| Jim Runestad | Republican | Yea |
| John Damoose | Republican | Yea |
| Jon Bumstead | Republican | Yea |
| Jonathan Lindsey | Republican | Yea |
| Joseph Bellino Jr. | Republican | Yea |
| Kevin Daley | Republican | Yea |
| Lana Theis | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Huizenga | Republican | Yea |
| Michael Webber | Republican | Yea |
| Michele Hoitenga | Republican | Yea |
| Rick Outman | Republican | Yea |
| Roger Hauck | Republican | Yea |
| Roger Victory | Republican | Yea |
| Ruth Johnson | Republican | Yea |
| Thomas Albert | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 702 do?
- Civil procedure: foreclosure; foreclosure or garnishment of wages for medical debt; prohibit. Creates new act. TIE BAR WITH: SB 0701'25
- Who sponsors SB 702?
- SB 702 is sponsored by Sarah Anthony (Democrat).
- What is the current status of SB 702?
- This bill has passed the Senate. Introduced June 17, 2026. It now moves to the second chamber.
- Where can I track SB 702?
- Track SB 702 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 702
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 702
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →