Concerning law enforcement officer protection.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 5299 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 5299.
You're tracking SB 5299
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 5299 — Concerning law enforcement officer protection.
Last action — By resolution, returned to Senate Rules Committee for third reading.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2023-2024 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
281 added · 189 removedPlain-language change summary
The latest version of SB 5299 adds clarity to the definition of third-degree assault by specifying who can be assaulted in particular contexts, especially concerning transit and school bus drivers. It explicitly includes school bus drivers and their supervisors in the list of individuals protected under this law when they are performing their official duties. This change emphasizes the importance of safeguarding those who transport students and ensures stricter penalties for those who may assault such workers. Overall, these updates aim to enhance safety for transit and school staff, reflecting the state's commitment to protecting public service personnel.
ENGROSSEDS-0454.1 SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 5299 State of Washington 68th Legislature 2023 Regular Session By Senate Law & Justice (originally sponsored by Senators Braun, Rolfes, Conway, Holy, Mullet, Torres, Wagoner, Warnick, C.
Wilson)Wilson READRead FIRSTfirst TIMEtime 02/07/23.01/12/23.
Referred to Committee on Law & Justice.
adding a new section to chapter 9.61 RCW;
adding a new section to chapter 4.24 RCW;
or (c) Assaults a school bus driver, the immediate supervisor of a driver, a mechanic, or a security officer, employed by a school district transportation service or a private company under contract for transportation services with a school district, while the person p.
1 ESSBSB 5299 district transportation service or a private company under contract for transportation services with a school district, while the person is performing his or her official duties at the time of the assault;
or (((k)))p. (l) Assaults a person located in a courtroom, jury room, judge's chamber, or any waiting area or corridor immediately adjacent to a courtroom, jury room, or judge's chamber.
This2 sectionSB shall5299 p.(((k))) (l) Assaults a person located in a courtroom, jury room, judge's chamber, or any waiting area or corridor immediately adjacent to a courtroom, jury room, or judge's chamber.
2This ESSBsection 5299shall apply only:
NEW SECTION.
A new section is added to chapter 9.61 RCW to read as follows:
(1) A person is guilty of doxing if:
(a) The person intentionally posts another person's personally identifiable information without his or her consent;
(b) The person knows that posting the personally identifiable information is reasonably likely to cause the person whose information is posted to experience harassment, bodily injury, or death;
and (c) The posting of the personally identifiable information causes the person whose information is posted to experience a substantial life disruption, harassment, bodily injury, or death.
(2) It is not an offense under this section for a person to:
(a) Provide another person's personally identifiable information when reporting unlawful activity or when providing such information in response to, or in connection with, an investigation conducted by a government agency or employer;
or (b) Provide a person's personally identifiable information in connection with lawful and constitutionally protected activity.
(3)(a) Except as provided in (b) of this subsection, doxing is a gross misdemeanor.
(b) A person who commits cyber harassment is guilty of a class C felony if the person has previously been convicted of doxing.
(4) Doxing may be committed in more than one location.
The offense is deemed to have been committed in any location in which any element of the offense occurred or in the location in which the person whose personally identifiable information resides.
(5) Nothing in this section shall be construed to:
Conflict with 47 U.S.C.
Sec.
230 of the communications decency act;
conflict with 42 U.S.C.
Sec.
1983 of the civil rights act;
or prohibit any activity p.
3 SB 5299 protected under the Constitution of the United States or the state Constitution.
(6) For the purposes of this section:
(a) "Bodily injury" has the same meaning as provided in RCW 9A.04.110.
(b) "Electronic communication" means any transfer of signs, signals, writings, images, sounds, data, or intelligence of any nature transmitted in whole or in part by a wire, radio, electromagnetic, photoelectronic, or photo optical system that affects interstate or foreign commerce.
(c) "Harassment" means a knowing and willful course of conduct directed at a specific person which seriously alarms, annoys, harasses, or is detrimental to such person, and which serves no legitimate or lawful purpose.
The course of conduct must:
Be such as would cause a reasonable person to suffer substantial emotional distress, and actually cause substantial emotional distress to the person;
or be such as would cause a reasonable parent to fear for the well-being of the parent's child.
(d) "Personally identifiable information" means:
Show all 73 changed lines (33 more)
(i) Any information that can be used to distinguish or trace an individual's identity, such as name, prior legal name, alias, mother's maiden name, social security number, date or place of birth, address, phone number, or biometric data;
(ii) Any information that is linked or linkable to an individual, such as medical, financial, education, consumer, or employment information, data, or records;
(iii) Any sensitive private information that is linked to a specific identifiable individual, such as gender identity, sexual orientation, or any sexually intimate visual depiction;
or (iv) Any information that provides access to a person's teleconferencing, video teleconferencing, or other digital meeting room.
(e) "Post" means to circulate, deliver, distribute, disseminate, transmit, or otherwise make available to two or more persons through electronic communication.
(f) "Substantial life disruption" means that a person significantly modifies that person's actions or routines either to avoid the person who posted the information or as a result of the posting, such as changing a phone number, changing an electronic mail address, deleting personal electronic accounts or significantly p.
4 SB 5299 decreasing use of the internet, moving from an established residence, changing daily routines, changing routes to and from work, changing employment or work schedule, or losing time from work or a job.
NEW SECTION.
Sec.
3.
A new section is added to chapter 4.24 RCW to read as follows:
(1) A person who is a victim of an offense under section 2 of this act may bring a civil action against the person who committed the offense or against any person who knowingly benefits, financially or by receiving anything of value, from participating in any venture that the person knew or should have known violated RCW 9A.36.031, and may recover damages and any other appropriate relief, including reasonable attorneys' fees.
(2) A person who is found liable under this section shall be jointly and severally liable with each other person, if any, who is found liable under this section for damages arising from the same conduct.
(3) A court in which a suit is brought under this section, on the motion of a party, may issue a temporary restraining order or permanent injunction to restrain or prevent the disclosure or continued disclosure of personally identifiable information.
Sec.
4.
3.5.
(1)p. Each law enforcement agency in the state is required to report each incident where a law enforcement officer employed by the agency used force and:
5 SB 5299 (1) Each law enforcement agency in the state is required to report each incident where a law enforcement officer employed by the agency used force and:
p.(vii) Struck a person using an impact weapon or instrument including, but not limited to, a club, baton, or flashlight;
3 ESSB 5299 (vii) Struck a person using an impact weapon or instrument including, but not limited to, a club, baton, or flashlight;
(h)p. Whether the person against whom force was used was believed to be armed;
6 SB 5299 (h) Whether the person against whom force was used was believed to be armed;
p.(p) Whether any minors were present at the scene of the incident, if known;
4 ESSB 5299 (p) Whether any minors were present at the scene of the incident, if known;
(c) If charges were filedfiled, against the civilian, the ultimate disposition of the case;
and (d) Reasoning if charges were not filedfiled. against the civilian;
andp. (e) The age, gender, race, and ethnicity of the individual who assaulted the officer.
7 SB 5299 (5) All law enforcement agencies shall submit the reports required by this section in accordance with the requirements of the statewide use of force data program no later than three months after the office of the attorney general determines that the system procured in RCW 10.118.040 can accept law enforcement agency reports.
p.NEW SECTION.
5 ESSB 5299 NEW SECTION.
4.6.
68 ESSBSB 5299
Show all 73 changed rows (33 more)
View plain text versions (3)
- Bill View text Current pdf
- Substitute Engrossed Substitute Bill pdf
- Substitute Substitute Bill pdf
Action History
-
By resolution, returned to Senate Rules Committee for third reading.
-
Referred to Rules 2 Review.
-
Minority; do not pass.
-
CSJR - Majority; do pass with amendment(s).
-
Executive action taken in the House Committee on Community Safety at 4:00 PM.
-
Public hearing in the House Committee on Community Safety at 10:30 AM.
-
First reading, referred to Community Safety, Justice, & Reentry.
-
Third reading, passed; yeas, 47; nays, 1; absent, 0; excused, 1.
-
Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.
-
Floor amendment(s) adopted.
-
1st substitute bill substituted (LAW 23).
-
Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.
-
On motion, referred to Rules.
-
By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.
-
Senate Rules "X" file.
-
Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.
-
Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.
-
LAW - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.
-
Executive action taken in the Senate Committee on Law & Justice at 8:00 AM.
-
Public hearing in the Senate Committee on Law & Justice at 10:30 AM.
-
First reading, referred to Law & Justice.
Sponsors
- Claire Wilson · Cosponsor
- Judy Warnick · Cosponsor
- Keith Wagoner · Cosponsor
- Nikki Torres · Cosponsor
- Mullet · Cosponsor
- Jeff Holy · Cosponsor
- Steve Conway · Cosponsor
- Rolfes · Cosponsor
- John Braun · Primary
- L. Wilson · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 9 co-sponsors · 141 not signed on · 1 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- John Braun Republican
Co-sponsors (9)
- Claire Wilson Democrat
- Judy Warnick Republican
- Keith Wagoner Republican
- Nikki Torres Republican
- Mullet
- Jeff Holy Republican
- Steve Conway Democrat
- Rolfes
- Wilson, L.
Not signed on (141)
141 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 141 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 22 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 47 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 96% | 2% | 0% | 2% |
How each member voted (49)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Billig | — | Yea |
| Hawkins | — | Yea |
| Keiser | — | Yea |
| Kuderer | — | Yea |
| Mullet | — | Yea |
| Padden | — | Yea |
| Randall | — | Not Voting |
| Rivers | — | Yea |
| Van De Wege | — | Yea |
| Wilson, L. | — | Yea |
| Annette Cleveland | Democrat | Yea |
| Bob Hasegawa | Democrat | Nay |
| Claire Wilson | Democrat | Yea |
| Claudia Kauffman | Democrat | Yea |
| Derek Stanford | Democrat | Yea |
| Drew Hansen | Democrat | Yea |
| Jamie Pedersen | Democrat | Yea |
| Javier Valdez | Democrat | Yea |
| Jesse Salomon | Democrat | Yea |
| Joe Nguyen | Democrat | Yea |
| John Lovick | Democrat | Yea |
| June Robinson | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Wellman | Democrat | Yea |
| Liz Lovelett | Democrat | Yea |
| Manka Dhingra | Democrat | Yea |
| Marko Liias | Democrat | Yea |
| Noel Frame | Democrat | Yea |
| Rebecca Saldaña | Democrat | Yea |
| Sharon Shewmake | Democrat | Yea |
| Steve Conway | Democrat | Yea |
| T'wina Nobles | Democrat | Yea |
| Victoria Hunt | Democrat | Yea |
| Yasmin Trudeau | Democrat | Yea |
| Chris Gildon | Republican | Yea |
| Curtis King | Republican | Yea |
| Drew MacEwen | Republican | Yea |
| Jeff Holy | Republican | Yea |
| Jeff Wilson | Republican | Yea |
| Jim McCune | Republican | Yea |
| John Braun | Republican | Yea |
| Judy Warnick | Republican | Yea |
| Keith Wagoner | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Schoesler | Republican | Yea |
| Matt Boehnke | Republican | Yea |
| Nikki Torres | Republican | Yea |
| Perry Dozier | Republican | Yea |
| Phil Fortunato | Republican | Yea |
| Ron Muzzall | Republican | Yea |
| Shelly Short | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 5299?
- SB 5299 is sponsored by Claire Wilson (Democrat), Judy Warnick (Republican), Keith Wagoner (Republican), Nikki Torres (Republican), Mullet, Jeff Holy (Republican), Steve Conway (Democrat), Rolfes, John Braun (Republican), and Wilson, L..
- What is the current status of SB 5299?
- This bill died with 2023-2024 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 5299?
- Track SB 5299 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 5299
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 5299
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →