Michigan 2025-2026 Regular Session Status: Passed Senate 1 R cosponsors

SB 694 — Elections: scheduling; reference to August primary election in the revised judicature act of 1961; revise to May primary election. Amends secs. 550, 550a, 805, 8175 & 8176 of 1961 PA 236 (MCL 600.550 et seq.). TIE BAR WITH: SB 0691'25

Last action — referred to Committee on Election Integrity

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has passed the Senate. Introduced March 18, 2026. It now moves to the second chamber.

Next likely step: consideration and a floor vote in the House.

Prognosis

Advancing 48% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Passed Senate

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 R).

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 2 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

Elections: scheduling; reference to August primary election in the revised judicature act of 1961; revise to May primary election. Amends secs. 550, 550a, 805, 8175 & 8176 of 1961 PA 236 (MCL 600.550 et seq.). TIE BAR WITH: SB 0691'25

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

12 added · 11 removed

Plain-language change summary

The recent amendment to Bill SB 694 includes the addition of 12 new lines while removing 11 existing ones. This update suggests that specific provisions may have been clarified or modified to improve the bill's effectiveness or align it better with current needs. Understanding these changes is important because they can affect how the law is implemented, impacting stakeholders and the public positively by ensuring that the legislation meets contemporary standards and expectations.

→
Previous
Latest
SUBSTITUTE FOR SENATE BILL NO.
SB-694, As Passed Senate, March 18, 2026 SUBSTITUTE FOR SENATE BILL NO.
(1) An additional circuit judgeship permitted by this chapter shall is not be authorized to be filled by election unless each county in the circuit, by resolution adopted by the county board of commissioners, approves the creation of that judgeship and unless the clerk of each county adopting such a that STM S02806'25 c (S-1) j9piw2 1 resolution files a copy of the resolution with the state court administrator not later than 4 p.m.
(1) An additional circuit judgeship permitted by this chapter shall is not be authorized to be filled by election unless each county in the circuit, by resolution adopted by the county board of commissioners, approves the creation of that judgeship and unless the clerk of each county adopting such a that STM S02806'25 c (S-1)_SB694_APS_1 764a9o 1 resolution files a copy of the resolution with the state court administrator not later than 4 p.m.
If a county, acting through its the county's board of commissioners, approves the creation of an additional circuit judgeship, that STM S02806'25 c (S-1) j9piw2 1 approval constitutes an exercise of the county's option to provide a new activity or service or to increase the level of activity or service offered in the county beyond that required by existing law, as the elements of that option are defined by 1979 PA 101, MCL 21.231 to 21.244, and a voluntary acceptance by the county of all expenses and capital improvements which that may result from the creation of the judgeship.
If a county, acting through its the county's board of commissioners, approves the creation of an additional circuit judgeship, that STM S02806'25 c (S-1)_SB694_APS_1 764a9o 1 approval constitutes an exercise of the county's option to provide a new activity or service or to increase the level of activity or service offered in the county beyond that required by existing law, as the elements of that option are defined by 1979 PA 101, MCL 21.231 to 21.244, and a voluntary acceptance by the county of all expenses and capital improvements which that may result from the creation of the judgeship.
STM S02806'25 c (S-1) j9piw2 1 (a) Each county in the circuit, by resolution adopted by the county board of commissioners, supports the temporary reduction in the number of judgeships.
STM S02806'25 c (S-1)_SB694_APS_1 764a9o 1 (a) Each county in the circuit, by resolution adopted by the county board of commissioners, supports the temporary reduction in the number of judgeships.
of the STM S02806'25 c (S-1) j9piw2 1 sixteenth Tuesday preceding one hundred fifty-first day before the August May primary immediately following the effective date of the amendatory act permitting the creation of the new circuit.
of the STM S02806'25 c (S-1)_SB694_APS_1 764a9o 1 sixteenth Tuesday preceding one hundred fifty-first day before the August May primary immediately following the effective date of the amendatory act permitting the creation of the new circuit.
The first term of each circuit judgeship is 6 years, unless the law permitting the creation of the new circuit STM S02806'25 c (S-1) j9piw2 1 and 1 or more judgeships provides for a term of a different length.
The first term of each circuit judgeship is 6 years, unless the law permitting the creation of the new circuit STM S02806'25 c (S-1)_SB694_APS_1 764a9o 1 and 1 or more judgeships provides for a term of a different length.
If a county, acting through its the county's board of commissioners, approves the creation of an additional judge of probate, that approval constitutes an exercise of the county's option to provide a new activity or service or to increase the level of activity or service offered in the county beyond that required by existing law, as the elements of that option are defined by 1979 PA 101, MCL 21.231 to 21.244, and a STM S02806'25 c (S-1) j9piw2 1 voluntary acceptance by the county of all expenses and capital improvements that may result from the creation of the judgeship.
If a county, acting through its the county's board of commissioners, approves the creation of an additional judge of probate, that approval constitutes an exercise of the county's option to provide a new activity or service or to increase the level of activity or service offered in the county beyond that required by existing law, as the elements of that option are defined by 1979 PA 101, MCL 21.231 to 21.244, and a STM S02806'25 c (S-1)_SB694_APS_1 764a9o 1 voluntary acceptance by the county of all expenses and capital improvements that may result from the creation of the judgeship.
of the sixteenth Tuesday preceding one hundred fifty- first day before the August May primary for the election to fill STM S02806'25 c (S-1) j9piw2 1 the additional district judgeship.
of the sixteenth Tuesday preceding one hundred fifty- first day before the August May primary for the election to fill STM S02806'25 c (S-1)_SB694_APS_1 764a9o 1 the additional district judgeship.
However, the STM S02806'25 c (S-1) j9piw2 1 exercise of the option does not affect the this state's obligation to pay the same portion of the additional judge's salary which that is paid by the this state to the other district judges in the same district, or to appropriate and disburse funds to the district control unit for the necessary costs of state requirements established by a state law which that becomes effective on or after December 23, 1978.
However, the STM S02806'25 c (S-1)_SB694_APS_1 764a9o 1 exercise of the option does not affect the this state's obligation to pay the same portion of the additional judge's salary which that is paid by the this state to the other district judges in the same district, or to appropriate and disburse funds to the district control unit for the necessary costs of state requirements established by a state law which that becomes effective on or after December 23, 1978.
The state court administrator shall immediately notify the elections division of the department of state with respect to STM S02806'25 c (S-1) j9piw2 1 each new judicial district and district judgeship authorized under this subsection.
The state court administrator shall immediately notify the elections division of the department of state with respect to STM S02806'25 c (S-1)_SB694_APS_1 764a9o 1 each new judicial district and district judgeship authorized under this subsection.
However, the exercise of the option does not affect the this state's obligation to pay the same STM S02806'25 c (S-1) j9piw2 1 portion of each judge's salary which that is paid by the this state to other district judges as provided by law, or to appropriate and disburse funds to the district control unit for the necessary costs of state requirements established by a state law that becomes effective on or after December 23, 1978.
However, the exercise of the option does not affect the this state's obligation to pay the same STM S02806'25 c (S-1)_SB694_APS_1 764a9o 1 portion of each judge's salary which that is paid by the this state to other district judges as provided by law, or to appropriate and disburse funds to the district control unit for the necessary costs of state requirements established by a state law that becomes effective on or after December 23, 1978.
Final Page STM S02806'25 c (S-1) j9piw2
Final Page STM S02806'25 c (S-1)_SB694_APS_1 764a9o
View plain text versions (7)

Action History

  1. referred to Committee on Election Integrity

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 146 not signed on · 5 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (146)

146 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 146 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 28 Yea · 5 Nay · 4 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 17002
Republican 10502
Unaffiliated 1000
Total 28504
% of votes cast 76%14%0%11%
How each member voted (37)
Member Party Vote
Outman — Yea
Darrin Camilleri Democrat Yea
Dayna Polehanki Democrat Yea
Erika Geiss Democrat Not Voting
Jeff Irwin Democrat Yea
Jeremy Moss Democrat Yea
John Cherry Democrat Yea
Kevin Hertel Democrat Yea
Mallory McMorrow Democrat Not Voting
Mary Cavanagh Democrat Yea
Paul Wojno Democrat Yea
Rosemary Bayer Democrat Yea
Sam Singh Democrat Yea
Sarah Anthony Democrat Yea
Sean McCann Democrat Yea
Stephanie Chang Democrat Yea
Sue Shink Democrat Yea
Sylvia Santana Democrat Yea
Veronica Klinefelt Democrat Yea
Winnie Brinks Democrat Yea
Aric Nesbitt Republican Yea
Dan Lauwers Republican Yea
Edward McBroom Republican Yea
Jim Runestad Republican Not Voting
John Damoose Republican Yea
Jon Bumstead Republican Yea
Jonathan Lindsey Republican Nay
Joseph Bellino Jr. Republican Nay
Kevin Daley Republican Yea
Lana Theis Republican Yea
Mark Huizenga Republican Nay
Michael Webber Republican Yea
Michele Hoitenga Republican Nay
Roger Hauck Republican Yea
Roger Victory Republican Yea
Ruth Johnson Republican Not Voting
Thomas Albert Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 28 Yea · 5 Nay · 4 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 17002
Republican 11502
Total 28504
% of votes cast 76%14%0%11%
How each member voted (37)
Member Party Vote
Darrin Camilleri Democrat Yea
Dayna Polehanki Democrat Yea
Erika Geiss Democrat Not Voting
Jeff Irwin Democrat Yea
Jeremy Moss Democrat Yea
John Cherry Democrat Yea
Kevin Hertel Democrat Yea
Mallory McMorrow Democrat Not Voting
Mary Cavanagh Democrat Yea
Paul Wojno Democrat Yea
Rosemary Bayer Democrat Yea
Sam Singh Democrat Yea
Sarah Anthony Democrat Yea
Sean McCann Democrat Yea
Stephanie Chang Democrat Yea
Sue Shink Democrat Yea
Sylvia Santana Democrat Yea
Veronica Klinefelt Democrat Yea
Winnie Brinks Democrat Yea
Aric Nesbitt Republican Yea
Dan Lauwers Republican Yea
Edward McBroom Republican Yea
Jim Runestad Republican Not Voting
John Damoose Republican Yea
Jon Bumstead Republican Yea
Jonathan Lindsey Republican Nay
Joseph Bellino Jr. Republican Nay
Kevin Daley Republican Yea
Lana Theis Republican Yea
Mark Huizenga Republican Nay
Michael Webber Republican Yea
Michele Hoitenga Republican Nay
Rick Outman Republican Yea
Roger Hauck Republican Yea
Roger Victory Republican Yea
Ruth Johnson Republican Not Voting
Thomas Albert Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 694 do?
Elections: scheduling; reference to August primary election in the revised judicature act of 1961; revise to May primary election. Amends secs. 550, 550a, 805, 8175 & 8176 of 1961 PA 236 (MCL 600.550 et seq.). TIE BAR WITH: SB 0691'25
Who sponsors SB 694?
SB 694 is sponsored by Edward McBroom (Republican).
What is the current status of SB 694?
This bill has passed the Senate. Introduced March 18, 2026. It now moves to the second chamber.
Where can I track SB 694?
Track SB 694 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 694

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 694

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →