Elections: scheduling; reference to August primary election in the revised judicature act of 1961; revise t...
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 694 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 694.
You're tracking SB 694
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 694 — Elections: scheduling; reference to August primary election in the revised judicature act of 1961; revise to May primary election. Amends secs. 550, 550a, 805, 8175 & 8176 of 1961 PA 236 (MCL 600.550 et seq.). TIE BAR WITH: SB 0691'25
Last action — referred to Committee on Election Integrity
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has passed the Senate. Introduced March 18, 2026. It now moves to the second chamber.
Next likely step: consideration and a floor vote in the House.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Passed Senate
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 R).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 2 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Elections: scheduling; reference to August primary election in the revised judicature act of 1961; revise to May primary election. Amends secs. 550, 550a, 805, 8175 & 8176 of 1961 PA 236 (MCL 600.550 et seq.). TIE BAR WITH: SB 0691'25
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
12 added · 11 removedPlain-language change summary
The recent amendment to Bill SB 694 includes the addition of 12 new lines while removing 11 existing ones. This update suggests that specific provisions may have been clarified or modified to improve the bill's effectiveness or align it better with current needs. Understanding these changes is important because they can affect how the law is implemented, impacting stakeholders and the public positively by ensuring that the legislation meets contemporary standards and expectations.
SB-694, As Passed Senate, March 18, 2026 SUBSTITUTE FOR SENATE BILL NO.
(1) An additional circuit judgeship permitted by this chapter shall is not be authorized to be filled by election unless each county in the circuit, by resolution adopted by the county board of commissioners, approves the creation of that judgeship and unless the clerk of each county adopting such a that STM S02806'25 c (S-1)(S-1)_SB694_APS_1 j9piw2764a9o 1 resolution files a copy of the resolution with the state court administrator not later than 4 p.m.
If a county, acting through its the county's board of commissioners, approves the creation of an additional circuit judgeship, that STM S02806'25 c (S-1)(S-1)_SB694_APS_1 j9piw2764a9o 1 approval constitutes an exercise of the county's option to provide a new activity or service or to increase the level of activity or service offered in the county beyond that required by existing law, as the elements of that option are defined by 1979 PA 101, MCL 21.231 to 21.244, and a voluntary acceptance by the county of all expenses and capital improvements which that may result from the creation of the judgeship.
STM S02806'25 c (S-1)(S-1)_SB694_APS_1 j9piw2764a9o 1 (a) Each county in the circuit, by resolution adopted by the county board of commissioners, supports the temporary reduction in the number of judgeships.
of the STM S02806'25 c (S-1)(S-1)_SB694_APS_1 j9piw2764a9o 1 sixteenth Tuesday preceding one hundred fifty-first day before the August May primary immediately following the effective date of the amendatory act permitting the creation of the new circuit.
The first term of each circuit judgeship is 6 years, unless the law permitting the creation of the new circuit STM S02806'25 c (S-1)(S-1)_SB694_APS_1 j9piw2764a9o 1 and 1 or more judgeships provides for a term of a different length.
If a county, acting through its the county's board of commissioners, approves the creation of an additional judge of probate, that approval constitutes an exercise of the county's option to provide a new activity or service or to increase the level of activity or service offered in the county beyond that required by existing law, as the elements of that option are defined by 1979 PA 101, MCL 21.231 to 21.244, and a STM S02806'25 c (S-1)(S-1)_SB694_APS_1 j9piw2764a9o 1 voluntary acceptance by the county of all expenses and capital improvements that may result from the creation of the judgeship.
of the sixteenth Tuesday preceding one hundred fifty- first day before the August May primary for the election to fill STM S02806'25 c (S-1)(S-1)_SB694_APS_1 j9piw2764a9o 1 the additional district judgeship.
However, the STM S02806'25 c (S-1)(S-1)_SB694_APS_1 j9piw2764a9o 1 exercise of the option does not affect the this state's obligation to pay the same portion of the additional judge's salary which that is paid by the this state to the other district judges in the same district, or to appropriate and disburse funds to the district control unit for the necessary costs of state requirements established by a state law which that becomes effective on or after December 23, 1978.
The state court administrator shall immediately notify the elections division of the department of state with respect to STM S02806'25 c (S-1)(S-1)_SB694_APS_1 j9piw2764a9o 1 each new judicial district and district judgeship authorized under this subsection.
However, the exercise of the option does not affect the this state's obligation to pay the same STM S02806'25 c (S-1)(S-1)_SB694_APS_1 j9piw2764a9o 1 portion of each judge's salary which that is paid by the this state to other district judges as provided by law, or to appropriate and disburse funds to the district control unit for the necessary costs of state requirements established by a state law that becomes effective on or after December 23, 1978.
Final Page STM S02806'25 c (S-1)(S-1)_SB694_APS_1 j9piw2764a9o
View plain text versions (7)
- As Passed by the Senate View text Current pdf
- Substitute Substitute (S-1) pdf
- Substitute Substitute (S-1) - 2 pdf
- Substitute Substitute (S-1) - 3 pdf
- Substitute Substitute (S-1) - 4 pdf
- Substitute Substitute (S-1) - 5 pdf
- Introduced Senate Introduced Bill pdf
Action History
-
referred to Committee on Election Integrity
Sponsors
- Edward McBroom · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 146 not signed on · 5 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Edward McBroom Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (146)
146 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 146 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 17 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 10 | 5 | 0 | 2 |
| Unaffiliated | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 28 | 5 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 76% | 14% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (37)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Outman | — | Yea |
| Darrin Camilleri | Democrat | Yea |
| Dayna Polehanki | Democrat | Yea |
| Erika Geiss | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Jeff Irwin | Democrat | Yea |
| Jeremy Moss | Democrat | Yea |
| John Cherry | Democrat | Yea |
| Kevin Hertel | Democrat | Yea |
| Mallory McMorrow | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Mary Cavanagh | Democrat | Yea |
| Paul Wojno | Democrat | Yea |
| Rosemary Bayer | Democrat | Yea |
| Sam Singh | Democrat | Yea |
| Sarah Anthony | Democrat | Yea |
| Sean McCann | Democrat | Yea |
| Stephanie Chang | Democrat | Yea |
| Sue Shink | Democrat | Yea |
| Sylvia Santana | Democrat | Yea |
| Veronica Klinefelt | Democrat | Yea |
| Winnie Brinks | Democrat | Yea |
| Aric Nesbitt | Republican | Yea |
| Dan Lauwers | Republican | Yea |
| Edward McBroom | Republican | Yea |
| Jim Runestad | Republican | Not Voting |
| John Damoose | Republican | Yea |
| Jon Bumstead | Republican | Yea |
| Jonathan Lindsey | Republican | Nay |
| Joseph Bellino Jr. | Republican | Nay |
| Kevin Daley | Republican | Yea |
| Lana Theis | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Huizenga | Republican | Nay |
| Michael Webber | Republican | Yea |
| Michele Hoitenga | Republican | Nay |
| Roger Hauck | Republican | Yea |
| Roger Victory | Republican | Yea |
| Ruth Johnson | Republican | Not Voting |
| Thomas Albert | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 17 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 11 | 5 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 28 | 5 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 76% | 14% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (37)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Darrin Camilleri | Democrat | Yea |
| Dayna Polehanki | Democrat | Yea |
| Erika Geiss | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Jeff Irwin | Democrat | Yea |
| Jeremy Moss | Democrat | Yea |
| John Cherry | Democrat | Yea |
| Kevin Hertel | Democrat | Yea |
| Mallory McMorrow | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Mary Cavanagh | Democrat | Yea |
| Paul Wojno | Democrat | Yea |
| Rosemary Bayer | Democrat | Yea |
| Sam Singh | Democrat | Yea |
| Sarah Anthony | Democrat | Yea |
| Sean McCann | Democrat | Yea |
| Stephanie Chang | Democrat | Yea |
| Sue Shink | Democrat | Yea |
| Sylvia Santana | Democrat | Yea |
| Veronica Klinefelt | Democrat | Yea |
| Winnie Brinks | Democrat | Yea |
| Aric Nesbitt | Republican | Yea |
| Dan Lauwers | Republican | Yea |
| Edward McBroom | Republican | Yea |
| Jim Runestad | Republican | Not Voting |
| John Damoose | Republican | Yea |
| Jon Bumstead | Republican | Yea |
| Jonathan Lindsey | Republican | Nay |
| Joseph Bellino Jr. | Republican | Nay |
| Kevin Daley | Republican | Yea |
| Lana Theis | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Huizenga | Republican | Nay |
| Michael Webber | Republican | Yea |
| Michele Hoitenga | Republican | Nay |
| Rick Outman | Republican | Yea |
| Roger Hauck | Republican | Yea |
| Roger Victory | Republican | Yea |
| Ruth Johnson | Republican | Not Voting |
| Thomas Albert | Republican | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 694 do?
- Elections: scheduling; reference to August primary election in the revised judicature act of 1961; revise to May primary election. Amends secs. 550, 550a, 805, 8175 & 8176 of 1961 PA 236 (MCL 600.550 et seq.). TIE BAR WITH: SB 0691'25
- Who sponsors SB 694?
- SB 694 is sponsored by Edward McBroom (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 694?
- This bill has passed the Senate. Introduced March 18, 2026. It now moves to the second chamber.
- Where can I track SB 694?
- Track SB 694 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 694
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 694
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →