HB 1192 — Concerning electric power system transmission planning.
Last action — House Rules "X" file.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2023-2024 Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
359 added · 372 removedPlain-language change summary
The latest version of Bill HB 1192 has removed a section regarding the legislature's intent to affirm local government permitting processes for transmission projects. Additionally, it emphasizes the challenges of developing transmission projects, which often take over a decade and may hinder the state's efforts to meet greenhouse gas emissions reduction goals by 2030. This change highlights the need for a faster approach to developing essential energy infrastructure while ensuring that environmental protection remains a priority.
H-1117.1Z-0278.1 SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1192 State of Washington 68th Legislature 2023 Regular Session By House Environment & Energy (originally sponsored by Representatives Duerr, Doglio, Berry, Ramel, Fitzgibbon, Lekanoff, and Pollet;
by request of Office of the Governor)Governor READPrefiled FIRST01/06/23. TIME 02/15/23.
Read first time 01/09/23.
Referred to Committee on Environment & Energy.
1 SHBHB 1192 (3) Expanded transmission capacity and the more effective use of existing transmission capacity will provide benefits to electricity consumers in the state by enhancing the reliability of the electric power system and increasing access to more affordable sources of electricity within the state and across the western United States and Canada.
(7) The legislature intends and affirms that the option to use local government permitting processes remains available for transmission projects not subject to mandatory jurisdiction under RCW 80.50.060(2).
(8) Transmission projects typically take at least a decade to develop and permit.
This timing presents particular challenges for achieving the state's greenhouse gas emissions reduction mandates, which include ambitious benchmarks as early as 2030.
There is a need to accelerate the timeline for transmission development while still protecting other Washington values.
p.(1) Utilities with more than ((twenty-five thousand)) 25,000 customers that are not full requirements customers must develop or update an integrated resource plan by September 1, 2008.
2 SHB 1192 (1) Utilities with more than ((twenty-five thousand)) 25,000 customers that are not full requirements customers must develop or update an integrated resource plan by September 1, 2008.
(a)p. A range of forecasts, for at least the next ((ten)) 10 years or longer, of projected customer demand which takes into account econometric data and customer usage;
2 HB 1192 (a) A range of forecasts, for at least the next ((ten)) 10 years or longer, of projected customer demand which takes into account econometric data and customer usage;
The transmission assessment must take into account the state's p.emissions reduction limits;
3opportunities SHBto 1192make emissionsmore reductioneffective limits;use of existing transmission capacity through energy efficiency, demand response, grid modernization, and other programs;
opportunities to make more effective use of existing transmission capacity through improved transmission system operating practices, energy efficiency, demand response, grid modernization, nonwires solutions, and other programs;
(g)p. A determination of resource adequacy metrics for the resource plan consistent with the forecasts;
3 HB 1192 (g) A determination of resource adequacy metrics for the resource plan consistent with the forecasts;
(i) Modeled load forecast scenarios that consider the anticipated levels of zero emissions vehicle use in a utility's service area, p.including anticipated levels of zero emissions vehicle use in the utility's service area provided in RCW 47.01.520, if feasible;
4 SHB 1192 including anticipated levels of zero emissions vehicle use in the utility's service area provided in RCW 47.01.520, if feasible;
Electric utilities may, but are not required to, use the forecasts generated by the mapping and forecasting tool created in RCWp. 47.01.520.
4 HB 1192 RCW 47.01.520.
(e) ((identify)) Identify any need to develop new, or expand or upgrade existing, bulk transmission and distribution facilities and document existing and planned efforts by the utility to make more effective use of existing transmission capacity and secure additional transmission capacity consistent with the requirements of subsection (1)(f) of this section;
p.(i) Evaluating and selecting conservation policies, programs, and targets;
5 SHB 1192 (i) Evaluating and selecting conservation policies, programs, and targets;
(i) Gas consisting largely of methane and other hydrocarbons derived from the decomposition of organic material in landfills, wastewater treatment facilities, and anaerobic digesters must be considered a nonemitting resource;p.
5 HB 1192 resource;
(ii) Analysis, research, findings, recommendations, actions, and any other relevant information found in the electrification of p.transportation plans submitted under RCW 35.92.450, 54.16.430, and 80.28.365;
6 SHB 1192 transportation plans submitted under RCW 35.92.450, 54.16.430, and 80.28.365;
The value of recoverablep. waste heat resulting from combined heat and power must be reflected in analyses of cost-effectiveness under this subsection.
6 HB 1192 recoverable waste heat resulting from combined heat and power must be reflected in analyses of cost-effectiveness under this subsection.
(1) Electric utilities must, in the selection and acquisition of renewable resources, give reasonable consideration to, and may not unreasonably exclude from consideration, resources that would use p.transmission services considered to be conditional firm under the tariff of the relevant transmission provider.
7 SHB 1192 transmission services considered to be conditional firm under the tariff of the relevant transmission provider.
(2) Electric utilities are encouraged to satisfy the transmission planning requirements of RCW 19.280.030 through statewide or multiutilityp. planning activities and through interstate transmission planning processes.
7 HB 1192 multiutility planning activities and through interstate transmission planning processes.
and (B) located in more than one p.jurisdiction that has promulgated land use plans or zoning ordinances;
8 SHB 1192 jurisdiction that has promulgated land use plans or zoning ordinances;
(i)p. The construction, reconstruction, or enlargement of new or existing electrical transmission facilities:
(A)8 OfHB a1192 nominal(i) voltageThe ofconstruction, atreconstruction, leastor 500,000enlargement voltsof alternatingnew current or atexisting leastelectrical 300,000transmission voltsfacilities: direct current;
(A) Of a nominal voltage of at least 500,000 volts;
Show all 49 changed lines (9 more)
p.(5) Applications for certification shall be upon forms prescribed by the council and shall be supported by such information and technical studies as the council may require.
9 SHB 1192 (5) Applications for certification shall be upon forms prescribed by the council and shall be supported by such information and technical studies as the council may require.
(7)p. The council must work with local governments where a project is proposed to be sited in order to provide for meaningful participation and input during siting review and compliance monitoring.
9 HB 1192 (7) The council must work with local governments where a project is proposed to be sited in order to provide for meaningful participation and input during siting review and compliance monitoring.
p.(1) The council shall consult with other state agencies, utilities, local municipal governments, public interest groups, tribes, and other interested persons to convey their views to the secretary and the federal energy regulatory commission regarding appropriate limits on federal regulatory authority in the siting of electrical transmission corridors in the state of Washington.
10 SHB 1192 (1) The council shall consult with other state agencies, utilities, local municipal governments, public interest groups, tribes, and other interested persons to convey their views to the secretary and the federal energy regulatory commission regarding appropriate limits on federal regulatory authority in the siting of electrical transmission corridors in the state of Washington.
The council's authority regarding transmission facilities under this subsection is limited to those transmission facilities that are the subject of ((sectionp. 1221 of the national energy policy act)) Title 16 U.S.C.
10 HB 1192 ((section 1221 of the national energy policy act)) Title 16 U.S.C.
11 SHBHB 1192
Show all 49 changed rows (9 more)
View plain text versions (2)
- Bill View text Current pdf
- Substitute Substitute Bill pdf
Action History
-
House Rules "X" file.
-
By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.
-
Referred to Rules 2 Review.
-
Minority; without recommendation.
-
ENVI - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.
-
Executive action taken in the House Committee on Environment & Energy at 1:30 PM.
-
Public hearing in the House Committee on Environment & Energy at 8:00 AM.
-
First reading, referred to Environment & Energy.
-
Prefiled for introduction.
Sponsors
- Gerry Pollet · Cosponsor
- Debra Lekanoff · Cosponsor
- Joe Fitzgibbon · Cosponsor
- Alex Ramel · Cosponsor
- Liz Berry · Cosponsor
- Beth Doglio · Cosponsor
- Davina Duerr · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 6 co-sponsors · 144 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Davina Duerr Democrat
Co-sponsors (6)
- Gerry Pollet Democrat
- Debra Lekanoff Democrat
- Joe Fitzgibbon Democrat
- Alex Ramel Democrat
- Liz Berry Democrat
- Beth Doglio Democrat
Not signed on (144)
144 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 144 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HB 1192?
- HB 1192 is sponsored by Gerry Pollet (Democrat), Debra Lekanoff (Democrat), Joe Fitzgibbon (Democrat), Alex Ramel (Democrat), Liz Berry (Democrat), Beth Doglio (Democrat), and Davina Duerr (Democrat).
- What is the current status of HB 1192?
- This bill died with 2023-2024 Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track HB 1192?
- Track HB 1192 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 1192
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 1192
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →