HB 2039 — Modifying the appeals process for environmental and land use matters.
Last action — Effective date 6/6/2024*.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed House
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced December 26, 2023. Enacted.
Odds of enactment
High chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
6 sponsors
1 primary, 5 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (6 D).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 3 recorded votes so far.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
386 added · 514 removedPlain-language change summary
The revised version of HB 2039 introduces new criteria for how cases can be directly reviewed by the court of appeals, specifically focusing on decisions from environmental boards related to clean energy projects. It adds more structured guidelines for when a court can take such cases directly and removes previous language that may have complicated the process. This change is significant because it aims to expedite judicial review of important environmental decisions that could influence clean energy initiatives, thereby promoting faster action on such critical issues.
ENGROSSEDH-2289.2 SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 2039 State of Washington 68th Legislature 2024 Regular Session By House Environment & Energy (originally sponsored by Representatives Fitzgibbon, Ramel, Reed, Ormsby, Fosse, and Duerr)Duerr READPrefiled FIRST12/26/23. TIME 01/26/24.
Read first time 01/08/24.
Referred to Committee on Environment & Energy.
amending RCW 34.05.518, 34.05.518,36.70C.150, 90.58.180, 70A.230.080, 70A.300.120, 70A.430.070, and 86.16.081, and 86.16.081;
repealingand RCWproviding 70A.205.145;an effective date.
providing an effective date;
and providing an expiration date.
RCW 34.05.518 and 2021 c 305 s 2 are each amended to read as follows:
(1)(a) The final decision of an administrative agency in an adjudicative proceeding under this chapter may be directly reviewed by the court of appeals ((upon)) either:
(i) Upon certification by the superior court pursuant to this ((section)) subsection and subsections (2) and (3) of this section;
or (ii) if the final decision is from an environmental board as identified in RCW 43.21B.005 and the final decision relates to a clean energy project as defined in RCW 43.158.010, pursuant to subsection (4) of this section.
((Transfer of cases pursuant to this section does not require the filing of a motion for discretionary review with the court of p.
1 ESHB 2039 appeals.)) (b) The superior court may certify cases for transfer to the court of appeals upon finding that:
(((a))) (i) All parties have consented to the transfer to the court of appeals and agreed that the judicial review can occur based upon the agency record developed before the administrative body without supplementing the record pursuant to RCW 34.05.562;
or (((b))) (ii) One or more of the parties have not consented to the transfer, but the superior court finds that transfer would serve the interest of justice, would not cause substantial prejudice to any party, including any unrepresented party, and further finds that:
(((i))) (A) The judicial review can occur based upon the agency record developed before the administrative body without supplementing the record pursuant to RCW 34.05.562;
or (((ii))) (B) The superior court has completed any necessary supplementation of the record pursuant to RCW 34.05.562, such that only issues of law remain for determination.
(2) If the superior court certifies a final decision of an administrative agency in an adjudicative proceeding, the superior court shall transfer the matter to the court of appeals as a direct appeal.
(3) A party contesting a superior court decision granting or denying certification for direct review may file a motion for discretionary review with the court of appeals.
(4)(a) For the appeal of a permit related to a clean energy project, as defined in RCW 43.158.010, that is the subject of a final adjudicative decision of an environmental board, as identified in RCW 43.21B.005, upon a motion filed by any party to the appeal, the superior court shall certify a case for transfer to the court of appeals upon a finding that:
(i) The judicial review can occur based upon the agency record developed before the administrative body without supplementing the record pursuant to RCW 34.05.562;
or (ii) The superior court has completed any necessary supplementation of the record pursuant to RCW 34.05.562.
(b) If the superior court certifies a final decision of an administrative agency in an adjudicative proceeding, the superior court shall transfer the matter to the court of appeals as a direct appeal.
(c) A party contesting a superior court decision granting or denying certification for direct review may file a motion for p.
2 ESHB 2039 discretionary review with the court of appeals.
Where a contesting party demonstrates that substantial prejudice would result from direct review by the court of appeals, the court of appeals may remand to the superior court.
(5) Transfer of cases pursuant to this section does not require the filing of a motion for discretionary review with the court of appeals.
Sec.
2.
(1) The final decision of an administrative agency in an adjudicative proceeding under this chapter may be directly reviewed by the court of appeals either (a) upon certification by the superior court pursuant to this section or (b) if the final decision is from an environmental board as defined in subsection (2)(3) of this sectionsection, ((or));upon acceptance by the court of appeals after a certificate of appealability has been filed by the environmental board that rendered the final decision.
(b) if the final decision is from an environmental board as ((defined in)) identified in RCW 43.21B.005 and the final decision relates to a clean energy project as defined in RCW 43.158.010, pursuant to subsection (3) of this section((, upon acceptance by the court of appeals after a certificate of appealability has been filed by the environmental board that rendered the final decision));
or (c) if the final decision is from an environmental board identified in RCW 43.21B.005 and the final decision does not relate to a clean energy project as defined in RCW 43.158.010, pursuant to subsection (4) of this section.
Transfer of a case pursuant to subsections (3) or (4) of this section does not require the filing of a motion for discretionary review with the court of appeals.
The superior court may certify a case for directp. review only if the judicial review is limited to the record of the agency proceeding and the court finds that:
1 HB 2039 direct review only if the judicial review is limited to the record of the agency proceeding and the court finds that:
and p.(((d))) (iv) The appellate court's determination in the proceeding would have significant precedential value.
3 ESHB 2039 (((d))) (iv) The appellate court's determination in the proceeding would have significant precedential value.
(3)(a) For the ((purposespurposes of direct review of final decisions of environmental boards, environmental boards include those boards identified in RCW 43.21B.005 and the growth management hearings board as identified in RCW 36.70A.250.
(b) An((An environmental board may issue a certificate of appealability if it finds that delay in obtaining a final and prompt determination of the issues would be detrimental to any party or the public interest and either:
(b)p. If an issue on review is the jurisdiction of the environmental board, the board may file an application for direct review on that issue.
Show all 115 changed lines (75 more)
2 HB 2039 (b) If an issue on review is the jurisdiction of the environmental board, the board may file an application for direct review on that issue.
(d) If a certificate of appealability is issued, the parties shall have fifteen days from the date of service to file a notice of discretionary review in the superior court, and the notice shall p.include a copy of the certificate of appealability and a copy of the final decision.
4 ESHB 2039 include a copy of the certificate of appealability and a copy of the final decision.
The superior court's decision may be appealed to the court of appeals.)) appealThe of a permit related to a clean energy project, as defined in RCW 43.158.010, that is the subject of a final adjudicative decision of an environmental board,board as identified in RCWan 43.21B.005,adjudicative uponproceeding aunder motionthis filedchapter bymay anybe partydirectly toreviewed theby appeal, the superior court shallof certifyappeals aupon casecertification forby transfer to the superior court ofpursuant appealsto uponthis asubsection. finding that:
Transfer of cases pursuant to this section does not require the filing of a motion for discretionary review with the court of appeals.
(c) The superior court may certify cases for transfer to the court of appeals upon finding that transfer would serve the interest of justice, would not cause substantial prejudice to any party, including any unrepresented party, and further finds that:
or (ii) The superior court has completed any necessary supplementation of the record pursuant to RCW 34.05.562.34.05.562, such that only issues of law remain for determination.
(b)(d) If the superior court certifies a final decision of an administrative agency in an adjudicative proceeding, the superior court shall transfer the matter to the court of appeals as a direct appeal.
(c)(e) A party contesting a superior court decision granting or denying certification for direct review may file a motion for discretionary review with the court of appeals.
Wherep. a contesting party demonstrates that substantial prejudice would result from direct review by the court of appeals, the court of appeals may remand to superior court.
(4)(a)3 TheHB final2039 adjudicativeSec. decision of an environmental board, as identified in RCW 43.21B.005, that does not relate to a clean energy project as defined in RCW 43.158.010, may be directly reviewed by the court of appeals upon certification by the superior court pursuant to this subsection.
The2. superior court shall certify cases for transfer to the court of appeals upon finding that:
(i)RCW All36.70C.150 parties have consented to the transfer to the court of appeals and agreed2021 thatc the305 judicials review1 canare occureach basedamended upon the agency record developed before the administrative body without supplementing the record pursuant to RCWread 34.05.562;as follows:
or(1) (ii)The Onesuperior orcourt moremay transfer the judicial review of a land use decision to the court of appeals upon finding that ((all parties have not consented to the transfer,transfer butto the superior court findsof thatappeals and agreed)) transfer would serve the p.interest of justice, that transfer would not cause substantial prejudice to any party, including any unrepresented party, and that the judicial review can occur based upon an existing record.
5Transfer ESHBof 2039cases interestpursuant ofto justice,this wouldsection does not causerequire substantialthe prejudicefiling toof anya party,motion includingfor anydiscretionary unrepresentedreview party,with andthe furthercourt findsof that:appeals.
(A)(2) TheUpon judicialstipulation reviewand canconsent occurto basedtransfer, uponthe parties waive the agencyright recordto developedseek beforean theaward administrativeof bodyattorneys' withoutfees supplementingand thecosts recordunder pursuantRCW 4.84.370, except as may be awarded following an appeal to RCWthe 34.05.562;supreme court.
or(3) (B)RCW The36.70C.090 superiordoes courtnot hasapply completedto anya necessarymatter supplementationtransferred ofto the recordcourt pursuant to RCW 34.05.562, such that only issues of lawappeals remainpursuant forto determination.this section.
(b)(((4) IfThis thesection superiorexpires courtJune certifies30, a2026.)) finalNEW decisionSECTION. of an administrative agency in an adjudicative proceeding, the superior court shall transfer the matter to the court of appeals as a direct appeal.
(c) A party contesting a superior court decision granting or denying certification for direct review may file a motion for discretionary review with the court of appeals.
Where a contesting party demonstrates that substantial prejudice would result from direct review by the court of appeals, the court of appeals may remand to the superior court.
NEW SECTION.
(1) Where multipleit permitsappears forthat themore samethan underlyingone cleanappeal energyhas project,arisen asout defined in RCW 43.158.010, are appealed to one or more of the environmentalsame boards,underlying asproject, identified in RCW 43.21B.005, the presiding officer shall consolidate thesuch appeals for hearing whenupon onemaking ora moredetermination ofthat the following three criteria arehave been met:
(a)(1) WhenConsolidation appealswill forexpedite thedisposition permitsof related to the sameappeals; underlying project are either:
(i)(2) FiledConsolidation withinwill 60avoid daysduplication of eachtestimony; other;
orand (ii)(3) IfConsolidation thewill permits are not filedprejudice within 60 days of each other and the environmentalrights board issues a stay of the appealparties. of the permit pursuant to RCW 43.21B.320 following the applicant's request.
Such a stay must include a stay of the construction of the project pending appeal, to allow other anticipated appeals of permits for the same underlying project to be filed with the environmental boards to accommodate consolidation pursuant to this section, but the environmental board may set a deadline after which an appeal may proceed in the absence of other permit appeals in order to ensure efficient resolution of appeals;
or p.
6 ESHB 2039 (b) The presiding officer determines that the following three criteria have been met:
(i) Consolidation will expedite disposition of the appeals;
(ii) Consolidation will avoid duplication of testimony;
and (iii) Consolidation will not prejudice the rights of the parties.
(2) When all appeals of individual permits consolidated pursuant to this section are within the jurisdiction of the pollution control hearings board, the pollution control hearings board shall retain jurisdiction over the consolidated matter.
When all appeals of individual permits consolidated pursuant to this section are within the jurisdiction of the shorelines hearings board, the shorelines hearings board shall retain jurisdiction over the consolidated matter.
When appeals to the pollution control hearings board and appeals to the shorelines hearings board are consolidated pursuant to this section, the following applies:
(a) The consolidated appeals must be heard by the pollution control hearings board;
(b) The pollution control hearings board must issue its decision on the consolidated appeal within 240 days, which must be measured from the date that the last of the consolidated appeals was filed;
and (c) The time period in (b) of this subsection may be extended on motion from a party or by the pollution control hearings board upon a showing that the consolidated appeal raises issues of unique complexity and that delay is not against the public interest.
In no case may the time period in (b) of this subsection be extended for a period greater than 30 days unless the time period is waived by all parties.
74 ESHBHB 2039 and the local government.
85 ESHBHB 2039 (d) Was developed without fully considering and evaluating all material submitted to the department during public review and comment;
(8) Where multipleit permitsappears forthat themore samethan underlyingone cleanappeal energyhas project,arisen asout defined in RCW 43.158.010, have been appealed to one or more of the environmentalsame boards,underlying asproject, identified in RCW 43.21B.005, the presiding officer shall consolidate thesuch appeals,appeals includingfor appealshearing toupon themaking shorelinesa hearingsdetermination board,that pursuantthe tofollowing sectionthree 3criteria ofhave thisbeen act.met:
(a) Consolidation will expedite disposition of the appeals;
(b) Consolidation will avoid duplication of testimony;
and (c) Consolidation will not prejudice the rights of the parties.
(a) Civil penalties imposed pursuant to chapter 70A.230 RCW and RCW 18.104.155, 70A.15.3160, 70A.300.090, 70A.20.050, 70A.205.280, 70A.300.090, 70A.355.070, 70A.430.070, 70A.500.260, 70A.505.100, 70A.505.110, 70A.530.040, 70A.350.070, 70A.515.060, 70A.245.040, 70A.245.050, 70A.245.070, 70A.245.080, 70A.245.130, 70A.245.140, 70A.65.200, p.
96 ESHBHB 2039 70A.245.050, 70A.245.070, 70A.245.080, 70A.245.130, 70A.245.140, 70A.65.200, 70A.455.090, 70A.550.030, 70A.555.110, 70A.560.020, 76.09.170, 77.55.440, 78.44.250, 88.46.090, 90.03.600, 90.46.270, 90.48.144, 90.56.310, 90.56.330, and 90.64.102.
107 ESHBHB 2039 (h) Any other decision by the department or an air authority which pursuant to law must be decided as an adjudicative proceeding under chapter 34.05 RCW.
(a) Hearings required by law to be conducted by the shorelines hearings board pursuant to chapter 90.58 RCW,RCW. except where appeals to the pollution control hearings board and appeals to the shorelines hearings board have been consolidated pursuant to section 3 of this act.
(d) Hearings conducted by the department to adopt, modify, or repeal rules.
118 ESHBHB 2039 (d)(3) HearingsReview conductedof rules and regulations adopted by the departmenthearings board shall be subject to adopt,review modify,in oraccordance repealwith rules.the provisions of the administrative procedure act, chapter 34.05 RCW.
(3) Review of rules and regulations adopted by the hearings board shall be subject to review in accordance with the provisions of the administrative procedure act, chapter 34.05 RCW.
p.(b) 30 days after receipt of the notice of disposition by a local air authority on application for relief from penalty, if such an application is made;
12or ESHBp. 2039 (b) 30 days after receipt of the notice of disposition by a local air authority on application for relief from penalty, if such an application is made;
or9 HB 2039 (c) 30 days after receipt of the notice of decision of the hearings board if the penalty is appealed.
(d) Penalties imposed pursuant to RCW 70A.245.040 and 70A.245.050 must be credited to the recycling enhancement account created in RCW 70A.245.100;
1310 ESHBHB 2039 (d)(e) Penalties imposed pursuant to RCW 70A.245.04070A.500.260 and 70A.245.050 must be crediteddeposited tointo the recyclingelectronic enhancementproducts recycling account created in RCW 70A.245.100;70A.500.130;
(e) Penalties imposed pursuant to RCW 70A.500.260 must be deposited into the electronic products recycling account created in RCW 70A.500.130;
In addition, the department may suspend or revoke any permits and/or certificates issued under the provisions of this p.chapter to a person who fails to comply with an order directed against him or her.
14 ESHB 2039 chapter to a person who fails to comply with an order directed against him or her.
Sec.p.
11 HB 2039 Sec.
(2) Any person who fails to comply with this chapter shall also be subject to a civil penalty not to exceed ((one thousand dollars)) p.$1,000 for each violation.
15 ESHB 2039 $1,000 for each violation.
(3) The penalty provided for in this section ((shall)) must be imposed by a notice in writing((, either by certified mail with return receipt requested or by personal service, to the person incurringp. the same from the department or local government, describing the violation with reasonable particularity and ordering)) and must be imposed consistent with the procedures of RCW 43.21B.300.
12 HB 2039 incurring the same from the department or local government, describing the violation with reasonable particularity and ordering)) and must be imposed consistent with the procedures of RCW 43.21B.300.
Section 1 of this act expirestakes effect July 1, 2026.
NEW SECTION.
Sec.
12.
Section 2 of this act takes effect July 1, 2026.
NEW SECTION.
Sec.
13.
RCW 70A.205.145 (Exemption from solid waste permit requirements — Waste-derived soil amendments — Application — Revocation of exemption — Appeal) and 2020 c 20 s 1175, 2016 c 119 s 7, & 1998 c 36 s 18 are each repealed.
1613 ESHBHB 2039
Show all 115 changed rows (75 more)
View plain text versions (4)
- Bill View text pdf
- Substitute Engrossed Substitute Bill pdf
- Substitute Substitute Bill pdf
- Substitute Substitute Passed Legislature Current pdf
Action History
-
Effective date 6/6/2024*.
-
Chapter 347, 2024 Laws.
-
Governor signed.
-
Delivered to Governor.
-
President signed.
-
Speaker signed.
-
Passed final passage; yeas, 72; nays, 24; absent, 0; excused, 1.
-
House concurred in Senate amendments.
-
Third reading, passed; yeas, 44; nays, 5; absent, 0; excused, 0.
-
Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.
-
Committee amendment(s) adopted as amended.
-
Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.
-
Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.
-
Minority; without recommendation.
-
ENET - Majority; do pass with amendment(s).
-
Executive action taken in the Senate Committee on Environment, Energy & Technology at 8:00 AM.
-
Public hearing in the Senate Committee on Environment, Energy & Technology at 8:00 AM.
-
First reading, referred to Environment, Energy & Technology.
-
Third reading, passed; yeas, 64; nays, 33; absent, 0; excused, 1.
-
Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.
-
Floor amendment(s) adopted.
-
1st substitute bill substituted (ENVI 24).
-
Rules Committee relieved of further consideration. Placed on second reading.
-
Referred to Rules 2 Review.
-
Minority; without recommendation.
-
ENVI - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.
-
Executive action taken in the House Committee on Environment & Energy at 4:00 PM.
-
Executive session scheduled, but no action was taken in the House Committee on Environment & Energy at 1:30 PM.
-
Public hearing in the House Committee on Environment & Energy at 1:30 PM.
-
First reading, referred to Environment & Energy.
-
Prefiled for introduction.
Sponsors
- Davina Duerr · Cosponsor
- Mary Fosse · Cosponsor
- Timm Ormsby · Cosponsor
- Julia Reed · Cosponsor
- Alex Ramel · Cosponsor
- Joe Fitzgibbon · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 5 co-sponsors · 145 not signed on · 31 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Joe Fitzgibbon Democrat
Co-sponsors (5)
- Davina Duerr Democrat
- Mary Fosse Democrat
- Timm Ormsby Democrat
- Julia Reed Democrat
- Alex Ramel Democrat
Not signed on (145)
145 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 145 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 8 | 21 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 57 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 72 | 24 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 74% | 25% | 0% | 1% |
How each member voted (97)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Chambers | — | Nay |
| Chandler | — | Not Voting |
| Cheney | — | Yea |
| Chopp | — | Yea |
| Hutchins | — | Yea |
| Kretz | — | Yea |
| Maycumber | — | Yea |
| Mosbrucker | — | Nay |
| Robertson | — | Yea |
| Sandlin | — | Nay |
| Wilcox | — | Yea |
| Alex Ramel | Democrat | Yea |
| Alicia Rule | Democrat | Yea |
| Amy Walen | Democrat | Yea |
| April Berg | Democrat | Yea |
| Beth Doglio | Democrat | Yea |
| Bill Ramos | Democrat | Yea |
| Brandy Donaghy | Democrat | Yea |
| Chipalo Street | Democrat | Yea |
| Chris Stearns | Democrat | Yea |
| Cindy Ryu | Democrat | Yea |
| Clyde Shavers | Democrat | Yea |
| Dan Bronoske | Democrat | Yea |
| Darya Farivar | Democrat | Yea |
| Dave Paul | Democrat | Yea |
| David Hackney | Democrat | Yea |
| Davina Duerr | Democrat | Yea |
| Debra Entenman | Democrat | Yea |
| Debra Lekanoff | Democrat | Yea |
| Emily Alvarado | Democrat | Yea |
| Gerry Pollet | Democrat | Yea |
| Greg Nance | Democrat | Yea |
| Jake Fey | Democrat | Yea |
| Jamila Taylor | Democrat | Yea |
| Jessica Bateman | Democrat | Yea |
| Joe Fitzgibbon | Democrat | Yea |
| Joe Timmons | Democrat | Yea |
| Julia Reed | Democrat | Yea |
| Julio Cortes | Democrat | Yea |
| Kristine Reeves | Democrat | Yea |
| Larry Springer | Democrat | Yea |
| Lauren Davis | Democrat | Yea |
| Laurie Jinkins | Democrat | Yea |
| Lillian Ortiz-Self | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Callan | Democrat | Yea |
| Liz Berry | Democrat | Yea |
| Marcus Riccelli | Democrat | Yea |
| Mari Leavitt | Democrat | Yea |
| Mary Fosse | Democrat | Yea |
| Melanie Morgan | Democrat | Yea |
| Mia Gregerson | Democrat | Yea |
| Mike Chapman | Democrat | Yea |
| Monica Jurado Stonier | Democrat | Yea |
| My-Linh Thai | Democrat | Yea |
| Nicole Macri | Democrat | Yea |
| Roger Goodman | Democrat | Yea |
| Sharlett Mena | Democrat | Yea |
| Sharon Tomiko Santos | Democrat | Yea |
| Sharon Wylie | Democrat | Yea |
| Shelley Kloba | Democrat | Yea |
| Steve Bergquist | Democrat | Yea |
| Steve Tharinger | Democrat | Yea |
| Strom Peterson | Democrat | Yea |
| Tana Senn | Democrat | Yea |
| Tarra Simmons | Democrat | Yea |
| Timm Ormsby | Democrat | Yea |
| Tina Orwall | Democrat | Yea |
| Vandana Slatter | Democrat | Yea |
| Alex Ybarra | Republican | Nay |
| Andrew Barkis | Republican | Yea |
| April Connors | Republican | Nay |
| Carolyn Eslick | Republican | Nay |
| Chris Corry | Republican | Yea |
| Cyndy Jacobsen | Republican | Nay |
| Dan Griffey | Republican | Nay |
| Drew Stokesbary | Republican | Yea |
| Ed Orcutt | Republican | Nay |
| Jenny Graham | Republican | Nay |
| Jim Walsh | Republican | Nay |
| Joe Schmick | Republican | Nay |
| Keith Goehner | Republican | Yea |
| Kevin Waters | Republican | Yea |
| Leonard Christian | Republican | Nay |
| Mark Klicker | Republican | Nay |
| Mary Dye | Republican | Nay |
| Michelle Valdez | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Steele | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Volz | Republican | Nay |
| Paul Harris | Republican | Yea |
| Peter Abbarno | Republican | Nay |
| Sam Low | Republican | Nay |
| Skyler Rude | Republican | Nay |
| Stephanie Barnard | Republican | Nay |
| Stephanie McClintock | Republican | Nay |
| Suzanne Schmidt | Republican | Nay |
| Tom Dent | Republican | Nay |
| Travis Couture | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 11 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 23 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 44 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 90% | 10% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (49)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Billig | — | Yea |
| Hawkins | — | Yea |
| Keiser | — | Yea |
| Kuderer | — | Yea |
| Mullet | — | Yea |
| Padden | — | Yea |
| Randall | — | Yea |
| Rivers | — | Yea |
| Van De Wege | — | Yea |
| Wilson, L. | — | Yea |
| Annette Cleveland | Democrat | Yea |
| Bob Hasegawa | Democrat | Yea |
| Claire Wilson | Democrat | Yea |
| Claudia Kauffman | Democrat | Yea |
| Derek Stanford | Democrat | Yea |
| Drew Hansen | Democrat | Yea |
| Jamie Pedersen | Democrat | Yea |
| Javier Valdez | Democrat | Yea |
| Jesse Salomon | Democrat | Yea |
| Joe Nguyen | Democrat | Yea |
| John Lovick | Democrat | Yea |
| June Robinson | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Wellman | Democrat | Yea |
| Liz Lovelett | Democrat | Yea |
| Manka Dhingra | Democrat | Yea |
| Marko Liias | Democrat | Yea |
| Noel Frame | Democrat | Yea |
| Rebecca Saldaña | Democrat | Yea |
| Sharon Shewmake | Democrat | Yea |
| Steve Conway | Democrat | Yea |
| T'wina Nobles | Democrat | Yea |
| Victoria Hunt | Democrat | Yea |
| Yasmin Trudeau | Democrat | Yea |
| Chris Gildon | Republican | Yea |
| Curtis King | Republican | Yea |
| Drew MacEwen | Republican | Yea |
| Jeff Holy | Republican | Yea |
| Jeff Wilson | Republican | Yea |
| Jim McCune | Republican | Nay |
| John Braun | Republican | Yea |
| Judy Warnick | Republican | Nay |
| Keith Wagoner | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Schoesler | Republican | Nay |
| Matt Boehnke | Republican | Nay |
| Nikki Torres | Republican | Yea |
| Perry Dozier | Republican | Nay |
| Phil Fortunato | Republican | Yea |
| Ron Muzzall | Republican | Yea |
| Shelly Short | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 4 | 26 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 57 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 7 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 64 | 33 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 65% | 34% | 0% | 1% |
How each member voted (98)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Chambers | — | Nay |
| Chandler | — | Not Voting |
| Cheney | — | Nay |
| Chopp | — | Yea |
| Hutchins | — | Yea |
| Kretz | — | Nay |
| Maycumber | — | Nay |
| Mosbrucker | — | Nay |
| Robertson | — | Yea |
| Sandlin | — | Nay |
| Wilcox | — | Nay |
| Alex Ramel | Democrat | Yea |
| Alicia Rule | Democrat | Yea |
| Amy Walen | Democrat | Yea |
| April Berg | Democrat | Yea |
| Beth Doglio | Democrat | Yea |
| Bill Ramos | Democrat | Yea |
| Brandy Donaghy | Democrat | Yea |
| Chipalo Street | Democrat | Yea |
| Chris Stearns | Democrat | Yea |
| Cindy Ryu | Democrat | Yea |
| Clyde Shavers | Democrat | Yea |
| Dan Bronoske | Democrat | Yea |
| Darya Farivar | Democrat | Yea |
| Dave Paul | Democrat | Yea |
| David Hackney | Democrat | Yea |
| Davina Duerr | Democrat | Yea |
| Debra Entenman | Democrat | Yea |
| Debra Lekanoff | Democrat | Yea |
| Emily Alvarado | Democrat | Yea |
| Gerry Pollet | Democrat | Yea |
| Greg Nance | Democrat | Yea |
| Jake Fey | Democrat | Yea |
| Jamila Taylor | Democrat | Yea |
| Jessica Bateman | Democrat | Yea |
| Joe Fitzgibbon | Democrat | Yea |
| Joe Timmons | Democrat | Yea |
| Julia Reed | Democrat | Yea |
| Julio Cortes | Democrat | Yea |
| Kristine Reeves | Democrat | Yea |
| Larry Springer | Democrat | Yea |
| Lauren Davis | Democrat | Yea |
| Laurie Jinkins | Democrat | Yea |
| Lillian Ortiz-Self | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Callan | Democrat | Yea |
| Liz Berry | Democrat | Yea |
| Marcus Riccelli | Democrat | Yea |
| Mari Leavitt | Democrat | Yea |
| Mary Fosse | Democrat | Yea |
| Melanie Morgan | Democrat | Yea |
| Mia Gregerson | Democrat | Yea |
| Mike Chapman | Democrat | Yea |
| Monica Jurado Stonier | Democrat | Yea |
| My-Linh Thai | Democrat | Yea |
| Nicole Macri | Democrat | Yea |
| Roger Goodman | Democrat | Yea |
| Sharlett Mena | Democrat | Yea |
| Sharon Tomiko Santos | Democrat | Yea |
| Sharon Wylie | Democrat | Yea |
| Shelley Kloba | Democrat | Yea |
| Steve Bergquist | Democrat | Yea |
| Steve Tharinger | Democrat | Yea |
| Strom Peterson | Democrat | Yea |
| Tana Senn | Democrat | Yea |
| Tarra Simmons | Democrat | Yea |
| Timm Ormsby | Democrat | Yea |
| Tina Orwall | Democrat | Yea |
| Vandana Slatter | Democrat | Yea |
| Alex Ybarra | Republican | Nay |
| Andrew Barkis | Republican | Yea |
| April Connors | Republican | Nay |
| Carolyn Eslick | Republican | Nay |
| Chris Corry | Republican | Nay |
| Cyndy Jacobsen | Republican | Nay |
| Dan Griffey | Republican | Nay |
| Drew Stokesbary | Republican | Nay |
| Ed Orcutt | Republican | Nay |
| Jenny Graham | Republican | Nay |
| Jim Walsh | Republican | Nay |
| Joe Schmick | Republican | Nay |
| Joel McEntire | Republican | Nay |
| Keith Goehner | Republican | Yea |
| Kevin Waters | Republican | Nay |
| Leonard Christian | Republican | Nay |
| Mark Klicker | Republican | Nay |
| Mary Dye | Republican | Nay |
| Michelle Valdez | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Steele | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Volz | Republican | Nay |
| Paul Harris | Republican | Nay |
| Peter Abbarno | Republican | Nay |
| Sam Low | Republican | Nay |
| Skyler Rude | Republican | Nay |
| Stephanie Barnard | Republican | Nay |
| Stephanie McClintock | Republican | Nay |
| Suzanne Schmidt | Republican | Nay |
| Tom Dent | Republican | Nay |
| Travis Couture | Republican | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HB 2039?
- HB 2039 is sponsored by Davina Duerr (Democrat), Mary Fosse (Democrat), Timm Ormsby (Democrat), Julia Reed (Democrat), Alex Ramel (Democrat), and Joe Fitzgibbon (Democrat).
- What is the current status of HB 2039?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced December 26, 2023. Enacted.
- Where can I track HB 2039?
- Track HB 2039 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 2039
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 2039
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →