Virginia 2021 Regular Session Status: Passed House Of Delegates

HB 1329 — Chesapeake Bay Preservation Areas; local governments to designate Areas, etc.

Last action — Left in Agriculture, Conservation and Natural Resources

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed House of Delegates
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2021 Regular Session. It reached “Passed House of Delegates” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Chesapeake Bay Preservation Areas; local ordinances; penalties. Directs localities in Tidewater Virginia to incorporate certain penalties into their ordinances protecting the quality of state waters in Chesapeake Bay Preservation Areas.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

109 added · 82 removed

Plain-language change summary

The latest version of Bill HB 1329 has shifted some responsibilities from the state to local governments regarding the Chesapeake Bay Preservation Areas. Specifically, it now requires counties, cities, and towns in Tidewater Virginia to designate these areas and include water quality protections in their local plans within one year of new criteria being adopted. This change is important because it empowers local governments to take initiative in environmental protection, ensuring that the quality of state waters is more effectively managed at the community level.

→
Previous
Latest
SESSION history | hilite | pdf | print version 20104205D HOUSE BILL NO.
SESSION history | hilite | pdf | print version 20106882D HOUSE BILL NO.
1329 Offered January 8, 2020 Prefiled January 8, 2020 A BILL to amend and reenact § 62.1-44.15:72 of the Code of Virginia, relating to Chesapeake Bay;
1329 AMENDMENT IN THE NATURE OF A SUBSTITUTE (Proposed by the House Committee on Agriculture, Chesapeake and Natural Resources on January 29, 2020) (Patron Prior to Substitute--Delegate Kory) A BILL to amend and reenact § 62.1-44.15:74 of the Code of Virginia, relating to Chesapeake Bay;
---------- Patron-- Kory ---------- Referred to Committee on Agriculture, Chesapeake and Natural Resources ---------- Be it enacted by the General Assembly of Virginia:
Be it enacted by the General Assembly of Virginia:
That § 62.1-44.15:72 of the Code of Virginia is amended and reenacted as follows:
That § 62.1-44.15:74 of the Code of Virginia is amended and reenacted as follows:
§ 62.1-44.15:72.
§ 62.1-44.15:74.
Board to develop criteria.
Local governments to designate Chesapeake Bay Preservation Areas;
incorporate into local plans and ordinances;
impose civil penalties.
In order to implement the provisions of this article and to assist counties, cities, and towns in regulating the use and development of land and in protecting the quality of state waters, the Board shall promulgate regulations that establish criteria for use by local governments to determine the ecological and geographic extent of Chesapeake Bay Preservation Areas.
Counties, cities, and towns in Tidewater Virginia shall use the criteria developed by the Board to determine the extent of the Chesapeake Bay Preservation Area within their jurisdictions.
The Board shall also promulgate regulations that establish criteria for use by local governments in granting, denying, or modifying requests to rezone, subdivide, or use and develop land in these areas.
Designation of Chesapeake Bay Preservation Areas shall be accomplished by every county, city, and town in Tidewater Virginia not later than 12 months after adoption of criteria by the Board.
In developing and amending the criteria, the Board shall consider all factors relevant to the protection of water quality from significant degradation as a result of the use and development of land.
Counties, cities, and towns in Tidewater Virginia shall incorporate protection of the quality of state waters into each locality's comprehensive plan consistent with the provisions of this article.
The criteria shall incorporate measures such as performance standards, best management practices, and various planning and zoning concepts to protect the quality of state waters while allowing use and development of land consistent with the provisions of this chapter.
The criteria adopted by the Board, operating in conjunction with other state water quality programs, shall encourage and promote (i) protection of existing high quality state waters and restoration of all other state waters to a condition or quality that will permit all reasonable public uses and will support the propagation and growth of all aquatic life, including game fish, which might reasonably be expected to inhabit them;
(ii) safeguarding the clean waters of the Commonwealth from pollution;
(iii) prevention of any increase in pollution;
(iv) reduction of existing pollution;
and (v) promotion of water resource conservation in order to provide for the health, safety, and welfare of the present and future citizens of the Commonwealth.
Prior to the development or amendment of criteria, the Board shall give due consideration to, among other things, the economic and social costs and benefits which can reasonably be expected to obtain as a result of the adoption or amendment of the criteria.
All counties, cities, and towns in Tidewater Virginia shall have zoning ordinances that incorporate measures to protect the quality of state waters in the Chesapeake Bay Preservation Areas consistent with the provisions of this article.
Zoning in Chesapeake Bay Preservation Areas shall comply with all criteria set forth in or established pursuant to § 62.1-44.15:72.
In developing such criteria the Board may consult with and obtain the comments of any federal, state, regional, or local agency that has jurisdiction by law or special expertise with respect to the use and development of land or the protection of water.
Counties, cities, and towns in Tidewater Virginia shall incorporate protection of the quality of state waters in Chesapeake Bay Preservation Areas into their subdivision ordinances consistent with the provisions of this article.
The Board shall give due consideration to the comments submitted by such federal, state, regional, or local agencies.
Counties, cities, and towns in Tidewater Virginia shall ensure that all subdivisions developed pursuant to their subdivision ordinances comply with all criteria developed by the Board.
In developing such criteria, the Board shall provide that any locality in a Chesapeake Bay Preservation Area that allows the owner of an on-site sewage treatment system not requiring a Virginia Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit to submit documentation in lieu of proof of septic tank pump-out shall require such owner to have such documentation certified by an operator or on-site soil evaluator licensed or certified under Chapter 23 (§ 54.1-2300 et seq.) of Title 54.1 as being qualified to operate, maintain, or design on-site sewage systems.
(Contingent expiration date) In addition to any other remedies which that may be obtained under any local ordinance enacted to protect the quality of state waters in Chesapeake Bay Preservation Areas, counties, cities, and towns in Tidewater Virginia may shall incorporate the following penalties into their zoning, subdivision, or other ordinances:
1.
Any person who (i) violates any provision of any such ordinance or (ii) violates or fails, neglects, or refuses to obey any local governmental body's or official's final notice, order, rule, regulation, or variance or permit condition authorized under such ordinance shall, upon such finding by an appropriate circuit court, be assessed a civil penalty not to exceed $5,000 for each day of violation.
Such civil penalties may, at the discretion of the court assessing them, be directed to be paid into the treasury of the county, city, or town in which the violation occurred for the purpose of abating environmental damage to or restoring Chesapeake Bay Preservation Areas therein, in such a manner as the court may direct by order, except that where the violator is the county, city, or town itself, or its agent, the court shall direct the penalty to be paid into the state treasury.
2.
With the consent of any person who (i) violates any provision of any local ordinance related to the protection of water quality in Chesapeake Bay Preservation Areas or (ii) violates or fails, neglects, or refuses to obey any local governmental body's or official's notice, order, rule, regulation, or variance or permit condition authorized under such ordinance, the local government may provide for the issuance of an order against such person for the one-time payment of civil charges for each violation in specific sums, not to exceed $10,000 for each violation.
Such civil charges shall be paid into the treasury of the county, city, or town in which the violation occurred for the purpose of abating environmental damage to or restoring Chesapeake Bay Preservation Areas therein, except that where the violator is the county, city, or town itself, or its agent, the civil charges shall be paid into the state treasury.
Civil charges shall be in lieu of any appropriate civil penalty that could be imposed under subdivision 1.
Civil charges may be in addition to the cost of any restoration required or ordered by the local governmental body or official.
E.
(Contingent effective date) In addition to any other remedies which that may be obtained under any local ordinance enacted to protect the quality of state waters in Chesapeake Bay Preservation Areas, counties, cities, and towns in Tidewater Virginia may shall incorporate the following penalties into their zoning, subdivision, or other ordinances:
1.
Any person who (i) violates any provision of any such ordinance or (ii) violates or fails, neglects, or refuses to obey any local governmental body's or official's final notice, order, rule, regulation, or variance or permit condition authorized under such ordinance shall, upon such finding by an appropriate circuit court, be assessed a civil penalty not to exceed $5,000 for each day of violation.
Such civil penalties may, at the discretion of the court assessing them, be directed to be paid into the treasury of the county, city, or town in which the violation occurred for the purpose of abating environmental damage to or restoring Chesapeake Bay Preservation Areas therein, in such a manner as the court may direct by order, except that where the violator is the county, city, or town itself, or its agent, the court shall direct the penalty to be paid into the state treasury and deposited by the State Treasurer into the Stormwater Local Assistance Fund established by § 62.1-44.15:29.1.
2.
With the consent of any person who (i) violates any provision of any local ordinance related to the protection of water quality in Chesapeake Bay Preservation Areas or (ii) violates or fails, neglects, or refuses to obey any local governmental body's or official's notice, order, rule, regulation, or variance or permit condition authorized under such ordinance, the local government may provide for the issuance of an order against such person for the one-time payment of civil charges for each violation in specific sums, not to exceed $10,000 for each violation.
Such civil charges shall be paid into the treasury of the county, city, or town in which the violation occurred for the purpose of abating environmental damage to or restoring Chesapeake Bay Preservation Areas therein, except that where the violator is the county, city, or town itself, or its agent, the civil charges shall be paid into the state treasury and deposited by the State Treasurer into the Stormwater Local Assistance Fund established by § 62.1-44.15:29.1.
Civil charges shall be in lieu of any appropriate civil penalty that could be imposed under subdivision 1.
Civil charges may be in addition to the cost of any restoration required or ordered by the local governmental body or official.
Show all 50 changed rows (10 more)
Previous
Latest
In developing such criteria, the Board shall not require the designation of a Resource Protection Area (RPA) as defined according to the criteria developed by the Board, adjacent to a daylighted stream.
Localities that are subject to the provisions of this article may by ordinance adopt an appeal period for any person aggrieved by a decision of a board that has been established by the locality to hear cases regarding ordinances adopted pursuant to this article.
However, a locality that elects not to designate an RPA adjacent to a daylighted stream shall use a water quality impact assessment to ensure that proposed development on properties adjacent to the daylighted stream does not result in the degradation of the stream.
The ordinance shall allow the aggrieved party a minimum of 30 days from the date of such decision to appeal the decision to the circuit court.
The water quality impact assessment shall (i) be consistent with the Board's criteria for water quality assessments in RPAs, (ii) identify the impacts of the proposed development on water quality, and (iii) determine specific measures for the mitigation of those impacts.
The objective of this assessment is to ensure that practices on properties adjacent to daylighted streams are effective in retarding runoff, preventing erosion, and filtering nonpoint source pollution.
The specific content for the water quality impact assessment shall be established and implemented by any locality that chooses not to designate an RPA adjacent to a daylighted stream.
Nothing in this subsection shall limit a locality's authority to include a daylighted stream within the extent of an RPA.
G.
In developing such criteria, the Board shall require that any local ordinance addressing permitted modifications of the buffer area include specific penalties for the removal of trees from an RPA without the prior approval of such locality.
H.
Effective July 1, 2014, requirements promulgated under this article directly related to compliance with the erosion and sediment control and stormwater management provisions of this chapter and regulated under the authority of those provisions shall cease to have effect.
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. Left in Agriculture, Conservation and Natural Resources

  2. Continued to 2021 in Agriculture, Conservation and Natural Resources (15-Y 0-N)

  3. Impact statement from DPB (HB1329H1)

  4. Referred to Committee on Agriculture, Conservation and Natural Resources

  5. Constitutional reading dispensed

  6. VOTE: Passage (55-Y 42-N)

  7. Read third time and passed House (55-Y 42-N)

  8. Engrossed by House - committee substitute HB1329H1

  9. Committee substitute agreed to 20106882D-H1

  10. Read second time

  11. Passed by for the day

  12. Read first time

  13. Committee substitute printed 20106882D-H1

  14. Reported from Agriculture, Chesapeake and Natural Resources with substitute (13-Y 9-N)

  15. Subcommittee recommends reporting with substitute (5-Y 3-N)

  16. House committee, floor amendments and substitutes offered

  17. Impact statement from DPB (HB1329)

  18. Assigned ACNR sub: Chesapeake

  19. Referred to Committee on Agriculture, Chesapeake and Natural Resources

  20. Prefiled and ordered printed; offered 01/08/20 20104205D

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 147 not signed on · 20 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (147)

147 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 147 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 15 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 15000
Total 15000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (15)
Member Party Vote
Petersen, J. Chapman — Yea
Lewis, Lynwood W., Jr. — Yea
Hanger, Emmett W., Jr. — Yea
Mason, T. Montgomery "Monty" — Yea
Ruff, Frank M., Jr. — Yea
McClellan, Jennifer L. — Yea
Morrissey, Joseph D. — Yea
Barbara A. Favola — Yea
David R. Suetterlein — Yea
David W. Marsden — Yea
Ghazala F. Hashmi — Yea
Mark D. Obenshain — Yea
Richard H. Stuart — Yea
Todd E. Pillion — Yea
William M. Stanley, Jr. — Yea

Official roll call →

VOTE: Passage (55-Y 42-N)

Passed 52 Yea · 41 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 524103
Total 524103
% of votes cast 54%43%0%3%
How each member voted (96)
Member Party Vote
Tyler, Roslyn C. — Yea
Wampler, William C., III — Nay
Avoli, G. "John" — Nay
Ayala, Hala S. — Yea
Batten, Amanda E. — Nay
Bell, Robert B. — Nay
Bourne, Jeffrey M. — Yea
Brewer, Emily M. — Nay
Byron, Kathy J. — Nay
Campbell, Jeffrey L. — Nay
Campbell, Ronnie R. — Nay
Carter, Lee J. — Yea
Cole, Mark L. — Nay
Cox, M. Kirkland — Nay
Coyner, Carrie E. — Nay
Edmunds, James E., II — Nay
Fariss, C. Matthew — Nay
Freitas, Nicholas J. — Nay
Gilbert, C. Todd — Nay
Gooditis, Wendy W. — Yea
Guy, Nancy D. — Yea
Heretick, Steve E. — Yea
Hudson, Sally L. — Yea
Hurst, Chris L. — Yea
Jenkins, Clinton L. — Yea
Jones, Jerrauld C. "Jay" — Yea
Keam, Mark L. — Yea
Kory, Kaye — Yea
LaRock, Dave A. — Nay
Levine, Mark H. — Yea
Marshall, Daniel W., III — Nay
Miyares, Jason S. — Nay
Mugler, Martha M. — Yea
Mullin, Michael P. — Yea
Murphy, Kathleen — Yea
Orrock, Robert D., Sr. — Nay
Plum, Kenneth R. — Yea
Poindexter, Charles D. — Nay
Ransone, Margaret B. — Nay
Robinson, Roxann L. — Nay
Rush, Nick — Nay
Samirah, Ibraheem S. — Yea
Subramanyam, Suhas — Yea
Alex Q. Askew — Yea
Alfonso H. Lopez — Yea
Barry D. Knight — Nay
Betsy B. Carr — Yea
C.E. Cliff Hayes, Jr. — Yea
Charniele L. Herring — Yea
Chris S. Runion — Nay
Christopher T. Head — Nay
Dan I. Helmer — Yea
Danica A. Roem — Yea
David A. Reid — Yea
David L. Bulova — Yea
Delores L. McQuinn — Yea
Don Scott — Yea
Elizabeth R. Guzman — Yea
Garrett McGuire — Nay
Hyland F. "Buddy" Fowler, Jr. — Nay
Israel D. O'Quinn — Nay
James A. "Jay" Leftwich — Nay
James W. Morefield — Nay
Jeion A. Ward — Yea
Joseph P. McNamara — Nay
Joshua G. Cole — Yea
Karrie K. Delaney — Yea
Kathy K.L. Tran — Yea
Kelly K. Convirs-Fowler — Yea
Kimberly Pope Adams — Yea
Kimberly Pope Adams — Nay
Lamont Bagby — Yea
Lashrecse D. Aird — Yea
Luke E. Torian — Yea
M. Keith Hodges — Nay
Marcia S. "Cia" Price — Yea
Marcus B. Simon — Yea
Mark D. Sickles — Yea
Michael J. Webert — Not Voting
Patrick A. Hope — Yea
Paul E. Krizek — Yea
R. Lee Ware — Nay
Richard C. "Rip" Sullivan, Jr. — Yea
Robert S. Bloxom, Jr. — Nay
Rodney T. Willett — Yea
Sam Rasoul — Yea
Schuyler T. VanValkenburg — Yea
Scott A. Wyatt — Nay
Shelly A. Simonds — Yea
Terry G. Kilgore — Nay
Terry L. Austin — Nay
Thomas C. Wright, Jr. — Nay
Tony O. Wilt — Not Voting
Vivian E. Watts — Yea
Wendell S. Walker — Nay
Will Davis — Not Voting

Official roll call →

Passed 13 Yea · 9 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 13900
Total 13900
% of votes cast 59%41%0%0%
How each member voted (22)
Member Party Vote
Plum, Kenneth R. — Yea
Gooditis, Wendy W. — Yea
Tyler, Roslyn C. — Yea
Keam, Mark L. — Yea
Hudson, Sally L. — Yea
Guy, Nancy D. — Yea
Marshall, Daniel W., III — Nay
Gilbert, C. Todd — Nay
Poindexter, Charles D. — Nay
Edmunds, James E., II — Nay
Ransone, Margaret B. — Nay
Alfonso H. Lopez — Yea
Dan I. Helmer — Yea
David L. Bulova — Yea
Joshua G. Cole — Yea
Kathy K.L. Tran — Yea
Michael J. Webert — Nay
R. Lee Ware — Nay
Robert S. Bloxom, Jr. — Nay
Rodney T. Willett — Yea
Shelly A. Simonds — Yea
Tony O. Wilt — Nay

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does HB 1329 do?
Chesapeake Bay Preservation Areas; local ordinances; penalties. Directs localities in Tidewater Virginia to incorporate certain penalties into their ordinances protecting the quality of state waters in Chesapeake Bay Preservation Areas.
Who sponsors HB 1329?
HB 1329 is sponsored by Kory, Kaye.
What is the current status of HB 1329?
This bill died with 2021 Regular Session. It reached “Passed House of Delegates” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track HB 1329?
Track HB 1329 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HB 1329

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HB 1329

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →