Chesapeake Bay Preservation Areas; local governments to designate Areas, etc.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HB 1329 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HB 1329.
You're tracking HB 1329
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HB 1329 — Chesapeake Bay Preservation Areas; local governments to designate Areas, etc.
Last action — Left in Agriculture, Conservation and Natural Resources
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed House of Delegates
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2021 Regular Session. It reached “Passed House of Delegates” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Chesapeake Bay Preservation Areas; local ordinances; penalties. Directs localities in Tidewater Virginia to incorporate certain penalties into their ordinances protecting the quality of state waters in Chesapeake Bay Preservation Areas.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
109 added · 82 removedPlain-language change summary
The latest version of Bill HB 1329 has shifted some responsibilities from the state to local governments regarding the Chesapeake Bay Preservation Areas. Specifically, it now requires counties, cities, and towns in Tidewater Virginia to designate these areas and include water quality protections in their local plans within one year of new criteria being adopted. This change is important because it empowers local governments to take initiative in environmental protection, ensuring that the quality of state waters is more effectively managed at the community level.
SESSION history | hilite | pdf | print version 20104205D20106882D HOUSE BILL NO.
1329 OfferedAMENDMENT JanuaryIN 8,THE 2020NATURE PrefiledOF A SUBSTITUTE (Proposed by the House Committee on Agriculture, Chesapeake and Natural Resources on January 8,29, 20202020) (Patron Prior to Substitute--Delegate Kory) A BILL to amend and reenact § 62.1-44.15:7262.1-44.15:74 of the Code of Virginia, relating to Chesapeake Bay;
---------- Patron-- Kory ---------- Referred to Committee on Agriculture, Chesapeake and Natural Resources ---------- Be it enacted by the General Assembly of Virginia:
That § 62.1-44.15:7262.1-44.15:74 of the Code of Virginia is amended and reenacted as follows:
§ 62.1-44.15:72.62.1-44.15:74.
BoardLocal governments to developdesignate criteria.Chesapeake Bay Preservation Areas;
incorporate into local plans and ordinances;
impose civil penalties.
InCounties, order to implement the provisions of this article and to assist counties, cities, and towns in regulatingTidewater theVirginia shall use and development of land and in protecting the qualitycriteria ofdeveloped stateby waters, the Board shall promulgate regulations that establish criteria for use by local governments to determine the ecological and geographic extent of the Chesapeake Bay Preservation Areas.Area within their jurisdictions.
TheDesignation Boardof shallChesapeake alsoBay promulgatePreservation regulationsAreas thatshall establishbe criteriaaccomplished for use by localevery governmentscounty, incity, granting,and denying,town orin modifyingTidewater requestsVirginia tonot rezone,later subdivide,than or12 usemonths andafter developadoption landof incriteria theseby areas.the Board.
InCounties, developingcities, and amendingtowns thein criteria,Tidewater theVirginia Board shall considerincorporate allprotection factorsof relevant to the protectionquality of waterstate qualitywaters frominto significanteach degradationlocality's ascomprehensive aplan resultconsistent ofwith the useprovisions and development of land.this article.
The criteria shall incorporate measures such as performance standards, best management practices, and various planning and zoning concepts to protect the quality of state waters while allowing use and development of land consistent with the provisions of this chapter.
The criteria adopted by the Board, operating in conjunction with other state water quality programs, shall encourage and promote (i) protection of existing high quality state waters and restoration of all other state waters to a condition or quality that will permit all reasonable public uses and will support the propagation and growth of all aquatic life, including game fish, which might reasonably be expected to inhabit them;
(ii) safeguarding the clean waters of the Commonwealth from pollution;
(iii) prevention of any increase in pollution;
(iv) reduction of existing pollution;
and (v) promotion of water resource conservation in order to provide for the health, safety, and welfare of the present and future citizens of the Commonwealth.
PriorAll tocounties, thecities, developmentand ortowns amendmentin ofTidewater criteria,Virginia the Board shall givehave duezoning considerationordinances to,that amongincorporate othermeasures things,to protect the economicquality andof socialstate costswaters andin benefitsthe whichChesapeake canBay reasonablyPreservation beAreas expectedconsistent towith obtain as a result of the adoptionprovisions or amendment of thethis criteria.article.
Zoning in Chesapeake Bay Preservation Areas shall comply with all criteria set forth in or established pursuant to § 62.1-44.15:72.
InCounties, developingcities, suchand criteriatowns thein BoardTidewater mayVirginia consultshall withincorporate andprotection obtainof the commentsquality of anystate federal,waters state,in regional,Chesapeake orBay localPreservation agencyAreas thatinto hastheir jurisdictionsubdivision byordinances lawconsistent or special expertise with respect to the useprovisions and development of landthis orarticle. the protection of water.
TheCounties, Boardcities, and towns in Tidewater Virginia shall giveensure duethat considerationall subdivisions developed pursuant to thetheir commentssubdivision submittedordinances bycomply suchwith federal,all state,criteria regional,developed orby localthe agencies.Board.
In(Contingent developingexpiration suchdate) criteria,In theaddition Boardto shall provide that any localityother inremedies awhich Chesapeake Bay Preservation Area that allowsmay thebe ownerobtained ofunder anany on-sitelocal sewageordinance treatmentenacted system not requiring a Virginia Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit to submitprotect documentationthe inquality lieu of proofstate ofwaters septicin tankChesapeake pump-outBay shallPreservation requireAreas, suchcounties, ownercities, toand havetowns suchin documentationTidewater certifiedVirginia bymay anshall operatorincorporate orthe on-sitefollowing soilpenalties evaluatorinto licensedtheir orzoning, certifiedsubdivision, under Chapter 23 (§ 54.1-2300 et seq.) of Title 54.1 as being qualified to operate, maintain, or designother on-siteordinances: sewage systems.
1.
Any person who (i) violates any provision of any such ordinance or (ii) violates or fails, neglects, or refuses to obey any local governmental body's or official's final notice, order, rule, regulation, or variance or permit condition authorized under such ordinance shall, upon such finding by an appropriate circuit court, be assessed a civil penalty not to exceed $5,000 for each day of violation.
Such civil penalties may, at the discretion of the court assessing them, be directed to be paid into the treasury of the county, city, or town in which the violation occurred for the purpose of abating environmental damage to or restoring Chesapeake Bay Preservation Areas therein, in such a manner as the court may direct by order, except that where the violator is the county, city, or town itself, or its agent, the court shall direct the penalty to be paid into the state treasury.
2.
With the consent of any person who (i) violates any provision of any local ordinance related to the protection of water quality in Chesapeake Bay Preservation Areas or (ii) violates or fails, neglects, or refuses to obey any local governmental body's or official's notice, order, rule, regulation, or variance or permit condition authorized under such ordinance, the local government may provide for the issuance of an order against such person for the one-time payment of civil charges for each violation in specific sums, not to exceed $10,000 for each violation.
Such civil charges shall be paid into the treasury of the county, city, or town in which the violation occurred for the purpose of abating environmental damage to or restoring Chesapeake Bay Preservation Areas therein, except that where the violator is the county, city, or town itself, or its agent, the civil charges shall be paid into the state treasury.
Civil charges shall be in lieu of any appropriate civil penalty that could be imposed under subdivision 1.
Civil charges may be in addition to the cost of any restoration required or ordered by the local governmental body or official.
E.
(Contingent effective date) In addition to any other remedies which that may be obtained under any local ordinance enacted to protect the quality of state waters in Chesapeake Bay Preservation Areas, counties, cities, and towns in Tidewater Virginia may shall incorporate the following penalties into their zoning, subdivision, or other ordinances:
1.
Any person who (i) violates any provision of any such ordinance or (ii) violates or fails, neglects, or refuses to obey any local governmental body's or official's final notice, order, rule, regulation, or variance or permit condition authorized under such ordinance shall, upon such finding by an appropriate circuit court, be assessed a civil penalty not to exceed $5,000 for each day of violation.
Such civil penalties may, at the discretion of the court assessing them, be directed to be paid into the treasury of the county, city, or town in which the violation occurred for the purpose of abating environmental damage to or restoring Chesapeake Bay Preservation Areas therein, in such a manner as the court may direct by order, except that where the violator is the county, city, or town itself, or its agent, the court shall direct the penalty to be paid into the state treasury and deposited by the State Treasurer into the Stormwater Local Assistance Fund established by § 62.1-44.15:29.1.
2.
With the consent of any person who (i) violates any provision of any local ordinance related to the protection of water quality in Chesapeake Bay Preservation Areas or (ii) violates or fails, neglects, or refuses to obey any local governmental body's or official's notice, order, rule, regulation, or variance or permit condition authorized under such ordinance, the local government may provide for the issuance of an order against such person for the one-time payment of civil charges for each violation in specific sums, not to exceed $10,000 for each violation.
Such civil charges shall be paid into the treasury of the county, city, or town in which the violation occurred for the purpose of abating environmental damage to or restoring Chesapeake Bay Preservation Areas therein, except that where the violator is the county, city, or town itself, or its agent, the civil charges shall be paid into the state treasury and deposited by the State Treasurer into the Stormwater Local Assistance Fund established by § 62.1-44.15:29.1.
Civil charges shall be in lieu of any appropriate civil penalty that could be imposed under subdivision 1.
Civil charges may be in addition to the cost of any restoration required or ordered by the local governmental body or official.
Show all 50 changed lines (10 more)
InLocalities developingthat suchare criteria,subject to the Boardprovisions shallof notthis requirearticle themay designationby ofordinance aadopt Resourcean Protectionappeal Areaperiod (RPA)for asany definedperson accordingaggrieved toby thea criteriadecision developedof a board that has been established by the Board,locality adjacent to ahear daylightedcases stream.regarding ordinances adopted pursuant to this article.
However,The aordinance localityshall thatallow electsthe notaggrieved toparty designate an RPA adjacent to a daylightedminimum streamof shall30 usedays afrom waterthe qualitydate impactof assessmentsuch todecision ensure that proposed development on properties adjacent to theappeal daylighted stream does not result in the degradationdecision ofto the stream.circuit court.
The water quality impact assessment shall (i) be consistent with the Board's criteria for water quality assessments in RPAs, (ii) identify the impacts of the proposed development on water quality, and (iii) determine specific measures for the mitigation of those impacts.
The objective of this assessment is to ensure that practices on properties adjacent to daylighted streams are effective in retarding runoff, preventing erosion, and filtering nonpoint source pollution.
The specific content for the water quality impact assessment shall be established and implemented by any locality that chooses not to designate an RPA adjacent to a daylighted stream.
Nothing in this subsection shall limit a locality's authority to include a daylighted stream within the extent of an RPA.
G.
In developing such criteria, the Board shall require that any local ordinance addressing permitted modifications of the buffer area include specific penalties for the removal of trees from an RPA without the prior approval of such locality.
H.
Effective July 1, 2014, requirements promulgated under this article directly related to compliance with the erosion and sediment control and stormwater management provisions of this chapter and regulated under the authority of those provisions shall cease to have effect.
Show all 50 changed rows (10 more)
View plain text versions (2)
- Committee Substitute Committee substitute printed 20106882D-H1 Current html January 29, 2020
- Prefiled Prefiled and ordered printed; offered 01/08/20 20104205D html January 08, 2020
Action History
-
Left in Agriculture, Conservation and Natural Resources
-
Continued to 2021 in Agriculture, Conservation and Natural Resources (15-Y 0-N)
-
Impact statement from DPB (HB1329H1)
-
Referred to Committee on Agriculture, Conservation and Natural Resources
-
Constitutional reading dispensed
-
VOTE: Passage (55-Y 42-N)
-
Read third time and passed House (55-Y 42-N)
-
Engrossed by House - committee substitute HB1329H1
-
Committee substitute agreed to 20106882D-H1
-
Read second time
-
Passed by for the day
-
Read first time
-
Committee substitute printed 20106882D-H1
-
Reported from Agriculture, Chesapeake and Natural Resources with substitute (13-Y 9-N)
-
Subcommittee recommends reporting with substitute (5-Y 3-N)
-
House committee, floor amendments and substitutes offered
-
Impact statement from DPB (HB1329)
-
Assigned ACNR sub: Chesapeake
-
Referred to Committee on Agriculture, Chesapeake and Natural Resources
-
Prefiled and ordered printed; offered 01/08/20 20104205D
Sponsors
- Kaye Kory · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 147 not signed on · 20 voted No
Sponsors (1)
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (147)
147 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 147 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (15)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Petersen, J. Chapman | — | Yea |
| Lewis, Lynwood W., Jr. | — | Yea |
| Hanger, Emmett W., Jr. | — | Yea |
| Mason, T. Montgomery "Monty" | — | Yea |
| Ruff, Frank M., Jr. | — | Yea |
| McClellan, Jennifer L. | — | Yea |
| Morrissey, Joseph D. | — | Yea |
| Barbara A. Favola | — | Yea |
| David R. Suetterlein | — | Yea |
| David W. Marsden | — | Yea |
| Ghazala F. Hashmi | — | Yea |
| Mark D. Obenshain | — | Yea |
| Richard H. Stuart | — | Yea |
| Todd E. Pillion | — | Yea |
| William M. Stanley, Jr. | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 52 | 41 | 0 | 3 |
| Total | 52 | 41 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 54% | 43% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (96)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Tyler, Roslyn C. | — | Yea |
| Wampler, William C., III | — | Nay |
| Avoli, G. "John" | — | Nay |
| Ayala, Hala S. | — | Yea |
| Batten, Amanda E. | — | Nay |
| Bell, Robert B. | — | Nay |
| Bourne, Jeffrey M. | — | Yea |
| Brewer, Emily M. | — | Nay |
| Byron, Kathy J. | — | Nay |
| Campbell, Jeffrey L. | — | Nay |
| Campbell, Ronnie R. | — | Nay |
| Carter, Lee J. | — | Yea |
| Cole, Mark L. | — | Nay |
| Cox, M. Kirkland | — | Nay |
| Coyner, Carrie E. | — | Nay |
| Edmunds, James E., II | — | Nay |
| Fariss, C. Matthew | — | Nay |
| Freitas, Nicholas J. | — | Nay |
| Gilbert, C. Todd | — | Nay |
| Gooditis, Wendy W. | — | Yea |
| Guy, Nancy D. | — | Yea |
| Heretick, Steve E. | — | Yea |
| Hudson, Sally L. | — | Yea |
| Hurst, Chris L. | — | Yea |
| Jenkins, Clinton L. | — | Yea |
| Jones, Jerrauld C. "Jay" | — | Yea |
| Keam, Mark L. | — | Yea |
| Kory, Kaye | — | Yea |
| LaRock, Dave A. | — | Nay |
| Levine, Mark H. | — | Yea |
| Marshall, Daniel W., III | — | Nay |
| Miyares, Jason S. | — | Nay |
| Mugler, Martha M. | — | Yea |
| Mullin, Michael P. | — | Yea |
| Murphy, Kathleen | — | Yea |
| Orrock, Robert D., Sr. | — | Nay |
| Plum, Kenneth R. | — | Yea |
| Poindexter, Charles D. | — | Nay |
| Ransone, Margaret B. | — | Nay |
| Robinson, Roxann L. | — | Nay |
| Rush, Nick | — | Nay |
| Samirah, Ibraheem S. | — | Yea |
| Subramanyam, Suhas | — | Yea |
| Alex Q. Askew | — | Yea |
| Alfonso H. Lopez | — | Yea |
| Barry D. Knight | — | Nay |
| Betsy B. Carr | — | Yea |
| C.E. Cliff Hayes, Jr. | — | Yea |
| Charniele L. Herring | — | Yea |
| Chris S. Runion | — | Nay |
| Christopher T. Head | — | Nay |
| Dan I. Helmer | — | Yea |
| Danica A. Roem | — | Yea |
| David A. Reid | — | Yea |
| David L. Bulova | — | Yea |
| Delores L. McQuinn | — | Yea |
| Don Scott | — | Yea |
| Elizabeth R. Guzman | — | Yea |
| Garrett McGuire | — | Nay |
| Hyland F. "Buddy" Fowler, Jr. | — | Nay |
| Israel D. O'Quinn | — | Nay |
| James A. "Jay" Leftwich | — | Nay |
| James W. Morefield | — | Nay |
| Jeion A. Ward | — | Yea |
| Joseph P. McNamara | — | Nay |
| Joshua G. Cole | — | Yea |
| Karrie K. Delaney | — | Yea |
| Kathy K.L. Tran | — | Yea |
| Kelly K. Convirs-Fowler | — | Yea |
| Kimberly Pope Adams | — | Yea |
| Kimberly Pope Adams | — | Nay |
| Lamont Bagby | — | Yea |
| Lashrecse D. Aird | — | Yea |
| Luke E. Torian | — | Yea |
| M. Keith Hodges | — | Nay |
| Marcia S. "Cia" Price | — | Yea |
| Marcus B. Simon | — | Yea |
| Mark D. Sickles | — | Yea |
| Michael J. Webert | — | Not Voting |
| Patrick A. Hope | — | Yea |
| Paul E. Krizek | — | Yea |
| R. Lee Ware | — | Nay |
| Richard C. "Rip" Sullivan, Jr. | — | Yea |
| Robert S. Bloxom, Jr. | — | Nay |
| Rodney T. Willett | — | Yea |
| Sam Rasoul | — | Yea |
| Schuyler T. VanValkenburg | — | Yea |
| Scott A. Wyatt | — | Nay |
| Shelly A. Simonds | — | Yea |
| Terry G. Kilgore | — | Nay |
| Terry L. Austin | — | Nay |
| Thomas C. Wright, Jr. | — | Nay |
| Tony O. Wilt | — | Not Voting |
| Vivian E. Watts | — | Yea |
| Wendell S. Walker | — | Nay |
| Will Davis | — | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 13 | 9 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 13 | 9 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 59% | 41% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (22)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Plum, Kenneth R. | — | Yea |
| Gooditis, Wendy W. | — | Yea |
| Tyler, Roslyn C. | — | Yea |
| Keam, Mark L. | — | Yea |
| Hudson, Sally L. | — | Yea |
| Guy, Nancy D. | — | Yea |
| Marshall, Daniel W., III | — | Nay |
| Gilbert, C. Todd | — | Nay |
| Poindexter, Charles D. | — | Nay |
| Edmunds, James E., II | — | Nay |
| Ransone, Margaret B. | — | Nay |
| Alfonso H. Lopez | — | Yea |
| Dan I. Helmer | — | Yea |
| David L. Bulova | — | Yea |
| Joshua G. Cole | — | Yea |
| Kathy K.L. Tran | — | Yea |
| Michael J. Webert | — | Nay |
| R. Lee Ware | — | Nay |
| Robert S. Bloxom, Jr. | — | Nay |
| Rodney T. Willett | — | Yea |
| Shelly A. Simonds | — | Yea |
| Tony O. Wilt | — | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 5 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 56% | 33% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Guy, Nancy D. | — | Yea |
| Gilbert, C. Todd | — | Nay |
| Ransone, Margaret B. | — | Nay |
| Plum, Kenneth R. | — | Not Voting |
| Alfonso H. Lopez | — | Yea |
| Dan I. Helmer | — | Yea |
| David L. Bulova | — | Yea |
| Robert S. Bloxom, Jr. | — | Nay |
| Shelly A. Simonds | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HB 1329 do?
- Chesapeake Bay Preservation Areas; local ordinances; penalties. Directs localities in Tidewater Virginia to incorporate certain penalties into their ordinances protecting the quality of state waters in Chesapeake Bay Preservation Areas.
- Who sponsors HB 1329?
- HB 1329 is sponsored by Kory, Kaye.
- What is the current status of HB 1329?
- This bill died with 2021 Regular Session. It reached “Passed House of Delegates” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track HB 1329?
- Track HB 1329 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 1329
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 1329
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →