Washington 2023-2024 Regular Session Status: Enacted 1 D cosponsors

SB 5589 — Concerning probate.

Last action — Effective date 8/1/2024.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed House
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 27, 2023. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 72% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 D).

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 3 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

380 added · 383 removed

Plain-language change summary

The updated version of SB 5589 has made some key adjustments in the text. Specifically, it has removed references to certain sections of the law (RCW 11.54.070 and RCW 11.54.080) and updated the citation numbers within the bill. These changes clarify the legal framework around property exemptions after someone's death, which is important for ensuring creditors are fairly treated while also protecting surviving spouses or partners from losing their homes or significant assets. Overall, these modifications aim to streamline the legal process for estates and provide clearer guidance on how property is managed after a person's passing.

→
Previous
Latest
ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 5589 State of Washington 68th Legislature 2023 Regular Session By Senate Law & Justice (originally sponsored by Senator Stanford) READ FIRST TIME 02/17/23.
S-0101.3 SENATE BILL 5589 State of Washington 68th Legislature 2023 Regular Session By Senator Stanford AN ACT Relating to probate;
AN ACT Relating to probate;
recodifying RCW 11.54.030;
1 ESSB 5589 NEW SECTION.
1 SB 5589 NEW SECTION.
(1) Any homestead or other property exempt from attachment, execution, and forced sale under Title 6 RCW immediately before a decedent's death remains exempt from attachment, execution, and forced sale for the debts of the decedent and the debts of the community composed of the decedent and the decedent's spouse or registered domestic partner that arose before the decedent's death, up to the amount specified in RCW 11.54.020(1), except as otherwise provided in Title 6 RCW or in this chapter.
(1) Any homestead or other property exempt from attachment, execution, and forced sale under Title 6 RCW immediately before a decedent's death remains exempt from attachment, execution, and forced sale for the debts of the decedent and the debts of the community composed of the decedent and the decedent's spouse or registered domestic partner that arose before the decedent's death, up to the amount specified in RCW 11.54.030(1), except as otherwise provided in Title 6 RCW or in this chapter.
(2) If the decedent resided or was domiciled in the state of Washington when the decedent died, and either:
(2)(a) If:
(a) No homestead or other property was exempt from attachment, execution, and forced sale under Title 6 RCW immediately before the decedent's death;
(i) The decedent resided or was domiciled in the state of Washington when the decedent died;
or p.
and (ii) Either:
2 ESSB 5589 (b) The total value of the property exempted from the claims of creditors under subsection (1) of this section or under the laws of another state (together with the value of any separate property of the decedent's surviving spouse or surviving registered domestic partner that is exempt from attachment, execution, and forced sale for the debts of the decedent's surviving spouse or surviving registered domestic partner) is less than the amount specified in RCW 11.54.020(1)(b);
p.
then the court shall designate other property of the estate, either community or separate, that, when added to the value of:
2 SB 5589 (A) No homestead or other property was exempt from attachment, execution, and forced sale under Title 6 RCW immediately before the decedent's death;
or (B) The total value of the property exempted from the claims of creditors under subsection (1) of this section or under the laws of another state (together with the value of any separate property of the decedent's surviving spouse or surviving registered domestic partner that is exempt from attachment, execution, and forced sale for the debts of the decedent's surviving spouse or surviving registered domestic partner) is less than the amount specified in RCW 11.54.030(1)(b);
(b) Then the court shall designate other property of the estate, either community or separate, that, when added to the value of:
(a) Set forth facts to establish that the claimant is entitled to an award under this chapter;
3 ESSB 5589 (b) State the nature and value of those assets held by all potential claimants that are exempt from the claims of creditors and that are known to the claimant or could be known to the claimant with reasonable diligence;
3 SB 5589 (a) Set forth facts to establish that the claimant is entitled to an award under this chapter;
and (c) Describe all other assets then held by the claimants, including any interest the claimants may have in any of the decedent's probate or nonprobate property.
(b) State the nature and value of those assets held by all potential claimants that are exempt from the claims of creditors and that are known to the claimant or could be known to the claimant with reasonable diligence;
and (c) Describe the nonexempt assets then held by the claimants, including any interest the claimants may have in any of the decedent's probate or nonprobate property.
or (ii) A notice agent has filed a declaration and oath as required in RCW 11.42.010(3)(a)(ii);
4 ESSB 5589 (b) The termination of any probate proceeding for the decedent's estate that has been commenced in the state of Washington;
4 SB 5589 (ii) A notice agent has filed a declaration and oath as required in RCW 11.42.010(3)(a)(ii);
or (c) Six years from the date of the death of the decedent)) under this title relating to the decedent's probate or nonprobate assets.
or (b) The termination of any probate proceeding for the decedent's estate that has been commenced in the state of Washington;
or (c) Six years from the date of the death of the decedent)) under this title.
(a) The value, as of the date of the decedent's death, of the decedent's property, or if the decedent is married or has a registered domestic partner, the value of the community property of the decedent and the decedent's spouse or registered domestic partner, that was exempt from attachment, execution, or forced sale under Title 6 RCW immediately before the decedent's death;
(a) The value, as of the date of the decedent's death, of the decedent's property, or if the decedent is married or has a registered domestic partner, the value of the community property of the decedent and the decedent's spouse or registered domestic p.
or p.
5 SB 5589 partner, that was exempt from attachment, execution, or forced sale under Title 6 RCW immediately before the decedent's death;
5 ESSB 5589 (b) The amount specified in RCW 6.13.030(1)(a) or, if greater, the amount specified in subsection (3) of this section, on the date of the decedent's death.
or (b) The amount specified in RCW 6.13.030(1)(a) or, if greater, the amount specified in subsection (3) of this section, on the date of the decedent's death.
(3) For 2024 and each calendar year thereafter, the amount of the basic award shall not be less than an amount that is calculated as follows:
(3) For 2023 and each calendar year thereafter, the amount of the basic award shall not be less than an amount that is calculated as follows:
In the event the bureau of labor statistics discontinues the use and publication of applicable averages, then the consumer price index to be used for the computation of the inflation factor shall be the consumer price average that was last published before the event that caused the inflation factor to be applied.
In the event the bureau of labor statistics discontinues the use and publication of bimonthly averages, then the consumer price index to be used for the computation of the inflation factor shall be the consumer price average that was last published before the event that caused the inflation factor to be applied, whether bimonthly, quarterly, semiannually, or annually.
Sec.
p.
6 SB 5589 Sec.
(1) If ((it is demonstrated)) a claimant demonstrates to the satisfaction of the court ((with clear, cogent, and convincing p.
(1) If ((it is demonstrated)) a claimant demonstrates to the satisfaction of the court ((with clear, cogent, and convincing evidence)) that a claimant's present and reasonably anticipated future needs ((during the pendency of any probate proceedings in the state of Washington)) with respect to basic maintenance and support during the pendency of any proceedings under this title will not ((otherwise)) be provided ((for)) from other resources((,)) and that ((the)) an increased award would not be inconsistent with the decedent's intentions or principles of equity and fairness, the amount of the award may be increased above the amount of the basic award in an amount that the court determines to be ((appropriate)) needed for a claimant's present and reasonably anticipated future needs with respect to basic maintenance and support during the pendency of any proceedings under this title.
6 ESSB 5589 evidence)) that a claimant's present and reasonably anticipated future needs ((during the pendency of any probate proceedings in the state of Washington)) with respect to basic maintenance and support during the pendency of any proceedings under this title relating to the decedent's probate or nonprobate assets will not ((otherwise)) be provided ((for)) from other resources((,)) and that ((the)) an increased award would not be inconsistent with the decedent's intentions or principles of equity and fairness, the amount of the award may be increased above the amount of the basic award in an amount that the court determines to be ((appropriate)) needed for a claimant's present and reasonably anticipated future needs with respect to basic maintenance and support during the pendency of any proceedings under this title relating to the decedent's probate or nonprobate assets.
(2) In determining the needs of the claimant, the court shall consider, without limitation, the resources available to the claimant and the claimant's ((dependents)) dependent children, and the resources reasonably expected to be available to the claimant and the claimant's ((dependents)) dependent children during the pendency of ((the probate)) any proceedings under this title, including income related to present or future employment and benefits flowing from the decedent's probate and nonprobate estate.
(2) In determining the needs of the claimant, the court shall consider, without limitation, the resources available to the claimant and the claimant's ((dependents)) dependent children, and the resources reasonably expected to be available to the claimant and the claimant's ((dependents)) dependent children during the pendency of ((the probate)) any proceedings under this title relating to the decedent's probate or nonprobate assets, including income related to present or future employment and benefits flowing from the decedent's probate and nonprobate estate.
and (f) Oral or written statements made by the decedent that are otherwise admissible as evidence.
and p.
p.
7 SB 5589 (f) Oral or written statements made by the decedent that are otherwise admissible as evidence.
7 ESSB 5589 The fact that the decedent has named beneficiaries other than the claimant as recipients of the decedent's estate is not of itself adequate to evidence such an intent as would prevent the award of an amount in excess of the basic award that is provided ((for)) in RCW ((6.13.030(2) with respect to lands)) 11.54.020(1).
The fact that the decedent has named beneficiaries other than the claimant as recipients of the decedent's estate is not of itself adequate to evidence such an intent as would prevent the award of an amount in excess of the basic award that is provided ((for)) in RCW ((6.13.030(2) with respect to lands)) 11.54.020(1).
or (2)(a) The decedent is survived by one or more dependent children who are not the children of the surviving spouse or surviving registered domestic partner and the award would decrease amounts otherwise distributable to ((such)) those children;
(2)(a) The decedent is survived by one or more dependent children who are not the children of the surviving spouse or surviving registered domestic partner and the award would decrease amounts otherwise distributable to ((such)) those children;
or (b) the award would have the effect of reducing amounts otherwise distributable to any of the decedent's ((minor)) dependent children.
or (b) the award would have the effect of reducing amounts otherwise distributable to p.
In either ((case)) of the cases specified in this subsection (2), the court p.
8 SB 5589 any of the decedent's ((minor)) dependent children.
8 ESSB 5589 ((shall)) must consider the factors presented in RCW 11.54.040 (2) and (3) and section 9 of this act and whether the needs of the ((minor)) dependent children with respect to basic maintenance and support are and will be adequately provided for, both during and after ((the pendency of)) any ((probate)) proceedings ((if such proceedings are pending)) under this title relating to the decedent's probate or nonprobate assets, considering support from any source, including support from the decedent's surviving spouse or surviving registered domestic partner.
In either ((case)) of the cases specified in this subsection (2)(b), the court ((shall)) must consider the factors presented in RCW 11.54.040 (2) and (3) and section 9 of this act and whether the needs of the ((minor)) dependent children with respect to basic maintenance and support are and will be adequately provided for, both during and after the pendency of any ((probate)) proceedings under this title if such proceedings are pending, considering support from any source, including support from the decedent's surviving spouse or surviving registered domestic partner.
Sec.
p.
9 SB 5589 Sec.
p.
(((1) The award has priority over all other claims made in the estate.
Show all 54 changed rows (14 more)
Previous
Latest
9 ESSB 5589 (((1) The award has priority over all other claims made in the estate.
Sec.
p.
10 SB 5589 Sec.
p.
((After payment of costs of administration)) Subject to federal preemption and the privileges and priorities allowed to encumbrances and liens under applicable law, the reasonable expenses of administration and the enforceable debts of the estate shall be paid in the following order:
10 ESSB 5589 ((After payment of costs of administration)) Subject to federal preemption and the privileges and priorities allowed to encumbrances and liens under applicable law, the reasonable expenses of administration and the enforceable debts of the estate shall be paid in the following order:
This act takes effect August 1, 2024.
This act takes effect August 1, 2023.
(2) When a right is acquired, extinguished, or barred upon the expiration of a prescribed period of time which has commenced to run by the provisions of any statute in force before the effective date of this section, those provisions shall remain in force and be deemed a part of this act with respect to that right.
(2) When a right is acquired, extinguished, or barred upon the expiration of a prescribed period of time which has commenced to run by the provisions of any statute in force before the effective date p.
p.
11 SB 5589 of this section, those provisions shall remain in force and be deemed a part of this act with respect to that right.
11 ESSB 5589 (3) The procedures in effect before the effective date of this section shall apply to any proceeding to the extent that in the opinion of the court the application of the procedures under this act would not be feasible or would work injustice.
(3) The procedures in effect before the effective date of this section shall apply to any proceeding to the extent that in the opinion of the court the application of the procedures under this act would not be feasible or would work injustice.
RCW 11.54.030 is recodified as a section in chapter 11.54 RCW, to be codified between RCW 11.54.010 and 11.54.020.
NEW SECTION.
Sec.
17.
12 ESSB 5589
12 SB 5589
View plain text versions (4)

Action History

  1. Effective date 8/1/2024.

  2. Chapter 20, 2024 Laws.

  3. Governor signed.

  4. Delivered to Governor.

  5. Speaker signed.

  6. President signed.

  7. Third reading, passed; yeas, 93; nays, 2; absent, 0; excused, 3.

  8. Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.

  9. Rules Committee relieved of further consideration. Placed on second reading.

  10. Referred to Rules 2 Review.

  11. Minority; without recommendation.

  12. CRJ - Majority; do pass.

  13. Executive action taken in the House Committee on Civil Rights & Judiciary at 10:30 AM.

  14. Public hearing in the House Committee on Civil Rights & Judiciary at 10:30 AM.

  15. First reading, referred to Civil Rights & Judiciary.

  16. Third reading, passed; yeas, 48; nays, 0; absent, 0; excused, 1.

  17. Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.

  18. Floor amendment(s) adopted.

  19. Returned to second reading for amendment.

  20. Rules suspended.

  21. Placed on third reading by Rules Committee.

  22. By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.

  23. By resolution, returned to Senate Rules Committee for third reading.

  24. Referred to Rules 2 Review.

  25. Minority; do not pass.

  26. CRJ - Majority; do pass.

  27. Executive action taken in the House Committee on Civil Rights & Judiciary at 10:30 AM.

  28. Executive session scheduled, but no action was taken in the House Committee on Civil Rights & Judiciary at 10:30 AM.

  29. Public hearing in the House Committee on Civil Rights & Judiciary at 8:00 AM.

  30. First reading, referred to Civil Rights & Judiciary.

  31. Third reading, passed; yeas, 48; nays, 0; absent, 0; excused, 1.

  32. Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.

  33. 1st substitute bill substituted (LAW 23).

  34. Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.

  35. Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.

  36. Minority; without recommendation.

  37. LAW - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.

  38. Executive action taken in the Senate Committee on Law & Justice at 8:00 AM.

  39. Public hearing in the Senate Committee on Law & Justice at 10:30 AM.

  40. First reading, referred to Law & Justice.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 150 not signed on · 2 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (150)

150 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 150 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 93 Yea · 2 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 28200
Democrat 55002
Unaffiliated 10001
Total 93203
% of votes cast 95%2%0%3%
How each member voted (98)
Member Party Vote
Chambers — Yea
Chandler — Not Voting
Cheney — Yea
Chopp — Yea
Hutchins — Yea
Kretz — Yea
Maycumber — Yea
Mosbrucker — Yea
Robertson — Yea
Sandlin — Yea
Wilcox — Yea
Alex Ramel Democrat Yea
Alicia Rule Democrat Yea
Amy Walen Democrat Yea
April Berg Democrat Yea
Beth Doglio Democrat Yea
Bill Ramos Democrat Yea
Brandy Donaghy Democrat Yea
Chipalo Street Democrat Yea
Chris Stearns Democrat Yea
Cindy Ryu Democrat Yea
Clyde Shavers Democrat Yea
Dan Bronoske Democrat Yea
Darya Farivar Democrat Yea
Dave Paul Democrat Yea
David Hackney Democrat Yea
Davina Duerr Democrat Yea
Debra Entenman Democrat Yea
Debra Lekanoff Democrat Yea
Emily Alvarado Democrat Yea
Gerry Pollet Democrat Yea
Greg Nance Democrat Yea
Jake Fey Democrat Yea
Jamila Taylor Democrat Yea
Jessica Bateman Democrat Yea
Joe Fitzgibbon Democrat Yea
Joe Timmons Democrat Yea
Julia Reed Democrat Yea
Julio Cortes Democrat Yea
Kristine Reeves Democrat Not Voting
Larry Springer Democrat Yea
Lauren Davis Democrat Yea
Laurie Jinkins Democrat Yea
Lillian Ortiz-Self Democrat Yea
Lisa Callan Democrat Yea
Liz Berry Democrat Yea
Marcus Riccelli Democrat Yea
Mari Leavitt Democrat Yea
Mary Fosse Democrat Yea
Melanie Morgan Democrat Not Voting
Mia Gregerson Democrat Yea
Mike Chapman Democrat Yea
Monica Jurado Stonier Democrat Yea
My-Linh Thai Democrat Yea
Nicole Macri Democrat Yea
Roger Goodman Democrat Yea
Sharlett Mena Democrat Yea
Sharon Tomiko Santos Democrat Yea
Sharon Wylie Democrat Yea
Shelley Kloba Democrat Yea
Steve Bergquist Democrat Yea
Steve Tharinger Democrat Yea
Strom Peterson Democrat Yea
Tana Senn Democrat Yea
Tarra Simmons Democrat Yea
Timm Ormsby Democrat Yea
Tina Orwall Democrat Yea
Vandana Slatter Democrat Yea
Alex Ybarra Republican Yea
Andrew Barkis Republican Yea
April Connors Republican Yea
Carolyn Eslick Republican Yea
Chris Corry Republican Yea
Cyndy Jacobsen Republican Yea
Dan Griffey Republican Yea
Drew Stokesbary Republican Yea
Ed Orcutt Republican Yea
Jenny Graham Republican Yea
Jim Walsh Republican Nay
Joe Schmick Republican Yea
Joel McEntire Republican Nay
Keith Goehner Republican Yea
Kevin Waters Republican Yea
Leonard Christian Republican Yea
Mark Klicker Republican Yea
Mary Dye Republican Yea
Michelle Valdez Republican Yea
Mike Steele Republican Yea
Mike Volz Republican Yea
Paul Harris Republican Yea
Peter Abbarno Republican Yea
Sam Low Republican Yea
Skyler Rude Republican Yea
Stephanie Barnard Republican Yea
Stephanie McClintock Republican Yea
Suzanne Schmidt Republican Yea
Tom Dent Republican Yea
Travis Couture Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 48 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 9001
Republican 16000
Democrat 23000
Total 48001
% of votes cast 98%0%0%2%
How each member voted (49)
Member Party Vote
Billig — Yea
Hawkins — Yea
Keiser — Yea
Kuderer — Yea
Mullet — Yea
Padden — Yea
Randall — Not Voting
Rivers — Yea
Van De Wege — Yea
Wilson, L. — Yea
Annette Cleveland Democrat Yea
Bob Hasegawa Democrat Yea
Claire Wilson Democrat Yea
Claudia Kauffman Democrat Yea
Derek Stanford Democrat Yea
Drew Hansen Democrat Yea
Jamie Pedersen Democrat Yea
Javier Valdez Democrat Yea
Jesse Salomon Democrat Yea
Joe Nguyen Democrat Yea
John Lovick Democrat Yea
June Robinson Democrat Yea
Lisa Wellman Democrat Yea
Liz Lovelett Democrat Yea
Manka Dhingra Democrat Yea
Marko Liias Democrat Yea
Noel Frame Democrat Yea
Rebecca Saldaña Democrat Yea
Sharon Shewmake Democrat Yea
Steve Conway Democrat Yea
T'wina Nobles Democrat Yea
Victoria Hunt Democrat Yea
Yasmin Trudeau Democrat Yea
Chris Gildon Republican Yea
Curtis King Republican Yea
Drew MacEwen Republican Yea
Jeff Holy Republican Yea
Jeff Wilson Republican Yea
Jim McCune Republican Yea
John Braun Republican Yea
Judy Warnick Republican Yea
Keith Wagoner Republican Yea
Mark Schoesler Republican Yea
Matt Boehnke Republican Yea
Nikki Torres Republican Yea
Perry Dozier Republican Yea
Phil Fortunato Republican Yea
Ron Muzzall Republican Yea
Shelly Short Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 48 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 11000
Republican 16000
Democrat 21001
Total 48001
% of votes cast 98%0%0%2%
How each member voted (49)
Member Party Vote
Billig — Yea
Hawkins — Yea
Keiser — Yea
Kuderer — Yea
Mullet — Yea
Padden — Yea
Randall — Yea
Rivers — Yea
Rolfes — Yea
Van De Wege — Yea
Wilson, L. — Yea
Annette Cleveland Democrat Yea
Bob Hasegawa Democrat Yea
Claire Wilson Democrat Yea
Claudia Kauffman Democrat Not Voting
Derek Stanford Democrat Yea
Jamie Pedersen Democrat Yea
Javier Valdez Democrat Yea
Jesse Salomon Democrat Yea
Joe Nguyen Democrat Yea
John Lovick Democrat Yea
June Robinson Democrat Yea
Lisa Wellman Democrat Yea
Liz Lovelett Democrat Yea
Manka Dhingra Democrat Yea
Marko Liias Democrat Yea
Noel Frame Democrat Yea
Rebecca Saldaña Democrat Yea
Sharon Shewmake Democrat Yea
Steve Conway Democrat Yea
T'wina Nobles Democrat Yea
Victoria Hunt Democrat Yea
Yasmin Trudeau Democrat Yea
Chris Gildon Republican Yea
Curtis King Republican Yea
Drew MacEwen Republican Yea
Jeff Holy Republican Yea
Jeff Wilson Republican Yea
Jim McCune Republican Yea
John Braun Republican Yea
Judy Warnick Republican Yea
Keith Wagoner Republican Yea
Mark Schoesler Republican Yea
Matt Boehnke Republican Yea
Nikki Torres Republican Yea
Perry Dozier Republican Yea
Phil Fortunato Republican Yea
Ron Muzzall Republican Yea
Shelly Short Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 5589?
SB 5589 is sponsored by Derek Stanford (Democrat).
What is the current status of SB 5589?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 27, 2023. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 5589?
Track SB 5589 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 5589

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 5589

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →