Concerning probate.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 5589 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 5589.
You're tracking SB 5589
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 5589 — Concerning probate.
Last action — Effective date 8/1/2024.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 27, 2023. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 D).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 3 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
380 added · 383 removedPlain-language change summary
The updated version of SB 5589 has made some key adjustments in the text. Specifically, it has removed references to certain sections of the law (RCW 11.54.070 and RCW 11.54.080) and updated the citation numbers within the bill. These changes clarify the legal framework around property exemptions after someone's death, which is important for ensuring creditors are fairly treated while also protecting surviving spouses or partners from losing their homes or significant assets. Overall, these modifications aim to streamline the legal process for estates and provide clearer guidance on how property is managed after a person's passing.
ENGROSSEDS-0101.3 SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 5589 State of Washington 68th Legislature 2023 Regular Session By Senate Law & Justice (originally sponsored by Senator Stanford)Stanford READAN FIRSTACT TIMERelating 02/17/23.to probate;
AN ACT Relating to probate;
recodifying RCW 11.54.030;
1 ESSBSB 5589 NEW SECTION.
(1) Any homestead or other property exempt from attachment, execution, and forced sale under Title 6 RCW immediately before a decedent's death remains exempt from attachment, execution, and forced sale for the debts of the decedent and the debts of the community composed of the decedent and the decedent's spouse or registered domestic partner that arose before the decedent's death, up to the amount specified in RCW 11.54.020(1),11.54.030(1), except as otherwise provided in Title 6 RCW or in this chapter.
(2)(2)(a) IfIf: the decedent resided or was domiciled in the state of Washington when the decedent died, and either:
(a)(i) NoThe homesteaddecedent resided or other property was exemptdomiciled fromin attachment,the execution,state andof forcedWashington salewhen under Title 6 RCW immediately before the decedent'sdecedent death;died;
orand p.(ii) Either:
2p. ESSB 5589 (b) The total value of the property exempted from the claims of creditors under subsection (1) of this section or under the laws of another state (together with the value of any separate property of the decedent's surviving spouse or surviving registered domestic partner that is exempt from attachment, execution, and forced sale for the debts of the decedent's surviving spouse or surviving registered domestic partner) is less than the amount specified in RCW 11.54.020(1)(b);
then2 theSB court5589 shall(A) designateNo homestead or other property ofwas theexempt estate,from eitherattachment, communityexecution, orand separate,forced that,sale whenunder addedTitle to6 RCW immediately before the valuedecedent's of:death;
or (B) The total value of the property exempted from the claims of creditors under subsection (1) of this section or under the laws of another state (together with the value of any separate property of the decedent's surviving spouse or surviving registered domestic partner that is exempt from attachment, execution, and forced sale for the debts of the decedent's surviving spouse or surviving registered domestic partner) is less than the amount specified in RCW 11.54.030(1)(b);
(b) Then the court shall designate other property of the estate, either community or separate, that, when added to the value of:
(a) Set forth facts to establish that the claimant is entitled to an award under this chapter;
3 ESSBSB 5589 (b)(a) StateSet theforth naturefacts andto valueestablish of those assets held by all potential claimants that are exempt from the claims of creditors and that are known to the claimant oris couldentitled be known to thean claimantaward withunder reasonablethis diligence;chapter;
and(b) (c)State Describethe allnature otherand assetsvalue thenof those assets held by theall claimants,potential includingclaimants anythat interestare exempt from the claimantsclaims mayof havecreditors inand anythat ofare theknown decedent'sto probatethe claimant or nonprobatecould property.be known to the claimant with reasonable diligence;
and (c) Describe the nonexempt assets then held by the claimants, including any interest the claimants may have in any of the decedent's probate or nonprobate property.
or (ii) A notice agent has filed a declaration and oath as required in RCW 11.42.010(3)(a)(ii);
4 ESSBSB 5589 (b)(ii) TheA terminationnotice ofagent anyhas probatefiled proceedinga fordeclaration theand decedent'soath estateas thatrequired has been commenced in theRCW state11.42.010(3)(a)(ii); of Washington;
or (c)(b) SixThe yearstermination from the date of theany deathprobate ofproceeding for the decedent))decedent's underestate thisthat titlehas relatingbeen tocommenced in the decedent'sstate probateof orWashington; nonprobate assets.
or (c) Six years from the date of the death of the decedent)) under this title.
(a) The value, as of the date of the decedent's death, of the decedent's property, or if the decedent is married or has a registered domestic partner, the value of the community property of the decedent and the decedent's spouse or registered domestic partner,p. that was exempt from attachment, execution, or forced sale under Title 6 RCW immediately before the decedent's death;
5 SB 5589 partner, that was exempt from attachment, execution, or p.forced sale under Title 6 RCW immediately before the decedent's death;
5or ESSB 5589 (b) The amount specified in RCW 6.13.030(1)(a) or, if greater, the amount specified in subsection (3) of this section, on the date of the decedent's death.
(3) For 20242023 and each calendar year thereafter, the amount of the basic award shall not be less than an amount that is calculated as follows:
In the event the bureau of labor statistics discontinues the use and publication of applicablebimonthly averages, then the consumer price index to be used for the computation of the inflation factor shall be the consumer price average that was last published before the event that caused the inflation factor to be applied.applied, whether bimonthly, quarterly, semiannually, or annually.
Sec.p.
6 SB 5589 Sec.
(1) If ((it is demonstrated)) a claimant demonstrates to the satisfaction of the court ((with clear, cogent, and convincing p.evidence)) that a claimant's present and reasonably anticipated future needs ((during the pendency of any probate proceedings in the state of Washington)) with respect to basic maintenance and support during the pendency of any proceedings under this title will not ((otherwise)) be provided ((for)) from other resources((,)) and that ((the)) an increased award would not be inconsistent with the decedent's intentions or principles of equity and fairness, the amount of the award may be increased above the amount of the basic award in an amount that the court determines to be ((appropriate)) needed for a claimant's present and reasonably anticipated future needs with respect to basic maintenance and support during the pendency of any proceedings under this title.
6(2) ESSBIn 5589determining evidence))the that a claimant's present and reasonably anticipated future needs ((duringof the pendencyclaimant, of any probate proceedings in the statecourt ofshall Washington))consider, withwithout respectlimitation, to basic maintenance and support during the pendencyresources ofavailable any proceedings under this title relating to the decedent'sclaimant probateand orthe nonprobateclaimant's assets((dependents)) willdependent notchildren, ((otherwise)) be provided ((for)) from other resources((,)) and thatthe ((the))resources anreasonably increasedexpected awardto would not be inconsistentavailable withto the decedent'sclaimant intentions or principles of equity and fairness, the amountclaimant's of((dependents)) thedependent awardchildren mayduring be increased above the amountpendency of the((the basicprobate)) awardany inproceedings anunder amountthis thattitle, theincluding courtincome determinesrelated to be ((appropriate)) needed for a claimant's present andor reasonably anticipated future needsemployment with respect to basic maintenance and supportbenefits duringflowing thefrom pendency of any proceedings under this title relating to the decedent's probate orand nonprobate assets.estate.
(2) In determining the needs of the claimant, the court shall consider, without limitation, the resources available to the claimant and the claimant's ((dependents)) dependent children, and the resources reasonably expected to be available to the claimant and the claimant's ((dependents)) dependent children during the pendency of ((the probate)) any proceedings under this title relating to the decedent's probate or nonprobate assets, including income related to present or future employment and benefits flowing from the decedent's probate and nonprobate estate.
and (f)p. Oral or written statements made by the decedent that are otherwise admissible as evidence.
p.7 SB 5589 (f) Oral or written statements made by the decedent that are otherwise admissible as evidence.
7 ESSB 5589 The fact that the decedent has named beneficiaries other than the claimant as recipients of the decedent's estate is not of itself adequate to evidence such an intent as would prevent the award of an amount in excess of the basic award that is provided ((for)) in RCW ((6.13.030(2) with respect to lands)) 11.54.020(1).
or (2)(a) The decedent is survived by one or more dependent children who are not the children of the surviving spouse or surviving registered domestic partner and the award would decrease amounts otherwise distributable to ((such)) those children;
or (b) the award would have the effect of reducing amounts otherwise distributable to anyp. of the decedent's ((minor)) dependent children.
In8 eitherSB ((case))5589 any of the casesdecedent's specified((minor)) independent thischildren. subsection (2), the court p.
8In ESSBeither 5589((case)) of the cases specified in this subsection (2)(b), the court ((shall)) must consider the factors presented in RCW 11.54.040 (2) and (3) and section 9 of this act and whether the needs of the ((minor)) dependent children with respect to basic maintenance and support are and will be adequately provided for, both during and after ((thethe pendency of))of any ((probate)) proceedings ((if such proceedings are pending)) under this title relatingif tosuch theproceedings decedent'sare probatepending, or nonprobate assets, considering support from any source, including support from the decedent's surviving spouse or surviving registered domestic partner.
Sec.p.
9 SB 5589 Sec.
p.(((1) The award has priority over all other claims made in the estate.
Show all 54 changed lines (14 more)
9 ESSB 5589 (((1) The award has priority over all other claims made in the estate.
Sec.p.
10 SB 5589 Sec.
p.((After payment of costs of administration)) Subject to federal preemption and the privileges and priorities allowed to encumbrances and liens under applicable law, the reasonable expenses of administration and the enforceable debts of the estate shall be paid in the following order:
10 ESSB 5589 ((After payment of costs of administration)) Subject to federal preemption and the privileges and priorities allowed to encumbrances and liens under applicable law, the reasonable expenses of administration and the enforceable debts of the estate shall be paid in the following order:
This act takes effect August 1, 2024.2023.
(2) When a right is acquired, extinguished, or barred upon the expiration of a prescribed period of time which has commenced to run by the provisions of any statute in force before the effective date ofp. this section, those provisions shall remain in force and be deemed a part of this act with respect to that right.
p.11 SB 5589 of this section, those provisions shall remain in force and be deemed a part of this act with respect to that right.
11 ESSB 5589 (3) The procedures in effect before the effective date of this section shall apply to any proceeding to the extent that in the opinion of the court the application of the procedures under this act would not be feasible or would work injustice.
RCW 11.54.030 is recodified as a section in chapter 11.54 RCW, to be codified between RCW 11.54.010 and 11.54.020.
NEW SECTION.
Sec.
17.
12 ESSBSB 5589
Show all 54 changed rows (14 more)
View plain text versions (4)
- Bill View text pdf
- Substitute Engrossed Substitute Bill pdf
- Substitute Substitute Bill pdf
- Substitute Substitute Passed Legislature Current pdf
Action History
-
Effective date 8/1/2024.
-
Chapter 20, 2024 Laws.
-
Governor signed.
-
Delivered to Governor.
-
Speaker signed.
-
President signed.
-
Third reading, passed; yeas, 93; nays, 2; absent, 0; excused, 3.
-
Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.
-
Rules Committee relieved of further consideration. Placed on second reading.
-
Referred to Rules 2 Review.
-
Minority; without recommendation.
-
CRJ - Majority; do pass.
-
Executive action taken in the House Committee on Civil Rights & Judiciary at 10:30 AM.
-
Public hearing in the House Committee on Civil Rights & Judiciary at 10:30 AM.
-
First reading, referred to Civil Rights & Judiciary.
-
Third reading, passed; yeas, 48; nays, 0; absent, 0; excused, 1.
-
Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.
-
Floor amendment(s) adopted.
-
Returned to second reading for amendment.
-
Rules suspended.
-
Placed on third reading by Rules Committee.
-
By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.
-
By resolution, returned to Senate Rules Committee for third reading.
-
Referred to Rules 2 Review.
-
Minority; do not pass.
-
CRJ - Majority; do pass.
-
Executive action taken in the House Committee on Civil Rights & Judiciary at 10:30 AM.
-
Executive session scheduled, but no action was taken in the House Committee on Civil Rights & Judiciary at 10:30 AM.
-
Public hearing in the House Committee on Civil Rights & Judiciary at 8:00 AM.
-
First reading, referred to Civil Rights & Judiciary.
-
Third reading, passed; yeas, 48; nays, 0; absent, 0; excused, 1.
-
Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.
-
1st substitute bill substituted (LAW 23).
-
Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.
-
Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.
-
Minority; without recommendation.
-
LAW - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.
-
Executive action taken in the Senate Committee on Law & Justice at 8:00 AM.
-
Public hearing in the Senate Committee on Law & Justice at 10:30 AM.
-
First reading, referred to Law & Justice.
Sponsors
- Derek Stanford · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 150 not signed on · 2 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Derek Stanford Democrat
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (150)
150 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 150 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 28 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 55 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Unaffiliated | 10 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 93 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 95% | 2% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (98)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Chambers | — | Yea |
| Chandler | — | Not Voting |
| Cheney | — | Yea |
| Chopp | — | Yea |
| Hutchins | — | Yea |
| Kretz | — | Yea |
| Maycumber | — | Yea |
| Mosbrucker | — | Yea |
| Robertson | — | Yea |
| Sandlin | — | Yea |
| Wilcox | — | Yea |
| Alex Ramel | Democrat | Yea |
| Alicia Rule | Democrat | Yea |
| Amy Walen | Democrat | Yea |
| April Berg | Democrat | Yea |
| Beth Doglio | Democrat | Yea |
| Bill Ramos | Democrat | Yea |
| Brandy Donaghy | Democrat | Yea |
| Chipalo Street | Democrat | Yea |
| Chris Stearns | Democrat | Yea |
| Cindy Ryu | Democrat | Yea |
| Clyde Shavers | Democrat | Yea |
| Dan Bronoske | Democrat | Yea |
| Darya Farivar | Democrat | Yea |
| Dave Paul | Democrat | Yea |
| David Hackney | Democrat | Yea |
| Davina Duerr | Democrat | Yea |
| Debra Entenman | Democrat | Yea |
| Debra Lekanoff | Democrat | Yea |
| Emily Alvarado | Democrat | Yea |
| Gerry Pollet | Democrat | Yea |
| Greg Nance | Democrat | Yea |
| Jake Fey | Democrat | Yea |
| Jamila Taylor | Democrat | Yea |
| Jessica Bateman | Democrat | Yea |
| Joe Fitzgibbon | Democrat | Yea |
| Joe Timmons | Democrat | Yea |
| Julia Reed | Democrat | Yea |
| Julio Cortes | Democrat | Yea |
| Kristine Reeves | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Larry Springer | Democrat | Yea |
| Lauren Davis | Democrat | Yea |
| Laurie Jinkins | Democrat | Yea |
| Lillian Ortiz-Self | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Callan | Democrat | Yea |
| Liz Berry | Democrat | Yea |
| Marcus Riccelli | Democrat | Yea |
| Mari Leavitt | Democrat | Yea |
| Mary Fosse | Democrat | Yea |
| Melanie Morgan | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Mia Gregerson | Democrat | Yea |
| Mike Chapman | Democrat | Yea |
| Monica Jurado Stonier | Democrat | Yea |
| My-Linh Thai | Democrat | Yea |
| Nicole Macri | Democrat | Yea |
| Roger Goodman | Democrat | Yea |
| Sharlett Mena | Democrat | Yea |
| Sharon Tomiko Santos | Democrat | Yea |
| Sharon Wylie | Democrat | Yea |
| Shelley Kloba | Democrat | Yea |
| Steve Bergquist | Democrat | Yea |
| Steve Tharinger | Democrat | Yea |
| Strom Peterson | Democrat | Yea |
| Tana Senn | Democrat | Yea |
| Tarra Simmons | Democrat | Yea |
| Timm Ormsby | Democrat | Yea |
| Tina Orwall | Democrat | Yea |
| Vandana Slatter | Democrat | Yea |
| Alex Ybarra | Republican | Yea |
| Andrew Barkis | Republican | Yea |
| April Connors | Republican | Yea |
| Carolyn Eslick | Republican | Yea |
| Chris Corry | Republican | Yea |
| Cyndy Jacobsen | Republican | Yea |
| Dan Griffey | Republican | Yea |
| Drew Stokesbary | Republican | Yea |
| Ed Orcutt | Republican | Yea |
| Jenny Graham | Republican | Yea |
| Jim Walsh | Republican | Nay |
| Joe Schmick | Republican | Yea |
| Joel McEntire | Republican | Nay |
| Keith Goehner | Republican | Yea |
| Kevin Waters | Republican | Yea |
| Leonard Christian | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Klicker | Republican | Yea |
| Mary Dye | Republican | Yea |
| Michelle Valdez | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Steele | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Volz | Republican | Yea |
| Paul Harris | Republican | Yea |
| Peter Abbarno | Republican | Yea |
| Sam Low | Republican | Yea |
| Skyler Rude | Republican | Yea |
| Stephanie Barnard | Republican | Yea |
| Stephanie McClintock | Republican | Yea |
| Suzanne Schmidt | Republican | Yea |
| Tom Dent | Republican | Yea |
| Travis Couture | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 23 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 48 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 98% | 0% | 0% | 2% |
How each member voted (49)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Billig | — | Yea |
| Hawkins | — | Yea |
| Keiser | — | Yea |
| Kuderer | — | Yea |
| Mullet | — | Yea |
| Padden | — | Yea |
| Randall | — | Not Voting |
| Rivers | — | Yea |
| Van De Wege | — | Yea |
| Wilson, L. | — | Yea |
| Annette Cleveland | Democrat | Yea |
| Bob Hasegawa | Democrat | Yea |
| Claire Wilson | Democrat | Yea |
| Claudia Kauffman | Democrat | Yea |
| Derek Stanford | Democrat | Yea |
| Drew Hansen | Democrat | Yea |
| Jamie Pedersen | Democrat | Yea |
| Javier Valdez | Democrat | Yea |
| Jesse Salomon | Democrat | Yea |
| Joe Nguyen | Democrat | Yea |
| John Lovick | Democrat | Yea |
| June Robinson | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Wellman | Democrat | Yea |
| Liz Lovelett | Democrat | Yea |
| Manka Dhingra | Democrat | Yea |
| Marko Liias | Democrat | Yea |
| Noel Frame | Democrat | Yea |
| Rebecca Saldaña | Democrat | Yea |
| Sharon Shewmake | Democrat | Yea |
| Steve Conway | Democrat | Yea |
| T'wina Nobles | Democrat | Yea |
| Victoria Hunt | Democrat | Yea |
| Yasmin Trudeau | Democrat | Yea |
| Chris Gildon | Republican | Yea |
| Curtis King | Republican | Yea |
| Drew MacEwen | Republican | Yea |
| Jeff Holy | Republican | Yea |
| Jeff Wilson | Republican | Yea |
| Jim McCune | Republican | Yea |
| John Braun | Republican | Yea |
| Judy Warnick | Republican | Yea |
| Keith Wagoner | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Schoesler | Republican | Yea |
| Matt Boehnke | Republican | Yea |
| Nikki Torres | Republican | Yea |
| Perry Dozier | Republican | Yea |
| Phil Fortunato | Republican | Yea |
| Ron Muzzall | Republican | Yea |
| Shelly Short | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 21 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 48 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 98% | 0% | 0% | 2% |
How each member voted (49)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Billig | — | Yea |
| Hawkins | — | Yea |
| Keiser | — | Yea |
| Kuderer | — | Yea |
| Mullet | — | Yea |
| Padden | — | Yea |
| Randall | — | Yea |
| Rivers | — | Yea |
| Rolfes | — | Yea |
| Van De Wege | — | Yea |
| Wilson, L. | — | Yea |
| Annette Cleveland | Democrat | Yea |
| Bob Hasegawa | Democrat | Yea |
| Claire Wilson | Democrat | Yea |
| Claudia Kauffman | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Derek Stanford | Democrat | Yea |
| Jamie Pedersen | Democrat | Yea |
| Javier Valdez | Democrat | Yea |
| Jesse Salomon | Democrat | Yea |
| Joe Nguyen | Democrat | Yea |
| John Lovick | Democrat | Yea |
| June Robinson | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Wellman | Democrat | Yea |
| Liz Lovelett | Democrat | Yea |
| Manka Dhingra | Democrat | Yea |
| Marko Liias | Democrat | Yea |
| Noel Frame | Democrat | Yea |
| Rebecca Saldaña | Democrat | Yea |
| Sharon Shewmake | Democrat | Yea |
| Steve Conway | Democrat | Yea |
| T'wina Nobles | Democrat | Yea |
| Victoria Hunt | Democrat | Yea |
| Yasmin Trudeau | Democrat | Yea |
| Chris Gildon | Republican | Yea |
| Curtis King | Republican | Yea |
| Drew MacEwen | Republican | Yea |
| Jeff Holy | Republican | Yea |
| Jeff Wilson | Republican | Yea |
| Jim McCune | Republican | Yea |
| John Braun | Republican | Yea |
| Judy Warnick | Republican | Yea |
| Keith Wagoner | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Schoesler | Republican | Yea |
| Matt Boehnke | Republican | Yea |
| Nikki Torres | Republican | Yea |
| Perry Dozier | Republican | Yea |
| Phil Fortunato | Republican | Yea |
| Ron Muzzall | Republican | Yea |
| Shelly Short | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 5589?
- SB 5589 is sponsored by Derek Stanford (Democrat).
- What is the current status of SB 5589?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 27, 2023. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 5589?
- Track SB 5589 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 5589
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 5589
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →