New Jersey 222nd Legislature Status: Introduced 2 D cosponsors

A 5324 — Establishes fee on certain employers that employ individuals who receive health benefits coverage through State Medicaid program.

Last action — APP

  1. 1
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed General Assembly
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been introduced in the General Assembly. Introduced June 23, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.

Next likely step: a committee referral and hearing.

Odds of enactment

Low chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a low chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Stalled 32% · moderate confidence
  • Introduced

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 3 sponsors

    3 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (2 D).

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 2 recorded votes so far.

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

In plain language

The bill establishes a fee for certain employers whose employees receive Medicaid health benefits.

This bill creates a fee for employers that have workers covered by the State Medicaid program. It aims to address the costs associated with providing health benefits through Medicaid.

What this means for you
  • Workers: Workers receiving Medicaid may see changes in employer contributions toward health benefits.
  • Small Business: For small businesses, this means potential additional costs if they employ individuals covered by Medicaid.

Summary

Health benefits coverage through St. Medicaid prog-estab fee, cert employers

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

161 added · 182 removed

Plain-language change summary

The amendment expands the definitions section of the bill to clarify terms such as "employee," "employer," "Commissioner," "Department," and "Division." It specifies that an "employee" does not include independent contractors unless the employer can prove otherwise, establishing a clearer distinction between employees and independent contractors. Additionally, the definition of "employer" has been refined to include specific criteria related to the number of employees and their health benefits coverage. These changes provide a more precise framework for understanding the parties involved in the legislation.

→
Previous
Latest
2026, c.023 (A5324 1R) Title 34 Chapter 11F (New) Employer Fee Concerning Certain Employees' Health Benefits Coverage §§1-3 C.34:11F-1 to 34:11F-3 §4 Note   P.L.
2026, c.023 (A5324 1R) CHAPTER 23   An Act establishing a fee on certain employers that employ individuals receiving health benefits coverage through the State Medicaid program, and supplementing Title 34 of the Revised Statutes.
2026, CHAPTER 23, approved June 30, 2026 Assembly, No.
5324 (First Reprint)     An Act establishing a fee on certain employers that employ individuals receiving health benefits coverage through the State Medicaid program, and supplementing Title 34 of the Revised Statutes.
        1.
  C.34:11F-1  Definitions;
fee to be imposed on employers;
employers may dispute determination;
certain employees excluded.
      1.
      “Employee” means any person suffered or permitted to work by an employer, except that an independent contractor shall not be considered an employee.  For purposes of this act, the employer shall have the burden of establishing that an individual is an independent contractor, by showing that the individual and the services that the individual provides meet the test for independent contractor status set forth in R.S.43:21-19.
      “Employee” means any person suffered or permitted to work by an employer, except that an independent contractor shall not be considered an employee.  For purposes of this act, the employer shall have the burden of establishing that an individual is an independent contractor by showing that the individual and the services that the individual provides meet the test for independent contractor status set forth in R.S.43:21-19.
      (1) for an employer with at least 50 but fewer than 250 employees who receive health benefits coverage through the State Medicaid program pursuant to P.L.1968, c.413 (C.30:4D-1 et seq.), $325 for each employee, and for each of the employee’s dependents, who receives State Medicaid benefits;
      (1) for an employer with at least 50 but fewer than employees who receive health benefits coverage through the State Medicaid program pursuant to P.L.1968, c.413 (C.30:4D-1 et seq.), $325 for each employee, and for each of the employee’s dependents, who receives State Medicaid benefits;
      (2) for an employer with at least 250 but fewer than 500 employees who receive health benefits coverage through the State Medicaid program pursuant to P.L.1968, c.413 (C.30:4D-1 et seq.), $525 for each employee, and for each of the employee’s dependents, who receives State Medicaid benefits;
      (2) for an employer with at least 250 but fewer than employees who receive health benefits coverage through the State Medicaid program pursuant to P.L.1968, c.413 (C.30:4D-1 et seq.), $525 for each employee, and for each of the employee’s dependents, who receives State Medicaid benefits;
      g.   An employer may dispute the determination that the employer is required to pay the fee established pursuant to this section by filing an appeal with the department for a review of that determination;
      g.   An employer may dispute the determination that the employer is required to pay the fee established pursuant to this section by filing an appeal with the department for a review of that determination, and the department shall have authority to reverse the division’s determination that the employer is required to pay the fee if it concludes the fee was improperly imposed.  An employer shall file the appeal in accordance with rules adopted pursuant to section 3 of this act and shall submit data satisfactory to the department to demonstrate that the assessment of the fee was incorrect, provided, however, the employer shall remit the fee as required by subsections b.
and the department shall have authority to reverse the division’s determination that the employer is required to pay the fee if it concludes the fee was improperly imposed.  An employer shall file the appeal in accordance with rules adopted pursuant to section 3 of this act and shall submit data satisfactory to the department to demonstrate that the assessment of the fee was incorrect;
provided, however, the employer shall remit the fee as required by subsections b.
      (2) an employee who works part-time, on a per diem basis, or who is a temporary employee;
      (2) an employee who works part-time, on a per-diem basis, or who is a temporary employee;
      1k.  (1) An employer shall not rely upon, use, or consider information disclosing whether a job applicant or employee receives health benefits coverage through the State Medicaid program pursuant to P.L.1968, c.413 (C.30:4D-1 et seq.) as a basis for denying to the applicant or employee the opportunity to obtain or maintain employment, or to advance in position in their job.
      k.   (1) An employer shall not rely upon, use, or consider information disclosing whether a job applicant or employee receives health benefits coverage through the State Medicaid program pursuant to P.L.1968, c.413 (C.30:4D-1 et seq.) as a basis for denying to the applicant or employee the opportunity to obtain or maintain employment, or to advance in position in their job.
      l.    Notwithstanding the provisions of any other law to the contrary, individually identifiable information about an employee or a dependent who receives health benefits coverage through the State Medicaid program pursuant to P.L.1968, c.413 (C.30:4D-1 et seq.) contained in data prepared for the purposes of implementing the provisions of this act shall be confidential and privileged.  The commissioner, the Director of the Division of Revenue and Enterprise Services, or any employee engaged in the administration thereof or charged with the custody of any such data shall not divulge, disclose, use for their own personal advantage, or examine for any reason other than a reason necessitated by the performance of official duties any information obtained from the data.  Individually identifiable information about an employee or a dependent shall be exempt from disclosure under P.L.1963, c.73 (C.47:1A-1 et seq.), commonly known as the open public records act.1        2.    Notwithstanding the provisions of any law or regulation to the contrary, the Departments of Human Services, Labor and Workforce Development, and the Treasury shall enter into a memorandum of understanding to share any data and other resources necessary to implement the provisions of this act to the extent allowed under federal law.
      l.    Notwithstanding the provisions of any other law to the contrary, individually identifiable information about an employee or a dependent who receives health benefits coverage through the State Medicaid program pursuant to P.L.1968, c.413 (C.30:4D-1 et seq.) contained in data prepared for the purposes of implementing the provisions of this act shall be confidential and privileged.  The commissioner, the Director of the Division of Revenue and Enterprise Services, or any employee engaged in the administration thereof or charged with the custody of any such data shall not divulge, disclose, use for their own personal advantage, or examine for any reason other than a reason necessitated by the performance of official duties any information obtained from the data.  Individually identifiable information about an employee or a dependent shall be exempt from disclosure under P.L.1963, c.73 (C.47:1A-1 et seq.), commonly known as the open public records act.
       3.    Notwithstanding the provisions of the "Administrative Procedure Act," P.L.1968, c.410 (C.52:14B-1 et seq.), to the contrary, the State Treasurer, in consultation with the Commissioners of Labor and Workforce Development and Human Services, may adopt, immediately, upon filing with the Office of Administrative Law, regulations that the State Treasurer deems necessary to implement the provisions of this act, which shall specify the number of days that employees, and dependents of the employees, shall be required to receive health benefits coverage through the State Medicaid program pursuant to P.L.1968, c.413 (C.30:4D-1 et seq.) and employed by an employer to cause the assessment of the fee established pursuant to section 1 of this act and the procedure for appealing the issuance of the fee.  The regulations shall be effective for a period not to exceed 365 days from the date of the filing, and the State Treasurer, in consultation with the  Commissioners of Labor and Workforce Development and Human Services, shall thereafter amend, adopt, or readopt the regulations in accordance with the requirements of P.L.1968, c.410 (C.52:14B-1 et seq.).
  C.34:11F-2  Sharing of data and other resources between departments.
     2.    Notwithstanding the provisions of any law or regulation to the contrary, the Departments of Human Services, Labor and Workforce Development, and the Treasury shall enter into a memorandum of understanding to share any data and other resources necessary to implement the provisions of this act to the extent allowed under federal law.
  C.34:11F-3  Regulations to be adopted, amended, and readopted.
     3.    Notwithstanding the provisions of the "Administrative Procedure Act," P.L.1968, c.410 (C.52:14B-1 et seq.), to the contrary, the State Treasurer, in consultation with the Commissioners of Labor and Workforce Development and Human Services, may adopt, immediately, upon filing with the Office of Administrative Law, regulations that the State Treasurer deems necessary to implement the provisions of this act, which shall specify the number of days that employees, and dependents of the employees, shall be required to receive health benefits coverage through the State Medicaid program pursuant to P.L.1968, c.413 (C.30:4D-1 et seq.) and employed by an employer to cause the assessment of the fee established pursuant to section 1 of this act and the procedure for appealing the issuance of the fee.  The regulations shall be effective for a period not to exceed 365 days from the date of the filing, and the State Treasurer, in consultation with the Commissioners of Labor and Workforce Development and Human Services, shall thereafter amend, adopt, or readopt the regulations in accordance with the requirements of P.L.1968, c.410 (C.52:14B-1 et seq.).
                                            Establishes fee on certain employers that employ individuals who receive health benefits coverage through State Medicaid program.
       Approved June 30, 2026.
View plain text versions (4)

Action History

  1. APP

  2. PS PBH

  3. SUB FOR

  4. R/S SWR 2RS

  5. PA

  6. REP/ACA 2RA

  7. INT 1RA REF ABU

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

3 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 117 not signed on · 19 voted No

Sponsors (3)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (117)

117 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 117 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 10 Yea · 4 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 10001
Republican 0400
Total 10401
% of votes cast 67%27%0%7%
How each member voted (15)
Member Party Vote
Abdelaziz, Al Democrat Yea
Freiman, Roy Democrat Not Voting
Murphy, Carol A. Democrat Yea
Park, Ellen J. Democrat Yea
Pintor Marin, Eliana Democrat Yea
Reynolds-Jackson, Verlina Democrat Yea
Rodriguez, Gabriel Democrat Yea
Schaer, Gary S. Democrat Yea
Schnall, Alexander Democrat Yea
Spearman, William W. Democrat Yea
Venezia, Michael Democrat Yea
Barlas, Al Republican Nay
Inganamort, Michael Republican Nay
Rumpf, Brian E. Republican Nay
Scharfenberger, Gerry Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Floor vote

Passed 22 Yea · 15 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 01500
Democrat 22003
Total 221503
% of votes cast 55%38%0%8%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Beach, James Democrat Not Voting
Burgess, Renee C. Democrat Yea
Burzichelli, John J. Democrat Yea
Cruz-Perez, Nilsa I. Democrat Not Voting
Cryan, Joseph P. Democrat Yea
Diegnan Jr., Patrick J. Democrat Yea
Gopal, Vin Democrat Yea
Greenstein, Linda R. Democrat Yea
Johnson, Gordon M. Democrat Yea
Lagana, Joseph A. Democrat Yea
McKeon, John F. Democrat Yea
McKnight, Angela V. Democrat Yea
Moriarty, Paul D. Democrat Yea
Mukherji, Raj Democrat Yea
Ruiz, M. Teresa Democrat Yea
Sarlo, Paul A. Democrat Yea
Scutari, Nicholas P. Democrat Yea
Singleton, Troy Democrat Yea
Smith, Bob Democrat Yea
Stack, Brian P. Democrat Yea
Timberlake, Britnee N. Democrat Not Voting
Turner, Shirley K. Democrat Yea
Vitale, Joseph F. Democrat Yea
Wimberly, Benjie E. Democrat Yea
Zwicker, Andrew Democrat Yea
Amato Jr., Carmen F. Republican Nay
Bramnick, Jon M. Republican Nay
Bucco, Anthony M. Republican Nay
Corrado, Kristin M. Republican Nay
Henry, Owen Republican Nay
Holzapfel, James W. Republican Nay
O'Scanlon Jr., Declan J. Republican Nay
Pennacchio, Joseph Republican Nay
Polistina, Vincent J. Republican Nay
Schepisi, Holly T. Republican Nay
Singer, Robert W. Republican Nay
Space, Parker Republican Nay
Steinhardt, Douglas J. Republican Nay
Testa Jr., Michael L. Republican Nay
Tiver, Latham Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does A 5324 do?
Health benefits coverage through St. Medicaid prog-estab fee, cert employers
Who sponsors A 5324?
A 5324 is sponsored by Vitale, Joseph F., Bagolie, Rosaura (Democrat), and Murphy, Carol A. (Democrat).
What is the current status of A 5324?
This bill has been introduced in the General Assembly. Introduced June 23, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Where can I track A 5324?
Track A 5324 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on A 5324

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of A 5324

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →