New Jersey 222nd Legislature Status: Introduced 7 D cosponsors

A 4881 — "Power NJ Act"; establishes advanced nuclear energy procurement program in BPU.

Last action — APP

  1. 1
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed General Assembly
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been introduced in the General Assembly. Introduced May 14, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.

Next likely step: a committee referral and hearing.

Odds of enactment

Low chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a low chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Advancing 38% · moderate confidence
  • Introduced

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 14 sponsors

    6 primary, 8 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (7 D).

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 5 recorded votes so far.

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

In plain language

The bill establishes a program for advanced nuclear energy procurement in New Jersey.

The Power NJ Act creates a procurement program for advanced nuclear energy in New Jersey. This program is managed by the Board of Public Utilities (BPU) and aims to promote the development of nuclear energy resources.

What this means for you
  • Environment: This program may contribute to cleaner energy sources, potentially reducing environmental impacts from fossil fuels.

Summary

Power NJ Act-estab advanced nuclear energy procurement program in BPU

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

484 added · 533 removed

Plain-language change summary

The revised bill A4881 includes a recodification of existing statutes related to nuclear energy, specifically updating the sections from C.48:3-87.3 to 48:3-87.7 into a new format under Title 48, Chapter 9A, specifically sections C.48:9A-1 through C.48:9A-14. This change matters because it consolidates and organizes the legal framework governing nuclear energy in New Jersey, making it easier to reference and understand.

→
Previous
Latest
A4881 2R [Second Reprint] ASSEMBLY, No.
P.L.
4881 STATE OF NEW JERSEY 222nd LEGISLATURE   INTRODUCED MAY 14, 2026     Sponsored by:
2026, c.042 (A4881 2R) Title 48 Chapter 9A (New) Nuclear Energy The following are recodified:
Assemblyman  WAYNE P.
C.48:9A-1 to 48:9A-5 (P.L.2018, c.16, ss.1-5, formerly C.48:3-87.3 to 48:3-87.7) §§1-9 C.48:9A-6 to 48:9A-14   P.L.
DEANGELO District 14 (Mercer and Middlesex) Assemblyman  DAVID BAILEY, JR.
2026, CHAPTER 42, approved July 13, 2026 Assembly, No.
District 3 (Cumberland, Gloucester and Salem) Assemblyman  ROBERT J.
4881 (Second Reprint)     An Act concerning advanced nuclear energy generation and economic development in the State and supplementing Title 48 of the Revised Statutes.
KARABINCHAK District 18 (Middlesex) Senator  JOHN J.
BURZICHELLI District 3 (Cumberland, Gloucester and Salem) Senator  BOB SMITH District 17 (Middlesex and Somerset) Senator  NICHOLAS P.
SCUTARI District 22 (Somerset and Union)   Co-Sponsored by:
Assemblyman Angelozzi, Assemblywomen McCoy, Murphy, Assemblyman Spearman, Senators Diegnan, Tiver, Singleton and Amato         SYNOPSIS      “Power NJ Act”;
establishes advanced nuclear energy procurement program in BPU.
  CURRENT VERSION OF TEXT      As reported by the Assembly Budget Committee on June 28, 2026, with amendments.
   An Act concerning advanced nuclear energy generation and economic development in the State and supplementing Title 48 of the Revised Statutes.
     “Qualified project” means an advanced nuclear energy project approved by both the board and the authority pursuant to sections 5 and 6 of this act.
     “Qualified project” means an advanced nuclear energy project approved by both the board and the authority pursuant to sections 5 and of this act.
of section 5 of this act and verified by the board and the authority, with the assistance of such independent consultants as the board or the authority may retain, as being necessary, justified, and as accurate and realistic as current information permits.
of section of this act and verified by the board and the authority, with the assistance of such independent consultants as the board or the authority may retain, as being necessary, justified, and as accurate and realistic as current information permits.
     (c)  a description of the proposed project’s impact on local water resources 1[(] ,1 including cooling water usage and thermal discharge 1[)] ,1 and a plan for minimizing the physical footprint on sensitive habitats or preserved lands;
     (c)  a description of the proposed project’s impact on local water resources 1[(] ,1 including cooling water usage and thermal discharge 1[)] ,1 and a plan for minimizing the physical footprint on sensitive habitats or preserved lands;
or imposes regulatory requirements that, considered together, significantly increase the total construction cost of the qualified project, as projected at the time of the change in law, provided that the qualified project entity has attempted to mitigate the effects of the change in law to the maximum extent reasonably practicable.        1[e.] f.1  Before entering into any agreement after preliminary qualification to sell electricity to a co-located energy user or to any end user through a direct power purchase agreement, the qualified project entity shall obtain board approval.  Approval of any such agreement shall include a requirement that some percentage of revenues of any direct power purchase agreement be returned to ratepayers pursuant to paragraph (2) of subsection d.
or imposes regulatory requirements that, considered together, significantly increase the total construction cost of the qualified project, as projected at the time of the change in law, provided that the qualified project entity has attempted to mitigate the effects of the change in law to the maximum extent reasonably practicable.
        1[e.] f.1  Before entering into any agreement after preliminary qualification to sell electricity to a co-located energy user or to any end user through a direct power purchase agreement, the qualified project entity shall obtain board approval.  Approval of any such agreement shall include a requirement that some percentage of revenues of any direct power purchase agreement be returned to ratepayers pursuant to paragraph (2) of subsection d.
     1e.  A qualified project shall not be eligible to receive an RCC for a megawatt hour of electricity generation if the qualified project also receives a zero-emission certificate pursuant to section 3 of P.L.2018, c.16 (C.48:3-87.5) for that megawatt hour of electricity generation.1                               8.  The financial and other information submitted to the board and authority pursuant to sections 4, 5, and of 1[this]1 this act may be submitted on a confidential basis and shall be 1[treated and maintained as confidential by the board and the authority and shall not be subject to public disclosure, notwithstanding any law to the contrary, including the common law] subject to the confidentiality procedures set forth pursuant to N.J.A.C.14:1-12.1 et seq., or any successor regulation, and section 1 of P.L.1982, c.222 (C.48:2-16.4), including the procedures for designating, challenging, and reviewing claims of confidentiality.  The Division of Rate Counsel, in, but not of, the Department of the Treasury, or PJM’s independent market monitor may enter into nondisclosure agreements with the board, the authority, or a qualified project entity, as applicable, to receive information designated as confidential pursuant to this section for purposes of performing their respective oversight and market monitoring functions.  Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit the right of the Division of Rate Counsel to access information pursuant to section 5 of this act or the application of P.L.1963, c.73 (C.47:1A-1 et seq.) for information that is not properly designated and maintained under the applicable confidentiality procedures1.
     1e.  A qualified project shall not be eligible to receive an RCC for a megawatt hour of electricity generation if the qualified project also receives a zero-emission certificate pursuant to section 3 of P.L.2018, c.16 (C.48:3-87.5) for that megawatt hour of electricity generation.1                               8.  The financial and other information submitted to the board and authority pursuant to sections 4, 5, and 6 of 1[this]1 this act may be submitted on a confidential basis and shall be 1[treated and maintained as confidential by the board and the authority and shall not be subject to public disclosure, notwithstanding any law to the contrary, including the common law] subject to the confidentiality procedures set forth pursuant to N.J.A.C.14:1-12.1 et seq., or any successor regulation, and section 1 of P.L.1982, c.222 (C.48:2-16.4), including the procedures for designating, challenging, and reviewing claims of confidentiality.  The Division of Rate Counsel, in, but not of, the Department of the Treasury, or PJM’s independent market monitor may enter into nondisclosure agreements with the board, the authority, or a qualified project entity, as applicable, to receive information designated as confidential pursuant to this section for purposes of performing their respective oversight and market monitoring functions.  Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit the right of the Division of Rate Counsel to access information pursuant to section 5 of this act or the application of P.L.1963, c.73 (C.47:1A-1 et seq.) for information that is not properly designated and maintained under the applicable confidentiality procedures1.
                                            “Power NJ Act”;
establishes advanced nuclear energy procurement program in BPU.
View plain text versions (4)

Action History

  1. APP

  2. PS PBH

  3. SUB FOR

  4. R/S SWR 2RS

  5. PA

  6. REP/ACA 2RA

  7. RCM ABU

  8. REP/ACA 2RA

  9. REP REF AAP

  10. REP REF ASL

  11. INT 1RA REF ATU

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

6 sponsors · 8 co-sponsors · 106 not signed on

Sponsors (6)

Co-sponsors (8)

Not signed on (106)

106 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 106 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 10 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 7000
Republican 3000
Total 10000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (10)
Member Party Vote
Bailey Jr., David Democrat Yea
DeAngelo, Wayne P. Democrat Yea
Egan, Kevin P. Democrat Yea
Karabinchak, Robert J. Democrat Yea
Katz, Andrea Democrat Yea
Spearman, William W. Democrat Yea
Walker, Jerry Democrat Yea
Barlas, Al Republican Yea
Kanitra, Paul Republican Yea
Myhre, Gregory E. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 15 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 11000
Republican 4000
Total 15000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (15)
Member Party Vote
Bailey Jr., David Democrat Yea
Carter, Linda S. Democrat Yea
Kane, Melinda Democrat Yea
McCoy, Tennille R. Democrat Yea
Morales, Carmen Theresa Democrat Yea
Pintor Marin, Eliana Democrat Yea
Reynolds-Jackson, Verlina Democrat Yea
Schaer, Gary S. Democrat Yea
Singh, Balvir Democrat Yea
Stewart, Kenyatta Democrat Yea
Swain, Lisa Democrat Yea
Auth, Robert Republican Yea
McClellan, Antwan L. Republican Yea
Myhre, Gregory E. Republican Yea
Webber, Jay Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 15 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 11000
Republican 4000
Total 15000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (15)
Member Party Vote
Abdelaziz, Al Democrat Yea
Freiman, Roy Democrat Yea
Murphy, Carol A. Democrat Yea
Park, Ellen J. Democrat Yea
Pintor Marin, Eliana Democrat Yea
Reynolds-Jackson, Verlina Democrat Yea
Rodriguez, Gabriel Democrat Yea
Schaer, Gary S. Democrat Yea
Schnall, Alexander Democrat Yea
Spearman, William W. Democrat Yea
Venezia, Michael Democrat Yea
Barlas, Al Republican Yea
Inganamort, Michael Republican Yea
Rumpf, Brian E. Republican Yea
Scharfenberger, Gerry Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Floor vote

Passed 40 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 15000
Democrat 25000
Total 40000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Beach, James Democrat Yea
Burgess, Renee C. Democrat Yea
Burzichelli, John J. Democrat Yea
Cruz-Perez, Nilsa I. Democrat Yea
Cryan, Joseph P. Democrat Yea
Diegnan Jr., Patrick J. Democrat Yea
Gopal, Vin Democrat Yea
Greenstein, Linda R. Democrat Yea
Johnson, Gordon M. Democrat Yea
Lagana, Joseph A. Democrat Yea
McKeon, John F. Democrat Yea
McKnight, Angela V. Democrat Yea
Moriarty, Paul D. Democrat Yea
Mukherji, Raj Democrat Yea
Ruiz, M. Teresa Democrat Yea
Sarlo, Paul A. Democrat Yea
Scutari, Nicholas P. Democrat Yea
Singleton, Troy Democrat Yea
Smith, Bob Democrat Yea
Stack, Brian P. Democrat Yea
Timberlake, Britnee N. Democrat Yea
Turner, Shirley K. Democrat Yea
Vitale, Joseph F. Democrat Yea
Wimberly, Benjie E. Democrat Yea
Zwicker, Andrew Democrat Yea
Amato Jr., Carmen F. Republican Yea
Bramnick, Jon M. Republican Yea
Bucco, Anthony M. Republican Yea
Corrado, Kristin M. Republican Yea
Henry, Owen Republican Yea
Holzapfel, James W. Republican Yea
O'Scanlon Jr., Declan J. Republican Yea
Pennacchio, Joseph Republican Yea
Polistina, Vincent J. Republican Yea
Schepisi, Holly T. Republican Yea
Singer, Robert W. Republican Yea
Space, Parker Republican Yea
Steinhardt, Douglas J. Republican Yea
Testa Jr., Michael L. Republican Yea
Tiver, Latham Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does A 4881 do?
Power NJ Act-estab advanced nuclear energy procurement program in BPU
Who sponsors A 4881?
A 4881 is sponsored by Burzichelli, John J., Smith, Bob, Scutari, Nicholas P., Diegnan, Patrick J., Tiver, Latham, Singleton, Troy, Amato, Carmen F., Spearman, William W. (Democrat), Murphy, Carol A. (Democrat), McCoy, Tennille R. (Democrat), Angelozzi, Anthony (Democrat), Karabinchak, Robert J. (Democrat), Bailey Jr., David (Democrat), and DeAngelo, Wayne P. (Democrat).
What is the current status of A 4881?
This bill has been introduced in the General Assembly. Introduced May 14, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Where can I track A 4881?
Track A 4881 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on A 4881

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of A 4881

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →