Massachusetts 191st Legislature (2019-2020) Status: In Committee 10 D cosponsors

S 889 — An Act relative to the use of administrative subpoenas to obtain telephone and internet records without judicial review

Last action — Accompanied a study order, see S2496

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 191st Legislature (2019-2020). It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

By Ms. Creem, a petition (accompanied by bill, Senate, No. 889) of Cynthia Stone Creem, Jack Patrick Lewis, Maria Duaime Robinson, Thomas M. Stanley and other members of the General Court for legislation relative to the use of administrative subpoenas to obtain telephone and internet records without judicial review. The Judiciary.

Bill Text

We don't have the full text on file for this bill yet.

Read S 889 on the official Massachusetts source →

Action History

  1. Accompanied a study order, see S2496

  2. Hearing scheduled for 06/17/2019 from 01:00 PM-05:00 PM in Gardner Auditorium

  3. House concurred

  4. Referred to the committee on The Judiciary

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 12 co-sponsors · 191 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (12)

Not signed on (191)

191 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 191 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

public-safety technology
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does S 889 do?
By Ms. Creem, a petition (accompanied by bill, Senate, No. 889) of Cynthia Stone Creem, Jack Patrick Lewis, Maria Duaime Robinson, Thomas M. Stanley and other members of the General Court for legislation relative to the use of administrative subpoenas to obtain telephone and internet records without judicial review. The Judiciary.
Who sponsors S 889?
S 889 is sponsored by Cynthia Stone Creem (Democrat), Jack Patrick Lewis (Democrat), Maria Duaime Robinson, Thomas M. Stanley (Democrat), Joseph A. Boncore, Mike Connolly (Democrat), Sal N. DiDomenico (Democrat), Jennifer E. Benson, Cindy F. Friedman (Democrat), Patricia D. Jehlen (Democrat), James K. Hawkins (Democrat), and James B. Eldridge (Democrat).
What is the current status of S 889?
This bill died with 191st Legislature (2019-2020). It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track S 889?
Track S 889 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on S 889

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of S 889

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →