Michigan 2025-2026 Regular Session Status: Passed Senate 1 R cosponsors

SB 272 — Housing: condominium; definition of undeveloped land; modify. Amends sec. 67 of 1978 PA 59 (MCL 559.167).

Last action — referred to Committee on Regulatory Reform

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has passed the Senate. Introduced March 19, 2026. It now moves to the second chamber.

Next likely step: consideration and a floor vote in the House.

Prognosis

Advancing 48% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Passed Senate

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 R).

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 2 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

Housing: condominium; definition of undeveloped land; modify. Amends sec. 67 of 1978 PA 59 (MCL 559.167).

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

5 added · 4 removed

Plain-language change summary

The latest version of Bill SB 272 includes new lines of text that clarify key provisions while removing some previously existing lines. This change helps to streamline the bill and make its intent more understandable. Simplifying the language and focusing on essential elements matters because it can improve the chances of the bill being effectively implemented and followed by those affected.

→
Previous
Latest
SUBSTITUTE FOR SENATE BILL NO.
SB-272, As Passed Senate, March 19, 2026 SUBSTITUTE FOR SENATE BILL NO.
The replat of the OOH S02003'25 (S-1) w54y1r 1 condominium subdivision plan shall must be designated replat number __________ of __________ county condominium subdivision plan number __________, using the same plan number assigned to the original condominium subdivision plan.
The replat of the OOH S02003'25 (S-1)_SB272_APS_1 r5ehdz 1 condominium subdivision plan shall must be designated replat number __________ of __________ county condominium subdivision plan number __________, using the same plan number assigned to the original condominium subdivision plan.
(4) If the developer does not withdraw the undeveloped land from the project or convert the undeveloped condominium units to "must be built" before the expiration of the applicable time period described under subsection (3), the association of co-owners, by an affirmative 2/3 majority vote of the members in good standing, may declare that the undeveloped land shall must remain part of the project but shall must revert to general common elements and that OOH S02003'25 (S-1) w54y1r 1 all rights to construct condominium units upon on that undeveloped land shall must cease.
(4) If the developer does not withdraw the undeveloped land from the project or convert the undeveloped condominium units to "must be built" before the expiration of the applicable time period described under subsection (3), the association of co-owners, by an affirmative 2/3 majority vote of the members in good standing, may declare that the undeveloped land shall must remain part of the project but shall must revert to general common elements and that OOH S02003'25 (S-1)_SB272_APS_1 r5ehdz 1 all rights to construct condominium units upon on that undeveloped land shall must cease.
(6) Subsections (3) and (4) do not apply to condominium units that are no longer owned by the developer or by the owner of the property at the time the property became part of the condominium OOH S02003'25 (S-1) w54y1r 1 project, unless the purchaser from the developer or owner of the property at the time the property became part of the condominium project is a successor developer under section 135.
(6) Subsections (3) and (4) do not apply to condominium units that are no longer owned by the developer or by the owner of the property at the time the property became part of the condominium OOH S02003'25 (S-1)_SB272_APS_1 r5ehdz 1 project, unless the purchaser from the developer or owner of the property at the time the property became part of the condominium project is a successor developer under section 135.
Final Page OOH S02003'25 (S-1) w54y1r
Final Page OOH S02003'25 (S-1)_SB272_APS_1 r5ehdz
⬇ Download PDF
View plain text versions (7)

Action History

  1. referred to Committee on Regulatory Reform

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 146 not signed on · 1 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (146)

146 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 146 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

PASSED

Passed 34 Yea · 1 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 17000
Democrat 16102
Unaffiliated 1000
Total 34102
% of votes cast 92%3%0%5%
How each member voted (37)
Member Party Vote
Outman — Yea
Darrin Camilleri Democrat Yea
Dayna Polehanki Democrat Yea
Erika Geiss Democrat Not Voting
Jeff Irwin Democrat Yea
Jeremy Moss Democrat Yea
John Cherry Democrat Yea
Kevin Hertel Democrat Yea
Mallory McMorrow Democrat Not Voting
Mary Cavanagh Democrat Yea
Paul Wojno Democrat Yea
Rosemary Bayer Democrat Yea
Sam Singh Democrat Yea
Sarah Anthony Democrat Yea
Sean McCann Democrat Yea
Stephanie Chang Democrat Yea
Sue Shink Democrat Nay
Sylvia Santana Democrat Yea
Veronica Klinefelt Democrat Yea
Winnie Brinks Democrat Yea
Aric Nesbitt Republican Yea
Dan Lauwers Republican Yea
Edward McBroom Republican Yea
Jim Runestad Republican Yea
John Damoose Republican Yea
Jon Bumstead Republican Yea
Jonathan Lindsey Republican Yea
Joseph Bellino Jr. Republican Yea
Kevin Daley Republican Yea
Lana Theis Republican Yea
Mark Huizenga Republican Yea
Michael Webber Republican Yea
Michele Hoitenga Republican Yea
Roger Hauck Republican Yea
Roger Victory Republican Yea
Ruth Johnson Republican Yea
Thomas Albert Republican Yea

Official roll call →

PASSED ROLL CALL # 45 YEAS 34 NAYS 1 EXCUSED 2 NOT VOTING 0

Passed 34 Yea · 1 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 18000
Democrat 16102
Total 34102
% of votes cast 92%3%0%5%
How each member voted (37)
Member Party Vote
Darrin Camilleri Democrat Yea
Dayna Polehanki Democrat Yea
Erika Geiss Democrat Not Voting
Jeff Irwin Democrat Yea
Jeremy Moss Democrat Yea
John Cherry Democrat Yea
Kevin Hertel Democrat Yea
Mallory McMorrow Democrat Not Voting
Mary Cavanagh Democrat Yea
Paul Wojno Democrat Yea
Rosemary Bayer Democrat Yea
Sam Singh Democrat Yea
Sarah Anthony Democrat Yea
Sean McCann Democrat Yea
Stephanie Chang Democrat Yea
Sue Shink Democrat Nay
Sylvia Santana Democrat Yea
Veronica Klinefelt Democrat Yea
Winnie Brinks Democrat Yea
Aric Nesbitt Republican Yea
Dan Lauwers Republican Yea
Edward McBroom Republican Yea
Jim Runestad Republican Yea
John Damoose Republican Yea
Jon Bumstead Republican Yea
Jonathan Lindsey Republican Yea
Joseph Bellino Jr. Republican Yea
Kevin Daley Republican Yea
Lana Theis Republican Yea
Mark Huizenga Republican Yea
Michael Webber Republican Yea
Michele Hoitenga Republican Yea
Rick Outman Republican Yea
Roger Hauck Republican Yea
Roger Victory Republican Yea
Ruth Johnson Republican Yea
Thomas Albert Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

housing
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 272 do?
Housing: condominium; definition of undeveloped land; modify. Amends sec. 67 of 1978 PA 59 (MCL 559.167).
Who sponsors SB 272?
SB 272 is sponsored by Roger Hauck (Republican).
What is the current status of SB 272?
This bill has passed the Senate. Introduced March 19, 2026. It now moves to the second chamber.
Where can I track SB 272?
Track SB 272 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 272

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of SB 272

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →