SB 78 — An Act amending Titles 23 (Domestic Relations) and 42 (Judiciary and Judicial Procedure) of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes, in child custody, further providing for definitions, for award of custody, for factors to consider when awarding custody, for consideration of criminal conviction, for guardian ad litem for child, for counsel for child and for award of counsel fees, costs and expenses; and, in Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts, providing for child abuse and domestic abuse education and training program for judges and court personnel.
Last action — Referred to JUDICIARY
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2021-2022 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
413 added · 279 removedPlain-language change summary
The recent amendments to Bill SB 78 clarified the definitions of "household member" and "professional supervised physical custody." Now, a "household member" includes a wider range of relationships, such as former spouses and individuals who share biological parenthood. Additionally, the bill emphasizes that professional supervised custody must now be monitored by someone specifically trained in areas like domestic violence and child abuse, ensuring better safety for children in these situations. These changes are important because they help protect children by ensuring interactions are supervised in a way that acknowledges the complexities of family dynamics and potential risks.
PRIOR PRINTER'S NO.
65 THEPRINTER'S GENERALNO. ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA SENATE BILL Session of No.
78930 2021THE INTRODUCEDGENERAL BYASSEMBLY BAKER,OF SANTARSIERO,PENNSYLVANIA VOGEL,SENATE KEARNEY,BILL FONTANA,Session SCHWANK, BROWNE, PHILLIPS-HILL, MENSCH, YAW AND MUTH, COSTA, JANUARY 22, 2021 REFERRED TO JUDICIARY, JANUARY 22, 2021 AN ACT Amending Titles 23 (Domestic Relations) and 42 (Judiciary and Judicial Procedure) of theNo. Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes, in child custody, further providing for definitions, for award of custody, for factors to consider when awarding custody, for consideration of criminal conviction, for guardian ad litem for child, for counsel for child and for award of counsel fees, costs and expenses;
78 2021 INTRODUCED BY BAKER, SANTARSIERO, VOGEL, KEARNEY, FONTANA, SCHWANK, BROWNE, PHILLIPS-HILL, MENSCH, YAW, MUTH, KANE,STA, COMITTA AND STEFANO, JANUARY 22, 2021 AS AMENDED ON THIRD CONSIDERATION, JUNE 21, 2021 AN ACT Amending Titles 23 (Domestic Relations) and 42 (Judiciary and Judicial Procedure) of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes, in child custody, further providing for definitions, for award of custody, for factors to consider when awarding custody, for consideration of criminal conviction, for guardian ad litem for child, for counsel for child and for award of counsel fees, costs and expenses;
§ 505 (relating to use of force in 20210SB0078PN006520210SB0078PN0930 - 2 - self-protection) by a party in response to abuse or domestic abuse by the other party.
*"HOUSEHOLD *MEMBER." *A "NonprofessionalSPOUSE supervisedOR physicalAN custody."INDIVIDUAL CustodialWHO timeHAS duringBEEN whichA an<-- agencySPOUSE, orAN anINDIVIDUAL adult,LIVING whoAS isA notSPOUSE aOR licensedWHO professionalLIVED designatedAS byA theSPOUSE, courtA orPARENT agreedOR uponCHILD, byANOTHER theINDIVIDUAL parties,RELATED monitorsBY theCONSANGUINITY interactionOR betweenAFFINITY, theA childCURRENT andOR theFORMER individualSEXUAL withOR thoseINTIMATE rights.PARTNER OR AN INDIVIDUAL WHO SHARES BIOLOGICAL PARENTHOOD, CURRENTLY SHARING A HOUSEHOLD WITH THE CHILD OR A PARTY.
"Professional* * * "Nonprofessional supervised physical custody." Custodial time during which an agency or an adult, who is not a licensed professional<-- monitorsprofessional, designated by the interactioncourt betweenor theagreed childupon andby the individual<-- withparties, thosemonitors custodythe rightsinteraction andbetween promotes the child'schild health and safetythe duringindividual thewith interaction.those rights.
Section"Professional 3.supervised physical custody." Custodial time during which a licensed professional monitors, WITH EDUCATION <-- AND TRAINING ON THE DYNAMICS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE, SEXUAL ASSAULT, CHILD ABUSE AND THE IMPACT OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ON CHILDREN, OVERSEES the interaction between the child and the individual with those custody rights and promotes the child's <-- health and safety OF THE CHILD during the interaction.
<-- * * * <-- "TEMPORARY HOUSING INSTABILITY." A PERIOD NOT TO EXCEED SIX MONTHS FROM THE DATE OF THE LAST INCIDENT OF ABUSE AS DETERMINED BY A COURT.
20210SB0078PN0930 - 3 - Section 3.
* * * (e) Safety conditions.--After considering the factors under [section 5328(a)(2)] sections 5328, 5329 (relating to consideration of criminal conviction), 5329.1 (relating to consideration of child abuse and involvement with protective services) and 5330 (relating to consideration of criminal charge), if the court finds [that there is an ongoing] a history of abuse of the child or a household member by a party or A <-- PRESENT risk of harm to the child or an abused party and awards any form of custody to a party who committed the abuse or who has a 20210SB0078PN0065 - 3 - household member who committed the abuse, the court shall include in the custody order safety conditions [designed], restrictions or safeguards as REASONABLY necessary to protect <-- the child or the abused party[.], including:
THE COURT SHALL <-- INCLUDE IN THE CUSTODY ORDER THE REASON FOR IMPOSING THE SAFETY CONDITIONS, RESTRICTIONS OR SAFEGUARDS AND AN EXPLANATION WHY THE SAFETY CONDITIONS, RESTRICTIONS OR SAFEGUARDS ARE IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE CHILD OR THE ABUSED PARTY.
IF SUPERVISED CONTACT IS ORDERED, THERE SHALL BE A REVIEW OF THE RISK OF HARM AND NEED FOR CONTINUED SUPERVISION ON AT LEAST AN ANNUAL BASIS.
THE SAFETY CONDITIONS, RESTRICTIONS OR SAFEGUARDS MAY INCLUDE ANY OF THE FOLLOWING:
(3) Limitations on the time of day that physical custody is permitted or on the number of hours of physical custody and the maximum number of hours of physical custody permitted 20210SB0078PN0930 - 4 - per day or per week.
(4) Appoint a qualified professional specializing in <-- treatment relating to the history of abuse or risk of harm to provide counseling.
THE APPOINTMENT OF A QUALIFIED PROFESSIONAL <-- SPECIALIZING IN PROGRAMMING RELATING TO THE HISTORY OF ABUSE OR RISK OF HARM TO PROVIDE BATTERER'S INTERVENTION OR HARM PREVENTION PROGRAMMING.
BATTERER'S INTERVENTION AND HARM PREVENTION PROGRAMMING MAY INCLUDE PROGRAMMING DESIGNED TO REHABILITATE THE OFFENDING INDIVIDUAL, INCLUDING PRIORITIZING A BATTERER'S INTERVENTION OR HARM PREVENTION PROGRAM, IF AVAILABLE, OR THE IMPACTS OF PHYSICAL, SEXUAL OR DOMESTIC ABUSE ON THE VICTIM.
THE COURT MAY ORDER AN EVALUATION BY THE APPOINTED QUALIFIED PROFESSIONAL UNDER THIS PARAGRAPH TO DETERMINE WHETHER ADDITIONAL PROGRAMMING IS NECESSARY.
(6) Any other safety condition, restriction or safeguard as necessary to ensure the health and safety of the child.child OR <-- TO PROTECT A HOUSEHOLD MEMBER.
(e.1) Supervision.--If a court finds by a preponderance of the evidence that a party has subjected ABUSED the child or any <-- household member to abuse, the court shall be presumed toto, THERE <-- SHALL BE A REBUTTABLE PRESUMPTION THAT THE COURT SHALL only 20210SB0078PN0930 - 5 - allow nonprofessional supervised physical custody or professional supervised physical custody between the child and the party who committed the abuse unless the court makes a 20210SB0078PN0065<-- - 4 - finding on the record that it finds by a preponderance of the evidence that the party no longer poses a risk of abuse to the child or any other household member and that another custody arrangement is in the best interest of the child and will not cause physical, emotional or psychological harm to the child.child..
(e.2)A Professional<-- supervision.--IfCOURT aMAY courtFIND findsTHAT byAN aINDICATED preponderanceREPORT ofFOR thePHYSICAL evidenceOR thatSEXUAL thereABUSE isUNDER anCHAPTER ongoing63 risk(RELATING ofTO abuseCHILD ofPROTECTIVE theSERVICES) child,IS theA courtBASIS shallFOR beA presumedFINDING toOF onlyABUSE allowUNDER professionalTHIS supervisedSUBSECTION physicalONLY custodyAFTER betweenA theDE childNOVO andREVIEW theOF partyTHE whoCIRCUMSTANCES committedLEADING theTO abuseTHE unlessINDICATED theREPORT. court makes a finding on the record that it finds by a preponderance of the evidence that the party no longer poses a risk of abuse to the child or any other household member and that another custody arrangement is in the best interest of the child and will not cause physical, emotional or psychological harm to the child.
NOTWITHSTANDING THE PROVISIONS OF THIS SUBSECTION, THE COURT MAY AWARD AN ALTERNATIVE FORM OF CUSTODY IF THE COURT FINDS BY A PREPONDERANCE OF THE EVIDENCE THAT:
(1) THE PARTY NO LONGER POSES A RISK OF ABUSE TO THE CHILD OR ANY OTHER HOUSEHOLD MEMBER;
AND (2) ANOTHER CUSTODY ARRANGEMENT IS IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE CHILD AND WILL NOT JEOPARDIZE THE HEALTH AND SAFETY OF THE CHILD.
(e.2) Professional supervision.--If a court finds by a preponderance of the evidence that there is an ongoing risk of abuse of the child, the court shall be presumed to THERE SHALL <-- BE A REBUTTABLE PRESUMPTION THAT THE COURT SHALL only allow professional supervised physical custody between the child and the party who committed the abuse unless the court makes a <-- finding on the record that it finds by a preponderance of the evidence that the party no longer poses a risk of abuse to the child or any other household member and that another custody arrangement is in the best interest of the child and will not 20210SB0078PN0930 - 6 - cause physical, emotional or psychological harm to the child.
POSES THE RISK OF ABUSE.
A COURT MAY FIND THAT AN INDICATED <-- REPORT FOR PHYSICAL OR SEXUAL ABUSE UNDER CHAPTER 63 IS A BASIS FOR A FINDING OF ABUSE UNDER THIS SUBSECTION ONLY AFTER A DE NOVO REVIEW OF THE CIRCUMSTANCES LEADING TO THE INDICATED REPORT.
NOTWITHSTANDING THE PROVISIONS OF THIS SUBSECTION, THE COURT MAY AWARD AN ALTERNATIVE FORM OF CUSTODY IF THE COURT FINDS BY A PREPONDERANCE OF THE EVIDENCE THAT:
(1) THE PARTY NO LONGER POSES A RISK OF ABUSE TO THE CHILD OR ANY OTHER HOUSEHOLD MEMBER;
AND (2) ANOTHER CUSTODY ARRANGEMENT IS IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE CHILD AND WILL NOT JEOPARDIZE THE HEALTH AND SAFETY OF THE CHILD.
(1) Which party is more likely to ensure the health and <-- safety of the child.
[(1)) Which party is more likely to encourage and permit <-- frequent and continuing contact between the child and another party.] (2)(1) TheWHICH presentPARTY andIS pastMORE abuseLIKELY committedTO byENSURE aTHE partyHEALTH orAND 20210SB0078PN0065<-- -SAFETY 5OF -THE memberCHILD. of the party's household.[, whether there is a continued risk of harm to the child or an abused party and which party can better provide adequate physical safeguards and supervision of the child.] (2.1) The information set forth in section 5329.1(a) (relating to consideration of child abuse and involvement with protective services).
(2.2)(2) ViolentThe orpresent assaultiveand behaviorpast abuse committed by a party,party includingor past20210SB0078PN0930 - 7 - member of the party's household.[, whether there is a continued risk of harm to the child or currentan protectionabused fromparty abuseand which party can better provide adequate physical safeguards and sexualsupervision violenceof the child.] (2.1) The information set forth in section 5329.1(a) (relating to consideration of child abuse protectionand orders.involvement with protective services).
(2.2) Violent or assaultive behavior committed by a party, including past or current protection from abuse and sexual violence abuse protection orders WHERE THERE HAS BEEN <-- A FINDING OF ABUSE.
(3)(2.4) TheTHE presentEXISTENCE andOF pastA parentalPROTECTION [duties]FROM andABUSE caretakerORDER duties<-- performedENTERED byON eachCONSENT partyOF onTHE behalfPARTIES, ofWITH theNO child.ADMISSION OR FINDING OF ABUSE, IF, UPON REVIEW OF THE FACTS PRESENTED AT THE CUSTODY HEARING, THE COURT FINDS THAT ABUSE OCCURRED.
(4)(3) The needpresent for stability and continuitypast inparental the[duties] child's education, family life and communitycaretaker life<-- exceptduties ifperformed changesby areeach necessaryparty toon protectbehalf the health and safety of the child.
(5)(4) The availabilityneed for stability and continuity in the child's education, family life and community life except if changes are necessary to protect the health and safety of extendedthe family.child OR A PARTY.
<-- (5) The availability of extended family.
In assessing the factor under this paragraph, IF THE COURT FINDS <-- 20210SB0078PN0930 - 8 - THAT the child's fear of a party IS based on the party's <-- ACTUAL AND specific conduct that is contrary to the child's <-- best interestinterest, THE FINDING shall be considered well-reasoned.
Show all 90 changed lines (50 more)
<-- (8) The attempts of a [parent] party to turn the child against the other [parent] party, except in cases of abuse <-- ABUSE [domestic violence] where reasonable safety measures are<-- 20210SB0078PN0065are - 6 - necessary to protect the health and safety of the child from harm.
A party'sPARTY'S reasonableREASONABLE concernsCONCERNS forFOR aA child'sCHILD'S healthHEALTH and<-- welfareAND andWELFARE theAND party'sTHE reasonablePARTY'S effortsREASONABLE toEFFORTS protectTO thePROTECT childTHE shallCHILD notSHALL beNOT consideredBE attemptsCONSIDERED toATTEMPTS turnTO theTURN childTHE againstCHILD theAGAINST otherTHE party.OTHER PARTY.
A CHILD'S DEFICIENT OR NEGATIVE RELATIONSHIP WITH A PARTY SHALL NOT BE PRESUMED TO BE CAUSED BY THE OTHER PARTY.
A party's reasonable concerns for a child's health <-- and welfare and the party's reasonable efforts to protect the child shall not be considered attempts to turn the child against the other party.
(13) The level of conflict between the parties and the willingness and ability of the parties to cooperate with one 20210SB0078PN0930 - 9 - another.
(a.1) Exception.--None of the factors in A FACTOR UNDER <-- subsection (a) shall NOT be adversely weighed against a party if <-- that party or the child was subjected to abuse by the other <-- party.
20210SB0078PN0065THE -CIRCUMSTANCES 7RELATED -TO *THE *FACTOR *WERE SectionIN 5.RESPONSE <-- TO ABUSE OR NECESSARY TO PROTECT THE CHILD OR THE ABUSED PARTY FROM HARM AND THE PARTY ALLEGING ABUSE DOES NOT POSE A RISK TO THE HEALTH AND SAFETY OF THE CHILD AT THE TIME OF THE CUSTODY HEARING.
SectionTEMPORARY 5329(a)HOUSING ofINSTABILITY TitleAS 23,A amendedRESULT JuneOF 5,ABUSE 2020SHALL (P.L.246,NOT No.32),BE isCONSIDERED amendedAGAINST toTHE read:PARTY ALLEGING ABUSE.
(A.2) DETERMINATION.--NO SINGLE FACTOR UNDER SUBSECTION (A) SHALL BY ITSELF BE DETERMINATIVE IN THE AWARDING OF CUSTODY.
THE COURT SHALL EXAMINE THE TOTALITY OF THE CIRCUMSTANCES, GIVING WEIGHTED CONSIDERATION TO THE FACTORS THAT AFFECT THE HEALTH AND SAFETY OF THE CHILD, WHEN ISSUING A CUSTODY ORDER THAT IS IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE CHILD.
* * * Section 5.
Section 5329(a) of Title 23, amended June 5, 2020 (P.L.246, No.32), is amended AND THE SECTION IS AMENDED BY <-- ADDING A SUBSECTION to read:
(a) Offenses.--Where a party seeks any form of custody, the court shall consider whether that party or member of that 20210SB0078PN0930 - 10 - party's household has been convicted of or has pleaded guilty or no contest to any of the offenses in this section or an offense in another jurisdiction substantially equivalent to any of the offenses in this section.
20210SB0078PN0065 - 8 - 18 Pa.C.S.
20210SB0078PN0930 - 11 - 18 Pa.C.S.
§ 5543 (relating to animal infighting).infighting FIGHTING).
<-- 18 Pa.C.S.
20210SB0078PN0065 - 9 - 18 Pa.C.S.
20210SB0078PN0930 - 12 - 75 Pa.C.S.
(A.1) DETERMINATION.--A CRIMINAL CONVICTION SPECIFIED UNDER <-- SUBSECTION (A) SHALL NOT BY ITSELF BE DETERMINATIVE IN THE AWARDING OF CUSTODY.
THE COURT SHALL EXAMINE THE TOTALITY OF THE CIRCUMSTANCES WHEN ISSUING A CUSTODY ORDER THAT IS IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE CHILD.
Sections 5334(c), 5335(b) and 5339 of Title 23 <-- are amended to read:
SECTION 6.
SECTION 5334(C) OF TITLE 23 IS AMENDED AND THE <-- SECTION IS AMENDED BY ADDING A SUBSECTION TO READ:
[or] AND <-- (2) the court is satisfied that the relevant information will be presented to the court only with such appointment[.];
<-- or (3) a guardian ad litem appointed under this section shall establish that the guardian ad litem received education and training under the program specified under 42 Pa.C.S.
§ 20210SB0078PN0930 - 13 - 1908 (relating to child abuse and domestic abuse education 20210SB0078PN0065 - 10 - and training program for judges and court personnel) or substantially similar training prior to appointment.
* * * §(F) 5335.EDUCATION AND TRAINING.--A COURT APPOINTING A GUARDIAN <-- AD LITEM UNDER THIS SECTION SHALL MAKE REASONABLE EFFORTS TO APPOINT A GUARDIAN AD LITEM WHO RECEIVED EVIDENCE-BASED EDUCATION AND TRAINING RELATING TO CHILD ABUSE, INCLUDING CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE, DOMESTIC ABUSE EDUCATION AND THE EFFECT OF CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE AND DOMESTIC ABUSE ON CHILDREN.
SECTION 7.
SECTIONS 5335(B) AND 5339 OF TITLE 23 ARE AMENDED TO READ:
§ 5335.
(a) Award.--Under this chapter, a court may award reasonable <-- interim or final counsel fees, costs and expenses to a party if the court finds that the conduct of another party was obdurate, vexatious,vexatious[,] OR repetitive or[or in bad faith.faith].
This section may <-- not apply if that party engaged the judicial process in good faith to protect the child from harm.
(b) Other costs.--The court may direct that a party who has <-- been found to have perpetrated abuse to pay all or a portion of the fees, costs and expenses incurred by the other party, including attorney fees, costs relating to any counsel for the child and treatment expenses incurred relating to the abuse, 20210SB0078PN0930 - 14 - including fees associated with any form of supervised physical custody.
Section 7.7 8.
Title 42 is amended by adding a section to <-- read:
The Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts may develop <-- and implement an ongoing education and training program for judges, magisterial district judges and relevant court personnel, including guardians ad litem, counsel for children, 20210SB0078PN0065 - 11 - masters and mediators, regarding child abuse, which includes all aspects of maltreatment, including sexual abuse, physical abuse, emotional abuse, implicit and explicit bias, trauma and neglect and the impact of child abuse and domestic violence on children.
Section(A) 8.PROGRAM.--THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF PENNSYLVANIA <-- COURTS MAY DEVELOP AND IMPLEMENT AN ONGOING EDUCATION AND TRAINING PROGRAM FOR JUDGES, MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT JUDGES AND RELEVANT COURT PERSONNEL, INCLUDING GUARDIANS AD LITEM, COUNSEL FOR CHILDREN, MASTERS AND MEDIATORS REGARDING CHILD ABUSE.
ThisTHE actEDUCATION shallAND takeTRAINING effectPROGRAM inSHALL 60INCLUDE days.ALL ASPECTS OF THE MALTREATMENT OF CHILDREN, INCLUDING ALL OF THE FOLLOWING:
20210SB0078PN0065(1) -SEXUAL 12ABUSE. -
20210SB0078PN0930 - 15 - (2) PHYSICAL ABUSE.
(3) IMPLICIT AND EXPLICIT BIAS.
(4) TRAUMA AND NEGLECT.
(5) THE IMPACT OF CHILD ABUSE AND DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ON CHILDREN.
(B) BEST PRACTICES.--THE EDUCATION AND TRAINING PROGRAM UNDER SUBSECTION (A) SHALL INCLUDE THE LATEST BEST PRACTICES FROM EVIDENCE-BASED, PEER-REVIEWED RESEARCH BY RECOGNIZED EXPERTS IN THE TYPES OF CHILD ABUSE SPECIFIED UNDER SUBSECTION (A).
THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF PENNSYLVANIA COURTS SHALL DESIGN THE EDUCATION AND TRAINING PROGRAM UNDER SUBSECTION (A) TO EDUCATE AND TRAIN RELEVANT COURT PERSONNEL ON ALL OF THE FACTORS LISTED UNDER 23 PA.C.S.
§ 5328(A) (RELATING TO FACTORS TO CONSIDER WHEN AWARDING CUSTODY) AND IMPROVE THE ABILITY OF COURTS TO MAKE APPROPRIATE CUSTODY DECISIONS THAT ARE IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE CHILD, INCLUDING EDUCATION AND TRAINING REGARDING THE IMPACT OF CHILD ABUSE, DOMESTIC ABUSE AND TRAUMA ON A VICTIM, SPECIFICALLY A CHILD, AND SITUATIONS WHEN ONE PARTY ATTEMPTS TO TURN A CHILD AGAINST ANOTHER PARTY.
Section 8 9.
This act shall take effect in 60 120 days.
<-- 20210SB0078PN0930 - 16 -
Show all 90 changed rows (50 more)
Action History
-
Referred to JUDICIARY
-
Third consideration and final passage
-
Re-reported as committed
-
Re-referred to APPROPRIATIONS
-
PN 0930 Amended on third consideration
-
Removed from table
-
Laid on the table
-
Removed from table
-
Laid on the table
-
Removed from table
-
Laid on the table
-
First consideration
-
Reported as committed
-
PN 0065 Referred to JUDICIARY
Sponsors
- Yudichak · Cosponsor
- Blake · Cosponsor
- Jay Costa · Cosponsor
- Judith L. Schwank · Cosponsor
- Browne · Cosponsor
- Kristin Phillips-Hill · Cosponsor
- Mensch · Cosponsor
- Gene Yaw · Cosponsor
- Katie J. Muth · Cosponsor
- John I. Kane · Cosponsor
- Carolyn T. Comitta · Cosponsor
- Patrick J. Stefano · Cosponsor
- Lisa Baker · Primary
- Steven J. Santarsiero · Cosponsor
- Elder A. Vogel · Cosponsor
- Timothy P. Kearney · Cosponsor
- Wayne D. Fontana · Cosponsor
- Camera Bartolotta · Cosponsor
- Maria Collett · Cosponsor
- Vincent J. Hughes · Cosponsor
- Scott Martin · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 20 co-sponsors · 232 not signed on · 4 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Lisa Baker Republican
Co-sponsors (20)
- Yudichak
- Blake
- Jay Costa Democratic
- Judith L. Schwank Democratic
- Browne
- Kristin Phillips-Hill Republican
- Mensch
- Gene Yaw Republican
- Katie J. Muth Democratic Voted No
- John I. Kane Democratic
- Carolyn T. Comitta Democratic
- Patrick J. Stefano Republican
- Steven J. Santarsiero Democratic
- Elder A. Vogel Republican
- Timothy P. Kearney Democratic Voted No
- Wayne D. Fontana Democratic
- Camera Bartolotta Republican
- Maria Collett Democratic
- Vincent J. Hughes Democratic
- Scott Martin Republican
Not signed on (232)
232 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 232 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 14 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 46 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 92% | 8% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (50)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| CORMAN | — | Yea |
| DISANTO | — | Yea |
| AUMENT | — | Yea |
| BREWSTER | — | Yea |
| BROWNE | — | Yea |
| GORDNER | — | Yea |
| YUDICHAK | — | Yea |
| MENSCH | — | Yea |
| REGAN | — | Yea |
| SABATINA | — | Yea |
| SCAVELLO | — | Yea |
| Anthony Williams | — | Yea |
| Amanda M. Cappelletti | Democratic | Nay |
| Art Haywood | Democratic | Yea |
| Carolyn T. Comitta | Democratic | Yea |
| Christine M. Tartaglione | Democratic | Yea |
| Jay Costa | Democratic | Yea |
| John I. Kane | Democratic | Yea |
| Judith L. Schwank | Democratic | Yea |
| Katie J. Muth | Democratic | Nay |
| Lindsey M. Williams | Democratic | Nay |
| Lisa M. Boscola | Democratic | Yea |
| Maria Collett | Democratic | Yea |
| Marty Flynn | Democratic | Yea |
| Nikil Saval | Democratic | Nay |
| Sharif Street | Democratic | Yea |
| Steven J. Santarsiero | Democratic | Yea |
| Timothy P. Kearney | Democratic | Yea |
| Vincent J. Hughes | Democratic | Yea |
| Wayne D. Fontana | Democratic | Yea |
| Camera Bartolotta | Republican | Yea |
| Chris Gebhard | Republican | Yea |
| Cris Dush | Republican | Yea |
| Daniel Laughlin | Republican | Yea |
| David G. Argall | Republican | Yea |
| Devlin J. Robinson | Republican | Yea |
| Doug Mastriano | Republican | Yea |
| Elder A. Vogel | Republican | Yea |
| Gene Yaw | Republican | Yea |
| Joe Pittman | Republican | Yea |
| Judy Ward | Republican | Yea |
| Kathleen C. Tomlinson | Republican | Yea |
| Kim L. Ward | Republican | Yea |
| Kristin Phillips-Hill | Republican | Yea |
| Lisa Baker | Republican | Yea |
| Michele Brooks | Republican | Yea |
| Patrick J. Stefano | Republican | Yea |
| Scott E. Hutchinson | Republican | Yea |
| Scott Martin | Republican | Yea |
| Wayne Langerholc | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 6 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 21 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 88% | 13% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (24)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| AUMENT | — | Yea |
| MENSCH | — | Yea |
| BROWNE | — | Yea |
| CORMAN | — | Yea |
| Art Haywood | Democratic | Nay |
| Jay Costa | Democratic | Yea |
| Judith L. Schwank | Democratic | Yea |
| Marty Flynn | Democratic | Yea |
| Nikil Saval | Democratic | Nay |
| Sharif Street | Democratic | Yea |
| Steven J. Santarsiero | Democratic | Yea |
| Timothy P. Kearney | Democratic | Nay |
| Vincent J. Hughes | Democratic | Yea |
| Chris Gebhard | Republican | Yea |
| Daniel Laughlin | Republican | Yea |
| David G. Argall | Republican | Yea |
| Devlin J. Robinson | Republican | Yea |
| Elder A. Vogel | Republican | Yea |
| Joe Pittman | Republican | Yea |
| Kim L. Ward | Republican | Yea |
| Kristin Phillips-Hill | Republican | Yea |
| Patrick J. Stefano | Republican | Yea |
| Scott Martin | Republican | Yea |
| Wayne Langerholc | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 18 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 50 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (50)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| AUMENT | — | Yea |
| BREWSTER | — | Yea |
| BROWNE | — | Yea |
| CORMAN | — | Yea |
| DISANTO | — | Yea |
| GORDNER | — | Yea |
| MENSCH | — | Yea |
| REGAN | — | Yea |
| SABATINA | — | Yea |
| SCAVELLO | — | Yea |
| YUDICHAK | — | Yea |
| Anthony Williams | — | Yea |
| Amanda M. Cappelletti | Democratic | Yea |
| Art Haywood | Democratic | Yea |
| Carolyn T. Comitta | Democratic | Yea |
| Christine M. Tartaglione | Democratic | Yea |
| Jay Costa | Democratic | Yea |
| John I. Kane | Democratic | Yea |
| Judith L. Schwank | Democratic | Yea |
| Katie J. Muth | Democratic | Yea |
| Lindsey M. Williams | Democratic | Yea |
| Lisa M. Boscola | Democratic | Yea |
| Maria Collett | Democratic | Yea |
| Marty Flynn | Democratic | Yea |
| Nikil Saval | Democratic | Yea |
| Sharif Street | Democratic | Yea |
| Steven J. Santarsiero | Democratic | Yea |
| Timothy P. Kearney | Democratic | Yea |
| Vincent J. Hughes | Democratic | Yea |
| Wayne D. Fontana | Democratic | Yea |
| Camera Bartolotta | Republican | Yea |
| Chris Gebhard | Republican | Yea |
| Cris Dush | Republican | Yea |
| Daniel Laughlin | Republican | Yea |
| David G. Argall | Republican | Yea |
| Devlin J. Robinson | Republican | Yea |
| Doug Mastriano | Republican | Yea |
| Elder A. Vogel | Republican | Yea |
| Gene Yaw | Republican | Yea |
| Joe Pittman | Republican | Yea |
| Judy Ward | Republican | Yea |
| Kathleen C. Tomlinson | Republican | Yea |
| Kim L. Ward | Republican | Yea |
| Kristin Phillips-Hill | Republican | Yea |
| Lisa Baker | Republican | Yea |
| Michele Brooks | Republican | Yea |
| Patrick J. Stefano | Republican | Yea |
| Scott E. Hutchinson | Republican | Yea |
| Scott Martin | Republican | Yea |
| Wayne Langerholc | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 18 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Unaffiliated | 12 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 47 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 96% | 0% | 0% | 4% |
How each member voted (49)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| AUMENT | — | Yea |
| BLAKE | — | Yea |
| BREWSTER | — | Yea |
| BROWNE | — | Yea |
| CORMAN | — | Yea |
| DISANTO | — | Yea |
| GORDNER | — | Not Voting |
| MENSCH | — | Yea |
| REGAN | — | Yea |
| SABATINA | — | Yea |
| SCAVELLO | — | Yea |
| YUDICHAK | — | Yea |
| Anthony Williams | — | Yea |
| Amanda M. Cappelletti | Democratic | Yea |
| Art Haywood | Democratic | Yea |
| Carolyn T. Comitta | Democratic | Yea |
| Christine M. Tartaglione | Democratic | Yea |
| Jay Costa | Democratic | Yea |
| John I. Kane | Democratic | Yea |
| Judith L. Schwank | Democratic | Yea |
| Katie J. Muth | Democratic | Yea |
| Lindsey M. Williams | Democratic | Yea |
| Lisa M. Boscola | Democratic | Yea |
| Maria Collett | Democratic | Yea |
| Nikil Saval | Democratic | Yea |
| Sharif Street | Democratic | Yea |
| Steven J. Santarsiero | Democratic | Yea |
| Timothy P. Kearney | Democratic | Yea |
| Vincent J. Hughes | Democratic | Yea |
| Wayne D. Fontana | Democratic | Yea |
| Camera Bartolotta | Republican | Yea |
| Cris Dush | Republican | Yea |
| Daniel Laughlin | Republican | Yea |
| David G. Argall | Republican | Yea |
| Devlin J. Robinson | Republican | Yea |
| Doug Mastriano | Republican | Yea |
| Elder A. Vogel | Republican | Yea |
| Gene Yaw | Republican | Yea |
| Joe Pittman | Republican | Yea |
| Judy Ward | Republican | Yea |
| Kathleen C. Tomlinson | Republican | Yea |
| Kim L. Ward | Republican | Yea |
| Kristin Phillips-Hill | Republican | Yea |
| Lisa Baker | Republican | Not Voting |
| Michele Brooks | Republican | Yea |
| Patrick J. Stefano | Republican | Yea |
| Scott E. Hutchinson | Republican | Yea |
| Scott Martin | Republican | Yea |
| Wayne Langerholc | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (14)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| AUMENT | — | Yea |
| GORDNER | — | Yea |
| REGAN | — | Yea |
| SABATINA | — | Yea |
| CORMAN | — | Yea |
| Amanda M. Cappelletti | Democratic | Yea |
| Art Haywood | Democratic | Yea |
| Maria Collett | Democratic | Yea |
| Steven J. Santarsiero | Democratic | Yea |
| Gene Yaw | Republican | Yea |
| Joe Pittman | Republican | Yea |
| Lisa Baker | Republican | Yea |
| Scott Martin | Republican | Yea |
| Wayne Langerholc | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 78?
- SB 78 is sponsored by Yudichak, Blake, Jay Costa (Democratic), Judith L. Schwank (Democratic), Browne, Kristin Phillips-Hill (Republican), Mensch, Gene Yaw (Republican), Katie J. Muth (Democratic), John I. Kane (Democratic), Carolyn T. Comitta (Democratic), Patrick J. Stefano (Republican), Lisa Baker (Republican), Steven J. Santarsiero (Democratic), Elder A. Vogel (Republican), Timothy P. Kearney (Democratic), Wayne D. Fontana (Democratic), Camera Bartolotta (Republican), Maria Collett (Democratic), Vincent J. Hughes (Democratic), and Scott Martin (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 78?
- This bill died with 2021-2022 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 78?
- Track SB 78 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 78
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 78
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →