Michigan 2025-2026 Regular Session Status: Passed Senate 1 D cosponsors

SB 170 — Appropriations: judiciary; appropriations for fiscal year 2025-2026; provide for. Creates appropriation act.

Last action — referred to Committee on Appropriations

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has passed the Senate. Introduced May 13, 2025. It now moves to the second chamber.

Next likely step: consideration and a floor vote in the House.

Odds of enactment

Moderate chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a moderate chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Advancing 48% · moderate confidence
  • Passed Senate

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 D).

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 2 recorded votes so far.

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

Summary

Appropriations: judiciary; appropriations for fiscal year 2025-2026; provide for. Creates appropriation act.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

45 added · 59 removed

Plain-language change summary

The latest version of Bill SB 170 has added provisions to support efforts in helping the wrongfully convicted in Michigan. Specifically, it now emphasizes increasing the capacity and efficiency of the clinic that assists in reviewing these cases. This change is important because it aims to ensure that more individuals who may have been wrongfully convicted can receive the assistance they need, which could lead to potential exonerations. Additionally, some language related to the allocation of funds for judicial complaints was revised for clarity.

→
Previous
Latest
SUBSTITUTE FOR SENATE BILL NO.
SB-170, As Passed Senate, May 13, 2025 SUBSTITUTE FOR SENATE BILL NO.
SCS S01527'25 (S-1) mn8da6 Total interdepartmental grants and intradepartmental transfers 1,902,300 ADJUSTED GROSS APPROPRIATION $ 393,396,900 Federal revenues:
SCS S01527'25 (S-1)_SB170_APS_1 mnqght Total interdepartmental grants and intradepartmental transfers 1,902,300 ADJUSTED GROSS APPROPRIATION $ 393,396,900 Federal revenues:
IDG from department of corrections 52,300 SCS S01527'25 (S-1) mn8da6 IDG from department of state police 1,500,000 IDG from department of state police, Michigan justice training fund 100,000 Federal revenues:
IDG from department of corrections 52,300 SCS S01527'25 (S-1)_SB170_APS_1 mnqght IDG from department of state police 1,500,000 IDG from department of state police, Michigan justice training fund 100,000 Federal revenues:
Interest on lawyers' trust accounts 407,900 Private funds 501,100 State justice institute 529,000 Community dispute resolution fund 2,602,200 Court of appeals filing/motion fees 1,450,000 Drug treatment court fund 1,920,500 Justice system fund 643,300 Law exam fees 794,500 Miscellaneous revenue 249,400 State court fund 419,900 State general fund/general purpose $ 84,940,300 SCS S01527'25 (S-1) mn8da6 Sec.
Interest on lawyers' trust accounts 407,900 Private funds 501,100 State justice institute 529,000 Community dispute resolution fund 2,602,200 Court of appeals filing/motion fees 1,450,000 Drug treatment court fund 1,920,500 Justice system fund 643,300 Law exam fees 794,500 Miscellaneous revenue 249,400 State court fund 419,900 State general fund/general purpose $ 84,940,300 SCS S01527'25 (S-1)_SB170_APS_1 mnqght Sec.
JUSTICES' AND JUDGES' COMPENSATION Judges' positions--591.0 justices and judges Supreme court justices' salaries--7.0 justices $ 1,270,500 Circuit court judges' state base salaries-- 223.0 judges 31,326,100 Circuit court judicial salary standardization 10,196,800 Court of appeals judges' salaries--25.0 judges 5,037,400 District court judges' state base salaries-- 232.0 judges 32,583,200 District court judicial salary standardization 10,608,600 Probate court judges' state base salaries-- 104.0 judges 14,486,400 Probate court judicial salary standardization 4,715,300 Judges' retirement system defined contributions 9,400,600 OASI, Social Security 8,339,600 GROSS APPROPRIATION $ 127,964,500 SCS S01527'25 (S-1) mn8da6 Appropriated from:
JUSTICES' AND JUDGES' COMPENSATION Judges' positions--591.0 justices and judges Supreme court justices' salaries--7.0 justices $ 1,270,500 Circuit court judges' state base salaries-- 223.0 judges 31,326,100 Circuit court judicial salary standardization 10,196,800 Court of appeals judges' salaries--25.0 judges 5,037,400 District court judges' state base salaries-- 232.0 judges 32,583,200 District court judicial salary standardization 10,608,600 Probate court judges' state base salaries-- 104.0 judges 14,486,400 Probate court judicial salary standardization 4,715,300 Judges' retirement system defined contributions 9,400,600 OASI, Social Security 8,339,600 GROSS APPROPRIATION $ 127,964,500 SCS S01527'25 (S-1)_SB170_APS_1 mnqght Appropriated from:
Interest on lawyers' trust accounts 88,400 Michigan justice fund 380,000 Miscellaneous revenue 172,400 State general fund/general purpose $ 23,983,800 SCS S01527'25 (S-1) mn8da6 Sec.
Interest on lawyers' trust accounts 88,400 Michigan justice fund 380,000 Miscellaneous revenue 172,400 State general fund/general purpose $ 23,983,800 SCS S01527'25 (S-1)_SB170_APS_1 mnqght Sec.
ONE-TIME APPROPRIATIONS Judicial tenure commission backlog 499,900 Innocence project grant 1,000,000 SCS S01527'25 (S-1) mn8da6 Resentencing litigation costs 100 GROSS APPROPRIATION $ 1,500,000 Appropriated from:
ONE-TIME APPROPRIATIONS Judicial tenure commission backlog 499,900 Innocence project grant 1,000,000 SCS S01527'25 (S-1)_SB170_APS_1 mnqght Resentencing litigation costs 100 GROSS APPROPRIATION $ 1,500,000 Appropriated from:
JUDICIARY SUPREME COURT Next generation Michigan court system $ 4,116,000 Problem solving courts 16,702,300 State court administrative office 200,000 Swift and sure sanctions program 3,350,000 JUSTICES' AND JUDGES' COMPENSATION Circuit court judicial salary standardization $ 10,196,800 District court judicial salary standardization 10,608,600 OASI, Social Security 1,459,400 Probate court judges' state base salaries 14,486,400 Probate court judicial salary standardization 4,715,300 SCS S01527'25 (S-1) mn8da6 TRIAL COURT OPERATIONS Court equity fund reimbursements $ 60,815,700 Drug case-flow program 250,000 Drunk driving case-flow program 3,300,000 Judicial technology improvement fund 4,815,000 Juror compensation reimbursement 6,616,200 Statewide e-file system 12,007,200 ONE-TIME APPROPRIATIONS Innocence investment grant 1,000,000 TOTAL $ 154,638,900 Sec.
JUDICIARY SUPREME COURT Next generation Michigan court system $ 4,116,000 Problem solving courts 16,702,300 State court administrative office 200,000 Swift and sure sanctions program 3,350,000 JUSTICES' AND JUDGES' COMPENSATION Circuit court judicial salary standardization $ 10,196,800 District court judicial salary standardization 10,608,600 OASI, Social Security 1,459,400 Probate court judges' state base salaries 14,486,400 Probate court judicial salary standardization 4,715,300 SCS S01527'25 (S-1)_SB170_APS_1 mnqght TRIAL COURT OPERATIONS Court equity fund reimbursements $ 60,815,700 Drug case-flow program 250,000 Drunk driving case-flow program 3,300,000 Judicial technology improvement fund 4,815,000 Juror compensation reimbursement 6,616,200 Statewide e-file system 12,007,200 ONE-TIME APPROPRIATIONS Innocence investment grant 1,000,000 TOTAL $ 154,638,900 Sec.
This requirement SCS S01527'25 (S-1) mn8da6 includes transmitting reports to the standard report recipients and any other required recipients by email and posting the reports on an internet site.
This requirement SCS S01527'25 (S-1)_SB170_APS_1 mnqght includes transmitting reports to the standard report recipients and any other required recipients by email and posting the reports on an internet site.
The report must list all travel outside this state by judicial branch employees in the previous fiscal year that was funded in whole or in part with funds appropriated in the judicial branch's SCS S01527'25 (S-1) mn8da6 budget.
The report must list all travel outside this state by judicial branch employees in the previous fiscal year that was funded in whole or in part with funds appropriated in the judicial branch's SCS S01527'25 (S-1)_SB170_APS_1 mnqght budget.
(4) The state court administrative office shall notify the standard report recipients and the senate and house standing SCS S01527'25 (S-1) mn8da6 committees on appropriations if these contingency funds are utilized.
(4) The state court administrative office shall notify the standard report recipients and the senate and house standing SCS S01527'25 (S-1)_SB170_APS_1 mnqght committees on appropriations if these contingency funds are utilized.
(2) For each report listed on the state court administrative office website, a reference shall be provided to each statutory or SCS S01527'25 (S-1) mn8da6 appropriations bill section and, if applicable, subsection where that report is required.
(2) For each report listed on the state court administrative office website, a reference shall be provided to each statutory or SCS S01527'25 (S-1)_SB170_APS_1 mnqght appropriations bill section and, if applicable, subsection where that report is required.
To the extent possible, the judicial branch shall not expend appropriations under part 1 until all existing SCS S01527'25 (S-1) mn8da6 authorized work project funds for the same purpose are exhausted.
To the extent possible, the judicial branch shall not expend appropriations under part 1 until all existing SCS S01527'25 (S-1)_SB170_APS_1 mnqght authorized work project funds for the same purpose are exhausted.
SCS S01527'25 (S-1) mn8da6 JUDICIAL BRANCH Sec.
SCS S01527'25 (S-1)_SB170_APS_1 mnqght JUDICIAL BRANCH Sec.
If funds in the court fee fund are insufficient to pay judges' compensation, the difference between the appropriated SCS S01527'25 (S-1) mn8da6 amount from that fund for judges' compensation and the actual amount available after the amount appropriated for trial court reimbursement is made is appropriated from the state general fund for judges' compensation.
If funds in the court fee fund are insufficient to pay judges' compensation, the difference between the appropriated SCS S01527'25 (S-1)_SB170_APS_1 mnqght amount from that fund for judges' compensation and the actual amount available after the amount appropriated for trial court reimbursement is made is appropriated from the state general fund for judges' compensation.
The funds may be used in connection with other federal, state, and local SCS S01527'25 (S-1) mn8da6 funding sources.
The funds may be used in connection with other federal, state, and local SCS S01527'25 (S-1)_SB170_APS_1 mnqght funding sources.
SCS S01527'25 (S-1) mn8da6 (2) Not later than March 1, the state court administrative office, in coordination with the department of corrections, shall submit a report on the swift and sure sanctions program that includes all of the following information for each individual court, by program:
SCS S01527'25 (S-1)_SB170_APS_1 mnqght (2) Not later than March 1, the state court administrative office, in coordination with the department of corrections, shall submit a report on the swift and sure sanctions program that includes all of the following information for each individual court, by program:
The state court administrative office shall summarize the costs to maintain the website, provide statistics on the number of individuals who visit the website, and provide information on content usage, form SCS S01527'25 (S-1) mn8da6 completion, and user feedback not later than March 1 for the previous fiscal year.
The state court administrative office shall summarize the costs to maintain the website, provide statistics on the number of individuals who visit the website, and provide information on content usage, form SCS S01527'25 (S-1)_SB170_APS_1 mnqght completion, and user feedback not later than March 1 for the previous fiscal year.
(2) Not later than March 1, the judiciary shall report on the SCS S01527'25 (S-1) mn8da6 medication-assisted treatment program.
(2) Not later than March 1, the judiciary shall report on the SCS S01527'25 (S-1)_SB170_APS_1 mnqght medication-assisted treatment program.
The state treasurer shall direct the SCS S01527'25 (S-1) mn8da6 investment of the fund and credit to the fund interest and earnings from fund investments.
The state treasurer shall direct the SCS S01527'25 (S-1)_SB170_APS_1 mnqght investment of the fund and credit to the fund interest and earnings from fund investments.
The funds appropriated in part 1 for innocence investment grant shall be provided to the Michigan Innocence Clinic at the University of Michigan Law School to further legal advocacy and litigation expenses associated with the legal representation of the wrongfully convicted in the state of Michigan.
(1) The funds appropriated in part 1 for innocence investment grant shall be provided to the Michigan Innocence Clinic at the University of Michigan Law School to further legal advocacy and investigation, and to cover litigation expenses associated with helping the wrongfully convicted across the state of Michigan.
Sec.
This work includes increasing the clinic’s case capacity, improving its efficiency in processing and investigating cases, increasing opportunities for student learning experiences, and providing support for both legal representation and associated forensic investigative work.
402.
(2) The unexpended funds appropriated in part 1 for innocence investment grant are designated as a work project appropriation.
(1) Funds appropriated in part 1 for judicial complaint backlog work project shall be allocated to the judicial tenure commission for the purpose of reducing the current judicial complaint backlog.
Unencumbered or unallotted funds must not lapse at the end of the fiscal year and must be available for expenditures under this section until the project has been completed.
The judicial tenure commission may hire contract attorneys for this purpose with the goal of reducing the judicial complaint backlog and reducing delays in the complaint investigation process.
The following is in compliance with section 451a of the management and budget act, 1984 SCS S01527'25 (S-1)_SB170_APS_1 mnqght PA 431, MCL 18.1451a:
(2) The unexpended funds appropriated in part 1 for judicial complaint backlog are designed as a work project appropriation.
(a) The purpose of the work project is to further legal advocacy and investigation, and to cover litigation expenses associated with helping the wrongfully convicted across the state of Michigan.
Unencumbered or unallotted funds must not lapse at the end of the fiscal year and must be available for expenditures under this SCS S01527'25 (S-1) mn8da6 section until the project has been completed.
(b) The work project will be accomplished by utilizing state employees, contracts with service providers, or both.
The following is in compliance with section 451a of the management and budget act, 1984 PA 431, MCL 18.1451a:
(c) The total estimated cost of the project is $1,000,000.00.
(a) The purpose of the project is to reduce the judicial complaint backlog and to reduce delays in the investigation of judicial complaints to under 90 days for each judicial complaint.
(d) The tentative completion date is September 30, 2030.
(b) The project will be accomplished by utilizing state employees, contracts with service providers, or both.
Final Page SCS S01527'25 (S-1)_SB170_APS_1 mnqght
(c) The total estimated cost of the project is $499,900.00.
(d) The tentative completion date is September 30, 2027.
Sec.
403.
(1) From the funds appropriated in part 1 for juvenile lifer litigation costs, the state appellate defender office shall operate a program to ensure this state's compliance with People v Czarnecki, ___Mich___ (2025) and People v Taylor, ___Mich___ (2025).
The purpose of the program is to ensure competent, resourced, and supervised counsel in cases involving resentencing individuals who are serving a life sentence for an offense committed when they were 19 or 20 years of age.
(2) The state appellate defender office shall submit a report not later than March 1 on the number of cases investigated and prepared by the state appellate defender office under subsection (1).
The report must include a calculation of the hours spent and the incremental costs associated with the investigation and robust examination of each case.
Final Page SCS S01527'25 (S-1) mn8da6
View plain text versions (7)

Action History

  1. referred to Committee on Appropriations

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 146 not signed on · 18 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (146)

146 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 146 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 19 Yea · 18 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 19000
Republican 01700
Unaffiliated 0100
Total 191800
% of votes cast 51%49%0%0%
How each member voted (37)
Member Party Vote
Outman — Nay
Darrin Camilleri Democrat Yea
Dayna Polehanki Democrat Yea
Erika Geiss Democrat Yea
Jeff Irwin Democrat Yea
Jeremy Moss Democrat Yea
John Cherry Democrat Yea
Kevin Hertel Democrat Yea
Mallory McMorrow Democrat Yea
Mary Cavanagh Democrat Yea
Paul Wojno Democrat Yea
Rosemary Bayer Democrat Yea
Sam Singh Democrat Yea
Sarah Anthony Democrat Yea
Sean McCann Democrat Yea
Stephanie Chang Democrat Yea
Sue Shink Democrat Yea
Sylvia Santana Democrat Yea
Veronica Klinefelt Democrat Yea
Winnie Brinks Democrat Yea
Aric Nesbitt Republican Nay
Dan Lauwers Republican Nay
Edward McBroom Republican Nay
Jim Runestad Republican Nay
John Damoose Republican Nay
Jon Bumstead Republican Nay
Jonathan Lindsey Republican Nay
Joseph Bellino Jr. Republican Nay
Kevin Daley Republican Nay
Lana Theis Republican Nay
Mark Huizenga Republican Nay
Michael Webber Republican Nay
Michele Hoitenga Republican Nay
Roger Hauck Republican Nay
Roger Victory Republican Nay
Ruth Johnson Republican Nay
Thomas Albert Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 19 Yea · 18 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 19000
Republican 01800
Total 191800
% of votes cast 51%49%0%0%
How each member voted (37)
Member Party Vote
Darrin Camilleri Democrat Yea
Dayna Polehanki Democrat Yea
Erika Geiss Democrat Yea
Jeff Irwin Democrat Yea
Jeremy Moss Democrat Yea
John Cherry Democrat Yea
Kevin Hertel Democrat Yea
Mallory McMorrow Democrat Yea
Mary Cavanagh Democrat Yea
Paul Wojno Democrat Yea
Rosemary Bayer Democrat Yea
Sam Singh Democrat Yea
Sarah Anthony Democrat Yea
Sean McCann Democrat Yea
Stephanie Chang Democrat Yea
Sue Shink Democrat Yea
Sylvia Santana Democrat Yea
Veronica Klinefelt Democrat Yea
Winnie Brinks Democrat Yea
Aric Nesbitt Republican Nay
Dan Lauwers Republican Nay
Edward McBroom Republican Nay
Jim Runestad Republican Nay
John Damoose Republican Nay
Jon Bumstead Republican Nay
Jonathan Lindsey Republican Nay
Joseph Bellino Jr. Republican Nay
Kevin Daley Republican Nay
Lana Theis Republican Nay
Mark Huizenga Republican Nay
Michael Webber Republican Nay
Michele Hoitenga Republican Nay
Rick Outman Republican Nay
Roger Hauck Republican Nay
Roger Victory Republican Nay
Ruth Johnson Republican Nay
Thomas Albert Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 170 do?
Appropriations: judiciary; appropriations for fiscal year 2025-2026; provide for. Creates appropriation act.
Who sponsors SB 170?
SB 170 is sponsored by Sue Shink (Democrat).
What is the current status of SB 170?
This bill has passed the Senate. Introduced May 13, 2025. It now moves to the second chamber.
Where can I track SB 170?
Track SB 170 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 170

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 170

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →