Family law: marriage and divorce; uniform premarital and marital agreements act; create. Creates new act.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 160 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 160.
You're tracking SB 160
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 160 — Family law: marriage and divorce; uniform premarital and marital agreements act; create. Creates new act.
Last action — referred to Committee on Judiciary
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has passed the Senate. Introduced May 07, 2025. It now moves to the second chamber.
Next likely step: consideration and a floor vote in the House.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
ModerateHow often bills like it became law.
-
Passed Senate
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 D).
-
Mixed recorded votes
1 passed, 1 failed in recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Family law: marriage and divorce; uniform premarital and marital agreements act; create. Creates new act.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
9 added · 8 removedPlain-language change summary
The latest version of Bill SB 160 includes nine new lines that add specific provisions or clarifications, while removing eight lines from the previous draft. This change is important because the additions likely strengthen the bill or clarify its intent, addressing concerns or gaps identified during earlier discussions. Overall, these adjustments enhance the bill's effectiveness and ensure it better serves its purpose.
SB-160, As Passed Senate, May 7, 2025 SUBSTITUTE FOR SENATE BILL NO.
OOI S00748'25 (S-1)(S-1)_SB160_APS_1 a5mgpvebafvs 1 (i) A threat of refusal to go forward with a marriage if a premarital agreement is not signed.
(6) "Premarital agreement" means an agreement between individuals who intend to marry that affirms, modifies, or waives a marital right or obligation during the marriage or at separation, OOI S00748'25 (S-1)(S-1)_SB160_APS_1 a5mgpvebafvs 1 marital dissolution, death of one of the spouses, or the occurrence or nonoccurrence of any other event.
or OOI S00748'25 (S-1)(S-1)_SB160_APS_1 a5mgpvebafvs 1 (2) an agreement between spouses who intend to obtain a marital dissolution or court-decreed separation that resolves their marital rights or obligations and is signed when a proceeding for marital dissolution or court-decreed separation is anticipated or pending.
A OOI S00748'25 (S-1)(S-1)_SB160_APS_1 a5mgpvebafvs 1 marital agreement is effective on signing by both parties.
OOI S00748'25 (S-1)(S-1)_SB160_APS_1 a5mgpvebafvs 1 (c) A notice of waiver of rights under this section requires language, conspicuously displayed, substantially similar to the following, as applicable to the premarital agreement or marital agreement:
(e) If a premarital agreement or marital agreement modifies or eliminates spousal support and the modification or elimination causes a party to the agreement to be eligible for support under a program of public assistance at the time of separation or marital dissolution, a court, on request of that party, may require the other party to provide support to the extent necessary to avoid OOI S00748'25 (S-1)(S-1)_SB160_APS_1 a5mgpvebafvs 1 that eligibility.
A statute of limitations applicable to an action asserting a claim for relief under a premarital agreement or marital agreement is tolled during the marriage of the parties to OOI S00748'25 (S-1)(S-1)_SB160_APS_1 a5mgpvebafvs 1 the agreement, but equitable defenses limiting the time for enforcement, including laches and estoppel, are available to either party.
Final Page OOI S00748'25 (S-1)(S-1)_SB160_APS_1 a5mgpvebafvs
View plain text versions (4)
- As Passed by the Senate View text Current pdf
- Substitute Substitute (S-1) pdf
- Substitute Substitute (S-1) - 2 pdf
- Introduced Senate Introduced Bill pdf
Action History
-
referred to Committee on Judiciary
Sponsors
- Sue Shink · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 146 not signed on · 13 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Sue Shink Democrat
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (146)
146 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 146 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 18 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 4 | 12 | 0 | 1 |
| Unaffiliated | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 22 | 13 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 59% | 35% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (37)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Outman | — | Nay |
| Darrin Camilleri | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Dayna Polehanki | Democrat | Yea |
| Erika Geiss | Democrat | Yea |
| Jeff Irwin | Democrat | Yea |
| Jeremy Moss | Democrat | Yea |
| John Cherry | Democrat | Yea |
| Kevin Hertel | Democrat | Yea |
| Mallory McMorrow | Democrat | Yea |
| Mary Cavanagh | Democrat | Yea |
| Paul Wojno | Democrat | Yea |
| Rosemary Bayer | Democrat | Yea |
| Sam Singh | Democrat | Yea |
| Sarah Anthony | Democrat | Yea |
| Sean McCann | Democrat | Yea |
| Stephanie Chang | Democrat | Yea |
| Sue Shink | Democrat | Yea |
| Sylvia Santana | Democrat | Yea |
| Veronica Klinefelt | Democrat | Yea |
| Winnie Brinks | Democrat | Yea |
| Aric Nesbitt | Republican | Nay |
| Dan Lauwers | Republican | Nay |
| Edward McBroom | Republican | Yea |
| Jim Runestad | Republican | Nay |
| John Damoose | Republican | Nay |
| Jon Bumstead | Republican | Nay |
| Jonathan Lindsey | Republican | Yea |
| Joseph Bellino Jr. | Republican | Nay |
| Kevin Daley | Republican | Nay |
| Lana Theis | Republican | Nay |
| Mark Huizenga | Republican | Yea |
| Michael Webber | Republican | Yea |
| Michele Hoitenga | Republican | Nay |
| Roger Hauck | Republican | Nay |
| Roger Victory | Republican | Nay |
| Ruth Johnson | Republican | Not Voting |
| Thomas Albert | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (6)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Lauwers Nesbitt Outman | — | Nay |
| Joseph Bellino Jr. | Republican | Nay |
| Kevin Daley | Republican | Nay |
| Michele Hoitenga | Republican | Nay |
| Roger Victory | Republican | Nay |
| Ruth Johnson | Republican | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 160 do?
- Family law: marriage and divorce; uniform premarital and marital agreements act; create. Creates new act.
- Who sponsors SB 160?
- SB 160 is sponsored by Sue Shink (Democrat).
- What is the current status of SB 160?
- This bill has passed the Senate. Introduced May 07, 2025. It now moves to the second chamber.
- Where can I track SB 160?
- Track SB 160 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 160
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 160
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →