S8927 — Relates to divorce and the consideration by the court of companion animals
Last action — In Assembly Committee
-
1Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been introduced in the Senate. Introduced January 16, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Next likely step: a committee referral and hearing.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
LowHow often bills like it became law.
Not enough signal yet to read this bill's trajectory — we surface a likelihood only once there's real movement (stage, sponsorship, committee, or votes) to point to.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
In plain language
The bill directs courts to consider various factors regarding companion animals in divorce cases.
This legislation requires courts to evaluate factors such as when a companion animal was acquired and who has been responsible for its care during divorce proceedings. It aims to ensure that the well-being of the animal is taken into account.
Summary
Directs the court to consider whether the companion animal was acquired prior to or during the marriage; the basic daily needs of the companion animal; the party who generally facilitates veterinary care for the companion animal; the party who generally provides the companion animal with social interaction; the party who generally ensures compliance with state and local regulations regarding the companion animal; and the party who provides the greater ability to financially support the companion animal.
Bill Text
- Full text View text Current
Action History
-
REFERRED TO JUDICIARY
-
DELIVERED TO ASSEMBLY
-
PASSED SENATE
-
ADVANCED TO THIRD READING
-
2ND REPORT CAL.
-
1ST REPORT CAL.1020
-
REFERRED TO JUDICIARY
Sponsors
- Jeremy Cooney · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 218 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (218)
218 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 218 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does S8927 do?
- Directs the court to consider whether the companion animal was acquired prior to or during the marriage; the basic daily needs of the companion animal; the party who generally facilitates veterinary care for the companion animal; the party who generally provides the companion animal with social interaction; the party who generally ensures compliance with state and local regulations regarding the companion animal; and the party who provides the greater ability to financially support the companion animal.
- Who sponsors S8927?
- S8927 is sponsored by Jeremy Cooney.
- What is the current status of S8927?
- This bill has been introduced in the Senate. Introduced January 16, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
- Where can I track S8927?
- Track S8927 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on S8927
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of S8927
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →