EXPOSURE OF CHILDREN TO DRUGS
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 6 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 6.
You're tracking SB 6
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 6 — EXPOSURE OF CHILDREN TO DRUGS
Last action — Sent to Senate Committees' Committee
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2025 First Special Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
- Introduced introduced version Current pdf
AI-generated reading aid from the bill's amendatory text — verify against the official bill.
The bill amends existing law to classify exposure of a child to certain controlled substances as child abuse and provides specific procedures for taking newborns into temporary protective custody under certain conditions.
-
Section 30-6-1 NMSA 1978
(4) exposed to the extent that the child tests positive at birth for either a Schedule I controlled substance pursuant to the Controlled Substances Act, including opiates, opiate derivatives, hallucinogens, stimulants and depressants that have no legitimate medical use, or a Schedule II controlled substance pursuant to the Controlled Substances Act, including any potentially addictive substance that is used or manufactured contrary to its current accepted medical use, unless the child tests positive for a Schedule II controlled substance pursuant to the Controlled Substances Act as a result of the mother's lawful intake of such substance as prescribed.
Adds a new category of child abuse related to exposure to controlled substances at birth.
-
[NEW MATERIAL] TAKING NEWBORN CHILDREN INTO TEMPORARY PROTECTIVE CUSTODY.-- A. A newborn child who is in a hospital setting shall not be taken into temporary protective custody without a court order that includes findings that an emergency situation exists and that the newborn child is seriously endangered. A newborn child may be detained in a hospital by a law enforcement officer upon the recommendation of the health care authority, the department or a physician, registered nurse, licensed practical nurse or physician assistant while a court order is being pursued, but the newborn child must be released if a court order is denied.
Establishes new procedures for taking newborns into temporary protective custody, requiring court orders in emergency situations.
-
C. A newborn child may be taken into temporary protective custody without a court order in the following circumstances: (1) when a newborn child is identified by a physician, registered nurse, licensed practical nurse or physician assistant engaged in the admission, care or treatment of patients as being affected by substance abuse or demonstrating withdrawal symptoms resulting from prenatal drug exposure; or (2) when the newborn child is subject to an environment exposing the newborn child to a laboratory for manufacturing controlled substances.
Allows for the removal of newborns without a court order in specific circumstances involving drug exposure or hazardous environments.
Action History
-
Sent to Senate Committees' Committee
Sponsors
- Crystal Brantley · Primary
- Joshua A. Sanchez · Primary
- Candy Spence Ezzell · Primary
- Jay C. Block · Primary
- Nicole Tobiassen · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →5 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 107 not signed on
Sponsors (5)
- Crystal Brantley Republican
- Joshua A. Sanchez Republican
- Candy Spence Ezzell Republican
- Jay C. Block Republican
- Nicole Tobiassen Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (107)
107 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 107 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 6?
- SB 6 is sponsored by Crystal Brantley (Republican), Joshua A. Sanchez (Republican), Candy Spence Ezzell (Republican), Jay C. Block (Republican), and Nicole Tobiassen (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 6?
- This bill died with 2025 First Special Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 6?
- Track SB 6 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 6
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 6
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →