PUBLIC SCHOOL CAPITAL OUTLAY CHANGES
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 82 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 82.
You're tracking SB 82
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 82 — PUBLIC SCHOOL CAPITAL OUTLAY CHANGES
Last action — Signed
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 22, 2025. Enacted.
Signed by Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham (Democratic) on March 21, 2025.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 D).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 2 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
381 added · 602 removedPlain-language change summary
The recent amendments to SB 82 extend a financial provision for public school capital projects through fiscal year 2027. This provision allows some school districts to reduce their local funding contributions by one-third and small districts by one-half. Additionally, the amendments simplify the criteria that the Public School Capital Outlay Council must consider when adjusting a district's local share. These changes aim to provide greater financial relief to schools, which can help improve their facilities and resources.
SENATEAN BILLACT 82RELATING 57THTO LEGISLATUREPUBLIC -SCHOOL STATEOFNEWMEXICO-CAPITAL FIRSTOUTLAY; SESSION, 2025 INTRODUCED BY William P.
SoulesEXTENDING ThisTHROUGH documentFISCAL mayYEAR incorporate2027 amendmentsTHE proposedPROVISION byTHAT aREDUCES committee,LOCAL butSHARES notBY yetONE-THIRD adopted,FOR asSOME wellSCHOOL asDISTRICTS amendmentsAND thatONE-HALF haveFOR beenCERTAIN adoptedSMALL duringSCHOOL theDISTRICTS; current legislative session.
TheELIMINATING documentSOME isOF aTHE toolCRITERIA toTHE showPUBLIC amendmentsSCHOOL inCAPITAL contextOUTLAY andCOUNCIL cannotIS beREQUIRED usedTO forCONSIDER theBEFORE purposeMAKING ofAN addingADJUSTMENT amendmentsTO toA legislation.SCHOOL DISTRICT'S LOCAL SHARE;
FORMAKING THECONFORMING PUBLICAMENDMENTS. SCHOOL CAPITAL OUTLAY OVERSIGHT TASK FORCE AND THE LEGISLATIVE EDUCATION STUDY COMMITTEE h AN ACT g o RELATING TO PUBLIC SCHOOL CAPITAL OUTLAY;
EXTENDINGBE THROUGHIT tENACTED hrBY gTHE eLEGISLATURE iOF k FISCAL YEAR 2027 THE PROVISIONSTATE THATOF REDUCESNEW LOCALMEXICO: SHARES BY h r i s ONE-THIRD FOR SOME SCHOOL DISTRICTS AND ONE-HALF FOR CERTAIN h , t, SMALL SCHOOL DISTRICTS;
ELIMINATING SOME OF THE CRITERIA THE e u g e b l e e h PUBLIC SCHOOL CAPITAL OUTLAY COUNCIL IS REQUIRED TO CONSIDER n d d i = = o h BEFORE MAKING AN ADJUSTMENT TO A SCHOOL DISTRICT'S LOCAL SHARE;
l ] b ,d i a º e MAKING CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.
r i = r t e w d m a n o d m :
b e d s º o t n = .228682.1AIC March 16, 2025 (2:25pm) s k m e e a n e d r e l u [ A d BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO:
(1) all school districts are eligible to apply for funding from the fund, regardless of percentage of SB 82 Page 1 indebtedness;
(2) priorities for funding shall be determined h g by using the statewide adequacy standards developed pursuant to o t hr Subsection C of this section;
g e i k (a) the council shall apply the h r i s h standards to charter schools to the same extent that they are , t, e u g applied to other public schools;
e b l e e h (b) the council may award grants n d d i = = o h annually to school districts for the purpose of repairing, l ] b ,d i a º e r i = r renovating or replacing public school building systems in t e w d m a n o existing buildings as identified in Section 22-24-4.6 dNMSA m1978; :
b e d s º o t n = .228682.1AIC March 16, 2025 (2:25pm) s k m e - 2 - e a n e d r e l u [ A d NMSA 1978;
In establishing the criteria, the council shall SB 82 Page 2 consider:
h g (b) the potential use of more durable o t hr construction materials that may reduce long-term operating g e i k costs;
h r i s (c) concepts that promote efficient but h , t, e u g flexible utilization of space;
and e b l e e h (d) any other financing or construction n d d i = = o h concept that may maximize the dollar effect of the state grant l ] b ,d i a º e r i = r assistance;
t e w d m a n o (4) no more than ten percent of the combined dtotal mof :grants in a funding cycle shall be used for retrofitting existing facilities for technology infrastructure;
b e d s º o t n = .228682.1AIC March 16, 2025 (2:25pm) s k m e - 3 - e a n e d r e l u [ A d total of grants in a funding cycle shall be used for retrofitting existing facilities for technology infrastructure;
(b) the maximum allowable gross square SB 82 Page 3 foot per student multiplied by the replacement cost per square foot divided by forty-five is calculated for each school district;
h (d) in those instances in which the u » r t h calculation pursuant to Subparagraph (c) of this paragraph g e l i yields a value equal to or greater than one, the phase two h r i s formula value shall be zero for the subject school district;
h , e h t u g (e) in those instances in which the e b l e e , gh calculation pursuant to Subparagraph (c) of this paragraph n d d i = = o h yields a value of ninety-hundredths or more but less than one, l ] b ,d i a º r the phase two formula value shall be one minus the value e r = t e w d m a n o calculated in Subparagraph (c) of this paragraph;
and d(f) min :those instances in which the calculation pursuant to Subparagraph (c) of this paragraph yields a value less than ninety-hundredths, the phase two formula value shall be one minus the value calculated in Subparagraph (c) of this paragraph plus the school district population density factor;
b r e t º o t n = .228682.1AIC March 16, 2025 (2:25pm) s k m e - 4 - e a n e d r e l u [ A d (f) in those instances in which the calculation pursuant to Subparagraph (c) of this paragraph yields a value less than ninety-hundredths, the phase two formula value shall be one minus the value calculated in Subparagraph (c) of this paragraph plus the school district population density factor;
Except as SB 82 Page 4 provided in Section 22-24-5.7 NMSA 1978 and except as adjusted pursuant to Paragraph (8), (9) or (10) of this subsection, the amount to be distributed from the fund for an approved project shall equal the total project cost multiplied by the following percentage, except that in no case shall the state share be less than six percent:
(a) for fiscal year 2024 through fiscal year [2026 ] 2027, the percentage shall be the phase two formula h g value plus a percentage equal to one-third of the difference o t hr between one and the phase two formula value;
provided that, for g e i k school districts with fewer than 200 MEM, the percentage shall h r i s be the phase two formula value plus a percentage equal to one-one-half h , t, e u g half of the difference between one and the phase two formula;
e b l e e h and n d d i = = o h (b) for fiscal year [2027 ] 2028 and l ] b ,d i a º e r i = r thereafter, the percentage shall be the phase two formula t e w d m a n o value;
d(7) mas :used in this subsection:
b e d s º o t n = .228682.1AIC March 16, 2025 (2:25pm) s k m e - 5 - e a n e d r e l u [ A d (7) as used in this subsection:
SB 82 Page 5 (c) "subject school district" means the school district that has submitted the application for funding and in which the approved public school capital outlay project will be located;
(8) the amount calculated pursuant to h g Paragraph (6) of this subsection may be increased by an o t hr additional five percent if the council finds that the subject g e i k school district has been exemplary in implementing and h r i s maintaining a preventive maintenance program.
The council h , t, e u g shall adopt such rules as are necessary to implement the e b l e e h provisions of this paragraph;
n d d i = = o h (9) the council may adjust the amount of a l ] b ,d i a º e r i = r school district's local share otherwise required if it t e w d m a n o determines that [a ] the school district has made a good-faith deffort mto :use all of its local resources.
b e d s º o t n = .228682.1AIC March 16, 2025 (2:25pm) s k m e - 6 - e a n e d r e l u [ A d effort to use all of its local resources.
(a) the school district has insufficient bonding capacity over the next four years to provide the local match necessary to complete the project and, for all educational purposes, has a residential property SB 82 Page 6 tax rate of at least ten dollars ($10.00) on each one thousand dollars ($1,000) of taxable value, as measured by the sum of all rates imposed by resolution of the local school board plus rates set to pay interest and principal on outstanding school district general obligation bonds;
or (b) the school district [1)] has fewer than an average of Hfl1ºeightone hundred»Hfl1 Hfl1ºone thousand five hundred»Hfl1hundred full-time-equivalent students on the second and third reporting dates of the prior school year [2)and, for all educational purposes, has a residential property tax rate of at least seventyseven percentdollars ($7.00) on each one thousand dollars ($1,000) of itstaxable studentsvalue, eligibleas formeasured freeby orthe hsum reduced-feeof lunch;all rates imposed by resolution of the local school board plus rates set to pay interest and principal on outstanding school district general obligation bonds;
3)(10) hasthe alocal phasematch twofor formulathe valueconstitutional calculatedspecial uschools »shall rbe tset hat pursuantfifty topercent Paragraphfor (5)projects ofthat thisqualify subsectionunder thatthe wouldeducational beadequacy gcategory eand lone ihundred greaterpercent thanfor fiftyprojects percent;that qualify in the support spaces category;
andprovided 4)]that and,the forcouncil allmay educationaladjust hor rwaive i s purposes, has a residential property tax rate of at least seven h , e h t u g dollars ($7.00) on each one thousand dollars ($1,000) of e b l e e , gh taxable value, as measured by the sumamount of allany ratesdirect imposedappropriation byoffset nto dor dlocal ishare =required =for o h resolution of the localconstitutional schoolspecial boardschools plusif ratesan setapplicant toconstitutional payspecial l ] b ,d i a º r e r = interest and principal on outstanding school districthas generalinsufficient tor eno wlocal dresources mavailable; a n o obligation bonds;
Show all 81 changed lines (41 more)
[orand d(11) mno :application for grant assistance SB 82 Page 7 from the fund shall be approved unless the council determines that:
b(a) rthe epublic tschool ºcapital ooutlay tproject nis =needed .228682.1AICand Marchincluded 16,in 2025the (2:25pm)school sdistrict's kfive-year mfacilities eplan -among 7its -top epriorities; a n e d r e l u [ A d (c) the school district:
1)(b) has an enrollment growth rate over the previous school yeardistrict ofhas atused leastits twocapital andresources one-halfin percent;a prudent manner;
2)(c) pursuantthe toschool itsdistrict five-yearhas facilitiesprovided plan,insurance willfor bebuildings buildingof athe new school withindistrict in accordance with the nextprovisions twoof years;Section 13-5-3 NMSA 1978;
and 3) for all educational purposes, has a residential property tax rate of at least ten dollars ($10.00) on each one thousand dollars ($1,000) of taxable value, as measured by the sum of all rates imposed by resolution of the local school board plus rates set to pay interest and principal on outstanding school district general obligation bonds] (10) the local match for the constitutional special schools shall be set at fifty percent for projects that qualify under the educational adequacy category and one hundred percent for projects that qualify in the support spaces category;
provided that the council may adjust or waive the amount of any direct appropriation offset to or local share required for the constitutional special schools if an applicant h constitutional special school has insufficient or no local u » r t h resources available;
and g e l i (11) no application for grant assistance from h r i s the fund shall be approved unless the council determines that:
h , e h t u g (a) the public school capital outlay e b l e e , gh project is needed and included in the school district's five- n d d i = = o h year facilities plan among its top priorities;
l ] b ,d i a º r (b) the school district has used its e r = t e w d m a n o capital resources in a prudent manner;
d m :
b r e t º o t n = .228682.1AIC March 16, 2025 (2:25pm) s k m e - 8 - e a n e d r e l u [ A d (c) the school district has provided insurance for buildings of the school district in accordance with the provisions of Section 13-5-3 NMSA 1978;
2) a current preventive maintenance plan that has been approved by the council pursuant to Section 22-24-5.3 NMSA 1978 and that is followed by each public school in the district;
(f) the application includes the capitalSB h82 Page 8 capital needs of any charter school located in the school district or u » r t h the school district has shown that the facilities of the g e l i charter school have a smaller deviation from the statewide h r i s adequacy standards than other district facilities included in h , e h t u g the application;
and e b l e e , gh (g) the school district has agreed, in n d d i = = o h writing, to comply with any reporting requirements or l ] b ,d i a º r conditions imposed by the council pursuant to Section 22-24-5.1 e r = t e w d m a n o NMSA 1978.
dC. m :
b r e t º o t n = .228682.1AIC March 16, 2025 (2:25pm) s k m e - 9 - e a n e d r e l u [ A d C.
The acquisition of a facility by a school district or charter school pursuant to a financing agreement that provides for lease payments with an option to purchase SB 82 Page 9 for a price that is reduced according to lease payments made may be considered a public school capital outlay project and eligible h for grant assistance under this section pursuant to the u » r t h following criteria:
g e l i (1) no grant shall be awarded unless the h r i s council determines that, at the time of exercising the option h , e h t u g to purchase the facility by the school district or charter e b l e e , gh school, the facility will equal or exceed the statewide n d d i = = o h adequacy standards and the building standards for public school l ] b ,d i a º r facilities;
e(2) rno =grant tshall ebe wawarded dunless mthe aschool ndistrict oand (2)the noneed grantfor shallthe befacility awardedmeet unlessall of the drequirements mfor :grant assistance pursuant to the Public School Capital Outlay Act;
b r e t º o t n = .228682.1AIC March 16, 2025 (2:25pm) s k m e - 10 - e a n e d r e l u [ A d school district and the need for the facility meet all of the requirements for grant assistance pursuant to the Public School Capital Outlay Act;
and SB 82 Page 10 (6) neither a grant award nor any provision of the Public School Capital Outlay Act creates a legal obligation for the school district or charter school to continue the lease h from year to year or to purchase the facility.
u » r t h E.
In order to encourage private capital investment g e l i in the construction of public school facilities, the purchase h r i s of a privately owned school facility that is, at the time of h , e h t u g application, in use by a school district may be considered a e b l e e , gh public school capital outlay project and eligible for grant n d d i = = o h assistance pursuant to this section if the council finds that:
l ] b ,d i a º r (1) at the time of the initial use by the eschool rdistrict, =the tfacility eto wbe dpurchased mequaled aor nexceeded othe schoolstatewide district,adequacy thestandards facilityand tothe bebuilding purchasedstandards equaledfor orpublic dschool mfacilities; :
b r e t º o t n = .228682.1AIC March 16, 2025 (2:25pm) s k m e - 11 - e a n e d r e l u [ A d exceeded the statewide adequacy standards and the building standards for public school facilities;
SB 82 Page 11 provided that, when determining the deviation from the statewide adequacy standards for the purposes of evaluating and prioritizing the project, the students using the facility shall be deemed to be attending other schools in the school district.
It is the intent of the legislature that grant assistance made pursuant to this section allows every school h district to meet the standards developed pursuant to Subsection u » r t h C of this section;
provided, however, that nothing in the g e l i Public School Capital Outlay Act or the development of h r i s standards pursuant to that act prohibits a school district from h , e h t u g using other funds available to the district to exceed the e b l e e , gh statewide adequacy standards.
n d d i = = o h G.
Upon request, the council shall work with, and l ] b ,d i a º r provide assistance and information to, the public school e r = t e w d m a n o capital outlay oversight task force.
dH. m :
b r e t º o t n = .228682.1AIC March 16, 2025 (2:25pm) s k m e - 12 - e a n e d r e l u [ A d H.
Upon the recommendation of the authority, the SB 82 Page 12 council shall develop building standards for public school facilities and shall promulgate other such rules as are necessary to carry out the provisions of the Public School Capital Outlay Act.
The report shall describe in detail all projects funded, the progress of projects previously h funded but not completed, the criteria used to prioritize and u » r t h fund projects and all other council actions.
The report shall g e l i be submitted to the public education commission, the governor, h r i s the legislative finance committee, the legislative education h , e h t u g study committee and the legislature.
e b l e e , gh K.
For any school district that received a n d d i = = o h standards- or systems-based award from the council in fiscal l ] b ,d i a º r year 2023, the state share for any future phase of the project efor rwhich =funding thas enot wyet dbeen mawarded ashall nbe othe amount calculated pursuant to Subsection B of this section for whichfiscal fundingyear has2024, notregardless yetof beenthe awardedstate shallshare beat the amounttime dof mthe :initial award.
b r e t º o t n = .228682.1AIC March 16, 2025 (2:25pm) s k m e - 13 - e a n e d r e l u [ A d calculated pursuant to Subsection B of this section for fiscal year 2024, regardless of the state share at the time of the initial award.
and (2) "membership" means the total enrollment of qualified students on the current roll of a class or school SB 82 Page 13 on a specified day.
provided that withdrawals do not include students in need of early intervention and habitual truants the school district is required to intervene with and keep in an educational setting." -SB 1482 -Page h14 u25 » r t h g e l i h r i s h , e h t u g e b l e e , gh n d d i = = o h l ] b ,d i a º r e r = t e w d m a n o d m :
b r e t º o t n = .228682.1AIC March 16, 2025 (2:25pm) s k m e e a n e d r e l u [ A d
Show all 81 changed rows (41 more)
View plain text versions (3)
- Final Version View text Current pdf
- Amended Amendments in Context pdf
- Introduced introduced version pdf
AI-generated reading aid from the bill's amendatory text — verify against the official bill.
The bill extends a provision that reduces local shares for school districts through fiscal year 2027 and eliminates certain criteria for local share adjustments.
-
Section 22-24-5 NMSA 1978
one-third for some school districts and one-half for certain small school districts;→ one-third for some school districts and one-half for certain small school districts;The provision that reduces local shares for school districts is extended through fiscal year 2027.
-
Section 22-24-5 NMSA 1978
the council shall consider:→ the council may consider:The language is softened, allowing the council more discretion in what factors to consider when making adjustments.
Action History
-
Signed
-
Senate concurred in House amendments
-
passed House
-
floor substitute adopted (1 amendment)
-
DO PASS committee report adopted
-
DO PASS committee report adopted
-
Sent to House Education Committee & House Government, Elections and Indian Affairs Committee
-
passed Senate
-
DO PASS committee report adopted
-
DO PASS committee report adopted
-
Sent to Senate Education Committee & Senate Finance Committee
Sponsors
- William P. Soules · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 111 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- William P. Soules Democrat
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (111)
111 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 111 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 33 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| Republican | 24 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 63 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| % of votes cast | 90% | 0% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (70)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Romero, GA | — | Yea |
| De La Cruz | — | Yea |
| Hernandez J.N. | — | Yea |
| Hernandez, J.F. | — | Yea |
| Roybal Caballero | — | Yea |
| Sena Cortez | — | Yea |
| Andrea Romero | Democrat | Yea |
| Angelica Rubio | Democrat | Yea |
| Anita Gonzales | Democrat | Yea |
| Charlotte Little | Democrat | Yea |
| Christine Chandler | Democrat | Yea |
| Cristina Parajón | Democrat | Yea |
| Cynthia Borrego | Democrat | Yea |
| D. Wonda Johnson | Democrat | Yea |
| Dayan Hochman-Vigil | Democrat | Yea |
| Debra M. Sariñana | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Derrick J. Lente | Democrat | Yea |
| Doreen Y. Gallegos | Democrat | Yea |
| E. Diane Torres-Velásquez | Democrat | Yea |
| Eleanor Chávez | Democrat | Yea |
| Elizabeth "Liz" Thomson | Democrat | Yea |
| Janelle Anyanonu | Democrat | Yea |
| Javier Martínez | Democrat | Yea |
| Joanne J. Ferrary | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Joseph Sanchez | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Joy Garratt | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Kathleen Cates | Democrat | Yea |
| Kristina Ortez | Democrat | Yea |
| Linda Serrato | Democrat | Yea |
| Marian Matthews | Democrat | Yea |
| Marianna Anaya | Democrat | Yea |
| Martha Garcia | Democrat | Yea |
| Matthew McQueen | Democrat | Yea |
| Meredith A. Dixon | Democrat | Yea |
| Micaela Lara Cadena | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Michelle Paulene Abeyta | Democrat | Yea |
| Miguel P. García | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Nathan P. Small | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Pamelya Herndon | Democrat | Yea |
| Patricia A. Lundstrom | Democrat | Yea |
| Raymundo Lara | Democrat | Yea |
| Reena Szczepanski | Democrat | Yea |
| Sarah Silva | Democrat | Yea |
| Susan K. Herrera | Democrat | Yea |
| Tara L. Lujan | Democrat | Yea |
| Yanira Gurrola | Democrat | Yea |
| Alan T. Martinez | Republican | Yea |
| Andrea Reeb | Republican | Yea |
| Angelita Mejia | Republican | Yea |
| Brian G. Baca | Republican | Yea |
| Catherine J. Cullen | Republican | Yea |
| Cathrynn N. Brown | Republican | Yea |
| Gail Armstrong | Republican | Yea |
| Harlan Vincent | Republican | Yea |
| Jack Chatfield | Republican | Yea |
| Jenifer Jones | Republican | Yea |
| Jimmy G. Mason | Republican | Yea |
| John Block | Republican | Yea |
| Jonathan A. Henry | Republican | Yea |
| Luis M. Terrazas | Republican | Yea |
| Mark B. Murphy | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Duncan | Republican | Yea |
| Martin R. Zamora | Republican | Yea |
| Nicole Chavez | Republican | Yea |
| Randall T. Pettigrew | Republican | Yea |
| Rebecca Dow | Republican | Yea |
| Rod Montoya | Republican | Yea |
| Stefani Lord | Republican | Yea |
| Tanya Mirabal Moya | Republican | Yea |
| William A. Hall II | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 23 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 14 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Unaffiliated | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 39 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 93% | 0% | 0% | 7% |
How each member voted (42)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| PAUL | — | Yea |
| SEDILLO-LOPEZ | — | Yea |
| Angel M. Charley | Democrat | Yea |
| Antoinette Sedillo Lopez | Democrat | Yea |
| Antonio Maestas | Democrat | Yea |
| Benny Shendo, Jr. | Democrat | Yea |
| Carrie Hamblen | Democrat | Yea |
| Cindy Nava | Democrat | Yea |
| Elizabeth "Liz" Stefanics | Democrat | Yea |
| George K. Muñoz | Democrat | Yea |
| Harold Pope | Democrat | Yea |
| Heather Berghmans | Democrat | Yea |
| Jeff Steinborn | Democrat | Yea |
| Joseph Cervantes | Democrat | Yea |
| Katy Duhigg | Democrat | Yea |
| Leo Jaramillo | Democrat | Yea |
| Linda M. Trujillo | Democrat | Yea |
| Martin Hickey | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Micaelita Debbie O'Malley | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Michael Padilla | Democrat | Yea |
| Mimi Stewart | Democrat | Yea |
| Natalie Figueroa | Democrat | Yea |
| Pete Campos | Democrat | Yea |
| Peter Wirth | Democrat | Yea |
| Roberto "Bobby" J. Gonzales | Democrat | Yea |
| Shannon D. Pinto | Democrat | Yea |
| William P. Soules | Democrat | Yea |
| Anthony L. Thornton | Republican | Yea |
| Candy Spence Ezzell | Republican | Yea |
| Craig W. Brandt | Republican | Yea |
| Crystal Brantley | Republican | Yea |
| David M. Gallegos | Republican | Yea |
| Gabriel Ramos | Republican | Yea |
| James G. Townsend | Republican | Yea |
| Jay C. Block | Republican | Yea |
| Joshua A. Sanchez | Republican | Not Voting |
| Larry R. Scott | Republican | Yea |
| Nicole Tobiassen | Republican | Yea |
| Pat Boone | Republican | Yea |
| Pat Woods | Republican | Yea |
| Steve D. Lanier | Republican | Yea |
| William E. Sharer | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 82?
- SB 82 is sponsored by William P. Soules (Democrat).
- What is the current status of SB 82?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 22, 2025. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 82?
- Track SB 82 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 82
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 82
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →