New Mexico 2025 Regular Session Status: Enacted 1 D cosponsors

SJM 2 — FRONTIER AREAS TASK FORCE

Last action — Signed

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed House
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 06, 2025. Enacted.

Signed by Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham (Democratic) on March 21, 2025.

Prognosis

Advancing 52% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 D).

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

133 added · 176 removed

Plain-language change summary

The bill has been updated to include a specific request for the governor to create a task force that will focus on studying the needs of frontier areas in the state and exploring the effectiveness of community-operated infrastructure networks for delivering essential services. This change is significant because it emphasizes the need for targeted attention to under-resourced rural communities, particularly in addressing health disparities and improving access to vital resources like clean water and internet service. By establishing this task force, the bill aims to give voice to these underserved areas and promote better governance and resource allocation.

→
Previous
Latest
SENATE JOINT MEMORIAL 2 57TH LEGISLATURE - STATE OF NEWMEXICO - FIRST SESSION 2025 INTRODUCED BY Pete Campos 6 8 10 A JOINT MEMORIAL REQUESTING THE GOVERNOR TO APPOINT A TASK FORCE TO STUDY THE NEEDS OF FRONTIER AREAS OF THE STATE AND TO CONSIDER THE EFFICACY OF THE COMMUNITY-OPERATED INFRASTRUCTURE NETWORK MODEL FOR THE IMPROVED DELIVERY OF NECESSARY SERVICES.
A JOINT MEMORIAL REQUESTING THE GOVERNOR TO APPOINT A TASK FORCE TO STUDY THE NEEDS OF FRONTIER AREAS OF THE STATE AND TO CONSIDER THE EFFICACY OF THE COMMUNITY-OPERATED INFRASTRUCTURE NETWORK MODEL FOR THE IMPROVED DELIVERY OF NECESSARY SERVICES.
16 WHEREAS, the term "frontier area" means the unincorporated e t 17 areas of a county that are sparsely populated and isolated from w l n d 18 larger population centers and services and includes rural = = 19 a l communities;
7 WHEREAS, the term "frontier area" means the unincorporated areas of a county that are sparsely populated and isolated from larger population centers and services and includes rural communities;
and i a e r 20 WHEREAS, recent public health research has added lack of a t m m 21 municipal status as a structural determinant of health, d r e 22 resulting in cumulative health risks for residents due to the c e s k 23 lack of health care resources, especially for low-income e a n b 24 communities of color;
and WHEREAS, recent public health research has added lack of municipal status as a structural determinant of health, resulting in cumulative health risks for residents due to the lack of health care resources, especially for low-income communities of color;
and u [ WHEREAS, unincorporated communities do not have their own .230085.2 local officials and remain as informal settlements with diminished legal power to comprehensively address local needs and concerns;
and WHEREAS, unincorporated communities do not have their own local officials and remain as informal settlements with diminished legal power to comprehensively address local needs and concerns;
and public facilities, such as parks, playgrounds, libraries and community centers, enjoyed in more populated areas;
and public facilities, such as SJM 2 Page 1 parks, playgrounds, libraries and community centers, enjoyed in more populated areas;
and e t 17 WHEREAS, infrastructure and regulatory systems have become w l n d 18 more complex, while the volunteer pool is being reduced through = = 19 a l population loss and elderly volunteers aging out or unable to i a e r 20 perform required skills, and younger people are unavailable to a t m m 21 fill that volunteer gap because of longer commutes for school d r e 22 and careers;
and WHEREAS, infrastructure and regulatory systems have become more complex, while the volunteer pool is being reduced through population loss and elderly volunteers aging out or unable to perform required skills, and younger people are unavailable to fill that volunteer gap because of longer commutes for school and careers;
and c e s k 23 WHEREAS, the community-operated infrastructure network e a n b 24 model might work well in frontier areas to increase efficiency u [ and reduce overhead costs of individual physical and social .230085.2 - 2 - infrastructure providers through shared services using economies of scale for administrative, financial management, capital improvement planning, permitting and other services that could be cooperatively managed for several infrastructure providers;
and WHEREAS, the community-operated infrastructure network model might work well in frontier areas to increase efficiency and reduce overhead costs of individual physical and social infrastructure providers through shared services using economies of scale for administrative, financial management, capital improvement planning, permitting and other services that could be cooperatively managed for several infrastructure providers;
and WHEREAS, community-operated infrastructure networks could help fill the personnel gaps as well as develop methodologies and strategies for frontier areas to have greater autonomy over local programs and services;
and WHEREAS, community-operated infrastructure networks could help fill the personnel gaps as well as develop methodologies and strategies for frontier areas to have SJM 2 Page 2 greater autonomy over local programs and services;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO that the governor be requested to appoint an executive-wide task force to study the needs of frontier e t 17 areas of the state, including members from the department of w l n d 18 finance and administration, in particular, the local government = = 19 a l division and the infrastructure planning and development i a e r 20 division;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO that the governor be requested to appoint an executive-wide task force to study the needs of frontier areas of the state, including members from the department of finance and administration, in particular, the local government division and the infrastructure planning and development division;
the office of the a t m m 21 state engineer;
the office of the state engineer;
the economic d r e 22 development department;
the economic development department;
the department of information c e s k 23 technology;
the department of information technology;
the department of e a n b 24 transportation;
the department of transportation;
community u [ representatives of frontier areas;
community representatives of frontier areas;
representatives of councils .230085.2 - 3 - of state government;
representatives of councils of state government;
B.
SJM 2 Page 3 B.
a review of statutes and rules and their application to frontier areas and what can be amended, repealed or enacted to assist frontier areas in the provision of e t 17 infrastructure and in the establishment of community-operated w l n d 18 infrastructure networks, including what resources can be = = 19 a l provided by the state;
a review of statutes and rules and their application to frontier areas and what can be amended, repealed or enacted to assist frontier areas in the provision of infrastructure and in the establishment of community-operated infrastructure networks, including what resources can be provided by the state;
and i a e r 20 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the study assess methodologies a t m m 21 for strengthening frontier areas with financial investment and d r e 22 other resources;
and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the study assess methodologies for strengthening frontier areas with financial investment and other resources;
and c e s k 23 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the study include potential e a n b 24 incentives for frontier areas willing to establish community- u [ operated infrastructure networks to increase efficiency and .230085.2 - 4 - reduce overhead costs of individual infrastructure providers through shared services and consider how the state, councils of government and counties can provide funding to replace volunteers with centralized paid staff who possess the training and skills needed to operate modern infrastructure;
and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the study include potential incentives for frontier areas willing to establish community-operated infrastructure networks to increase efficiency and reduce overhead costs of individual infrastructure providers through shared services and consider how the state, councils of government and counties can provide funding to replace volunteers with centralized paid staff who possess the training and skills needed to operate modern infrastructure;
and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the task force provide periodic reports of its work to the legislative interim committees concerned with rural economic development and other rural concerns and a final report to the governor and the legislature, with findings and recommendations, by November 1, 2025;
and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the task force provide periodic reports of its work to the legislative interim SJM 2 Page 4 committees concerned with rural economic development and other rural concerns and a final report to the governor and the legislature, with findings and recommendations, by November 1, 2025;
e t 17 - 5 - w l n d 18 = = 19 a l i a e r 20 a t m m 21 d r e 22 c e s k 23 e a n b 24 u [ .230085.2
SJM 2 Page 5 25
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. Signed

  2. passed House

  3. DO PASS committee report adopted

  4. Sent to House Rural Development, Land Grants and Cultural Affairs Committee

  5. passed Senate

  6. DO PASS committee report adopted

  7. DO PASS committee report adopted

  8. Sent to Senate Rules Committee & Senate Indian, Rural and Cultural Affairs Committee

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 111 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (111)

111 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 111 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SJM 2?
SJM 2 is sponsored by Pete Campos (Democrat).
What is the current status of SJM 2?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 06, 2025. Enacted.
Where can I track SJM 2?
Track SJM 2 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SJM 2

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SJM 2

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →