SB 126 — INCREASE RURAL SERVICE FUND ALLOCATIONS
Last action — Signed
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 23, 2025. Enacted.
Signed by Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham (Democratic) on April 09, 2025.
Odds of enactment
High chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 D).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 2 recorded votes so far.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
304 added · 428 removedPlain-language change summary
The recent amendments to SB 126 significantly increase the funding allocated to the broadband program from the State Rural Universal Service Fund, raising it from $30 million to $40 million. This change also boosts the financial cap on the fund, which allows for larger obligations and administrative expenses. Essentially, this enhancement aims to improve broadband services, especially in rural areas, by ensuring more funds are available for expansion and support, which can lead to better internet access for residents.
SENATE BILL 126 57TH LEGISLATURE -STATEOFNEWMEXICO- FIRST SESSION, 2025 INTRODUCED BY Michael Padilla 6 8 10 AN ACT RELATING TO TELECOMMUNICATIONS;
INCREASING THE CAP e t 17 ON OBLIGATIONS OF THE STATE RURAL UNIVERSAL SERVICE FUND PLUS w l n d 18 ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES AND A PRUDENT FUND BALANCE FROM THIRTY = = 19 a l MILLION DOLLARS ($30,000,000) TO FORTY MILLION DOLLARS i a e r 20 ($40,000,000).
a t m m 21 d r e 22 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO:
c e s k 23 SECTION 1.
Section 63-9H-6 NMSA 1978 (being Laws 1999, e a n b 24 Chapter 295, Section 6, as amended) is amended to read:
u [ "63-9H-6.
STATE RURAL UNIVERSAL SERVICE FUND-- .229250.2 ESTABLISHMENT.-- A.
As used in this section, "universal service" means basic local exchange service, comparable retail alternative services at affordable rates, service pursuant to a SB 126 Page 1 low-income telephone assistance plan and broadband internet access service to unserved and underserved areas as determined by the commission.
The fund shall be financed by a surcharge on intrastate retail public telecommunications services to be determined by the commission, excluding services provided pursuant to a low-income telephone assistance plan billed to end-user customers by a telecommunications carrier, and e t 17 excluding all amounts from surcharges, gross receipts taxes, w l n d 18 excise taxes, franchise fees and similar charges.
For the = = 19 a l purpose of funding the fund, the commission has the authority i a e r 20 to apply the surcharge on intrastate retail public a t m m 21 telecommunications services provided by telecommunications d r e 22 carriers, including commercial mobile radio services and voice c e s k 23 over internet protocol services, at a competitively and e a n b 24 technologically neutral rate or rates to be determined by the u [ commission.
The commission may establish the surcharge as a .229250.2 - 2 - percentage of intrastate retail public telecommunications services revenue or as a fixed amount applicable to each communication connection.
Such surcharges shall be competitively and SB 126 Page 2 technologically neutral.
or to Native American customers e t 17 who reside on tribal or pueblo land.
w l n d 18 C.
The fund shall be competitively and = = 19 a l technologically neutral, equitable and nondiscriminatory in its i a e r 20 collection and distribution of funds, portable between eligible a t m m 21 telecommunications carriers and additionally shall provide a d r e 22 specific, predictable and sufficient support mechanism as c e s k 23 determined by the commission that ensures universal service in e a n b 24 the state.
u [ D.
.229250.2 - 3 - (1) establish eligibility criteria for participation in the fund consistent with federal law that ensure the availability of universal service at affordable rates.
(2) provide for the collection of the surcharge on a competitively neutral basis and for the SB 126 Page 3 administration and disbursement of money from the fund;
and (5) establish affordability benchmark rates for local residential and business services that shall be e t 17 utilized in determining the level of support from the fund.
w l n d 18 The process for determining subsequent adjustments to the = = 19 a l benchmark shall be established through a rulemaking.
i a e r 20 E.
All incumbent telecommunications carriers and a t m m 21 competitive carriers already designated as eligible d r e 22 telecommunications carriers for the fund shall be eligible for c e s k 23 participation in the fund.
All other carriers that choose to e a n b 24 become eligible to receive support from the fund may petition u [ the commission to be designated as an eligible .229250.2 - 4 - telecommunications carrier for the fund.
(2) the unique advantages and disadvantages SB 126 Page 4 of the competitor's service offering;
The rules shall enumerate the appropriate uses of fund support and any restrictions on the use of fund support e t 17 by eligible telecommunications carriers.
The rules shall w l n d 18 require that an eligible telecommunications carrier receiving = = 19 a l support from the fund pursuant to Subsection K, L, M or N of i a e r 20 this section must expend no less than sixty percent of the a t m m 21 support it receives to deploy and maintain broadband internet d r e 22 access services in rural areas of the state.
The rules also c e s k 23 shall provide for annual reporting by eligible e a n b 24 telecommunications carriers verifying that the reporting u [ carrier continues to meet the requirements for designation as .229250.2 - 5 - an eligible telecommunications carrier for purposes of the fund and is in compliance with the commission's rules, including the provisions regarding use of support from the fund.
The commission shall, upon implementation of the fund, select a neutral third-party administrator to collect, administer and disburse money from the fund under the supervision and control of the commission pursuant to SB 126 Page 5 established criteria and rules promulgated by the commission.
e t 17 provided, however, that nothing in this section shall be w l n d 18 construed as granting any authority to the commission to impose = = 19 a l the surcharge on or otherwise regulate broadband internet i a e r 20 access services.
a t m m 21 I.
The commission shall ensure that intrastate d r e 22 switched access charges are equal to interstate switched access c e s k 23 charges established by the federal communications commission as e a n b 24 of January 1, 2006.
Nothing in this section shall preclude the u [ commission from considering further adjustments to intrastate .229250.2 - 6 - switched access charges based on changes to interstate switched access charges.
To ensure that providers of intrastate retail communications service contribute to the fund and to further ensure that the surcharge determined pursuant to Subsection B of this section to be paid by the end-user customer will be held to a minimum, the commission shall adopt rules, or take SB 126 Page 6 other appropriate action, to require all such providers to participate in a plan to ensure accurate reporting.
(1) the annual percentage change in the number e t 17 of access lines served by the incumbent local exchange carriers w l n d 18 receiving such support for the prior calendar year, as compared = = 19 a l to base year 2014;
and i a e r 20 (2) changes in the affordability benchmark a t m m 21 rates that have occurred since 2014.
d r e 22 L.
Notwithstanding the provisions of Subsection K c e s k 23 of this section, the annual amount of access reduction support e a n b 24 payments for an eligible incumbent local exchange carrier in u [ 2024, 2025 and 2026 shall be equal to the annual access .229250.2 - 7 - reduction support payments for that eligible incumbent local exchange carrier for the year 2023.
SB 126 Page 7 (1) an eligible incumbent telecommunications carrier that is not eligible for funding pursuant to rate rebalancing in Subsection K of this section and that has been previously authorized pursuant to Subsection N of this section for need-based support may apply for ongoing fund support;
provided that an eligible telecommunications carrier receiving fund support pursuant to this subsection shall not offer basic local e t 17 exchange residential and business services at rate levels lower w l n d 18 than the rates for such services charged by any of the = = 19 a l comparable carriers used for the determination of the level of i a e r 20 support;
a t m m 21 (3) the commission shall act upon a request d r e 22 for ongoing fund support within one hundred twenty days of the c e s k 23 filing of the request;
Show all 58 changed lines (18 more)
and e a n b 24 (4) nothing in this section shall limit the u [ commission's authority to adopt rules pursuant to Subsection F .229250.2 - 8 - of this section regarding appropriate uses of fund support and any restrictions on the use of the fund support by eligible telecommunications carriers.
The commission may also authorize payments from the fund to incumbent rural telecommunications carriers or to SB 126 Page 8 telecommunications carriers providing comparable retail alternative services that have been designated as eligible telecommunications carriers serving in rural areas of the state upon a finding, based on factors that may include a carrier's regulated revenues, expenses or investment, by the commission that such payments are needed to ensure the widespread availability and affordability of universal service.
The commission shall decide cases filed pursuant to this subsection with reasonable promptness, with or without a hearing, but no later than six months following the filing of an application seeking payments from the fund, unless the commission finds e t 17 that a longer time will be required, in which case the w l n d 18 commission may extend the period for an additional three = = 19 a l months.
i a e r 20 O.
The commission shall adopt rules that establish a t m m 21 and implement a broadband program to provide funding to d r e 22 eligible telecommunications carriers for the construction and c e s k 23 maintenance of broadband infrastructure.
Each year, an amount e a n b 24 equal to [thirty million dollars ($30,000,000)] forty million u [ dollars ($40,000,000) less the amounts expended pursuant to .229250.2 - 9 - Subsections K, L, M and N of this section shall be dedicated to the broadband program.
SB 126 Page 9 (2) submit applications for funding to the connect New Mexico council for prioritization and alignment with the statewide broadband plan to ensure digital equity and digital inclusion;
The total obligations of the fund determined by the commission pursuant to this section, plus administrative expenses and a prudent fund balance, shall not exceed a cap of [thirty million dollars ($30,000,000)] forty million dollars e t 17 ($40,000,000) per year.
[The commission shall evaluate the w l n d 18 amount of the cap in an appropriate proceeding to be completed = = 19 a l by June 30, 2019 and consider whether, based on the then- i a e r 20 current status of the fund, the cap should be modified, a t m m 21 maintained or eliminated.] d r e 22 R.
By October 1 of each year, the commission shall c e s k 23 make a report to the legislature regarding the status of the e a n b 24 fund, including:
u [ (1) relevant data relating to implementation .229250.2 - 10 - of the broadband program and the progress toward digital equity and digital inclusion in rural areas of the state;
The 2025 annual report made pursuant to Subsection R of this section shall include an assessment of SB 126 Page 10 the state rural universal service fund that addresses:
(2) a methodology for determining broadband support levels that is consistent with the requirements of e t 17 Subsection C of this section and accounts, at a minimum, for w l n d 18 broadband costs, potential revenues from deployed = = 19 a l infrastructure and existing federal support mechanisms;
i a e r 20 (3) the appropriate size of the fund;
a t m m 21 (4) criteria for awarding funding;
d r e 22 (5) the impact of proposed changes on per- c e s k 23 connection assessments;
and e a n b 24 (6) whether all sellers of prepaid u [ telecommunications services should be required to collect state .229250.2 - 11 - rural universal service fund assessments at the point of sale, similar to the methodology for collecting 911 emergency surcharges pursuant to Section 63-9D-5 NMSA 1978." SECTION 2.
-SB 12126 -Page 811 1025 12 14 16 e t 17 w l n d 18 = = 19 a l i a e r 20 a t m m 21 d r e 22 c e s k 23 e a n b 24 u [ .229250.2
Show all 58 changed rows (18 more)
View plain text versions (2)
- Final Version View text Current pdf
- Introduced introduced version pdf
Action History
-
Signed
-
DO PASS committee report adopted
-
passed House
-
DO PASS committee report adopted
-
Sent to House Commerce & Economic Development Committee & House Appropriations & Finance Committee
-
passed Senate
-
DO PASS committee report adopted
-
DO PASS committee report adopted
-
Sent to Senate Tax, Business and Transportation Committee & Senate Finance Committee
Sponsors
- Michael Padilla · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 111 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Michael Padilla Democrat
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (111)
111 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 111 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 35 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Republican | 23 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 64 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| % of votes cast | 91% | 0% | 0% | 9% |
How each member voted (70)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Romero, GA | — | Yea |
| De La Cruz | — | Yea |
| Hernandez J.N. | — | Yea |
| Hernandez, J.F. | — | Yea |
| Roybal Caballero | — | Yea |
| Sena Cortez | — | Yea |
| Andrea Romero | Democrat | Yea |
| Angelica Rubio | Democrat | Yea |
| Anita Gonzales | Democrat | Yea |
| Charlotte Little | Democrat | Yea |
| Christine Chandler | Democrat | Yea |
| Cristina Parajón | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Cynthia Borrego | Democrat | Yea |
| D. Wonda Johnson | Democrat | Yea |
| Dayan Hochman-Vigil | Democrat | Yea |
| Debra M. Sariñana | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Derrick J. Lente | Democrat | Yea |
| Doreen Y. Gallegos | Democrat | Yea |
| E. Diane Torres-Velásquez | Democrat | Yea |
| Eleanor Chávez | Democrat | Yea |
| Elizabeth "Liz" Thomson | Democrat | Yea |
| Janelle Anyanonu | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Javier Martínez | Democrat | Yea |
| Joanne J. Ferrary | Democrat | Yea |
| Joseph Sanchez | Democrat | Yea |
| Joy Garratt | Democrat | Yea |
| Kathleen Cates | Democrat | Yea |
| Kristina Ortez | Democrat | Yea |
| Linda Serrato | Democrat | Yea |
| Marian Matthews | Democrat | Yea |
| Marianna Anaya | Democrat | Yea |
| Martha Garcia | Democrat | Yea |
| Matthew McQueen | Democrat | Yea |
| Meredith A. Dixon | Democrat | Yea |
| Micaela Lara Cadena | Democrat | Yea |
| Michelle Paulene Abeyta | Democrat | Yea |
| Miguel P. García | Democrat | Yea |
| Nathan P. Small | Democrat | Yea |
| Pamelya Herndon | Democrat | Yea |
| Patricia A. Lundstrom | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Raymundo Lara | Democrat | Yea |
| Reena Szczepanski | Democrat | Yea |
| Sarah Silva | Democrat | Yea |
| Susan K. Herrera | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Tara L. Lujan | Democrat | Yea |
| Yanira Gurrola | Democrat | Yea |
| Alan T. Martinez | Republican | Yea |
| Andrea Reeb | Republican | Yea |
| Angelita Mejia | Republican | Yea |
| Brian G. Baca | Republican | Yea |
| Catherine J. Cullen | Republican | Yea |
| Cathrynn N. Brown | Republican | Yea |
| Gail Armstrong | Republican | Yea |
| Harlan Vincent | Republican | Yea |
| Jack Chatfield | Republican | Yea |
| Jenifer Jones | Republican | Yea |
| Jimmy G. Mason | Republican | Yea |
| John Block | Republican | Yea |
| Jonathan A. Henry | Republican | Yea |
| Luis M. Terrazas | Republican | Yea |
| Mark B. Murphy | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Duncan | Republican | Yea |
| Martin R. Zamora | Republican | Yea |
| Nicole Chavez | Republican | Not Voting |
| Randall T. Pettigrew | Republican | Yea |
| Rebecca Dow | Republican | Yea |
| Rod Montoya | Republican | Yea |
| Stefani Lord | Republican | Yea |
| Tanya Mirabal Moya | Republican | Yea |
| William A. Hall II | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 23 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 13 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Unaffiliated | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 38 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 90% | 0% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (42)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| PAUL | — | Yea |
| SEDILLO-LOPEZ | — | Yea |
| Angel M. Charley | Democrat | Yea |
| Antoinette Sedillo Lopez | Democrat | Yea |
| Antonio Maestas | Democrat | Yea |
| Benny Shendo, Jr. | Democrat | Yea |
| Carrie Hamblen | Democrat | Yea |
| Cindy Nava | Democrat | Yea |
| Elizabeth "Liz" Stefanics | Democrat | Yea |
| George K. Muñoz | Democrat | Yea |
| Harold Pope | Democrat | Yea |
| Heather Berghmans | Democrat | Yea |
| Jeff Steinborn | Democrat | Yea |
| Joseph Cervantes | Democrat | Yea |
| Katy Duhigg | Democrat | Yea |
| Leo Jaramillo | Democrat | Yea |
| Linda M. Trujillo | Democrat | Yea |
| Martin Hickey | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Micaelita Debbie O'Malley | Democrat | Yea |
| Michael Padilla | Democrat | Yea |
| Mimi Stewart | Democrat | Yea |
| Natalie Figueroa | Democrat | Yea |
| Pete Campos | Democrat | Yea |
| Peter Wirth | Democrat | Yea |
| Roberto "Bobby" J. Gonzales | Democrat | Yea |
| Shannon D. Pinto | Democrat | Not Voting |
| William P. Soules | Democrat | Yea |
| Anthony L. Thornton | Republican | Not Voting |
| Candy Spence Ezzell | Republican | Yea |
| Craig W. Brandt | Republican | Yea |
| Crystal Brantley | Republican | Yea |
| David M. Gallegos | Republican | Yea |
| Gabriel Ramos | Republican | Yea |
| James G. Townsend | Republican | Yea |
| Jay C. Block | Republican | Yea |
| Joshua A. Sanchez | Republican | Yea |
| Larry R. Scott | Republican | Yea |
| Nicole Tobiassen | Republican | Yea |
| Pat Boone | Republican | Yea |
| Pat Woods | Republican | Yea |
| Steve D. Lanier | Republican | Not Voting |
| William E. Sharer | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 126?
- SB 126 is sponsored by Michael Padilla (Democrat).
- What is the current status of SB 126?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 23, 2025. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 126?
- Track SB 126 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 126
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 126
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →