HB 129 — PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PROBATION PERIOD
Last action — action postponed indefinitely
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2025 Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
124 added · 106 removedPlain-language change summary
The recent amendment to House Bill 129 reduces the probation period for public employees from one year to 180 days. Additionally, it prohibits extending the probation period if an employee chooses to transfer to a different state service. These changes aim to provide more job security for public workers while promoting flexibility in their careers, potentially making public employment more attractive.
HOUSE BILL 129 57TH LEGISLATURE -STATEOFNEWMEXICO-- STATE OF NEW MEXICO - FIRST SESSION, 2025 INTRODUCED BY Reena Szczepanski and Patricia Roybal Caballero and Eleanor Chávez and Linda M.
Trujillo 7This 9document ANmay ACTincorporate RELATINGamendments TOproposed PUBLICby EMPLOYEES;a committee, but not yet adopted, as well as amendments that have been adopted during the current legislative session.
REDUCINGThe THEdocument PERIODis OFa EMPLOYMENTtool PROBATIONto FORshow PUBLICamendments EMPLOYEESin FROMcontext ONEand YEARcannot TObe ONEused HUNDREDfor EIGHTYthe DAYS;purpose of adding amendments to legislation.
PROHIBITING AN ADDITIONALACT PROBATIONARYh PERIODRELATING IF AN EMPLOYEE ELECTS TO TRANSFERPUBLIC OREMPLOYEES; MOVE TO A DIFFERENT STATE SERVICE ASSIGNMENT.
eREDUCING THE PERIOD OF EMPLOYMENT g o t 17hr BEPROBATION ITFOR ENACTEDPUBLIC BYEMPLOYEES THEFROM LEGISLATUREONE OFYEAR THETO STATEONE OFHUNDRED NEWg MEXICO:e i k EIGHTY DAYS;
wPROHIBITING AN ADDITIONAL PROBATIONARY PERIOD IF h r i s AN EMPLOYEE ELECTS TO TRANSFER OR HGEICºMOVE TO A DIFFERENT h , t, STATE»HGEIC HGEICºCOMMENCE ANOTHER CLASSIFIED»HGEIC SERVICE e u g e b l ne de 18h SECTIONASSIGNMENT 1.HGEICº;
SectionPROVIDING 10-9-13EXCEPTIONS»HGEIC NMSA. 1978 (being Laws 1961, = = 19 a l Chapter 240, Section 9, as amended) is amended to read:
n d d i = = o h l ] b ,d i a º e rBE 20IT "10-9-13.ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO:
RULES--ADOPTION--COVERAGE.--Rulesr promulgatedi a= r t me mw 21d bym thea boardn shallo beSECTION effective1. when filed as required by law.
dSection r10-9-13 eNMSA 221978 The(being rulesLaws shall1961, provide,d amongm other: things, for:
cb e d s º o t n = .229063.1AIC February 17, 2025 (1:24pm) s k 23m A.e e a n e d r e l u [ A d Chapter 240, Section 9, as amended) is amended to read:
a"10-9-13. classification plan for all positions in the e a n b 24 service;
uRULES--ADOPTION--COVERAGE.--Rules [promulgated B.by the board shall be effective when filed as required by law.
The rules shall provide, among other things, for:
A.
a classification plan for all positions in the service;
B.
.229063.1 C.
exemption from competitive entrance tests for those professional persons applying for classified positions in h the service who possess recognized registration or u » r certification by another state agency;
t h g e l i E.
a period of probation of [one year]year ] one hundred h r i s eighty days during which a probationer may be discharged or h , e h demoted or returned to the eligible list without benefit of t u g e b l e e , gh hearing;
provided that, once an employee has completed the n d d i = = o h initial probationary period, that employee shall not be el t] 17b ,d i a º r required to complete any additional probationary period upon we lr n= t e w d 18m a n o electing to transferHGEICºtransfer or otherwise move to another service =d =m 19: a l assignment;
ib r e t º o t n = .229063.1AIC February 17, 2025 (1:24pm) s k m e - 2 - e a n e d r 20e F.l u [ A d assignment»HGEIC HGEICºcommence another classified service assignment, unless that employee has had a break in state service of one or more days that was not the result of a reduction in force or a job-related injury or illness as provided by rule»HGEIC ;
theF. establishment of employment lists for the a t m m 21 certification of the highest standing candidates to the d r e 22 prospective employers and procedure to be followed in hiring c e s k 23 from the lists;
ethe aestablishment nof bemployment 24lists G.for the certification of the highest standing candidates to the prospective employers and procedure to be followed in hiring from the lists;
G.
u [ H.
dismissal or demotion procedure for employees in .229063.1 - 2 - the service, including presentation of written notice stating specific reasons and time for the employees to reply thereto, in writing, and appeals to the board;
the rejection of applicants who fail to meet reasonable requirements as to age, physical condition, h training, experience or moral conduct;
and u » r J.
employment of any apparently qualified applicant t h g e l i for a period of not more than ninety days when an emergency h r i s condition exists and there are no applicants available on an h , e h appropriate employment list as provided in Subsection F of this t u g e b l e e , gh section.
The applicant, if employed, shall be paid at the same n d d i = = o h rate as a comparable position covered by the Personnel Act." - 3 - 15 e t 17 w l n] db 18,d = = 19 a l i a eº r 20- a3 t- me m 21 d r e= 22t c e sw kd 23m e a n bo 24d um [: .229063.1
b r e t º o t n = .229063.1AIC February 17, 2025 (1:24pm) s k m e e a n e d r e l u [ A d
View plain text versions (2)
- Amended Amendments in Context Current pdf
- Introduced introduced version pdf
Action History
-
action postponed indefinitely
-
DO PASS committee report adopted
-
Sent to Senate Health and Public Affairs Committee & Senate Finance Committee
-
passed House
-
DO PASS, as amended, committee report adopted
-
DO PASS committee report adopted
-
Sent to House Labor, Veterans & Military Affairs Committee & House Government, Elections and Indian Affairs Committee
-
Sent to House Pre-file
Sponsors
- Linda M. Trujillo · Primary
- Eleanor Chávez · Primary
- Reena Szczepanski · Primary
- Patricia Roybal Caballero · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →4 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 108 not signed on
Sponsors (4)
- Linda M. Trujillo Democrat
- Eleanor Chávez Democrat
- Reena Szczepanski Democrat
- Patricia Roybal Caballero Democrat
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (108)
108 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 108 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HB 129?
- HB 129 is sponsored by Linda M. Trujillo (Democrat), Eleanor Chávez (Democrat), Reena Szczepanski (Democrat), and Patricia Roybal Caballero (Democrat).
- What is the current status of HB 129?
- This bill died with 2025 Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track HB 129?
- Track HB 129 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 129
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 129
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →