PROTESTS FOR REPLACEMENT WELLS
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HB 356 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HB 356.
You're tracking HB 356
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HB 356 — PROTESTS FOR REPLACEMENT WELLS
Last action — action postponed indefinitely
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2025 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
116 added · 71 removedPlain-language change summary
In the updated version of House Bill 356, a clarification was added stating that replacement wells located within one hundred feet of the original well are not subject to protest. This means that if someone needs to replace their well, they can do so without facing challenges from others, which could streamline the process. Additionally, it allows for a request for a hearing if someone feels aggrieved, providing a way for concerns to be formally addressed. This change is important because it aims to facilitate access to water resources while still ensuring that disputes can be resolved.
HOUSE BILL 356 57TH LEGISLATURE -STATEOFNEWMEXICO-- STATEOFNEWMEXICO- FIRST SESSION, 2025 INTRODUCED BY Cathrynn N.
Brown 6This 8document 10may ANincorporate ACTamendments RELATINGproposed TOby WATER;a committee, but not yet adopted, as well as amendments that have been adopted during the current legislative session.
PROVIDINGThe THATdocument REPLACEMENTis WELLSa WITHINtool ONEto HUNDREDshow FEETamendments OFin THEcontext ORIGINALand WELLcannot AREbe NOTused SUBJECTfor TOthe PROTEST;purpose of adding amendments to legislation.
ALLOWINGh AN AGGRIEVALACT ANDg REQUESTo FORRELATING HEARING TO BEWATER; FILED.
15PROVIDING BETHAT ITREPLACEMENT ENACTEDWELLS BYWITHIN THEONE LEGISLATUREt hr g e i k HUNDRED FEET OF THE STATEORIGINAL OFWELL NEWARE MEXICO:NOT SUBJECT TO PROTEST;
SECTIONh 1.r i s ALLOWING AN AGGRIEVAL AND REQUEST FOR HEARING TO BE FILED.
Sectionh 72-12-22, NMSAt, 1978e (beingu Lawsg 1959,e b l e te 17h ChapterBE 41,IT SectionENACTED 1)BY isTHE amendedLEGISLATURE toOF read:THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO:
w l n d 18d "72-12-22.i = = o h SECTION 1.
REPLACEMENTSection WELL72-12-22 WITHINNMSA ONE1978 HUNDRED(being FEET.--Laws =1959, =l 19] b ,d i a lº A.e Chapter 41, Section 1) is amended to read:
Ther owner of a water right may drill and use a i a= e r 20 replacement well drilled within one hundred feet of the a t me mw 21 original well prior to application to the state engineer and d rm e 22 the publication and hearing set out in Section [75-11-3 New c e s k 23 Mexico Statutes Annotated, 1953 Compilation] 72-12-3 NMSA 1978 e a n bo 24"72-12-22. if:
uREPLACEMENT [WELL (1)WITHIN theONE wellHUNDRED isFEET.-- drilledd intom the: same [and .229789.1 only the same] underground stream, channel, artesian basin, reservoir or lake as the original well;
[and]b (2)e thed appropriations isº ofo thet samen amount= of.229789.1AIC waterFebruary allowed19, by2025 [his](9:57pm) thes owner'sk waterm righte ine thea originaln well;e d r e l u [ A d A.
[and]The (3)owner anof emergencya situationwater existsright inmay whichdrill and use a replacement well drilled within one hundred feet of the delayoriginal causedwell byprior application,to application to the state engineer and the publication and hearing wouldset resultout in cropSection loss[75-11-3 orNew otherMexico seriousStatutes economicAnnotated, loss;1953 Compilation] 72-12-3 NMSA 1978 if:
and(1) (4) [he] the ownerwell filesis andrilled applicationinto or notifies the officesame ofHAAWCº the[and»HAAWC stateHAAWCºand»HAAWC engineerHAAWCºonly [office]the ofsame]»HAAWC theseHAAWCºonly facts and the locationsame»HAAWC ofunderground thestream, proposedchannel, replacementartesian wellbasin, byreservoir registeredor letter,lake prioras tothe drilling;original well;
provided[and that] [he](2) the ownerappropriation shallis fileof applicationthe forsame aamount permitof withinwater [30]allowed thirtyby days[his after] drillingthe begins.owner's water right in the original well;
B.[and ] (3) an emergency situation exists in which the delay caused by application, publication and hearing would result in crop loss or other serious economic loss;
Applicationsand forh replacement(4) wells[he within] onethe hundredowner feetfiles an application or g o t hr notifies the office of the originalstate engineer [office] of these g e i k facts and the location of the proposed replacement well areby noth subjectr i s registered letter, prior to protest.drilling;
eprovided tthat 17[he If] the applicanth is, aggrievedt, byowner theshall statefile engineerapplication actionfor ona wpermit lwithin n[30] dthirty 18e theu application,g ane aggrievalb andl requeste fore hearingh maydays beafter =drilling =begins. 19 a l filed.
in ad ed ri 20= [B.]= C.o h B.
TheApplications ownersfor of other water rights, who claim a t m m 21 to be injured by the drilling of a replacement wellwells underwithin theseone dl r] eb 22,d circumstances,i may not enjoin the drilling of such a wellº or c e shundred kfeet 23 the use of the wateroriginal fromwell the well, but are limitednot tosubject an e a n b 24 action at law to recoverprotest. damages [and to their right to protest u [ the granting of a permit]." .229789.1 - 2 -
r i = r t e w d m a n o If the applicant is aggrieved by the state engineer action on d m :
b e d s º o t n = .229789.1AIC February 19, 2025 (9:57pm) s k m e - 2 - e a n e d r e l u [ A d the application, an aggrieval and request for hearing may be filed.
[B.] C.
The owners of other water rights, who claim to be injured by the drilling of a replacement well under these circumstances, may not enjoin the drilling of such a well or the use of the water from the well, but are limited to an action at law to recover damages [and to their right to protest the granting of a permit]." - 3 - » g o » r h t i k l i g t h s , e h t l i w l b l e e , gh n d l h = = b , a l º d i a r e r = , a t e d m a n o d m :
b r e t º o t n = .229789.1AIC February 19, 2025 (9:57pm) s k m e e a n e d r e l u [ A d
View plain text versions (2)
- Amended Amendments in Context Current pdf
- Introduced introduced version pdf
AI-generated reading aid from the bill's amendatory text — verify against the official bill.
The bill provides that replacement wells within one hundred feet of the original well are not subject to protest and allows aggrieved parties to request a hearing.
-
Section 72-12-22
Applications for replacement wells within one hundred feet of the original well are not subject to protest.This change explicitly states that replacement wells within this distance are not subject to protest.
-
Section 72-12-22
but are limited to an action at law to recover damages and to their right to protest the granting of a permit.→ but are limited to an action at law to recover damages.This removal clarifies that affected parties cannot protest the granting of a permit for the well.
-
Section 72-12-22
if: (1) the well is drilled into the same→ The owner of a water right may drill and use a replacement well drilled within one hundred feet of the original well prior to application to the state engineer and the publication and hearing set out in Section 72-12-3 NMSA 1978 if:This addition clarifies the conditions under which a replacement well can be drilled without prior application.
Action History
-
action postponed indefinitely
-
DO PASS, as amended, committee report adopted
-
Sent to House Agriculture, Acequias & Water Resources Committee & House Judiciary Committee
Sponsors
- Cathrynn N. Brown · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 111 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Cathrynn N. Brown Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (111)
111 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 111 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HB 356?
- HB 356 is sponsored by Cathrynn N. Brown (Republican).
- What is the current status of HB 356?
- This bill died with 2025 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track HB 356?
- Track HB 356 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 356
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 356
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →