PRIVATE COLLECTION OF SPEEDING CAMERA FINES
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 91 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 91.
You're tracking SB 91
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 91 — PRIVATE COLLECTION OF SPEEDING CAMERA FINES
Last action — action postponed indefinitely
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2025 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
194 added · 142 removedPlain-language change summary
In the latest version of Senate Bill 91, a line has been added to clarify that municipalities with a penalty assessment program are prohibited from using private companies to collect unpaid fines or to impound vehicles related to speeding violations captured by automated cameras. This change is significant because it aims to limit the role of private entities in enforcement actions, promoting a more transparent and accountable approach to handling traffic penalties in local governments.
SENATE BILL 91 57TH LEGISLATURE -STATEOFNEWMEXICO-- STATE OF NEW MEXICO - FIRST SESSION, 2025 INTRODUCED BY Katy M.
Duhigg and Janelle Anyanonu 6This 8document 10may ANincorporate ACTamendments RELATINGproposed TOby MOTORa VEHICLES;committee, but not yet adopted, as well as amendments that have been adopted during the current legislative session.
PROHIBITINGThe Adocument MUNICIPALITYis THATa HAStool ESTABLISHEDto Ashow MUNICIPALamendments PENALTYin ASSESSMENTcontext PROGRAMand FROMcannot USINGbe Aused PRIVATEfor ENTITYthe TOpurpose COLLECTof UNPAIDadding PENALTIESamendments ORto TOlegislation. IMPOUND VEHICLES FOR UNPAID PENALTIES FOR SPEEDING VIOLATIONS DETECTED BY AN AUTOMATED CAMERA OR DEVICE.
eh tAN 17ACT BEg ITo ENACTEDRELATING BYTO THEMOTOR LEGISLATUREVEHICLES; OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO:
wPROHIBITING A MUNICIPALITY THAT HAS t hr g e i k ESTABLISHED A MUNICIPAL PENALTY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM FROM USING A h r i s PRIVATE ENTITY TO COLLECT UNPAID PENALTIES OR TO IMPOUND h , t, VEHICLES FOR UNPAID PENALTIES FOR SPEEDING VIOLATIONS DETECTED e u g e b l ne de 18h SECTIONBY 1.AN AUTOMATED CAMERA OR DEVICE.
Sectionn 66-8-130d NMSAd 1978i (being Laws 1978, = = 19o ah l Chapter] 35,b Section,d 538, as amended by Laws 2013, Chapter 192, i a º e rBE 20IT SectionENACTED 2BY andTHE byLEGISLATURE LawsOF 2013,THE ChapterSTATE 197,OF SectionNEW 4)MEXICO: is amended a t m m 21 to read:
dr i = r t e 22w "66-8-130.d m a n o SECTION 1.
[ALLSection TRAFFIC66-8-130 CITATIONSNMSA TO1978 CONFORM--(being cLaws e1978, sd km 23: MUNICIPALITIES MAY PASS ORDINANCE TO ESTABLISH SIMILAR PROGRAM] e a n b 24 CITATIONS TO CONFORM--MUNICIPAL ORDINANCES--AUTOMATED VIOLATION u [ DETECTION--PENALTY LIMITS--PROHIBITED COLLECTION ACTIONS.-- .229546.3 A.
b e d s º o t n = .229546.3AIC February 12, 2025 (2:53pm) s k m e e a n e d r e l u [ A d Chapter 35, Section 538, as amended by Laws 2013, Chapter 192, Section 2 and by Laws 2013, Chapter 197, Section 4) is amended to read:
"66-8-130.
[ALL TRAFFIC CITATIONS TO CONFORM-- MUNICIPALITIES MAY PASS ORDINANCE TO ESTABLISH SIMILAR PROGRAM] CITATIONS TO CONFORM--MUNICIPAL ORDINANCES--AUTOMATED VIOLATION DETECTION--PENALTY LIMITS--PROHIBITED COLLECTION ACTIONS.-- A.
Every municipality that has adopted an ordinance to establish a penalty assessment program shall assess on all penalty h assessment misdemeanors after January 1, 1984, in addition to u » r the penalty assessment, a penalty assessment fee of ten dollars t h g e l i ($10.00) to be deposited in a special fund in the municipal h r i s treasury for use by the municipality only for municipal jailer h , e h training;
for the construction planning, construction, t u g e b l e e , gh operation and maintenance of the municipal jail;
for paying the n d d i = = o h costs of housing that municipality's prisoners in other el t] 17b ,d i a º r detention facilities in the state;
or for complying with match we lr n= t e w d 18m a n o or contribution requirements for the receipt of federal funds =d =m 19: a l relating to jails.
Suchb ar municipale programt shallº beo limitedt in = .229546.3AIC February 12, 2025 (2:53pm) s k m e - 2 - e a n e d r 20e tol violationsu of[ municipalA trafficd ordinances.relating to jails.
Such a tmunicipal mprogram mshall 21be B.limited to violations of municipal traffic ordinances.
IfB. a municipality with a population less than d r e 22 three thousand according to the most recent federal decennial c e s k 23 census has a balance in its special fund pursuant to Subsection e a n b 24 A of this section that is over the amount projected to be u [ needed for the next fiscal year for the purposes set forth in .229546.3 - 2 - that subsection, the municipality may transfer the unneeded balance to the municipality's general fund.
If a municipality with a population less than three thousand according to the most recent federal decennial census has a balance in its special fund pursuant to Subsection A of this section that is over the amount projected to be needed for the next fiscal year for the purposes set forth in that subsection, the municipality may transfer the unneeded balance to the municipality's general fund.
With the prior approval of the h director, the required information may be submitted to the u » r division by electronic means in lieu of forwarding copies of t h g e l i the penalty assessments.
h r i s D.
Each agency shall provide itself with copies h , e h conforming exactly in size and format with the uniform traffic t u g e b l e e , gh citation and the electronic version of the uniform traffic n d d i = = o h citation if applicable, prescribed by the director, and any el t] 17b ,d i a º r alterations to the format to conform with local conditions must we lr n= t e w d 18m a n o be approved by the director.
=d =m 19: a l E.
Ab municipalityr thate establishest aº municipalo it an e= r.229546.3AIC 20February penalty12, assessment2025 program(2:53pm) pursuants tok thism sectione may- use3 an- e a tn me md 21r automatede cameral oru device[ toA detectd speedingE. infractions;
dA rmunicipality ethat 22establishes provideda thatmunicipal thepenalty municipalityassessment shallprogram not:pursuant to this section may use an automated camera or device to detect speeding infractions;
cprovided e s k 23 (1) impose penalties that exceedthe thosemunicipality eshall anot: n b 24 established in Sections 66-8-116 through 66-8-117 NMSA 1978;
u(1) [impose (2)penalties usethat aexceed collectionsthose agencyestablished orin otherSections private66-8-116 .229546.3through -66-8-117 3NMSA -1978; entity to collect unpaid penalties for violations detected by an automated camera or device;
(2) use a collections agency or other private entity to collect unpaid penalties for violations detected by an automated camera or device;
STBTCºor»STBTC (4) impound a vehicle based only on nonpayment of a penalty assessed for violations detected by an automated camera or device;device STBTCº;
or h (5) pay a third-party administrator of a u » r municipal penalty assessment program using automated cameras or t h g e l i devices a commission based on the number of penalty assessments issued.h r i s issued»STBTC .
h , e h F.
As used in this section, "credit reporting t u g e b l e e , gh agency" means a person that, for monetary fees, for dues or on n d d i = = o h a cooperative nonprofit basis, regularly engages in whole or in el t] 17b ,d i a º r part in the practice of assembling or evaluating credit we lr n= t e w d 18m a n o information or other information on other persons for the =d = 19 a l purpose of furnishing credit reports to third parties." i a e r 20 - 4 - a t m m: 21 d r e 22 c e s k 23 e a n b 24 u [ .229546.3
b r e t º o t n = .229546.3AIC February 12, 2025 (2:53pm) s k m e - 4 - e a n e d r e l u [ A d purpose of furnishing credit reports to third parties." - 5 - » g o » r h t i k l i g t h s , e h t l i w l b l e e , g n d l h = = b , a l º d i a r e r = , a t e d m a n o d m :
b r e t º o t n = .229546.3AIC February 12, 2025 (2:53pm) s k em e e a n e d r e l u [ A d
View plain text versions (2)
- Amended Amendments in Context Current pdf
- Introduced introduced version pdf
AI-generated reading aid from the bill's amendatory text — verify against the official bill.
The bill prohibits municipalities with a penalty assessment program from using private entities to collect unpaid penalties or impound vehicles for speeding violations detected by automated cameras.
-
Section 66-8-130
use a collections agency or other private entity to collect unpaid penalties for violations detected by an automated camera or device;→ not use a collections agency or other private entity to collect unpaid penalties for violations detected by an automated camera or device;This change prevents municipalities from outsourcing the collection of unpaid penalties.
-
Section 66-8-130
impound a vehicle based only on nonpayment of a penalty assessed for violations detected by an automated camera or device;→ not impound a vehicle based only on nonpayment of a penalty assessed for violations detected by an automated camera or device;This change prohibits vehicle impoundment solely due to unpaid penalties from automated violation detections.
Action History
-
action postponed indefinitely
-
DO PASS, as amended, committee report adopted
-
Sent to Senate Tax, Business and Transportation Committee & Senate Judiciary Committee
Sponsors
- Janelle Anyanonu · Primary
- Katy Duhigg · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →2 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 110 not signed on
Sponsors (2)
- Janelle Anyanonu Democrat
- Katy Duhigg Democrat
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (110)
110 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 110 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 91?
- SB 91 is sponsored by Janelle Anyanonu (Democrat) and Katy Duhigg (Democrat).
- What is the current status of SB 91?
- This bill died with 2025 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 91?
- Track SB 91 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 91
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 91
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →