New Mexico 2025 Regular Session Status: Enacted 3 D cosponsors

HM 27 — ANTI-DONATION CLAUSE INTERIM COMMITTEE WORK

Last action — Signed

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed House
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 21, 2025. Enacted.

Signed by Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham (Democratic) on April 08, 2025.

Prognosis

Advancing 56% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 3 sponsors

    3 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (3 D).

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

108 added · 142 removed

Plain-language change summary

The revised bill, HM 27, now includes a clearer request for the New Mexico Legislative Council to form an interim committee. This committee will explore how to best apply a recent voter-approved exception to the state's Anti-Donation Clause, specifically to provide state assistance for essential services like utilities. This is important because many communities in New Mexico face challenges in accessing basic services, and the committee's findings will help shape future legislative proposals aimed at addressing these issues in the 2026 session.

→
Previous
Latest
HOUSE MEMORIAL 27 57TH LEGISLATURE - STATE OF NEWMEXICO - FIRST SESSION 2025 INTRODUCED BY Linda Serrato and Joseph Franklin Hernandez and Patricia Roybal Caballero 7 9 A MEMORIAL REQUESTING THE NEW MEXICO LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL TO TASK AN INTERIM COMMITTEE TO ASSESS THE BEST METHODS TO IMPLEMENT THE EXCEPTION THE VOTERS APPROVED TO ARTICLE 9, SECTION 14 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF NEW MEXICO, COMMONLY KNOWN AS THE ANTI-DONATION CLAUSE, FOR THE PROVISION OF STATE ASSISTANCE FOR ESSENTIAL SERVICES AND TO DEVELOP LEGISLATIVE PROPOSALS BASED ON THE e t 17 COMMITTEE'S FINDINGS FOR THE 2026 LEGISLATIVE SESSION.
A MEMORIAL REQUESTING THE NEW MEXICO LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL TO TASK AN INTERIM COMMITTEE TO ASSESS THE BEST METHODS TO IMPLEMENT THE EXCEPTION THE VOTERS APPROVED TO ARTICLE 9, SECTION 14 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF NEW MEXICO, COMMONLY KNOWN AS THE ANTI- DONATION CLAUSE, FOR THE PROVISION OF STATE ASSISTANCE FOR ESSENTIAL SERVICES AND TO DEVELOP LEGISLATIVE PROPOSALS BASED ON THE COMMITTEE'S FINDINGS FOR THE 2026 LEGISLATIVE SESSION.
w l n d 18 = = 19 a l WHEREAS, many New Mexico communities have struggled to i a e r 20 acquire essential utility services for their residents, a t m m 21 including internet, electricity, natural gas, water and d r e 22 wastewater services;
WHEREAS, many New Mexico communities have struggled to acquire essential utility services for their residents, including internet, electricity, natural gas, water and wastewater services;
and c e s k 23 WHEREAS, utility providers in New Mexico sometimes find e a n b 24 u [ the capital costs of installing utility cables, lines, pipes and other utility infrastructure to be prohibitive for some .230484.2 communities due to their geography, geology, per capita disposable income, population density or other factors;
and WHEREAS, utility providers in New Mexico sometimes find the capital costs of installing utility cables, lines, pipes and other utility infrastructure to be prohibitive for some communities due to their geography, geology, per capita disposable income, population density or other factors;
WHEREAS, in 2022, the voters of New Mexico approved an exception to Article 9, Section 14 of the constitution of New Mexico, commonly known as the "anti-donation clause", to allow the state to expend funds or resources for the purpose of providing essential services primarily for residential purposes and defined "essential services" as "infrastructure that allows internet, energy, water, wastewater or other similar services e t 17 as provided by law";
HM 27 Page 1 WHEREAS, in 2022, the voters of New Mexico approved an exception to Article 9, Section 14 of the constitution of New Mexico, commonly known as the "anti-donation clause", to allow the state to expend funds or resources for the purpose of providing essential services primarily for residential purposes and defined "essential services" as "infrastructure that allows internet, energy, water, wastewater or other similar services as provided by law";
and w l n d 18 WHEREAS, the exception the voters approved included a = = 19 a l requirement for state expenditures to provide essential i a e r 20 services pursuant to implementing legislation that includes a t m m 21 "safeguards to protect public money and other public d r e 22 resources";
and WHEREAS, the exception the voters approved included a requirement for state expenditures to provide essential services pursuant to implementing legislation that includes "safeguards to protect public money and other public resources";
and c e s k 23 WHEREAS, electricity, internet, natural gas, water and e a n b 24 wastewater services meet very different human and community u [ needs, operate under very different regulatory structures and .230484.2 - 2 - have very different types of supporting infrastructure;
and WHEREAS, electricity, internet, natural gas, water and wastewater services meet very different human and community needs, operate under very different regulatory structures and have very different types of supporting infrastructure;
A.
HM 27 Page 2 A.
(2) whether a single entity to assist all e t 17 essential services or several separate public entities, each w l n d 18 specifically dedicated to a particular type of essential = = 19 a l service, would be more efficient and provide greater i a e r 20 accountability to safeguard public money and other public a t m m 21 resources;
(2) whether a single entity to assist all essential services or several separate public entities, each specifically dedicated to a particular type of essential service, would be more efficient and provide greater accountability to safeguard public money and other public resources;
d r e 22 (3) whether the best pathway to implement an c e s k 23 assistance program for essential services is to establish a e a n b 24 program to provide assistance for one type of essential service u [ to act as a prototype to develop best practices for providing .230484.2 - 3 - assistance for other essential services or to implement a broad spectrum assistance program for all essential services;
(3) whether the best pathway to implement an assistance program for essential services is to establish a program to provide assistance for one type of essential service to act as a prototype to develop best practices for providing assistance for other essential services or to implement a broad spectrum assistance program for all essential services;
(5) whether the provision of assistance for essential services should be conditioned on some level of matching funding from local governments;
(5) whether the provision of assistance for essential services should be conditioned on some level of HM 27 Page 3 matching funding from local governments;
and e t 17 B.
and B.
develop legislative proposals for the 2026 w l n d 18 legislative session to implement an assistance program for = = 19 a l essential services based on the committee's findings;
develop legislative proposals for the 2026 legislative session to implement an assistance program for essential services based on the committee's findings;
and i a e r 20 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that copies of this memorial be a t m m 21 transmitted to the members of the New Mexico legislative d r e 22 council and the director of the legislative council service.
and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that copies of this memorial be transmitted to the members of the New Mexico legislative council and the director of the legislative council service.
c e s k 23 - 4 - e a n b 24 u [ .230484.2
HM 27 Page 4 25
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. Signed

  2. passed House

  3. DO PASS committee report adopted

  4. Sent to House Government, Elections and Indian Affairs Committee

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

3 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 109 not signed on

Sponsors (3)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (109)

109 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 109 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors HM 27?
HM 27 is sponsored by Linda Serrato (Democrat), Joseph Franklin Hernandez (Democrat), and Patricia Roybal Caballero (Democrat).
What is the current status of HM 27?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 21, 2025. Enacted.
Where can I track HM 27?
Track HM 27 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HM 27

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HM 27

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →