New Mexico 2025 Regular Session Status: Enacted Bipartisan · 1 D · 1 R cosponsors

HM 57 — LAW ENFORCEMENT RECRUITMENT & RETENTION

Last action — Signed

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed House
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 10, 2025. Enacted.

Signed by Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham (Democratic) on April 22, 2025.

Odds of enactment

High chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence
  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 2 sponsors

    2 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Bipartisan support

    Sponsored across 2 parties (1 D · 1 R) — cross-party backing.

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

136 added · 179 removed

Plain-language change summary

The updated version of House Memorial 57 includes additional context and background about the New Mexico Law Enforcement Academy, emphasizing the need for high-quality training and standards in law enforcement. It highlights the expectation from police chiefs and sheriffs for the academy to provide effective training. These changes matter because they aim to improve recruitment and retention of instructors, which is crucial for maintaining the quality of law enforcement training in the state.

→
Previous
Latest
HOUSE MEMORIAL 57 57 TH LEGISLATURE- STATE OF NEW MEXICO - FIRST SESSIO, 2025 INTRODUCED BY William A.
A MEMORIAL REQUESTING A DESIGNEE FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, THE DIRECTOR OF THE NEW MEXICO LAW ENFORCEMENT ACADEMY, THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF TRAINING FOR THE NEW MEXICO LAW ENFORCEMENT ACADEMY AND A DESIGNEE OF THE PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION TO COLLABORATE AND STUDY THE ISSUES REGARDING RECRUITMENT AND RETENTION OF NEW MEXICO LAW ENFORCEMENT ACADEMY INSTRUCTORS AND PROVIDE A CONSENSUS RECOMMENDATION TO THE LEGISLATIVE INTERIM COMMITTEE CHARGED WITH REVIEWING MATTERS RELATED TO INVESTMENTS AND PENSIONS.
Hall IIand Patricia A.
WHEREAS, the New Mexico law enforcement academy was established by the legislature in 1969 as the "police academy", later changing the name to the "New Mexico law enforcement academy" in 1970;
Lundstrom 6 8 10 A MEMORIAL REQUESTING A DESIGNEE FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, THE DIRECTOR OF THE NEW MEXICO LAW ENFORCEMENT ACADEMY, THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF TRAINING FOR THE NEW MEXICO LAW ENFORCEMENT ACADEMY AND A DESIGNEE OF THE PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION TO COLLABORATE AND STUDY THE ISSUES REGARDING RECRUITMENT AND RETENTION OF NEW MEXICO LAW ENFORCEMENT ACADEMY INSTRUCTORS AND e t 17 w l PROVIDE A CONSENSUS RECOMMENDATION TO THE LEGISLATIVE INTERIM n d 18 COMMITTEE CHARGED WITH REVIEWING MATTERS RELATED TO INVESTMENTS = = 19 a l AND PENSIONS.
and WHEREAS, law enforcement in New Mexico is working under the president's task force on 21st century policing, whose mandate was to identify best policing practices and offer recommendations on how those practices can promote effective crime reduction while building public trust;
i a e r 20 a t m m 21 WHEREAS, the New Mexico law enforcement academy was d r e 22 established by the legislature in 1969 as the "police academy", c e s k 23 e a later changing the name to the "New Mexico law enforcement n b 24 u [ academy" in 1970;
and .230735.2 WHEREAS, law enforcement in New Mexico is working under the president's task force on 21st century policing, whose mandate was to identify best policing practices and offer recommendations on how those practices can promote effective crime reduction while building public trust;
and WHEREAS, with the best practices mandate top of mind, the New Mexico law enforcement academy is expected by New Mexico's chiefs of police and sheriffs to provide cutting-edge training for officers and law enforcement staff, and providing cutting- edge training requires subject matter experts who are experienced and committed to the mission;
and WHEREAS, with the best practices mandate top of mind, the New Mexico law enforcement academy is expected by New Mexico's chiefs of police and sheriffs to provide cutting- HM 57 Page 1 edge training for officers and law enforcement staff, and providing cutting-edge training requires subject matter experts who are experienced and committed to the mission;
and WHEREAS, the New Mexico law enforcement academy instructors are certified police officers, ideally with several years of experience coupled with instructor credentialing in e t 17 critical areas of high-risk and technical instruction;
and WHEREAS, the New Mexico law enforcement academy instructors are certified police officers, ideally with several years of experience coupled with instructor credentialing in critical areas of high-risk and technical instruction;
and w l n d 18 WHEREAS, the desired target instructor applicants are = = 19 a l officers with experience who are currently employed at various i a e r 20 law enforcement agencies throughout the state, and those a t m m 21 officers are covered under the public employees retirement d r e 22 association's municipal police member coverage plan five, which c e s k 23 allows for enhanced retirement with twenty years of service;
and WHEREAS, the desired target instructor applicants are officers with experience who are currently employed at various law enforcement agencies throughout the state, and those officers are covered under the public employees retirement association's municipal police member coverage plan five, which allows for enhanced retirement with twenty years of service;
e a n b 24 and u [ WHEREAS, it is a nearly insurmountable obstacle for the .230735.2 - 2 - New Mexico law enforcement academy to attract the ideal officers to fill instructor positions since those officers would be leaving a municipal law enforcement position for which they are eligible to retire after twenty years to become an instructor at the New Mexico law enforcement academy and be covered by a retirement plan requiring twenty-five years of service to retire with a comparable retirement benefit;
and WHEREAS, it is a nearly insurmountable obstacle for the New Mexico law enforcement academy to attract the ideal officers to fill instructor positions since those officers would be leaving a municipal law enforcement position for which they are eligible to retire after twenty years to become an instructor at the New Mexico law enforcement academy and be covered by a retirement plan requiring twenty- five years of service to retire with a comparable retirement benefit;
and WHEREAS, the New Mexico law enforcement academy is powerless to equalize academy instructors' retirement eligibility requirements with those of their municipal law enforcement counterparts because current law requires that academy instructors, regardless of years of experience and specialized credentials, when hired by the academy, be moved from the enhanced twenty-year retirement plan to the state general member coverage plan three, which requires twenty-five years of service before the officer can retire with a e t 17 comparable retirement benefit as provided under the municipal w l n d 18 police member coverage plan five;
and WHEREAS, the New Mexico law enforcement academy is HM 57 Page 2 powerless to equalize academy instructors' retirement eligibility requirements with those of their municipal law enforcement counterparts because current law requires that academy instructors, regardless of years of experience and specialized credentials, when hired by the academy, be moved from the enhanced twenty-year retirement plan to the state general member coverage plan three, which requires twenty- five years of service before the officer can retire with a comparable retirement benefit as provided under the municipal police member coverage plan five;
and = = 19 a l WHEREAS, requiring five additional years of service for an i a e r 20 officer to retire in order to receive a benefit comparable to a t m m 21 an officer working five fewer years presents a harsh and d r e 22 significant barrier to instructor recruitment, and even c e s k 23 officers who are not planning to retire are understandably e a n b 24 reluctant to accept a position for which they would have to u [ give up the enhanced retirement option;
and WHEREAS, requiring five additional years of service for an officer to retire in order to receive a benefit comparable to an officer working five fewer years presents a harsh and significant barrier to instructor recruitment, and even officers who are not planning to retire are understandably reluctant to accept a position for which they would have to give up the enhanced retirement option;
and .230735.2 - 3 - WHEREAS, although positions for instructors have been posted multiple times, the New Mexico law enforcement academy remains only forty percent staffed in the instructor role;
and WHEREAS, although positions for instructors have been posted multiple times, the New Mexico law enforcement academy remains only forty percent staffed in the instructor role;
and WHEREAS, the New Mexico law enforcement academy is committed to retaining the highest level of expectations in the hiring of instructors, but without offering qualified candidates a retirement level playing field, the academy simply cannot compete with law enforcement agencies statewide;
and WHEREAS, the New Mexico law enforcement academy is committed to retaining the highest level of expectations in the hiring of instructors, but without offering qualified candidates a retirement level playing field, the academy HM 57 Page 3 simply cannot compete with law enforcement agencies statewide;
and WHEREAS, unfortunately, the primary recruitment obstacle for the New Mexico law enforcement academy is also the primary e t 17 retention obstacle because current academy instructors would w l n d 18 benefit by returning to local law enforcement agencies so as to = = 19 a l regain eligibility for twenty-year retirement, and this fact i a e r 20 has repeatedly played out as the reason that highly a t m m 21 credentialed instructors have left the academy for employment d r e 22 at other law enforcement agencies;
and WHEREAS, unfortunately, the primary recruitment obstacle for the New Mexico law enforcement academy is also the primary retention obstacle because current academy instructors would benefit by returning to local law enforcement agencies so as to regain eligibility for twenty- year retirement, and this fact has repeatedly played out as the reason that highly credentialed instructors have left the academy for employment at other law enforcement agencies;
and c e s k 23 WHEREAS, solution-focused discussions with collaboration e a n b 24 among key stakeholders and policymakers for resolution of the u [ issues surrounding recruitment and retention of New Mexico law .230735.2 - 4 - enforcement academy instructors is a matter of significant importance to the overall policing strategies and capabilities of the state;
and WHEREAS, solution-focused discussions with collaboration among key stakeholders and policymakers for resolution of the issues surrounding recruitment and retention of New Mexico law enforcement academy instructors is a matter of significant importance to the overall policing strategies and capabilities of the state;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO that a designee of the department of public safety, the director of the New Mexico law enforcement academy, the deputy director of training for the New Mexico law enforcement academy and a designee of the public employees retirement association be requested to collaborate and study the issues regarding the recruitment and retention of law enforcement academy instructors and, through a consensus, make a recommendation during the upcoming interim, no later than September 15, 2025, to the legislative interim committee charged with reviewing matters related to investments and pensions;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO that a designee of the department of public safety, the director of the New HM 57 Page 4 Mexico law enforcement academy, the deputy director of training for the New Mexico law enforcement academy and a designee of the public employees retirement association be requested to collaborate and study the issues regarding the recruitment and retention of law enforcement academy instructors and, through a consensus, make a recommendation during the upcoming interim, no later than September 15, 2025, to the legislative interim committee charged with reviewing matters related to investments and pensions;
and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that copies of this memorial be e t 17 transmitted to the governor, the New Mexico legislative w l n d 18 council, the secretary of public safety, the director of the = = 19 a l New Mexico law enforcement academy and the executive director i a e r 20 of the public employees retirement association.
and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that copies of this memorial be transmitted to the governor, the New Mexico legislative council, the secretary of public safety, the director of the New Mexico law enforcement academy and the executive director of the public employees retirement association.
a t m m 21 - 5 - d r e 22 c e s k 23 e a n b 24 u [ .230735.2
HM 57 Page 5 25
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. Signed

  2. passed House

  3. DO PASS committee report adopted

  4. Sent to House Government, Elections and Indian Affairs Committee

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

2 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 110 not signed on

Sponsors (2)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (110)

110 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 110 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors HM 57?
HM 57 is sponsored by Patricia A. Lundstrom (Democrat) and William A. Hall II (Republican).
What is the current status of HM 57?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 10, 2025. Enacted.
Where can I track HM 57?
Track HM 57 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HM 57

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HM 57

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →