New Mexico 2023 Regular Session Status: Enacted 4 D cosponsors

HM 51 — STUDY PUBLIC SCHOOL FUNDING FORMULA

Last action — Signed

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed House
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 17, 2023. Enacted.

Signed by Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham (Democratic) on March 14, 2023.

Odds of enactment

High chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Advancing 60% · moderate confidence
  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 5 sponsors

    5 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (4 D).

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

160 added · 213 removed

Plain-language change summary

The updated version of Bill HM 51 includes additional language that emphasizes the need to study the public education funding formula in New Mexico. Specifically, it notes that there are concerns about whether the current funding system is adequately supporting at-risk students, which includes groups like English learners, Native American students, students with disabilities, and low-income students. This change is important because it highlights the need for a thorough evaluation to ensure all students receive a constitutionally sufficient education, ultimately aiming to improve educational outcomes across the state.

→
Previous
Latest
HOUSE MEMORIAL 51 56TH LEGISLATURE - STATE OF NEWMEXICO - FIRST SESSION 2023 INTRODUCED BY Susan K.
A MEMORIAL REQUESTING THE LEGISLATIVE EDUCATION STUDY COMMITTEE, IN COLLABORATION WITH THE LEGISLATIVE FINANCE COMMITTEE, THE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION, THE PUBLIC EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, THE PUBLIC SCHOOL CAPITAL OUTLAY COUNCIL AND OTHER REPRESENTATIVES OF STAKEHOLDER GROUPS, TO APPOINT A SUBCOMMITTEE TO STUDY THE PUBLIC EDUCATION FUNDING FORMULA AND ASSESS WHETHER THE FUNDING FORMULA IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE 12, SECTION 1 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF NEW MEXICO AND TO PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE FIFTY-EIGHTH LEGISLATURE, FIRST SESSION.
Herrera and Debra M.
WHEREAS, Article 12, Section 1 of the constitution of New Mexico provides that a "uniform system of free public schools sufficient for the education of, and open to, all children of school age in the state shall be established and maintained";
Sariñana and Joy Garratt and Christine Trujillo and G.
and WHEREAS, the first judicial district court found New Mexico's public education system has failed to provide a constitutionally sufficient and adequate education for at-risk students, including English learners, Native American students, students with disabilities and low-income students;
Andrés Romero 7 9 A MEMORIAL REQUESTING THE LEGISLATIVE EDUCATION STUDY COMMITTEE, IN COLLABORATION WITH THE LEGISLATIVE FINANCE COMMITTEE, THE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION, THE PUBLIC EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, THE PUBLIC SCHOOL CAPITAL OUTLAY COUNCIL AND OTHER REPRESENTATIVES OF STAKEHOLDER GROUPS, TO APPOINT A SUBCOMMITTEE TO STUDY THE PUBLIC EDUCATION FUNDING FORMULA AND e t 17 ASSESS WHETHER THE FUNDING FORMULA IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS w l n d 18 OF ARTICLE 12, SECTION 1 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF NEW MEXICO AND = = 19 a l TO PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE FIFTY-EIGHTH LEGISLATURE, i a e r 20 FIRST SESSION.
and WHEREAS, the first judicial district court enjoined the state to provide sufficient resources, including HM 51 Page 1 instructional materials, well-trained staff and curricular offerings, necessary for providing all students with a constitutionally sufficient public education;
a t m m 21 d r e 22 WHEREAS, Article 12, Section 1 of the constitution of New c e s k 23 Mexico provides that a "uniform system of free public schools e a n b 24 u [ sufficient for the education of, and open to, all children of school age in the state shall be established and maintained";
and WHEREAS, the legislature has responded to the first judicial district court's ruling by significantly increasing investments in school personnel compensation, programs and services for students with at-risk factors, instructional materials and educational technology, early literacy and reading support initiatives and professional learning opportunities for educators and school leaders;
.225088.1 and WHEREAS, the first judicial district court found New Mexico's public education system has failed to provide a constitutionally sufficient and adequate education for at-risk students, including English learners, Native American students, students with disabilities and low-income students;
and WHEREAS, the first judicial district court has not yet found the state to be in compliance with its findings;
and WHEREAS, the first judicial district court enjoined the state to provide sufficient resources, including instructional materials, well-trained staff and curricular offerings, necessary for providing all students with a constitutionally sufficient public education;
and WHEREAS, a well-designed public school funding methodology is a critical component in achieving a high-quality, equitable and constitutionally sufficient public education system;
and WHEREAS, the legislature has responded to the first judicial district court's ruling by significantly increasing investments in school personnel compensation, programs and services for students with at-risk factors, instructional materials and educational technology, early literacy and e t 17 reading support initiatives and professional learning w l n d 18 opportunities for educators and school leaders;
and WHEREAS, the current public education funding formula was created in 1974 and has been amended or added to more than fifty times since its inception;
and = = 19 a l WHEREAS, the first judicial district court has not yet i a e r 20 found the state to be in compliance with its findings;
and a t m m 21 WHEREAS, a well-designed public school funding methodology d r e 22 is a critical component in achieving a high-quality, equitable c e s k 23 and constitutionally sufficient public education system;
and e a n b 24 WHEREAS, the current public education funding formula was u [ created in 1974 and has been amended or added to more than .225088.1 - 2 - fifty times since its inception;
and WHEREAS, the cost differential for kindergarten students was last adjusted in 1990, with the subsequent inclusion of three- and four-year-old developmentally disabled students;
and WHEREAS, the cost differential for kindergarten students was last adjusted in 1990, with the subsequent inclusion of HM 51 Page 2 three- and four-year-old developmentally disabled students;
and WHEREAS, the cost differentials for students enrolled in bilingual and multicultural education programs were last e t 17 adjusted in 1993;
and WHEREAS, the cost differentials for students enrolled in bilingual and multicultural education programs were last adjusted in 1993;
and w l n d 18 WHEREAS, the five-year phase-out of the small school = = 19 a l program cost differential is almost complete, with the i a e r 20 simultaneous phase-in of the rural population factor;
and WHEREAS, the five-year phase-out of the small school program cost differential is almost complete, with the simultaneous phase-in of the rural population factor;
and a t m m 21 WHEREAS, the at-risk factor has been increased from nine d r e 22 hundred fifteen ten-thousandths in fiscal year 2014 to its c e s k 23 current three-tenths;
and WHEREAS, the at-risk factor has been increased from nine hundred fifteen ten-thousandths in fiscal year 2014 to its current three-tenths;
and e a n b 24 WHEREAS, the fine arts factor has not been adjusted since u [ fiscal year 2006;
and WHEREAS, the fine arts factor has not been adjusted since fiscal year 2006;
and .225088.1 - 3 - WHEREAS, the cost differential for school districts and charter schools serving students in a home school environment was last adjusted in 2013;
and WHEREAS, the cost differential for school districts and charter schools serving students in a home school environment was last adjusted in 2013;
and WHEREAS, the legislature has enacted legislation to allow a school district or charter school to generate additional program units through participation in the K-5 plus and extended learning time programs;
and WHEREAS, the legislature has enacted legislation to HM 51 Page 3 allow a school district or charter school to generate additional program units through participation in the K-5 plus and extended learning time programs;
and e t 17 WHEREAS, it is unclear whether the methodology of w l n d 18 determining student membership is an adequate method of = = 19 a l determining the program units to which a school district or i a e r 20 charter school is entitled;
and WHEREAS, it is unclear whether the methodology of determining student membership is an adequate method of determining the program units to which a school district or charter school is entitled;
and a t m m 21 WHEREAS, the state equalization guarantee, which is the d r e 22 distribution of state money for education, is computed by c e s k 23 determining each school district's or charter school's total e a n b 24 program units and then multiplying that by the unit value to u [ derive the program cost;
and WHEREAS, the state equalization guarantee, which is the distribution of state money for education, is computed by determining each school district's or charter school's total program units and then multiplying that by the unit value to derive the program cost;
and .225088.1 - 4 - WHEREAS, there are several proposals in the fifty-sixth legislature, first session, to amend the public education funding formula, including an increase to the at-risk factor, an increase to the fine arts factor, a repeal of the K-5 plus factor and a repeal of the extended learning time factor;
and WHEREAS, there are several proposals in the fifty-sixth legislature, first session, to amend the public education funding formula, including an increase to the at-risk factor, an increase to the fine arts factor, a repeal of the K-5 plus HM 51 Page 4 factor and a repeal of the extended learning time factor;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO that the legislative education study committee, in collaboration with the legislative finance committee, the public education department, the department of finance and administration, the public school e t 17 capital outlay council and representatives of the public school w l n d 18 facilities authority, the New Mexico association of school = = 19 a l business officials and the New Mexico coalition of educational i a e r 20 leaders, be requested to study the public education funding a t m m 21 formula and assess whether the funding formula is meeting the d r e 22 requirements of Article 12, Section 1 of the constitution of c e s k 23 New Mexico;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO that the legislative education study committee, in collaboration with the legislative finance committee, the public education department, the department of finance and administration, the public school capital outlay council and representatives of the public school facilities authority, the New Mexico association of school business officials and the New Mexico coalition of educational leaders, be requested to study the public education funding formula and assess whether the funding formula is meeting the requirements of Article 12, Section 1 of the constitution of New Mexico;
and e a n b 24 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the study include legislation u [ passed by the fifty-sixth legislature, first session;
and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the study include legislation passed by the fifty-sixth legislature, first session;
and .225088.1 - 5 - BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the results of this study be reported to the legislative education study committee, the legislative finance committee and the governor before the 2025 legislative session;
and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the results of this study be reported to the legislative education study committee, the HM 51 Page 5 legislative finance committee and the governor before the 2025 legislative session;
- 6 - 16 e t 17 w l n d 18 = = 19 a l i a e r 20 a t m m 21 d r e 22 c e s k 23 e a n b 24 u [ .225088.1
HM 51 Page 6 25
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. Signed

  2. passed House

  3. DO PASS committee report adopted

  4. Sent to House Education Committee

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

5 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 107 not signed on

Sponsors (5)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (107)

107 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 107 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors HM 51?
HM 51 is sponsored by Trujillo, Christine, Debra M. Sariñana (Democrat), Joy Garratt (Democrat), G. Andrés Romero (Democrat), and Susan K. Herrera (Democrat).
What is the current status of HM 51?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 17, 2023. Enacted.
Where can I track HM 51?
Track HM 51 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HM 51

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HM 51

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →