GRID MODERNIZATION PLANS
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HB 243 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HB 243.
You're tracking HB 243
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HB 243 — GRID MODERNIZATION PLANS
Last action — DO NOT PASS, replaced with committee substitute
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2023 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
33 added · 194 removedPlain-language change summary
The updated bill, HB 243, now gives the Public Regulation Commission the authority to create rules about grid modernization plans that electric utilities must file periodically. This change matters because it aims to enhance the reliability and cost-effectiveness of the state's electricity distribution system while ensuring that these plans align with the state's overall roadmap for modernization. Additionally, the new provisions specifically exclude rural electric cooperatives, which means they won't be required to follow these regulations.
HOUSE ENERGY, ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE FOR HOUSE BILL 243 56TH LEGISLATURE -STATEOFNEWMEXICO- FIRST SESSION, 2023 INTRODUCED4 BY6 Tara8 L.10 AN ACT RELATING TO ENERGY;
LujanREQUIRING 6ELECTRIC 8PUBLIC 10UTILITIES ANTO ACTFILE RELATINGA TOGRID ENERGY;MODERNIZATION PLAN WITH THE PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION;
REQUIRINGAUTHORIZING ELECTRICTHE PUBLIC UTILITIESREGULATION COMMISSION TO FILEMAKE ARULES REGARDING GRID MODERNIZATION PLANPLANS. WITH THE PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION.
1516 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO:
e t 17 SECTION 1.
SectionA 62-8-13new NMSAsection 1978of (beingChapter Laws62, 2020,Article e8 tNMSA 17w Chapterl 15,n Sectiond 3,18 as1978 amended) is amendedenacted to read:
w= = 19 a l n"[NEW dMATERIAL] 18GRID "62-8-13.MODERNIZATION PLAN.-- i a e r 20 A.
APPLICATIONPursuant FORto GRIDthe MODERNIZATIONcommission's PROJECTS.--rulemaking =a =t 19m m 21 authority, an electric public utility subject to the ratemaking d r e 22 jurisdiction of the commission shall periodically file a lgrid A.c e s k 23 modernization plan with the commission.
A publicgrid utilitymodernization maye filea ann applicationb with24 iplan amay einclude rmeasures 20of thecost-effectiveness commissionand toreliability approveu grid[ modernizationof projectsthe thatdistribution aregrid aand thow mthe mplans 21are neededconsistent bywith the.225274.3 utility,HENRC/HB or243 uponthe requeststate's ofroadmap thefor commission.grid modernization.
d r e 22 Applications may include requests for approval of investments c e s k 23 or incentives to facilitate grid modernization, rate designs or e a n b 24 programs that incorporate the use of technologies, equipment or u [ infrastructure associated with grid modernization and customer .223688.2 education and outreach programs that increase awareness of grid modernization programs and of the benefits of grid modernization.
Applications shall include the utility's estimate of costs for grid modernization projects and demonstrate that the grid modernization projects are cost- effective pursuant to a least-cost, best-fit analysis and minimize the net present value of revenue requirements.
Applications for grid modernization projects shall be filed pursuant to Sections 62-9-1 and 62-9-3 NMSA 1978, as applicable.
WhenBy consideringOctober applications1, for2024, approval, the commission shall reviewadopt therules reasonablenessto ofimplement athe proposedprovisions grid modernization project and as part of thatthis reviewsection. shall consider whether the requested investments, incentives, programs and expenditures are:
(1)C. reasonably expected to improve the public e t 17 utility's electrical system efficiency, reliability, resilience w l n d 18 and security;
maintainThe reasonableprovisions operations,of maintenancethis andsection do not apply to a distribution cooperative organized pursuant to the Rural Electric Cooperative Act." - 2 - 9 11 13 15 e t 17 w l n d 18 = = 19 a l ratepayeri costs;a e r 20 a t m m 21 d r e 22 c e s k 23 e a n b 24 u [ .225274.3
and meet energy demands through a flexible, i a e r 20 diversified and distributed energy portfolio, including energy a t m m 21 standards established in Section 62-16-4 NMSA 1978;
d r e 22 (2) designed to support connection of New c e s k 23 Mexico's electrical grid into regional energy markets and e a n b 24 increase New Mexico's capability to supply regional energy u [ needs through export of clean and renewable electricity;
.223688.2 - 2 - (3) reasonably expected to increase access to and use of clean and renewable energy, with consideration given for increasing access to low-income users and users in underserved communities;
(4) designed to contribute to the reduction of air pollution, including greenhouse gases;
(5) reasonably expected to support increased product and program offerings by utilities to their customers;
allow for private capital investments and skilled jobs in related services;
and provide customer protection, information or education;
(6) transparent, incorporating public reporting requirements to inform project design and commission policy;
[and] (7) reasonably expected to be favorable pursuant to a least-cost, best-fit analysis;
and e t 17 [(7)] (8) otherwise consistent with the w l n d 18 state's grid modernization planning process and priorities.
= = 19 a l C.
Except as provided in Subsection D of this i a e r 20 section, a public utility that undertakes grid modernization a t m m 21 projects approved by the commission may recover its reasonable d r e 22 costs through an approved tariff rider or in base rates, or by c e s k 23 a combination of the two.
Costs that are no greater than the e a n b 24 amount approved by the commission for a utility grid u [ modernization project are presumed to be reasonable.
A tariff .223688.2 - 3 - rider proposed by a public utility to fund approved grid modernization projects shall go into effect thirty days after filing, unless suspended by the commission for a period not to exceed one hundred eighty days.
If the tariff rider is not approved or suspended within thirty days after filing, it shall be deemed approved as a matter of law.
If the commission has not acted to approve or disapprove the tariff rider by the end of the suspension period, it shall be deemed approved as a matter of law.
D.
Costs for a grid modernization project that only benefits customers of an electric distribution system shall not be recovered from customers served at a level of one hundred ten thousand volts or higher from an electric transmission system in New Mexico.
E.
The provisions of this section do not apply to a distribution cooperative organized pursuant to the Rural e t 17 Electric Cooperative Act.
w l n d 18 F.
As used in this section:
= = 19 a l (1) "grid modernization" means improvements to i a e r 20 electric distribution or transmission infrastructure through a t m m 21 investments in assets, technologies or services that are d r e 22 designed to modernize the electrical system by enhancing c e s k 23 electric distribution or transmission grid reliability, e a n b 24 resilience, interconnection of distributed energy resources, u [ distribution system efficiency, grid security against cyber and .223688.2 - 4 - physical threats, customer service or energy efficiency and conservation and includes:
[(1)] (a) advanced metering infrastructure and associated communications networks;
[(2)] (b) intelligent grid devices for real time or near-real time system and asset information;
Show all 69 changed lines (29 more)
[(3)] (c) automated control systems for electric transmission and distribution circuits and substations;
[(4)] (d) high-speed, low-latency communications networks for grid device data exchange and remote and automated control of devices;
[(5)] (e) distribution system hardening projects for circuits and substations designed to reduce service outages or service restoration times, but does not include the conversion of overhead tap lines to underground e t 17 service;
w l n d 18 [(6)] (f) physical security measures at = = 19 a l critical distribution substations;
i a e r 20 [(7)] (g) cybersecurity measures;
a t m m 21 [(8)] (h) systems or technologies that d r e 22 enhance or improve distribution system planning capabilities by c e s k 23 the public utility;
e a n b 24 [(9)] (i) technologies to enable demand u [ response;
.223688.2 - 5 - [(10)] (j) energy storage systems and microgrids that support circuit-level grid stability, power quality, reliability or resiliency or provide temporary backup energy supply;
[(11)] (k) infrastructure and equipment necessary to support electric vehicle charging or the electrification of community infrastructure or industrial production, processing or transportation;
and [(12)] (l) new customer information platforms designed to provide improved customer access, greater service options and expanded access to energy usage information;
(2) "least-cost, best-fit analysis" means an analysis that identifies the options that minimize the net present value of revenue requirements associated with the electric public utility's distribution system and compares the e t 17 total costs of investment alternatives over a defined period of w l n d 18 time, including capital, operations and maintenance costs;
and = = 19 a l (3) "net present value of revenue i a e r 20 requirements" means the current worth of the total expected a t m m 21 future revenue requirements associated with a particular d r e 22 resource portfolio, expressed in dollars in the year the c e s k 23 application is submitted as discounted by the appropriate e a n b 24 discount rate." u [ SECTION 2.
A new section of Chapter 62, Article 8 NMSA .223688.2 - 6 - 1978 is enacted to read:
"[NEW MATERIAL] GRID MODERNIZATION PLAN.--By March 31, 2025 and every four years thereafter on or before March 31, an electric public utility that is subject to the ratemaking jurisdiction of the commission shall file a grid modernization plan with the commission.
The plan shall include:
A.
an assessment of the electric public utility's planned expenditures for operations, maintenance and proposed projects and how the planned expenditures are consistent with the state's roadmap for grid modernization;
B.
a statistical analysis of system reliability for the electric public utility's distribution in the utility's service area that uses standard utility industry measures for service reliability and includes the reporting of incidents of transmission, substation and distribution outages but excludes planned outages for maintenance;
e t 17 C.
the following statistics for the electric public w l n d 18 utility's operations:
= = 19 a l (1) a system average interruption duration i a e r 20 index that measures the duration in minutes of outages that a t m m 21 were more than five minutes for each customer per year;
d r e 22 (2) a system average interruption frequency c e s k 23 index that measures the number of outages of a duration of more e a n b 24 than five minutes for each customer per year;
u [ (3) a momentary average interruption frequency .223688.2 - 7 - index that measures the number of outages of a duration of less than five minutes for each customer per year;
and (4) a customer average interruption duration index that measures the average outage duration for a customer served by the utility;
D.
the identification of the top ten percent of worst performing circuits in the electric public utility's service area, including the number of customers served by each circuit and an analysis of the factors that contributed to any circuit outages, such as weather events, aging infrastructure, constraints on circuit capacity due to customer load growth or other factors;
and E.
the electric public utility's plan for any investments or maintenance necessary to improve the performance of the utility's worst performing circuits." - 8 - e t 17 w l n d 18 = = 19 a l i a e r 20 a t m m 21 d r e 22 c e s k 23 e a n b 24 u [ .223688.2
Show all 69 changed rows (29 more)
View plain text versions (2)
- Substitute EN substitute Current pdf
- Introduced introduced version pdf
Action History
-
DO NOT PASS, replaced with committee substitute
-
Sent to House Energy, Environment and Natural Resources Committee & House Judiciary Committee
Sponsors
- Tara L. Lujan · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 111 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Tara L. Lujan Democrat
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (111)
111 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 111 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HB 243?
- HB 243 is sponsored by Tara L. Lujan (Democrat).
- What is the current status of HB 243?
- This bill died with 2023 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track HB 243?
- Track HB 243 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 243
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 243
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →