New Mexico 2022 Regular Session Status: In Committee 3 D cosponsors

HB 5 — PRETRIAL RELEASE CONDITIONS

Last action — action postponed indefinitely

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed House
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2022 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

45 added · 123 removed

Plain-language change summary

In the latest version of Bill HB 5, the focus has shifted from establishing a rebuttable presumption against pretrial release for certain serious offenses to a system that requires continuous electronic location monitoring for certain defendants once they are granted pretrial release. This change means that instead of just considering the nature of the crimes to determine if a person is dangerous, the bill now mandates that defendants who meet specific criteria will be monitored electronically to track their movements. This could enhance safety by ensuring that law enforcement can keep tabs on those accused of serious crimes while they await trial.

→
Previous
Latest
HOUSE BILL 5 55TH LEGISLATURE -STATEOFNEWMEXICO- SECOND SESSION , 2022 INTRODUCED BY Marian Matthews and Meredith A.
HOUSE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE FOR HOUSE BILL 5 55TH LEGISLATURE -STATEOFNEWMEXICO- SECOND SESSION , 2022 4 6 8 10 AN ACT RELATING TO PRETRIAL RELEASE;
Dixon and William "Bill" R.
REQUIRING CONTINUOUS ELECTRONIC LOCATION MONITORING OF CERTAIN DEFENDANTS ON PRETRIAL RELEASE;
Rehm and Linda M.
REQUIRING COLLECTION AND MAINTENANCE OF ELECTRONIC LOCATION MONITORING DATA FOR THOSE DEFENDANTS;
Lopez and Natalie Figueroa 7 9 AN ACT RELATING TO PRETRIAL RELEASE;
REQUIRING NOTIFICATION TO LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES OF VIOLATIONS OF COURT-ORDERED ELECTRONIC LOCATION MONITORING;
ESTABLISHING WHEN A REBUTTABLE PRESUMPTION ARISES THAT A PERSON IS DANGEROUS TO ANY OTHER PERSON OR TO THE COMMUNITY AND NO RELEASE CONDITIONS WILL REASONABLY PROTECT THE SAFETY OF ANY OTHER PERSON OR THE COMMUNITY;
REQUIRING AVAILABILITY OF e t 17 ELECTRONIC LOCATION MONITORING DATA TO LAW ENFORCEMENT w l n d 18 AGENCIES, DISTRICT ATTORNEYS, PUBLIC DEFENDERS AND THE OFFICE = = 19 a l OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL;
CONFIRMING THE PROSECUTING AUTHORITY'S BURDEN OF PROOF IN PRETRIAL DETENTION HEARINGS;
e t 17 w l n d 18 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO:
i a e r 20 a t m m 21 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO:
= = 19 a l SECTION 1.
d r e 22 SECTION 1.
A new section of Chapter 31, Article 3 NMSA i a e r 20 1978 is enacted to read:
A new section of Chapter 31, Article 3 NMSA c e s k 23 1978 is enacted to read:
a t m m 21 "[NEW MATERIAL] REBUTTABLE PRESUMPTION AGAINST RELEASE.-- d r e 22 A.
e a n b 24 "[NEW MATERIAL] COURT-ORDERED ELECTRONIC LOCATION u [ MONITORING OF CERTAIN DEFENDANTS ON PRETRIAL RELEASE-- .222615.1 HJC/HB 5 COLLECTION AND MAINTENANCE OF DATA--NOTIFICATION OF VIOLATIONS--DATA AVAILABILITY.-- A.
Subject to rebuttal by the defendant in a c e s k 23 pretrial detention hearing requested by a prosecuting e a n b 24 authority, evidence or offers of proof establishing probable u [ cause for any of the following felony offenses for which a .221264.12GLG defendant is charged shall be deemed prima facie proof that the defendant is a danger to any other person or to the community and that no release conditions will reasonably protect the safety of any other person or the community:
When a court orders electronic location monitoring of a defendant charged with a felony as a condition of pretrial release, the electronic location monitoring of the defendant shall be conducted for twenty-four hours per day and seven days per week.
(1) any of the following serious violent felony offenses:
The data obtained from the electronic location monitoring shall be collected for the duration of the period for which the monitoring is required and shall be maintained for at least five years.
(a) murder in the first degree;
B.
(b) first or second degree felony human trafficking of a child;
An entity conducting electronic location monitoring of a defendant on pretrial release shall immediately notify each law enforcement agency within the jurisdiction of the court of a violation of a requirement for electronic location monitoring, including the defendant's presence in a prohibited location or the disabling of an electronic location e t 17 monitoring device.
(c) first degree felony abuse of a child;
w l n d 18 C.
(d) sexual exploitation of a child constituting at least a second degree felony;
The electronic location monitoring data = = 19 maintained pursuant to this section shall be made available, a l i a e r 20 upon request, to a law enforcement agency, a district attorney, a t m m 21 a public defender or the office of the attorney general." d r e 22 SECTION 2.
or (e) a serious violent felony offense as provided in Subparagraphs (a) through (n) of Paragraph (4) of Subsection L of Section 33-2-34 NMSA 1978;
EMERGENCY.--It is necessary for the public c e s k 23 peace, health and safety that this act take effect immediately.
e t 17 (2) a felony offense during which a firearm w l n d 18 was brandished pursuant to Section 31-18-16 NMSA 1978 or during = = 19 a l which a firearm was discharged;
e a n b 24 - 2 - u [ .222615.1
or i a e r 20 (3) a felony offense during which great bodily a t m m 21 harm was inflicted as defined in Section 30-1-12 NMSA 1978 or d r e 22 that caused the death of a person.
c e s k 23 B.
Subject to rebuttal by the defendant in a e a n b 24 pretrial detention hearing requested by a prosecuting u [ authority, it shall be presumed that the defendant is a danger .221264.12GLG - 2 - to any other person or to the community and that no release condition will reasonably protect the safety of any other person or the community if the court finds that there is probable cause to believe that the defendant committed a new felony offense that prompted the detention hearing:
(1) while pending trial or sentencing for an offense listed in Paragraphs (1) through (3) of Subsection A of this section;
(2) while on probation, parole or any other post-conviction supervision for an offense listed in Paragraphs (1) through (3) of Subsection A of this section;
or (3) within five years of having been convicted of an offense listed in Paragraphs (1) through (3) of Subsection A of this section.
C.
If the court rules that the presumption in Subsection A or B of this section applies to a defendant, the e t 17 court shall evaluate whether the prosecuting authority has w l n d 18 satisfied its burden to prove by clear and convincing evidence = = 19 a l that no release conditions will reasonably protect the safety i a e r 20 of any other person or the community by evaluating any factors a t m m 21 established by rules approved by the New Mexico supreme court d r e 22 for pretrial detention, including:
c e s k 23 (1) the nature and circumstances of the e a n b 24 offense charged, including whether the offense is a crime of u [ violence;
.221264.12GLG - 3 - (2) the weight of the evidence against the defendant;
(3) the history and characteristics of the defendant;
(4) the nature and seriousness of the danger to any person or to the community that would be posed by the defendant's release;
(5) any facts tending to indicate that the defendant may or may not commit new crimes if released;
(6) whether the defendant has been ordered detained under Article 2, Section 13 of the constitution of New Mexico based on a finding of dangerousness in another pending case or was ordered detained based on a finding of dangerousness in any prior case;
and (7) any available results of a pretrial risk assessment instrument approved by the New Mexico supreme court e t 17 for use in the jurisdiction;
provided that the court shall not w l n d 18 defer to the recommendation in the instrument but shall make an = = 19 a l independent determination of dangerousness and community safety i a e r 20 based on all information available at the hearing.
a t m m 21 D.
Nothing in this section shall be deemed to shift d r e 22 the burden of proof to the defendant that the defendant is not c e s k 23 a danger to any other person or to the community and that there e a n b 24 are no release conditions that will reasonably protect the u [ safety of any other person or the community.
The burden of .221264.12GLG - 4 - proof rests with the prosecuting authority.
E.
For the purposes of this section, "firearm" means any weapon that will, is designed to or may readily be converted to expel a projectile by the action of an explosive." SECTION 2.
APPLICABILITY.--The provisions of this act apply to charges first filed against defendants on or after the effective date of this act.
Show all 43 changed rows (3 more)
Previous
Latest
SECTION 3.
EMERGENCY.--It is necessary for the public peace, health and safety that this act take effect immediately.
- 5 - 12 14 16 e t 17 w l n d 18 = = 19 a l i a e r 20 a t m m 21 d r e 22 c e s k 23 e a n b 24 u [ .221264.12GLG
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. action postponed indefinitely

  2. DO NOT PASS, replaced with committee substitute

  3. DO PASS committee report adopted

  4. withdrawn from committee

  5. referred to House Government, Elections and Indian Affairs Committee & House Judiciary Committee

  6. germane & printed

  7. not printed House Rules and Order of Business Committee

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

5 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 107 not signed on

Sponsors (5)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (107)

107 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 107 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors HB 5?
HB 5 is sponsored by Rehm, William "Bill" R., Linda M. López (Democrat), Figueroa, Natalie, Meredith A. Dixon (Democrat), and Marian Matthews (Democrat).
What is the current status of HB 5?
This bill died with 2022 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track HB 5?
Track HB 5 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HB 5

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HB 5

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →