Requiring hospitals to receive patients transported to them by EMS providers
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 652 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 652.
You're tracking SB 652
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 652 — Requiring hospitals to receive patients transported to them by EMS providers
Last action — Referred to Rules on 2nd reading
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House of Delegates
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2022 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
19 added · 26 removedPlain-language change summary
The updated version of Bill SB 652 now specifies that hospitals must accept patients transported by emergency medical services within 60 minutes of their arrival. It removed vague language about "unreasonable delays" in accepting patients and emphasizes the hospital's obligation to provide emergency care immediately. These changes are significant because they aim to ensure timely access to treatment for patients in emergencies, potentially improving patient outcomes and reducing the burden on emergency services.
NEWS RELEASES HELPFUL LINKS IntroducedSB652 VersionSUB1 « Senate Bill 652 History OTHER VERSIONS — CommitteeIntroduced SubstituteVersion (1) | | Email Key:
Red = new code to be enacted WEST VIRGINIAvirginia LEGISLATURElegislature REGULARregular SESSIONsession IntroducedCommittee Substitute for Senate Bill 652 By Senators Woodrum, Boley, Clements, Grady, Karnes, Phillips, Roberts, Stover, Sypolt, Trump, Martin, Hamilton, Smith, and SmithRucker [Introduced[Originating Februaryin 16,the 2022;Committee on Health and Human Resources;
referredreported to the Committee on HealthFebruary and25, Human2022] Resources] A BILL to amend the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended, by adding thereto a new section, designated §16-5B-20, relating to prohibiting hospitals from refusing to receive and delaying the reception of patients presented by emergency medical services;
No hospital licensed under this article shall refuse to receive, refuse to treat, or unreasonably delay the receipt of a patient when transported and presented to the hospital by an emergency medical services provider.
When a patient is presented to the emergency department of a hospital, the hospital shall accept and receive the patient promptlywithin 60 minutes of arrival in the emergency department and relieve the emergency medical service of any further obligation to treat or provide care to the patient.
The hospital shall, at a minimum, provide emergency care to the patient until he or she may be placed at a suitable in-patient health care facility or until the patient may be safely released from inpatientin-patient care.
NOTE: Bill Status | Bill Tracking | Legacy WV Code | Bulletin Board | District Maps | Senate Roster | House Roster | Live | Blog | Jobs | Links | Home This Web site is maintained by the West Virginia Legislature's Office of Reference & Information.
The purpose of this bill is to require hospitals to promptly receive patients transported to them by EMS providers.
Strike-throughs indicate language that would be stricken from a heading or the present law and underscoring indicates new language that would be added.
Bill Status | Bill Tracking | Legacy WV Code | Bulletin Board | District Maps | Senate Roster | House Roster | Live | Blog | Jobs | Links | Home This Web site is maintained by the West Virginia Legislature's Office of Reference & Information.
View plain text versions (2)
- Committee Substitute View text html
- Introduced Introduced Version Current html
Action History
-
Referred to Rules on 2nd reading
-
On 2nd reading
-
Read 1st time
-
On 1st reading
-
Committee substitute reported
-
To Health and Human Resources
-
Introduced in Senate
-
To Health and Human Resources
-
Filed for introduction
Sponsors
- Patricia Rucker · Cosponsor
- Bill Hamilton · Cosponsor
- Trump · Cosponsor
- Sypolt · Cosponsor
- Stover · Cosponsor
- Rollan A. Roberts · Cosponsor
- Phillips · Cosponsor
- Karnes · Cosponsor
- Amy Grady · Cosponsor
- Charles H. Clements · Cosponsor
- Boley · Cosponsor
- Jack Woodrum · Primary
- Patrick Martin · Cosponsor
- Randy E. Smith · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 13 co-sponsors · 138 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Jack Woodrum Republican
Co-sponsors (13)
- Patricia Rucker Republican
- Bill Hamilton Republican
- Trump
- Sypolt
- Stover
- Rollan A. Roberts Republican
- Phillips
- Karnes
- Amy Grady Republican
- Charles H. Clements Republican
- Boley
- Patrick Martin Republican
- Randy E. Smith Republican
Not signed on (138)
138 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 138 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 652?
- SB 652 is sponsored by Patricia Rucker (Republican), Bill Hamilton (Republican), Trump, Sypolt, Stover, Rollan A. Roberts (Republican), Phillips, Karnes, Amy Grady (Republican), Charles H. Clements (Republican), Boley, Jack Woodrum (Republican), Patrick Martin (Republican), and Randy E. Smith (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 652?
- This bill died with 2022 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 652?
- Track SB 652 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 652
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 652
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →