U.S. Army PFC Ralph E. Lusk Memorial Bridge
House Concurrent Resolution 91 requests the Division of Highways to rename Gardner Bridge in Mercer County to honor PFC Ralph E. Lusk, who served in the Vietnam War. It also asks for signs to identify the bridge by this new name.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HCR 91 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HCR 91.
You're tracking HCR 91
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HCR 91 — U.S. Army PFC Ralph E. Lusk Memorial Bridge
Last action — To House Technology and Infrastructure
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
Died in session
This bill died with 2022 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
In plain language
The bill requests naming a bridge in honor of U.S. Army PFC Ralph E. Lusk.
House Concurrent Resolution 91 requests the Division of Highways to rename Gardner Bridge in Mercer County to honor PFC Ralph E. Lusk, who served in the Vietnam War. It also asks for signs to identify the bridge by this new name.
Bill Text
- Introduced Introduced Version Current html
Action History
-
To House Technology and Infrastructure
-
Introduced in House
-
To Technology and Infrastructure then Rules
-
Filed for introduction
Sponsors
- Mike Pushkin · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 151 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Mike Pushkin Democrat
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (151)
151 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 151 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HCR 91?
- HCR 91 is sponsored by Mike Pushkin (Democrat).
- What is the current status of HCR 91?
- This bill died with 2022 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track HCR 91?
- Track HCR 91 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HCR 91
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HCR 91
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →