SB 650 — Eliminating number of royalty owners required for utilization by operator for lawful use and development by co-tenants
Last action — Chapter 179, Acts, Regular Session, 2022
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House of Delegates
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2022 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
14 added · 221 removedPlain-language change summary
The recent amendment to Bill SB 650 changes the bill's title and scope by removing the requirement that at least seven royalty owners must be involved for the Cotenancy Modernization and Majority Protection Act to apply. This change is important because it broadens the act's applicability, potentially allowing more landowners to benefit from its provisions and protections. Additionally, the amendment corrects internal references within the bill, which helps clarify the legal language. Overall, these updates aim to make the legislation more effective and accessible.
SBSB650 650SFAT TextSmith skip#1 navigation2-22 SENATEChilds PRESIDENT7879 SENATORS COMMITTEESSenator VIDEO/AUDIOSmith DISTRICTmoved MAPSto SENATEamend CLERKthe SENATEbill RULESby HOUSEstriking SPEAKERout DELEGATESthe COMMITTEEStitle VIDEO/AUDIOand DISTRICTsubstituting MAPStherefor HOUSEa CLERKnew HOUSEtitle, RULESto HOUSEread STAFFas JOINTfollows: INTERIM COMMITTEES LEGISLATIVE ADMINISTRATOR LEGISLATIVE SERVICES DIVISION PUBLIC INFORMATION LEGISLATIVE AUTOMATED SYSTEMS DIVISION LEGISLATIVE AUDITOR'S OFFICE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION & RESEARCH DIVISION POST AUDIT DIVISION BUDGET DIVISION REGULATORY AND FISCAL AFFAIRS DIVISION CLAIMS COMMISSION CRIME VICTIMS RULE-MAKING REVIEW SPECIAL INVESTIGATIONS JUDICIAL COMP.
COMMISSIONEng. JOINT RULES STAFF INFO BILL STATUS BILL STATUS BILL TRACKING STATE LAW WEST VIRGINIA CODE ACTS OF THE LEGISLATURE CODE OF 1931 WV CONSTITUTION US CONSTITUTION REPORTS AGENCY REPORTS AGENCY GRANT AWARDS PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS POST AUDITS EDUCATIONAL CITIZEN’S GUIDE INTERNSHIP PROGRAM PAGE PROGRAM PUBLICATIONS PHOTO GALLERY CAPITOL HISTORY HOW A BILL BECOMES LAW CONTACT SENATE ROSTER HOUSE ROSTER PUBLIC INFO.
NEWSSenate RELEASESBill HELPFUL650—A LINKSBill Enrolledto Versionamend -and Finalreenact Version§37B-1-4 «of Senatethe BillCode 650of HistoryWest OTHERVirginia, VERSIONS1931, — as Committeeamended, Substituterelating (1)generally | to Introducedaltering Versionthe | applicability | of Emailthe Key:Cotenancy Modernization and Majority Protection Act;
Green = existing Code.
Red = new code to be enacted WEST virginia legislature regular session ENROLLED Committee Substitute for Senate Bill 650 By Senator Nelson [Passed March 05, 2022;
in effect 90 days from passage] AN ACT to amend and reenact §37B-1-4 of the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended, relating generally to altering the applicability of the Cotenancy Modernization and Majority Protection Act;
Be it enacted byAdopted theRejected Legislature of West Virginia:
ARTICLE 1.
MINERAL development by A majority of cotenants.
§37B-1-4.
Lawful use and development by cotenants;
election of interests;
reporting and remitting of interests of unknown or unlocatable cotenants;
establishment of terms and provisions for development;
and merging of surface and oil and gas.
(a) If an operator or owner makes or has made reasonable efforts to negotiate with all royalty owners in an oil or natural gas mineral property and royalty owners vested with at least three fourths of the right to develop, operate, and produce oil, natural gas, or their constituents consent to the lawful use or development of the oil or natural gas mineral property, the operator’s or owner’s use or development of the oil or natural gas mineral property is permissible, is not waste, and is not trespass.
In that case, the consenting cotenants and their lessees, operators, agents, contractors, or assigns are not liable for damages for waste or trespass due to the lawful use or development and shall pay the nonconsenting cotenants in accordance with subsections (b), (c), and (e) of this section, reserve the amounts specified in subsection (d) and (e) of this section for the benefit of unknown or unlocatable interest owners, and report and remit the reserved interests as provided in subsection (d) of this section.
(b) A nonconsenting cotenant is entitled to receive, based on his or her election, either:
(1) A pro rata share of production royalty, paid on the gross proceeds received at the first point of sale to an unaffiliated third-party purchaser and free of post-production expenses, equal to the highest royalty percentage paid to his or her consenting cotenants in the same mineral property, under a bona fide, arms-length lease transaction and lease bonus and delay rental payments or other non-royalty mineral payments, calculated on a weighted-average net mineral acre basis;
or (2) To participate in the development and receive his or her pro rata share of the revenue and cost equal to his or her share of production attributable to the tract or tracts being developed according to the interest of such nonconsenting cotenant, exclusive of any royalty or overriding royalty reserved in any lease, assignments thereof, or agreements relating thereto, after the market value of such nonconsenting cotenant’s share of production, exclusive of such royalty and overriding royalty, equals double the share of such costs payable or charged to the interest of such nonconsenting cotenant.
(c) A nonconsenting cotenant shall have 45 days following the operator’s written delivery of its best and final lease offer in which to make his or her election for either a production royalty or a revenue share as specified in subsection (b) of this section.
If the nonconsenting cotenant fails to deliver a written election to the operator prior to the expiration of the 45-day period, he or she shall be deemed to have made the election set forth in subdivision (1), subsection (b) of this section.
Within 30 days after a nonconsenting cotenant has chosen or is deemed to have chosen the production royalty option, the nonconsenting cotenant shall have the right to appeal to the commission regarding the issue of whether there has been compliance with subdivision (1) of subsection (b) of this section, to verify the highest royalty paid in the same mineral property and the value for the lease bonus and delay rental payments:
Provided, That the operations upon the parcel may continue during the proceedings. (d) Unknown or unlocatable interest owners are deemed to have made the election provided by subdivision (1), subsection (b) of this section and are only entitled to receive the amount provided by that subdivision.
Within 120 days from the date upon which an amount is reserved for an unknown or unlocatable interest owner pursuant to subsection (a) of this section, the consenting cotenants and their lessees, operators, agents, contractors, or assigns shall make a report to the State Treasurer as the unclaimed property administrator and each calendar quarter, thereafter, concerning each reserved interest for each unknown or unlocatable interest owner and shall concurrently remit the amount reserved, in accordance with the provisions of §37B-2-1 et seq.
and §36-8-1 et seq.
of this code and as determined by the State Treasurer.
The quarterly report and remittances shall be submitted by the first day of the month following each calendar quarter.
(e) Unless otherwise agreed to in writing or defined by this section, any nonconsenting cotenant and any unknown or unlocatable interest owner who elects or is deemed to elect a production royalty under subdivision (1), subsection (b) of this section is subject to and shall benefit from the other terms and provisions defined by the lease executed by a consenting cotenant which contains terms and provisions most favorable to the nonconsenting cotenant or the unknown or unlocatable interest owner:
Provided, That nonconsenting cotenants and unknown or unlocatable interest owners shall not be subject to or liable under any warranty of title, jurisdictional or choice of law provisions, arbitration provisions, injection well provisions, disposal well provisions, and storage provisions:
Provided, however, That consenting cotenants and their lessees, operators, agents, contractors, or assigns shall only develop the specifically targeted stratigraphic formation and 100 feet above and below said formation;
nonconsenting cotenants and unknown or unlocatable interest owners will retain all rights to all other formations unless or until reasonable efforts are made to renegotiate under this section for each additional formation.
If a consenting cotenant has made a lease only for the targeted formation, in that case the nonconsenting cotenants and unknown and unlocatable cotenants shall receive the highest royalty, bonus, and delay rental in the lease which was executed for the targeted formation. (f) Unless otherwise agreed to in writing or defined by this section, a nonconsenting cotenant who elects to participate under subdivision (2), subsection (b) of this section, shall be subject to and shall benefit from other terms and provisions determined to be just and reasonable by the Oil and Gas Conservation Commission in a manner similar to the provisions of §22C-9-7(b)(5)(B) of this code governing deep wells.
The commission may propose rules for legislative approval in accordance with the provisions of §29A-3-1 et seq.
of this code, to implement and make effective the provisions of this section and the powers and authority conferred and the duties imposed upon the commission under the provisions of this section.
Notwithstanding the determination of participation terms by the commission, an operator may proceed with the development of oil, natural gas, or their constituents pursuant to this section.
(g) After seven years from the date of the first report to the treasurer, a bona fide surface owner may file an action to quiet title to the interests of all unknown and unlocatable interest owners of the oil and natural gas estate underlying the surface tract.
To the extent relevant and practical, such action shall follow the provisions of §55-12A-1 et seq.
of this code.
Upon presentation of sufficient proof, a bona fide surface owner shall be entitled to receive a special commissioner’s deed transferring title to the interest of any or all unknown or unlocatable interest owners in an oil and natural gas estate which underlies the surface tract.
Show all 46 changed lines (6 more)
The surface owner shall only be entitled to their proportionate share of all future proceeds and is not entitled to any of the accrued funds which have been remitted to the treasurer prior to the execution of the special commissioner’s deed.
The unknown or unlocatable interest owners are not entitled to any amounts paid to the grantees of the special commissioner’s deed after delivery of said deed.
Bill Status | Bill Tracking | Legacy WV Code | Bulletin Board | District Maps | Senate Roster | House Roster | Live | Blog | Jobs | Links | Home This Web site is maintained by the West Virginia Legislature's Office of Reference & Information.
| Terms of Use | Webmaster | © 2026 West Virginia Legislature ** Print On Demand Name:
Email:
Phone:
Show all 46 changed rows (6 more)
View plain text versions (4)
- SB650 SFAT SMITH _1 2-22 adopted.htm View text Current html
- Committee Substitute Enrolled Committee Substitute html
- Committee Substitute View text html
- Introduced Introduced Version html
Action History
-
Chapter 179, Acts, Regular Session, 2022
-
Approved by Governor 3/30/2022
-
Approved by Governor 3/30/22 - House Journal
-
Approved by Governor 3/30/2022 - Senate Journal
-
To Governor 3/9/22 - House Journal
-
To Governor 3/9/2022
-
House Message received
-
Completed legislative action
-
Communicated to Senate
-
Passed House (Roll No. 376)
-
Read 3rd time
-
On 3rd reading, Special Calendar
-
Read 2nd time
-
On 2nd reading, Special Calendar
-
Read 1st time
-
On 1st reading, Special Calendar
-
Do pass
-
To House Energy and Manufacturing
-
To Energy and Manufacturing
-
Introduced in House
-
Ordered to House
-
Passed Senate with amended title (Roll No. 215)
-
Read 3rd time
-
On 3rd reading
-
Read 2nd time
-
On 2nd reading
-
Read 1st time
-
On 1st reading
-
Committee substitute reported
-
To Energy, Industry, and Mining
-
Introduced in Senate
-
To Energy, Industry, and Mining
-
Filed for introduction
Sponsors
- Nelson · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 151 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Nelson
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (151)
151 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 151 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 18 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 29 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 85% | 15% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (34)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| LINDSAY | — | Yea |
| STOLLINGS | — | Yea |
| BALDWIN | — | Nay |
| MARONEY | — | Yea |
| STOVER | — | Yea |
| BEACH | — | Yea |
| MARTIN | — | Yea |
| SWOPE | — | Yea |
| BOLEY | — | Yea |
| MAYNARD | — | Yea |
| SYPOLT | — | Nay |
| BROWN | — | Yea |
| NELSON | — | Yea |
| CAPUTO | — | Nay |
| PHILLIPS | — | Yea |
| PLYMALE | — | Yea |
| TRUMP | — | Yea |
| GEFFERT | — | Nay |
| ROMANO | — | Nay |
| JEFFRIES | — | Yea |
| SMITH | — | Yea |
| MR PRESIDENT | — | Yea |
| KARNES | — | Yea |
| Mike Woelfel | Democrat | Yea |
| Amy Grady | Republican | Yea |
| Bill Hamilton | Republican | Yea |
| Charles H. Clements | Republican | Yea |
| Eric Tarr | Republican | Yea |
| Jack Woodrum | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Azinger | Republican | Yea |
| Patricia Rucker | Republican | Yea |
| Rollan A. Roberts | Republican | Yea |
| Ryan Weld | Republican | Yea |
| Tom Takubo | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 650?
- SB 650 is sponsored by Nelson.
- What is the current status of SB 650?
- This bill died with 2022 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 650?
- Track SB 650 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 650
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 650
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →