Require visitation immediately following a procedure in a health care facility
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HB 4257 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HB 4257.
You're tracking HB 4257
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HB 4257 — Require visitation immediately following a procedure in a health care facility
Last action — Chapter 229, Acts, Regular Session, 2022
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed House of Delegates
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 19, 2022. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
11 sponsors
1 primary, 10 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (6 R).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 1 recorded vote so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
12 added · 105 removedPlain-language change summary
In the latest revision of Bill HB 4257, the title was changed to clarify its focus on improving patient visitation rights in healthcare facilities. It now explicitly mentions allowing visitation when a patient is stable after surgery and includes provisions for clergy visitation. These updates are significant because they aim to enhance emotional support for patients during their recovery, fostering a better healing environment.
HB4257 SSFAT H&HRMaroney AM #1 3-33-9 Dellinger 7965 TheSenator CommitteeMaroney on Health and Human Resources moved to amend the bill by striking out everythingthe aftertitle theand enactingsubstituting clausetherefor anda insertingnew intitle, lieuto thereofread theas following:follows:
ARTICLEEng. 39.
PATIENTCom. SAFETY ACT.
§16-39-3.Sub for House Bill 4257—A Bill to amend and reenact §16-39-3 and §16-39-8 of the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended, all relating to requiring visitation of a patient in a health care facility;
Definitions.defining terms;
Forpermitting purposesvisitation ofwhen this article, the followingpatient wordsis andstable phrasesfollowing havea thesurgical followingprocedure; meanings:
“Appropriatepermitting authority”visitation meansof a federal,patient state,by county,a ormember municipalof governmentclergy; body, agency or organization having jurisdiction over criminal law enforcement, regulatory violations, professional conduct or ethics, or waste or any member, officer, agent, representative, or supervisory employee thereof;
“Clergy”and meansestablishing anparameters ordainedfor clergy,clergy suchvisitation. as a rabbi, priest, Islamic cleric, associate pastor, licensed minister, or lay minister serving under the direction of the congregation such as the Roman Catholic Eucharistic ministers;
“Commissioner” means the commissionerAdopted ofRejected the division of health;
“Direct patient care” means health care that provides for the physical, diagnostic, emotional, or rehabilitational needs of a patient or health care that involves examination, treatment, or preparation for diagnostic tests or procedures.
“Discrimination or retaliation” includes any threat, intimidation, discharge, or any adverse change in a health care worker’s position, location, compensation, benefits, privileges, or terms or conditions of employment that occurs as a result of a health care worker engaging in any action protected by this article.
“Good faith report” means a report of conduct defined in this article as wrongdoing or waste that is made without malice or consideration of personal benefit and which the person making the report has reasonable cause to believe is true.
“Health care entity” includes a health care facility, such as a hospital, clinic, nursing facility, or other provider of health care services.
“Health care facility” means:
(1) A hospital licensed pursuant to §16-5B-1 et seq.
of this code;
(2) A nursing home licensed pursuant to §16-5C-1 et seq.
of this code;
(3) An assisted living residence licensed pursuant to §16-5D-1 et seq.
of this code;
and (4) Hospice licensed pursuant to §16-5I-1 et seq.
of this code.
“Health care worker” means a person who provides direct patient care to patients of a health care entity and who is an employee of the health care entity, a subcontractor, or independent contractor for the health care entity, or an employee of the subcontractor or independent contractor.
The term includes, but is not limited to, a nurse, nurse’s aide, laboratory technician, physician, intern, resident, physician assistant, physical therapist, or any other person who provides direct patient care.
“Patient” means a person living or receiving services as an inpatient at a healthcare facility.
“Public Health State of Emergency” means a federal or state declaration of a state of emergency arising from or relating to a public health crisis.
“Visitor” means any visitor from the patient’s family, or hospice or clergy visiting a patient in a healthcare facility.
“Waste” means the conduct, act, or omission by a health care entity that results in substantial abuse, misuse, destruction, or loss of funds, resources, or property belonging to a patient, a health care entity, or any federal or state program.
“Wrongdoing” means a violation of any law, rule, regulation, or generally recognized professional or clinical standard that relates to care, services, or conditions and which potentially endangers one or more patients or workers or the public.
§16-39-8.
Visitation of a patient in a health care facility.
(a) During a declared public health state of emergency for a contagious disease, a health care facility shall permit visitation of a patient. If the patient’s death is imminent, the health care facility shall allow visitation upon request at any time and frequency. In all other instances, the health care facility shall allow visitation once the patient is stable following a surgical procedure and, not less than once every five days:
Provided, That visitation permitted by any health care entity may not be inconsistent with any applicable federal law, rule, policy, or guidance in effect for the same emergency.
(b) A visitor shall comply with the applicable procedures established by the health care facility.
(c) The health care facility may deny a visitor entry to the health care facility, may subject a visitor to expulsion from the facility, or may permanently revoke visitation rights to a visitor who does not comply with the applicable procedures established by the health care facility.
(d) A healthcare facility is not liable to a person visiting another person, nor to any other patient or resident of the health care facility, for any civil damages for injury or death resulting from or related to actual or alleged exposure during, or through the performance of, the visitation in compliance with this section, unless the health care facility failed to substantially comply with the applicable health and safety procedures established by the health care facility.
(e) Health care facilities shall provide patients adequate and lawful access to clergy so that patients can practice their religion by receiving clergy visitation at any reasonable time, as long as the visit does not disrupt clinical care:
Provided, That if the health care facility limits the number of people able to visit the patient, the member of the clergy is not to be considered within that number.
(f) Clergy shall comply with the applicable visitation procedures established by the health care facility.
Adopted Rejected
View plain text versions (5)
- HB4257 SFAT MARONEY _1 3-9 adopted.htm View text html
- HB4257 S H_HR AM _1 3-3 adopted.htm View text Current html
- Committee Substitute Enrolled Committee Substitute html
- Committee Substitute View text html
- Introduced Introduced Version html
Compared against the W. Va. Code as published AI-generated reading aid — verify against the official bill.
The bill amends the definitions in West Virginia Code § 16-39-3 and adds provisions regarding patient visitation during public health emergencies in § 16-39-8.
-
§16-39-3
“Visitor” means any visitor from the patient’s family, or hospice or clergy visiting a patient in a healthcare facility.
This adds a definition for 'Visitor' related to healthcare facilities.
-
§16-39-8
(a) During a declared public health state of emergency for a contagious disease, a health care facility shall permit visitation of a patient. If the patient’s death is imminent, the health care facility shall allow visitation upon request at any time and frequency. In all other instances, the health care facility shall allow visitation once the patient is stable following a surgical procedure and, not less than once every five days: Provided, That visitation permitted by any health care entity may not be inconsistent with any applicable federal law, rule, policy, or guidance in effect for the same emergency. (b) A visitor shall comply with the applicable procedures established by the health care facility. (c) The health care facility may deny a visitor entry to the health care facility, may subject a visitor to expulsion from the facility, or may permanently revoke visitation rights to a visitor who does not comply with the applicable procedures established by the health care facility. d) A healthcare facility is not liable to a person visiting another person, nor to any other patient or resident of the health care facility, for any civil damages for injury or death resulting from or related to actual or alleged exposure during, or through the performance of, the visitation in compliance with this section, unless the health care facility failed to substantially comply with the applicable health and safety procedures established by the health care facility. e) Health care facilities shall provide patients adequate and lawful access to clergy so that patients can practice their religion by receiving clergy visitation at any reasonable time, as long as the visit does not disrupt clinical care: Provided, That if the health care facility limits the number of people able to visit the patient, the member of the clergy is not to be considered within that number. (f) Clergy shall comply with the applicable visitation procedures established by the health care facility.
This establishes new visitation rights and procedures for patients during a public health emergency.
Action History
-
Chapter 229, Acts, Regular Session, 2022
-
Approved by Governor 3/28/22
-
To Governor 3/25/22
-
Approved by Governor 3/28/22 - House Journal
-
Approved by Governor 3/28/22 - Senate Journal
-
To Governor 3/25/22 - House Journal
-
To Governor 3/25/2022 - Senate Journal
-
House Message received
-
Completed legislative action
-
Communicated to Senate
-
Effective from passage (Roll No. 466)
-
House concurred in Senate amendment and passed bill (Roll No. 465)
-
House received Senate message
-
Senate requests House to concur
-
Effective from passage (Roll No. 400)
-
Floor title amendment adopted
-
Committee title amendment withdrawn by unanimous consent
-
Passed Senate (Roll No. 400)
-
Read 3rd time
-
Deferred until foot of 3rd reading
-
On 3rd reading
-
Committee amendment adopted (Voice vote)
-
Read 2nd time
-
On 2nd reading
-
Read 1st time
-
On 1st reading
-
Reported do pass, with amendment and title amendment
-
To Health and Human Resources
-
To Health and Human Resources
-
Introduced in Senate
-
Communicated to Senate
-
Effective from passage (Roll No. 61)
-
Passed House (Roll No. 60)
-
Read 3rd time
-
On 3rd reading, Special Calendar
-
Read 2nd time
-
On 2nd reading, Special Calendar
-
Read 1st time
-
On 1st reading, Special Calendar
-
By substitute, do pass
-
To House Health and Human Resources
-
Introduced in House
-
To Health and Human Resources
-
Filed for introduction
Sponsors
- Phil Mallow · Cosponsor
- Forsht · Cosponsor
- Rowan · Cosponsor
- Evan Worrell · Cosponsor
- D. Rolland Jennings · Cosponsor
- Bates · Cosponsor
- Guy Ward · Cosponsor
- Tully · Cosponsor
- Matthew Rohrbach · Cosponsor
- Summers · Cosponsor
- Dean Jeffries · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 10 co-sponsors · 123 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Dean Jeffries Republican
Co-sponsors (10)
- Phil Mallow Republican
- Forsht
- Rowan
- Evan Worrell Republican
- D. Rolland Jennings Republican
- Bates
- Guy Ward Republican
- Tully
- Matthew Rohrbach Republican
- Summers
Not signed on (123)
123 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 123 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 9 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Unaffiliated | 23 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 33 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 97% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (34)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| LINDSAY | — | Yea |
| STOLLINGS | — | Yea |
| BALDWIN | — | Yea |
| MARONEY | — | Yea |
| STOVER | — | Yea |
| BEACH | — | Yea |
| MARTIN | — | Yea |
| SWOPE | — | Yea |
| BOLEY | — | Yea |
| MAYNARD | — | Yea |
| SYPOLT | — | Yea |
| BROWN | — | Yea |
| NELSON | — | Yea |
| CAPUTO | — | Yea |
| PHILLIPS | — | Yea |
| PLYMALE | — | Yea |
| TRUMP | — | Yea |
| GEFFERT | — | Yea |
| ROMANO | — | Yea |
| JEFFRIES | — | Yea |
| SMITH | — | Yea |
| MR PRESIDENT | — | Yea |
| KARNES | — | Yea |
| Mike Woelfel | Democrat | Yea |
| Amy Grady | Republican | Yea |
| Bill Hamilton | Republican | Yea |
| Charles H. Clements | Republican | Yea |
| Eric Tarr | Republican | Yea |
| Jack Woodrum | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Azinger | Republican | Yea |
| Patricia Rucker | Republican | Yea |
| Rollan A. Roberts | Republican | Not Voting |
| Ryan Weld | Republican | Yea |
| Tom Takubo | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HB 4257?
- HB 4257 is sponsored by Phil Mallow (Republican), Forsht, Rowan, Evan Worrell (Republican), D. Rolland Jennings (Republican), Bates, Guy Ward (Republican), Tully, Matthew Rohrbach (Republican), Summers, and Dean Jeffries (Republican).
- What is the current status of HB 4257?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 19, 2022. Enacted.
- Where can I track HB 4257?
- Track HB 4257 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 4257
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 4257
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →