SB 1007 — Stormwater management; inspections.
Last action — Left in Agriculture, Chesapeake and Natural Resources
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House of Delegates
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2020 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Stormwater management; inspections. Directs the State Water Control Board to adopt regulations that require that a long-term maintenance agreement for any best management practice that is a wet pond provide for inspections no more frequently than every three years.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
47 added · 44 removedPlain-language change summary
The recent amendments to SB 1007 clarify the authority of the Virginia Stormwater Management Program (VSMP) to adjust its fee schedule. Specifically, the VSMP can now increase or decrease fees based on assessment needs, while ensuring that funding for program oversight remains intact. This change is significant because it allows for more flexible and responsive management of funding, which can help improve stormwater management practices and potentially lead to better environmental outcomes. Additionally, the requirements for stormwater management practices now include specific provisions for flood conditions, aiming to enhance protection against flooding.
1007 OfferedSenate JanuaryAmendments 16,in [ ] February 7, 2020 A BILL to amend and reenact § 62.1-44.15:28, as it is currently effective and as it shall become effective, of the Code of Virginia, relating to stormwater management;
---------- Patron--Patron Prior to Engrossment--Senator Reeves ---------- Referred to Committee on Agriculture, Conservation and Natural Resources ---------- Be it enacted by the General Assembly of Virginia:
Require that a long-term maintenance agreement for any best management practice that is a wet pond provide for inspections no more frequently than every [ five ] [ three ] years.
Require that a long-term maintenance agreement for any best management practice that is a wet pond provide for inspections no more frequently than every [ five ] [ three ] years.
View plain text versions (2)
- Amended Engrossed by Senate as amended SB1007E Current html February 07, 2020
- Impact statement from DPB (SB1007) View text html January 16, 2020
Action History
-
Left in Agriculture, Chesapeake and Natural Resources
-
Subcommittee recommends laying on the table (5-Y 3-N)
-
Impact statement from DPB (SB1007E)
-
Assigned ACNR sub: Chesapeake
-
Referred to Committee on Agriculture, Chesapeake and Natural Resources
-
Read first time
-
Placed on Calendar
-
Read third time and passed Senate (37-Y 1-N)
-
Printed as engrossed 20105334D-E
-
Engrossed by Senate as amended SB1007E
-
Committee amendments agreed to
-
Reading of amendments waived
-
Read second time
-
Constitutional reading dispensed (40-Y 0-N)
-
Reported from Agriculture, Conservation and Natural Resources with amendments (13-Y 2-N)
-
Impact statement from DPB (SB1007)
-
Referred to Committee on Agriculture, Conservation and Natural Resources
-
Presented and ordered printed 20105334D
Sponsors
- Bryce E. Reeves · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 147 not signed on · 5 voted No
Sponsors (1)
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (147)
147 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 147 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 5 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 56% | 33% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Alfonso H. Lopez | — | Yea |
| Bulova, David L. | — | Yea |
| Dan I. Helmer | — | Yea |
| Gilbert, C. Todd | — | Nay |
| Guy, Nancy D. | — | Yea |
| Plum, Kenneth R. | — | Not Voting |
| Ransone, Margaret B. | — | Nay |
| Robert S. Bloxom, Jr. | — | Nay |
| Shelly A. Simonds | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 37 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 37 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 93% | 3% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (40)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (40)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 13 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 13 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 87% | 13% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (15)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| McClellan, Jennifer L. | — | Nay |
| Morrissey, Joseph D. | — | Yea |
| Barbara A. Favola | — | Yea |
| David R. Suetterlein | — | Yea |
| David W. Marsden | — | Yea |
| Hanger, Emmett W., Jr. | — | Yea |
| Hashmi, Ghazala F. | — | Yea |
| Lewis, Lynwood W., Jr. | — | Yea |
| Mark D. Obenshain | — | Yea |
| Mason, T. Montgomery "Monty" | — | Nay |
| Petersen, J. Chapman | — | Yea |
| Richard H. Stuart | — | Yea |
| Ruff, Frank M., Jr. | — | Yea |
| Todd E. Pillion | — | Yea |
| William M. Stanley, Jr. | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 1007 do?
- Stormwater management; inspections. Directs the State Water Control Board to adopt regulations that require that a long-term maintenance agreement for any best management practice that is a wet pond provide for inspections no more frequently than every three years.
- Who sponsors SB 1007?
- SB 1007 is sponsored by Bryce E. Reeves.
- What is the current status of SB 1007?
- This bill died with 2020 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 1007?
- Track SB 1007 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 1007
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 1007
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →