SB 7 — Relating to damages for medical monitoring
Last action — On 2nd reading, House Calendar
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House of Delegates
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2022 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
22 added · 56 removedPlain-language change summary
The recent amendments to SB 7 clarified the conditions under which plaintiffs can claim damages for medical monitoring. Specifically, the updated bill states that simply having an increased risk of disease is not enough to file a claim; plaintiffs must now prove they have an existing and diagnosable injury directly caused by the defendant’s actions. This change matters because it sets a higher standard for plaintiffs, which could make it more difficult for them to receive compensation for medical monitoring.
NEWS RELEASES HELPFUL LINKS IntroducedSB7 VersionSUB1 « Senate Bill 7 History OTHER VERSIONS — CommitteeIntroduced SubstituteVersion (1) | | Email Key:
Red = new code to be enacted WEST virginia legislature regular session IntroducedCommittee Substitute for Senate Bill 7 By Senators Azinger, Trump, and Swope [Introduced[Originating Januaryin 12,the 2022;Committee on the Judiciary;
referredreported to the Committee on theFebruary Judiciary]01, 2022] A BILL to amend the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended, by adding thereto a new section, designated §55-7-32, relating to damages for medical monitoring;
establishingproviding requirementsthat forincreased anrisk orderof disease is not a compensable basis for paymentdamages ofor medicalother monitoringrelief expenses;in any civil action;
providingand thatestablishing anrequirements increasedfor riskan oforder disease is not a compensable basis for damagespayment inof anymedical civilmonitoring action;expenses.
providing that, where awarded, payment of medical monitoring expenses shall not be paid to a prevailing plaintiff until the procedure is completed;
requiring that, where awarded, defendants pay medical monitoring expenses into a fund established by the court for that purpose;
and providing for the return of any money remaining in the fund after medical monitoring is no longer required to the defendants.
(a) Increased risk of disease, whether or not accompanied by physiological or other changes in the human body, is not compensable through damages or any other form of relief under the law of this state, regardless of the legal theory being asserted.
In any civil action a defendant cannot be required to pay as damages or provide any other type of legal, injunctive, or equitable relief for a plaintiff’s future medical surveillance, screening tests, or monitoring procedures unless the plaintiff proves the following in addition to the other requirements for the underlying cause of action:
and (2) thatThat the plaintiff’s presently existing physical disease or injury was caused by the defendant’s conduct.
(b) In any civil action inBill whichStatus | aBill courtTracking | ordersLegacy aWV defendantCode | toBulletin payBoard | forDistrict aMaps | plaintiff’sSenate futureRoster | medicalHouse surveillance,Roster | screeningLive | tests,Blog | orJobs | monitoringLinks | procedures,Home aThis plaintiffWeb shallsite notis bemaintained awardedby orthe paidWest anyVirginia moneysLegislature's toOffice cover the cost of hisReference or& herInformation. future medical surveillance, screening tests, or monitoring procedures until they have been completed.
The court shall order that the liable defendant make periodic payments into a fund established to pay the cost of future medical surveillance, screening tests, or monitoring procedures that are required by the judgment of the court.
The court shall determine how such fund will be administered.
The court shall also determine the date after which such future medical surveillance, screening tests, or monitoring procedures are no longer required, and after that date any moneys remaining in the fund that are not needed to pay for medical surveillance, screening tests, or monitoring procedures completed prior to such termination date shall be repaid to the liable defendant who paid such amounts into the fund.
If there are multiple defendants, then repayments shall be made in proportion to the total contributions of each defendant into the fund.
NOTE:
The purpose of this bill is to provide for damages for medical monitoring.
The bill establishes requirements for an order for payment of medical monitoring expenses.
The bill provides that an increased risk of disease is not a compensable basis for damages in any civil action.
The bill provides that, where awarded, payment of medical monitoring expenses shall not be paid to a prevailing plaintiff until the procedure is completed.
The bill requires that, where awarded, defendants pay medical monitoring expenses into a fund established by the court for that purpose.
Finally, the bill provides for the return of any money remaining in the fund after medical monitoring is no longer required to the defendants.
Strike-throughs indicate language that would be stricken from a heading or the present law, and underscoring indicates new language that would be added.
Bill Status | Bill Tracking | Legacy WV Code | Bulletin Board | District Maps | Senate Roster | House Roster | Live | Blog | Jobs | Links | Home This Web site is maintained by the West Virginia Legislature's Office of Reference & Information.
View plain text versions (2)
- Committee Substitute View text html
- Introduced Introduced Version Current html
Action History
-
On 2nd reading, House Calendar
-
Placed on House Calendar
-
On 2nd reading, Special Calendar
-
Read 1st time
-
Immediate consideration
-
Motion to reject committee report
-
Do pass
-
To House Judiciary
-
To Judiciary
-
Introduced in House
-
Ordered to House
-
Passed Senate (Roll No. 72)
-
Read 3rd time
-
On 3rd reading
-
Read 2nd time
-
On 2nd reading
-
Read 1st time
-
On 1st reading
-
Committee substitute reported
-
To Judiciary
-
Introduced in Senate
-
To Judiciary
-
Filed for introduction
Sponsors
- Swope · Cosponsor
- Trump · Cosponsor
- Mike Azinger · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 2 co-sponsors · 149 not signed on · 2 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Mike Azinger Republican
Co-sponsors (2)
- Swope
- Trump
Not signed on (149)
149 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 149 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 9 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 11 | 11 | 0 | 1 |
| Democrat | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 20 | 13 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 59% | 38% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (34)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| LINDSAY | — | Nay |
| STOLLINGS | — | Nay |
| BALDWIN | — | Nay |
| MARONEY | — | Yea |
| STOVER | — | Nay |
| BEACH | — | Nay |
| MARTIN | — | Nay |
| SWOPE | — | Yea |
| BOLEY | — | Yea |
| MAYNARD | — | Yea |
| SYPOLT | — | Yea |
| BROWN | — | Nay |
| NELSON | — | Yea |
| CAPUTO | — | Nay |
| PHILLIPS | — | Yea |
| PLYMALE | — | Yea |
| TRUMP | — | Yea |
| GEFFERT | — | Nay |
| ROMANO | — | Nay |
| JEFFRIES | — | Not Voting |
| SMITH | — | Yea |
| MR PRESIDENT | — | Yea |
| KARNES | — | Nay |
| Mike Woelfel | Democrat | Nay |
| Amy Grady | Republican | Yea |
| Bill Hamilton | Republican | Nay |
| Charles H. Clements | Republican | Yea |
| Eric Tarr | Republican | Yea |
| Jack Woodrum | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Azinger | Republican | Yea |
| Patricia Rucker | Republican | Yea |
| Rollan A. Roberts | Republican | Yea |
| Ryan Weld | Republican | Yea |
| Tom Takubo | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 7?
- SB 7 is sponsored by Swope, Trump, and Mike Azinger (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 7?
- This bill died with 2022 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 7?
- Track SB 7 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 7
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 7
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →