A7898 — Relates to mandatory arbitration clauses in employment contracts
Last action — In Senate Committee
-
1Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been introduced in the Assembly. Introduced April 11, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Next likely step: a committee referral and hearing.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
LowHow often bills like it became law.
Not enough signal yet to read this bill's trajectory — we surface a likelihood only once there's real movement (stage, sponsorship, committee, or votes) to point to.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
In plain language
The bill requires notice of arbitration clauses in employment contracts.
This bill mandates that employers provide specific notice regarding mandatory arbitration clauses in employment contracts. The exact details and requirements are not available as the bill text is not provided.
Summary
Requires specific notice of mandatory arbitration clauses in employment contracts.
Bill Text
- Full text View text Current
AI-generated reading aid from the bill's amendatory text — verify against the official bill.
This bill amends 1 section(s) of the New York Consolidated Laws: Section 7515 of the civil practice law.
-
Section 7515 of the civil practice law
seventy-five of the civil practice law and rules→ this ; provided, however, that in the event that a party is required to sign a contract for employment containing a manda- tory arbitration clause the representative shall disclose the mandatory arbitration clause to the party and clearly explain, in plain language, what an arbitration clause is. If the party is agreeing to a contract by any form of contact that is not personal, including but not limited to, electronically, using the internet or through the mail, such contract shall have, at the end of such contract, information informing the party that they are signing a mandatory arbitration clause and an internet italics link to a valid and plain written explanation of what an arbitration clause isamended
Action History
-
REFERRED TO JUDICIARY
-
DELIVERED TO SENATE
-
PASSED ASSEMBLY
-
ADVANCED TO THIRD READING CAL.283
-
REPORTED
-
REFERRED TO JUDICIARY
-
REFERRED TO JUDICIARY
Sponsors
- Jeffrey Dinowitz · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 218 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (218)
218 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 218 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does A7898 do?
- Requires specific notice of mandatory arbitration clauses in employment contracts.
- Who sponsors A7898?
- A7898 is sponsored by Jeffrey Dinowitz.
- What is the current status of A7898?
- This bill has been introduced in the Assembly. Introduced April 11, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
- Where can I track A7898?
- Track A7898 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on A7898
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of A7898
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →