AB 900 — Relating to: reductions to state aid paid to school districts for payments made under parental choice programs and the Special Needs Scholarship Program. (FE)
Last action — Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2023-2024 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
115 added · 181 removedPlain-language change summary
The latest version of Assembly Bill 900 removes certain reductions to state aid for school districts that participate in parental choice programs, specifically starting for students enrolling in the 2024-25 school year. Additionally, it extends this benefit to independent charter schools authorized by various institutions. This change is important because it aims to increase funding stability for schools and enhance educational opportunities for students across these programs.
- 2024 LEGISLATURE LRBs0274/1LRB-5394/1 FFK:wlj&cjsFFK:cjs ASSEMBLY SUBSTITUTE AMENDMENT 1, TO ASSEMBLY BILL 900 FebruaryJanuary 5,4, 2024 - OfferedIntroduced by RepresentativesCHUTTRepresentatives SCHUTT, MAXEY , ITCHENSLLEN , EHNKE , B ODDEN , RANDTJEN , DITTRICH, ONOVAN , EDMING, GOEBEN , URD , MAGNAFICI, M ELOTIK , MICHALSKI, MOSES, NEDWESKI , ENTERMAN , ETTINGER , ODRIGUEZ , R OZAR, SCHMIDT , USLER , WICHGERS , WITTKE and M AXEY.URPHY, cosponsored by Senators J AGLER, HUTTON , EYEN , CABRAL-GUEVARA , KAPENGA , NODL , NASS, Q UINN, STAFSHOLT, STROEBEL, TESTIN, TOMCZYK and W ANGGAARD .
AReferred N A CT to repealCommittee 115.7915on (4m)Education. (f), 118.40 (2r) (g), 118.40 (2x) (f), 118.60 (3) (d), 118.60 (4d), 121.07 (2), 121.08 (4) (b) 1.
andA 3.,N 121.085,A 121.845CT (1m)to andrepeal 121.91121.08 (4) (n);(b) 1.
and 3.;
to amend 115.7915 (4m) (title),(f) 118.601. (4s), 121.137 (2), 121.15 (1) (c), 121.15 (1g) (c), 121.90 (1) (g) and 121.91 (7);
anda., toc., created., 121.91df. (4) (m) of the statutes;
and dh., 118.60 (4d) (a), 118.60 (4d) (b) 1.
a., b., c.
and d., 121.07 (2) (b), 121.07 (2) (c) and 121.137 (2);
and to create 115.7915 (1) (am) of the statutes;
reductions to state aid paid to school districts for payments made under parental choice programs and the Special Needs Scholarship ProgramProgram. and to certain independent charter schools and school district revenue limits.
Analysis by the Legislative Reference Bureau This bill repealsends reductions to state aid paid to 1) school districts for per pupil payments made under the Milwaukee Parental Choice Program, the Racine Parental Choice Program, the Wisconsin Parental Choice Program, and the Special Needs Scholarship Program;Program beginning with payments made for pupils who begin in these programs in the 2024-25 school year.
andUnder 2) independent charter schools authorized by the Officebill, ofcurrent Educationallaw Opportunityapplies into thepayments UWmade System,under the chancellorRPCP, ofWPCP, anand institutionSNSP infor thepupils UWwho Systembegan otherparticipating thanin UW–Milwaukeethese orprograms UW–Parkside,before aJuly technical1, college district board other than the Milwaukee Area Technical College district board, the LRBs0274/1 - 2024 Legislature(legacy -pupils). 2 - FFK:wlj&cjs county executive of Waukesha County, the College of Menominee Nation, or the Lac Courte Oreilles Ojibwa Community College (new charter school authorizer).
The billRacine alsoand providesWisconsin aParental one-timeChoice recurringPrograms revenueand limitthe adjustmentSpecial forNeeds schoolScholarship districtsProgram thatUnder iscurrent equallaw, toper 25pupil percentpayments ofto theprivate impactschools onparticipating ain schoolthe district'sRPCP, levyWPCP, thatand occursSNSP dueare topaid thefrom changessum insufficient theappropriations, bill,ensuring includingthat removingfull parentalpayments choiceare pupilsmade andto independentprivate charterschools schoolfor pupils andparticipating sharedin costseach associatedof withthe reductions- for2024 paymentsLegislature made- for2 those- pupilsLRB-5394/1 fromFFK:cjs theASSEMBLY generalBILL state900 formula.programs.
The Racine and Wisconsin Parental Choice Programs and the Special Needs Scholarship Program Under current law, per pupil payments to private schools participating in the RPCP, WPCP, and SNSP are paid from sum sufficient appropriations, ensuring that full payments are made to private schools for pupils participating in each of the programs.
These aid reductions are deposited intoin the general fund.
The bill eliminates reductions to equalization aid for per pupil payments made under the RPCP, WPCP, and SNSP beginningfor pupils who begin participating in the RPCP, WPCP, or SNSP in the 2024-25 school year.
Under current law, a pupil participating in the RPCP, WPCP, or SNSP for whom a per pupil payment was made in the previous school year is included in the pupil's resident school district's membership for purposes of calculating general state aids.
Current law also allows a school district to increase its revenue limit for a school year by the amount of the aid reduction described above.above for that school year.
TheUnder billthe repealsbill, bothonly legacy pupils for whom a per pupil payment is made in the previous year are counted for purposes of thesecalculating provisions.state aid.
Under the bill, beginning in the 2024-25 school year, a pupil participating in the RPCP, WPCP, or SNSP is not included in the pupil's resident school district membership and there is no longer a school district revenue limit adjustment for the aid reduction described above.
Current law also requires DPI to reduce the general state aid for Milwaukee Public Schools by a percentage of the amount paid to private schools participating in the MPCP and deposit the reduction intoin the general fund.
Current law describes the amount of the reduction to MPS in two parts.
In the 2023-24 school year, the first part of the reduction to the general state aid for MPS is 3.2 percent of the total per pupil payments made to private schools participating in the LRBs0274/1 - 2024 Legislature - 3 - FFK:wlj&cjs MPCP.
The bill eliminatesrepeals this aspectprovision ofon theJuly reduction1, to2024, when the generalprovision statebecomes aidobsolete. for MPS.
IndependentLRB-5394/1 charter- schools2024 UnderLegislature current- law,3 per- pupilFFK:cjs paymentsASSEMBLY toBILL an900 independentFor charterfurther schoolinformation authorizedsee bythe astate newand charterlocal schoolfiscal authorizerestimate, arewhich paidwill frombe sumprinted sufficientas appropriations,an ensuringappendix that full payments are made to independentthis charterbill. schools.
Current law also requires DPI to reduce each school district's equalization aid by an amount equal to the total per pupil payments paid to these independent charter schools that are attributable to pupils residing in that school district.
If a school district does not receive equalization aid sufficient to cover the aid reduction, the balance is reduced from other state aid received by the school district.
These aid reductions are deposited into the general fund.
In general, these reductions reimburse the general fund for per pupil payments made to independent charter schools that are authorized by new charter school authorizers.
The bill eliminates reductions to equalization aid for per pupil payments made to these independent charter schools beginning in the 2024-25 school year.
The 2021-23 biennial budget eliminated reductions to equalization aid for payments made to independent charter schools authorized by the City of Milwaukee, the chancellor of UW–Milwaukee, the chancellor of UW–Parkside, or the Milwaukee Area Technical College district board (legacy charter school authorizers).
Under current law, a pupil for whom a per pupil payment was made to an independent charter school authorized by a new charter school authorizer in the previous school year is included in the pupil's resident school district's membership for purposes of calculating general state aids.
A school district's membership in the previous school year is a factor used to calculate equalization aid.
Additionally, under current law, pupils attending an independent charter school authorized by a new charter school authorizer are included in their resident school district's pupil count for purposes of calculating revenue limits.
The bill repeals both of these provisions.
Under the bill, beginning in the 2024-25 school year, a pupil attending an independent charter school authorized by a new charter school authorizer is not included in the pupil's resident school district membership and is not counted as enrolled in the pupil's resident school district for purposes of revenue limits.
LRBs0274/1 - 2024 Legislature - 4 - FFK:wlj&cjs School district revenue limit adjustment The bill creates a school district revenue limit adjustment that increases a school district's limit for the 2024-25 school year by an amount equal to 25 percent of the levy impact of the changes discussed above for each school district.
The revenue limit adjustment is a recurring revenue limit adjustment, which means the increase is included in the base for determining a school district's revenue limit for the next school year.
115.7915 (4m)(1) (title)(am) of the statutes is amendedcreated to read:
Show all 191 changed lines (151 more)
115.7915 (4m)(1) (title)CHOLARSHIP(am) PAYMENTS;“Legacy pupil" means a child who attended a private school participating in the program under this section under a scholarship under this section before July 1, 2024.
STATE AID REDUCTION SECTION 2.
115.7915 (4m) (f) of1. the statutes is repealed.
a., c., d., df.
and dh.
of the statutes are amended to read:
115.7915 (4m) (f) 1.
a.
Determine the sum of the amount paid for each child legacy pupil residing in the school district for whom a payment is made under par.
(a) in that school year.
c.
Determine the number of legacy pupils residing in the school district for whom a payment is made under par.
(e) in that school year.
d.
Multiply the number of legacy pupils under subd.
1.
c.
by the per pupil amount paid under par.
(e) for that school year.
df.
Identify the childrenegacy pupils residing in the school district for whom a payment is made under sub.
(4p) in that school year.
dh.
Sum the payments made under sub.
(4p) (a) for all ofthe children legacy pupils identified under subd.
1.
df.
for that school year.
118.40118.60 (2r)(4d) (g)(a) of the statutes is repealed.amended to read:
118.60 (4d) (a) In this subsection, “incoming“legacy choice pupil" means a pupil who resides in a school district, other than a 1st class city school district, who begins participating in the program under this section in after the 2015-16 2014-15 - 2024 Legislature - 4 - LRB-5394/1 FFK:cjs ASSEMBLY BILL 900 SECTION 3 school year or anyd before the 2024-25 school year thereafter, and who is enrolled in a private school under this section.
118.40118.60 (2x)(4d) (f)(b) of1. the statutes is repealed.
a., b., c.
and d.
of the statutes are amended to read:
118.60 (4d) (b) 1.
a.
Identify the incoming legacy choice pupils residing in the school district for whom a payment is made under sub.
(4) (bg) in that school year.
b.
Sum the payments made under sub.
(4) (bg) for all ofgacy choice pupils identified under subd.
1.
a.
for that school year.
c.
Identify the incominggacy choice pupils residing in the school district for whom a payment is made under sub.
(4m) in that school year.
d.
Sum the payments made under sub.
(4m) (a) for all of the legacy choice pupils identified under subd.
1.
c.
for that school year.
118.60121.07 (3)(2) (d)(b) of the statutes is repealed.amended to read:
121.07 (2) (b) The number of pupils residing in the school district in the previous school year who were incominggacy choice pupils, as defined in s.
118.60 (4d) (a), and for whom a payment was made under s.
118.60 (4) (bg) in the previous school year.
118.60121.07 (4d)(2) (c) of the statutes is repealed.amended to read:
121.07 (2) (c) The number of legacypils, as defined in s.
115.7915 (1) (am), residing in the school district in the previous school year for whom a payment was made under s.
115.7915 (4m) (a) or (e) in the previous school year.
118.60 (4s) of the statutes is amended to read:
118.60 (4s) Notwithstanding subs.
(4), (4d), (4m), and (4r), a pupil attending a private school participating in the program under this section who is receiving a scholarship under s.
115.7915 shall not be counted as a pupil attending the private school under this section under sub.
(4), (4d), (4m), or (4r).
SECTION 8.
121.07 (2) of the statutes is repealed.
SECTION 9.
Multiplyiplying the amounts LRBs0274/1LRB-5394/1 - 2024 Legislature - 5 - FFK:wlj&cjsFFK:cjs SECTION 97 ASSEMBLY BILL 900 paid under s.
119.23 (4) and (4m) in the 2009-10 school year by 3.4 percent, and multiplymultiplyby by multiplying the amounts paid under s.
SECTION 10.8.
SECTION 11.9.
121.085 of the statutes is repealed.
SECTION 12.
SECTION 13.10.0Initial applicability.
121.15 (1) (c)This ofact thefirst statutesapplies isto amendedaid topaid read:in the 2024-25 school year.
121.15SECTION (1)11.Effective (c)dates. For the payments from December to June, the total aid entitlement for each district shall be computed on the basis of the school district's membership, as calculated under s.
121.07This (2)act budgettakes andeffect membershipon reportthe underday s.after publication, except as follows:
121.05.(1) The treatment of s.
SECTION121.08 14.(4) (b) (intro.), 1., 2.
121.15and (1g)3. (c) of the statutes is amended to read:
121.15takes (1g)effect (c) For the payments from November to June, the total aid entitlement shall be computed on theJuly basis1, of2024. the school district's membership, as calculated under s.
121.07 (2) budget and membership report under s.
121.05.
SECTION 15.
121.845 (1m) of the statutes is repealed.
SECTION 16.
121.90 (1) (g) of the statutes is amended to read:
121.90 (1) (g) Ineginning in the 2017-18 school year and in each ending in the 2023-24 school year thereafter, the “number of pupils enrolled" shall include the total number of pupils residing in the school district who on the 3rd Friday of September of each appropriate school year attend a charter school established under LRBs0274/1 - 2024 Legislature - 6 - FFK:wlj&cjs SECTION 16 a contract with an entity under s.
118.40 (2r) (b) 1.
e.
to h.
or a charter school established under a contract with the director under s.
118.40 (2x).
SECTION 17.
121.91 (4) (m) of the statutes is created to read:
121.91 (4) (m) The limit otherwise applicable under sub.
(2m) to a school district is increased for the 2024-25 school year by an amount calculated as follows:
1.
Determine the total amount by which the school district's state aid payment under s.
121.08 was reduced under s.
115.7915 (4m) (f) 1., 2021 stats., s.
118.40 (2r) (g) 1., 2021 stats., s.
118.40 (2x) (f) 1., 2021 stats., and s.
118.60 (4d) (b) 1., 2021 stats., in the 2023-24 school year and express the reduction as a positive number.
2.
Determine the amount of state aid the school district would have received under s.
121.08 in the 2023-24 school year if the pupils described in s.
121.07 (2) (b) to (f), 2021 stats., were not included in the membership for all school districts in the 2023-24 school year and the shared costs associated with the aid reductions under s.
115.7915 (4m) (f) 1., 2021 stats., s.
118.40 (2r) (g) 1., 2021 stats., 118.40 (2x) (f) 1., 2021 stats., and s.
118.60 (4d) (b) 1., 2021 stats., for all school districts were not included in the 2023-24 school year.
3.
Subtract the amount of general aid the school district actually received in the 2023-24 school year from the amount determined for the school district under subd.
2.
4.
Add the amount under subd.
3.
to the amount under subd.
1.
5.
Multiply the amount under subd.
4.
by 0.25.
SECTION 18.
121.91 (4) (n) of the statutes is repealed.
SECTION 19.
121.91 (7) of the statutes is amended to read:
121.91 (7) Except as provided in subs.
(4) (f) 2.
and (n) (o) to (qe) and (8), if an excess revenue is approved under sub.
(3) for a recurring purpose or allowed under LRBs0274/1 - 2024 Legislature - 7 - FFK:wlj&cjs S ECTION 19 sub.
(4), the excess revenue shall be included in the base for determining the limit for the next school year for purposes of this section.
If an excess revenue is approved under sub.
(3) for a nonrecurring purpose, the excess revenue shall not be included in the base for determining the limit for the next school year for purposes of this section.
S ECTION 20.0Nonstatutory provisions.
(1) DECOUPLING;
2024-25 SCHOOL YEARThe department of public instruction shall exclude pupils described in s.
121.07 (2) (b) to (f), 2021 stats., and any shared costs associated with the aid reductions under s.
115.7915 (4m) (f) 1., 2021 stats.
s.
118.40 (2r) (g) 1.
and (2x) (f) 1., 2021 stats., and s.
118.60 (4d) (b) 1., 2021 stats., from the data for the 2023-24 school year that are used to calculate general state aid paid in the 2024-25 school year.
S ECTION 21.0Initial applicability.
(1) The treatment of ss.
115.7915 (4m) (title) and (f), 118.40 (2r) (g) and (2x) (f), 118.60 (4d) and (4s), and 121.08 (4) (b) (intro.), 1., 2., and 3.
first applies to aid paid in the 2024-25 school year.
(2) The treatment of s.
121.91 (4) (n) first applies to a revenue limit calculated for the 2024-25 school year.
Show all 191 changed rows (151 more)
View plain text versions (2)
- Bill Text View text pdf
- Substitute Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 Current pdf
Action History
-
Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
-
Read first time and referred to committee on Education
-
Representative Steffen added as a coauthor
-
Received from Assembly
-
Ordered immediately messaged
-
Read a third time and passed, Ayes 64, Noes 35
-
Rules suspended
-
Ordered to a third reading
-
Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adopted
-
Read a second time
-
Placed on calendar 2-20-2024 by Committee on Rules
-
Referred to committee on Rules
-
Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Education, Ayes 10, Noes 5
-
Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Education, Ayes 10, Noes 5
-
Executive action taken
-
Representative Green added as a coauthor
-
Public hearing held
-
Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Representatives Schutt, Kitchens and Maxey
-
Fiscal estimate received
-
Read first time and referred to Committee on Education
-
Introduced by Representatives Schutt, Maxey, Allen, Behnke, Bodden, Brandtjen, Dittrich, Donovan, Edming, Goeben, Hurd, Magnafici, Melotik, Michalski, Moses, Nedweski, Penterman, Rettinger, Rodriguez, Rozar, Schmidt, Tusler, Wichgers, Wittke and Murphy; cosponsored by Senators Jagler, Hutton, Feyen, Cabral-Guevara, Kapenga, Knodl, Nass, Quinn, Stafsholt, Stroebel, Testin, Tomczyk and Wanggaard
Sponsors
- Schutt · Primary
- Dave Maxey · Primary
- Scott Allen · Primary
- Elijah Behnke · Primary
- Bodden · Primary
- Brandtjen · Primary
- Barbara Dittrich · Primary
- Bob Donovan · Primary
- Edming · Primary
- Joy Goeben · Primary
- Karen Hurd · Primary
- Magnafici · Primary
- Paul Melotik · Primary
- Michalski · Primary
- Clint Moses · Primary
- Amanda Nedweski · Primary
- William Penterman · Primary
- Rettinger · Primary
- Jessie Rodriguez · Primary
- Rozar · Primary
- Schmidt · Primary
- Ron Tusler · Primary
- Chuck Wichgers · Primary
- Robert Wittke · Primary
- David Murphy · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →25 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 107 not signed on · 25 voted No
Sponsors (25)
- Schutt
- Maxey, Dave Republican
- Allen, Scott Republican
- Behnke, Elijah Republican
- Bodden
- Brandtjen
- Dittrich, Barbara Republican
- Donovan, Bob Republican
- Edming
- Goeben, Joy Republican
- Hurd, Karen Republican
- Magnafici
- Melotik, Paul Republican
- Michalski
- Moses, Clint Republican
- Nedweski, Amanda Republican
- Penterman, William Republican
- Rettinger
- Rodriguez, Jessie Republican
- Rozar
- Schmidt
- Tusler, Ron Republican
- Wichgers, Chuck Republican
- Wittke, Robert Republican
- Murphy, David Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (107)
107 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 107 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 45 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 0 | 24 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 19 | 11 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 64 | 35 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 65% | 35% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (99)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| BALDEH | — | Nay |
| BINSFELD | — | Yea |
| BODDEN | — | Yea |
| BRANDTJEN | — | Yea |
| CABRERA | — | Nay |
| CONLEY | — | Nay |
| CONSIDINE | — | Nay |
| EDMING | — | Yea |
| GOYKE | — | Nay |
| JOHNSON | — | Yea |
| KATSMA | — | Yea |
| MACCO | — | Yea |
| MAGNAFICI | — | Yea |
| MICHALSKI | — | Yea |
| MYERS | — | Nay |
| OHNSTAD | — | Nay |
| OLDENBURG | — | Yea |
| PETRYK | — | Yea |
| PLUMER | — | Yea |
| RETTINGER | — | Yea |
| RIEMER | — | Nay |
| ROZAR | — | Yea |
| SAPIK | — | Yea |
| SCHMIDT | — | Yea |
| SCHRAA | — | Yea |
| SCHUTT | — | Yea |
| SHANKLAND | — | Nay |
| SHELTON | — | Nay |
| SPEAKER | — | Yea |
| ANDERSON, J | — | Nay |
| Anderson, Clinton | Democrat | Nay |
| Andraca, Deb | Democrat | Nay |
| Bare, Mike | Democrat | Nay |
| Billings, Jill | Democrat | Nay |
| Clancy, Ryan | Democrat | Nay |
| Doyle, Steve | Democrat | Nay |
| Drake, Dora | Democrat | Nay |
| Emerson, Jodi | Democrat | Nay |
| Haywood, Kalan | Democrat | Nay |
| Hong, Francesca | Democrat | Nay |
| Jacobson, Jenna | Democrat | Nay |
| Joers, Alex | Democrat | Nay |
| Madison, Darrin | Democrat | Nay |
| McGuire, Tip | Democrat | Nay |
| Moore Omokunde, Supreme | Democrat | Nay |
| Neubauer, Greta | Democrat | Nay |
| Ortiz-Velez, Sylvia | Democrat | Nay |
| Palmeri, Lori | Democrat | Nay |
| Ratcliff, Melissa | Democrat | Nay |
| Sinicki, Christine | Democrat | Nay |
| Snodgrass, Lee | Democrat | Nay |
| Stubbs, Shelia | Democrat | Nay |
| Subeck, Lisa | Democrat | Nay |
| Vining, Robyn | Democrat | Nay |
| Allen, Scott | Republican | Yea |
| Armstrong, David | Republican | Yea |
| August, Tyler | Republican | Yea |
| Behnke, Elijah | Republican | Yea |
| Born, Mark | Republican | Yea |
| Brooks, Robert | Republican | Yea |
| Callahan, Calvin | Republican | Yea |
| Dallman, Alex | Republican | Yea |
| Dittrich, Barbara | Republican | Yea |
| Donovan, Bob | Republican | Yea |
| Duchow, Cindi | Republican | Yea |
| Goeben, Joy | Republican | Yea |
| Green, Chanz | Republican | Yea |
| Gundrum, Rick | Republican | Yea |
| Gustafson, Nate | Republican | Yea |
| Hurd, Karen | Republican | Yea |
| Kitchens, Joel | Republican | Yea |
| Krug, Scott | Republican | Yea |
| Kurtz, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Maxey, Dave | Republican | Yea |
| Melotik, Paul | Republican | Yea |
| Moses, Clint | Republican | Yea |
| Murphy, David | Republican | Yea |
| Mursau, Jeffrey | Republican | Yea |
| Nedweski, Amanda | Republican | Yea |
| Neylon, Adam | Republican | Yea |
| Novak, Todd | Republican | Yea |
| O'Connor, Jerry | Republican | Yea |
| Penterman, William | Republican | Yea |
| Petersen, Kevin | Republican | Yea |
| Pronschinske, Treig | Republican | Yea |
| Rodriguez, Jessie | Republican | Yea |
| Snyder, Patrick | Republican | Yea |
| Sortwell, Shae | Republican | Yea |
| Spiros, John | Republican | Yea |
| Steffen, David | Republican | Yea |
| Summerfield, Rob | Republican | Yea |
| Swearingen, Rob | Republican | Yea |
| Tittl, Paul | Republican | Yea |
| Tranel, Travis | Republican | Yea |
| Tusler, Ron | Republican | Yea |
| VanderMeer, Nancy | Republican | Yea |
| Wichgers, Chuck | Republican | Yea |
| Wittke, Robert | Republican | Yea |
| Zimmerman, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors AB 900?
- AB 900 is sponsored by Schutt, Maxey, Dave (Republican), Allen, Scott (Republican), Behnke, Elijah (Republican), Bodden, Brandtjen, Dittrich, Barbara (Republican), Donovan, Bob (Republican), Edming, Goeben, Joy (Republican), Hurd, Karen (Republican), Magnafici, Melotik, Paul (Republican), Michalski, Moses, Clint (Republican), Nedweski, Amanda (Republican), Penterman, William (Republican), Rettinger, Rodriguez, Jessie (Republican), Rozar, Schmidt, Tusler, Ron (Republican), Wichgers, Chuck (Republican), Wittke, Robert (Republican), and Murphy, David (Republican).
- What is the current status of AB 900?
- This bill died with 2023-2024 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 900?
- Track AB 900 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 900
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 900
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →