Concerning forensic competency restoration programs.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 5664 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 5664.
You're tracking SB 5664
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 5664 — Concerning forensic competency restoration programs.
Last action — Effective date 6/9/2022.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 05, 2022. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
3 sponsors
1 primary, 2 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (2 D).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 3 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
496 added · 538 removedPlain-language change summary
The latest version of SB 5664 keeps the definitions related to mental health commitments and admissions but removes specific references that were present in a prior draft. This includes the elimination of the phrasing about "adding new sections" to the existing laws. These changes simplify the bill, which may help it move through the legislative process more smoothly by providing clarity without adding complexity. This matters because clearer legislation can lead to better implementation and understanding of mental health laws in Washington.
S-4053.2S-3149.6 SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 5664 State of Washington 67th Legislature 2022 Regular Session By Senate Behavioral Health Subcommittee to Health & Long Term Care (originally sponsored by Senators Dhingra, Keiser, and Nobles)Nobles READPrefiled FIRST01/05/22. TIME 01/31/22.
Read first time 01/10/22.
Referred to Committee on Health & Long Term Care.
and reenacting and amending RCW 10.77.010;10.77.010.
and adding new sections to chapter 10.77 RCW.
(5) A "criminally insane" person means any person who has been acquitted of a crime charged by reason of insanity, and thereupon found to be a substantial danger to other persons or to present a substantial likelihood of committing criminal acts jeopardizing p.
1 SSBSB 5664 substantial likelihood of committing criminal acts jeopardizing public safety or security unless kept under further control by the court or other persons or institutions.
2 SSBSB 5664 (15) "Immediate family member" means a spouse, child, stepchild, parent, stepparent, grandparent, sibling, or domestic partner.
3 SSBSB 5664 (c) A social worker with a master's or further advanced degree from a social work educational program accredited and approved as provided in RCW 18.320.010.
4 SSBSB 5664 attorney, to evaluate and report upon the mental condition of the defendant.
5 SSBSB 5664 (f) When a defendant is ordered to be evaluated under this subsection (1), or when a party or the court determines at first appearance that an order for evaluation under this subsection will be requested or ordered if charges are pursued, the court may delay granting bail until the defendant has been evaluated for competency or sanity and appears before the court.
6 SSBSB 5664 shall be rendered under this subsection (3)(d) unless the evaluator or court determines that the defendant is competent to stand trial;
7 SSBSB 5664 competency evaluation and restoration services)), but intends for the department to manage, allocate, and request appropriations for resources in order to meet these targets whenever possible without sacrificing the accuracy and quality of competency ((evaluations and restorations, and to otherwise make sustainable improvements and track performance related to the timeliness of competency services:
8 SSBSB 5664 manner that results in measurable incremental progress toward meeting the time limits over the course of the year.
(((ii))) (b) The individual circumstances of the defendant make accurate completion of an evaluation of competency to ((proceedproceed or))or stand trial dependent upon review of mental health, substance use disorder, or medical history information which is in the custody of a third party and cannot be immediately obtained by the department((.department ((.
(d) TheCompletion defendantof isthe medicallyreferral unavailable((is forfrustrated competencyby evaluationlack orof)) admissionrequires additional time to aaccommodate facilitythe foravailability competencyor restoration;participation ((by)) of counsel, ((jail or)) court personnel, interpreters, or the defendant;
(e) Completion of the referral ((is frustrated by lack of)) requires additional time to accommodate the availability or participation ((by)) of counsel, ((jail or)) court personnel, interpreters, or the defendant;
(v))) (f)(e) The defendant asserts legal rights that result in a delay in the provision of competency services;
or (((vi))) (g)(f) An unusual spike in the receipt of evaluation referrals or in the number of defendants requiring restoration services has occurred, causing temporary delays until the unexpected excess demand for competency services can be resolved.
(((2))) (5) The department shall provide written notice to the court when it will not be able to meet the maximum time limits under p.
9 SSBSB 5664 (((2))) (5) The department shall provide written notice to the court when it will not be able to meet the maximum time limits under subsection (2) of this section and identify the reasons for the delay and provide a reasonable estimate of the time necessary to complete the competencyevaluation. service.
(((5))) (9) This section does not create any new entitlement or cause of action related to the timeliness of competency ((evaluations or admission for inpatient restoration)) to stand trial services p.
10 SSBSB 5664 (((5))) (9) This section does not create any new entitlement or cause of action related to the timeliness of competency ((evaluations or admission for inpatient restoration)) to stand trial services ((related to competency to proceed or stand trial)), nor can it form the basis for contempt sanctions under chapter 7.21 RCW or a motion to dismiss criminal charges.
Based)), or may alternatively order the defendant to receive outpatient competency restoration based on a recommendation from a forensic navigator and input from the parties((,parties ((, the court may order the defendant to receive inpatient competency restoration or outpatient competency restoration)).
The department, in conjunction with the health care authority, must establish rules for conditions of participation in the outpatient competency restoration program, which must include the defendant being subject to medication management ((and)).and regular urinalysis testing for defendants who have a current substance use disorder diagnosis.
The courtoutpatient maycompetency orderrestoration regularprogram shall monitor the defendant during the defendant's placement in the program and report any p.
11 SSBSB 5664 urinalysisnoncompliance testingor ((forsignificant defendantschanges whowith haverespect ato currentthe substancedefendant useto disorderthe diagnosis)).department and, if applicable, the forensic navigator.
The outpatient competency restoration program shall monitor the defendant during the defendant's placement in the program and report any noncompliance or significant changes with respect to the defendant to the department and, if applicable, the forensic navigator.
The outpatient competency restoration program shall coordinate with the authority, the department, and any law enforcement personnel under (d)(i) of this subsection to ensure that the time period between termination and admissionacceptance into the inpatient facility is as minimal as possible.
The department shall obtain a placement for the defendant within seven days of the notice of intenttermination toof terminate the outpatient competency restoration program.
(i) The department may authorizecause a peace officer to detaintake the defendant into emergency custody for transport to a crisis stabilization unit, evaluation and treatment facility, emergency department of a local hospital, or triage facility for medical clearance, and maythereafter authorize the peace officer to detain the defendant for transport to the designated inpatient competency restoration facility.
This subsection does not preclude voluntary transportation of the defendant to a facility for medical p.clearance or inpatient competency restoration, or authorize admission of the defendant into jail.
12 SSB 5664 clearance or inpatient competency restoration, or authorize admission of the defendant into jail.
The court shall schedule a hearing within five days to review the ((placementp. and)) conditions of release of the defendant and anticipated release from treatment and issue appropriate orders.
((The12 standardSB of5664 proof((placement shalland)) beconditions aof preponderancerelease of the evidence,defendant and theanticipated courtrelease mayfrom intreatment itsand discretionissue renderappropriate itsorders. decision based on written submissions, live testimony, or remote testimony.
(E))) (e) The courtstandard mayof notproof issueshall anbe ordera forpreponderance outpatientof competency restoration unless the departmentevidence, certifiesand that there is an available appropriate outpatient competency restoration program that has adequate space for the person at the time the order is issued or the court placesmay thein defendantits underdiscretion therender guidanceits anddecision controlbased ofon awritten professionalsubmissions, personlive identifiedtestimony, inor theremote courttestimony. order.
(((E))) (e) The court may not issue an order for outpatient competency restoration unless the department certifies that there is an available appropriate outpatient competency restoration program that has adequate space for the person at the time the order is issued or the court places the defendant under the guidance and control of a professional person identified in the court order.
(((2))) (4) On or before expiration of the initial felony competency restoration period ((of commitment under subsection (1) of p.this section)) the court shall conduct a hearing((, at which it shall)) to determine whether ((or not)) the defendant is ((incompetent.
13 SSB 5664 this section)) the court shall conduct a hearing((, at which it shall)) to determine whether ((or not)) the defendant is ((incompetent.
If the court finds by a preponderance of the evidence that ((a)) the defendant ((charged with a felony)) is incompetent to stand trial, the court ((shall have the option of extending the)) may order ((of commitment or alternativep. treatment)) an extension of the competency restoration period for an additional period of ((ninety)) 90 days, but the court must at the same time ((of extension)) set a date for a ((prompt)) new hearing to determine the defendant's competency to stand trial before the expiration of ((the)) this second restoration period.
Show all 88 changed lines (48 more)
13 SB 5664 alternative treatment)) an extension of the competency restoration period for an additional period of ((ninety)) 90 days, but the court must at the same time ((of extension)) set a date for a ((prompt)) new hearing to determine the defendant's competency to stand trial before the expiration of ((the)) this second restoration period.
(4) For persons charged with a felony, at)) (5) At the hearing upon the expiration of the second felony competency restoration period, or at the end of the first felony competency restoration period ((in the case of a)) if the defendant ((with a developmental disability)) is ineligible for a second or third competency restoration period under subsection (4) of this section, if the jury or court finds that the defendant is incompetentincompetent((, ((, or if the court or jury at any stage finds that the defendant is incompetent and the court determines that the defendant is unlikely to regain competency, the charges shall be dismissed)) to stand trial, the court shall dismiss the charges without prejudice((,)) and ((the court shall)) order the defendant to be committed to a state hospital ((as defined in RCW 72.23.010)) for up to ((seventy-two)) 120 hours starting from admission to the facility, excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and holidays, for evaluation for the purpose of filing a civil commitment petition under chapter 71.05 RCW.
or (ii) p.presents a substantial likelihood of committing criminal acts jeopardizing public safety or security;
14 SSB 5664 presents a substantial likelihood of committing criminal acts jeopardizing public safety or security;
((The six-month)) (6)p. Any period of competency restoration treatment under this section includes only the time the defendant is actually at the facility and is in addition to reasonable time for transport to or from the facility.
14 SB 5664 (6) Any period of competency restoration treatment under this section includes only the time the defendant is actually at the facility and is in addition to reasonable time for transport to or from the facility.
(2)(((a))) If a court finds pursuant to subsection (1)(b) of this section that there is a compelling state interest in pursuing nonfelony competency restoration treatment, ((then)) the court shall p.commit the defendant to the custody of the secretary for inpatient competency restoration((.
15 SSB 5664 commit the defendant to the custody of the secretary for inpatient competency restoration((.
(((i)))p. (a) To be eligible for an order for outpatient competency restoration, a defendant must be clinically appropriate and be willing to:
15 SB 5664 (((i))) (a) To be eligible for an order for outpatient competency restoration, a defendant must be clinically appropriate and be willing to:
The department, in conjunction with the health care authority, must establish rules for conditions of participation in the outpatient competency restoration program, which must include the defendant being subject to medication management ((and)).and regular urinalysis testing for defendants who have a current substance use disorder diagnosis.
The court may order regular urinalysis testing ((for defendants who have a current substance use disorder diagnosis)).
The department shall place the defendant instead)) director of the outpatient competency restoration p.program shall notify the authority and the department of the need to terminate the outpatient competency restoration program and intent to request placement for the defendant in an appropriate facility of the department for inpatient competency restoration ((for no longer than twenty-nine days regardless of any time spent in outpatient competency restoration, in addition to reasonable time for transport to or from the facility)).
16The SSB 5664 program shall notify the authority and the department of the need to terminate the outpatient competency restoration programp. and intent to request placement for the defendant in an appropriate facility of the department for inpatient competency restoration ((for no longer than twenty-nine days regardless of any time spent in outpatient competency restoration, in addition to reasonable time for transport to or from the facility)).
The16 outpatientSB competency5664 restoration program shall coordinate with the authority, the department, and any law enforcement personnel under (d)(i) of this subsection to ensure that the time period between termination and admissionacceptance into the inpatient facility is as minimal as possible.
The department shall obtain a placement for the defendant within seven days of the notice of intenttermination to terminate of the outpatient competency restoration program.
(i) The department may authorizecause a peace officer to detaintake the defendant into emergency custody for transport to a crisis stabilization unit, evaluation and treatment facility, emergency department of a local hospital, or triage facility for medical clearance, and maythereafter authorize the peace officer to detain the defendant for transport to the designated inpatient competency restoration facility.
((TheThe standard of proof shall be a preponderance of the evidence, and the court may in its discretion render its decision based on written submissions, live testimony, or remote testimony.
(v)))(((v))) (e) The court may not issue an order for outpatient competency restoration unless the department certifies that there is an available appropriate outpatient restoration program that has p.adequate space for the person at the time the order is issued or the court places the defendant under the guidance and control of a professional person identified in the court order.
17 SSB 5664 adequate space for the person at the time the order is issued or the court places the defendant under the guidance and control of a professional person identified in the court order.
The court may orderp. any combination of this subsection ((, not to exceed ninety days.
This17 periodSB must5664 beorder consideredany tocombination includeof onlythis thesubsection, timenot the defendant is actually at the facility and shall be in addition to reasonableexceed time((ninety)) for90 transportdays. to or from the facility)).
(((c)))((This (4)period Ifmust thebe courtconsidered hasto determinedinclude oronly the partiestime agree that the defendant is unlikelyactually toat regain competency, the courtfacility mayand dismissshall thebe chargesin withoutaddition prejudice without ordering the defendant to undergoreasonable nonfelonytime competency restoration treatment, in which case the court shall order that the defendant be referred for evaluationtransport forto civilor commitmentfrom in the mannerfacility. provided in (((d))) subsection (5) of this ((subsection)) section.
(c))) (4) If the court has determined or the parties agree that the defendant is unlikely to regain competency, the court may dismiss the charges without prejudice without ordering the defendant to undergo nonfelony competency restoration treatment, in which case the court shall order that the defendant be referred for evaluation for civil commitment in the manner provided in (((d))) subsection (5) of this ((subsection)) section.
The court must p.give notice to all parties at least ((twenty-four)) 24 hours before the dismissal of any proceeding under this subsection, and provide an opportunity for a hearing on whether to dismiss the proceedings.
18 SSB 5664 give notice to all parties at least ((twenty-four)) 24 hours before the dismissal of any proceeding under this subsection, and provide an opportunity for a hearing on whether to dismiss the proceedings.
If the court so finds, the defendant is barred from the possession of firearms until a court restores his or her rightp. to possess a firearm under RCW 9.41.047.
18 SB 5664 right to possess a firearm under RCW 9.41.047.
(2) In the event that a person remains in jail 21 days after service on the department of a court order to transport the person to a facility designated by the department for inpatient competency restoration treatment, the department shall upon the request of any party perform a competency to stand trial status check at reasonable intervals to determine if the circumstances of the person have changed suchsince that the court should authorize an updated competency evaluation, and provide a status update to the parties and the court.
p.((The)) (1) Within amounts appropriated, the department shall be responsible for all costs relating to the evaluation and treatment of persons committed to it pursuant to any provisions of this chapter, and the logistical and supportive services pertaining thereto except as otherwise provided by law.
19 SSB 5664 ((The)) (1) Within amounts appropriated, the department shall be responsible for all costs relating to the evaluation and inpatient treatment of persons committed to it pursuant to any provisions of this chapter, and the logistical and supportive services pertaining thereto except as otherwise provided by law.
(2)p. Within amounts appropriated, the authority shall be responsible for all costs relating to outpatient competency restoration programs.
NEW19 SECTION.SB 5664 (2) Within amounts appropriated, the authority shall be responsible for all costs relating to outpatient competency restoration programs.
Sec.
8.
A new section is added to chapter 10.77 RCW to read as follows:
No officer of a public or private agency, nor the superintendent, professional person in charge, his or her professional designee, or attending staff of any such agency, nor any public official performing functions necessary to the administration of this chapter, nor peace officer responsible for detaining a person pursuant to this chapter, nor the state, a unit of local government, an evaluation and treatment facility, a secure withdrawal management and stabilization facility, or an approved substance use disorder treatment program shall be civilly or criminally liable for performing duties pursuant to this chapter with regard to the decision of whether to detain a person for medical clearance or treatment, provided that such duties were performed in good faith and without gross negligence.
NEW SECTION.
Sec.
9.
A new section is added to chapter 10.77 RCW to read as follows:
The department shall report annually to the governor and relevant committees of the legislature, beginning November 1, 2022, describing:
(1) How many individuals are being served by outpatient competency restoration programs and in what locations;
(2) The length of stay of individuals in outpatient competency restoration programs;
(3) The number of individuals who are revoked from an outpatient competency restoration program into inpatient treatment, and the outcomes of other individuals, if any, whose participation in an outpatient competency restoration program were terminated before the completion of the program;
and p.
20 SSB 5664 (4) For individuals who were revoked from an outpatient competency restoration program into an inpatient competency restoration program, how many days the individuals spent in outpatient competency restoration treatment and inpatient competency restoration treatment, and whether the restoration programs resulted in a finding of competent to stand trial or another outcome.
2120 SSBSB 5664
Show all 88 changed rows (48 more)
View plain text versions (3)
- Bill View text Current pdf
- Substitute Substitute Bill pdf
- Substitute Second Substitute Bill pdf
Action History
-
Effective date 6/9/2022.
-
Chapter 288, 2022 Laws PV.
-
Governor partially vetoed.
-
Delivered to Governor.
-
Speaker signed.
-
President signed.
-
Passed final passage; yeas, 49; nays, 0; absent, 0; excused, 0.
-
Senate concurred in House amendments.
-
Third reading, passed; yeas, 97; nays, 1; absent, 0; excused, 0.
-
Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.
-
Floor amendment(s) adopted.
-
Committee amendment not adopted.
-
Rules Committee relieved of further consideration. Placed on second reading.
-
Scheduled for public hearing in the House Committee on Appropriations at 11:00 AM
-
Referred to Rules 2 Review.
-
Minority; without recommendation.
-
APP - Majority; do pass with amendment(s) by Civil Rights & Judiciary.
-
Executive action taken in the House Committee on Appropriations at 11:00 AM.
-
Scheduled for public hearing in the House Committee on Appropriations at 11:00 AM
-
Public hearing in the House Committee on Appropriations at 11:00 AM.
-
Referred to Appropriations.
-
Scheduled for public hearing in the House Committee on Civil Rights & Judiciary at 10:00 AM
-
Minority; without recommendation.
-
CRJ - Majority; do pass with amendment(s).
-
Executive action taken in the House Committee on Civil Rights & Judiciary at 10:00 AM.
-
Scheduled for public hearing in the House Committee on Civil Rights & Judiciary at 10:00 AM
-
Public hearing in the House Committee on Civil Rights & Judiciary at 10:00 AM.
-
First reading, referred to Civil Rights & Judiciary.
-
Third reading, passed; yeas, 49; nays, 0; absent, 0; excused, 0.
-
Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.
-
2nd substitute bill substituted (WM 22).
-
Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.
-
Scheduled for public hearing in the Senate Committee on Ways & Means at 10:00 AM
-
Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.
-
WM - Majority; 2nd substitute bill be substituted, do pass.
-
Executive action taken in the Senate Committee on Ways & Means at 10:00 AM.
-
Scheduled for public hearing in the Senate Committee on Ways & Means at 09:00 AM
-
Public hearing in the Senate Committee on Ways & Means at 9:00 AM.
-
Referred to Ways & Means.
-
Scheduled for public hearing in the Senate Committee on Behavioral Health Subcommittee to Health & Long Term Care at 11:30 AM
-
And refer to Ways & Means.
-
BH - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.
-
Executive action taken in the Senate Committee on Behavioral Health Subcommittee to Health & Long Term Care at 11:30 AM.
-
Scheduled for public hearing in the Senate Committee on Behavioral Health Subcommittee to Health & Long Term Care at 10:30 AM
-
Public hearing in the Senate Committee on Behavioral Health Subcommittee to Health & Long Term Care at 10:30 AM.
-
Scheduled for public hearing in the Senate Committee on Health & Long Term Care at 08:00 AM
-
Referred to Behavioral Health Subcommittee to Health & Long Term Care.
-
Executive action taken in the Senate Committee on Health & Long Term Care at 8:00 AM.
-
First reading, referred to Health & Long Term Care.
-
Prefiled for introduction.
Sponsors
- T'wina Nobles · Cosponsor
- Keiser · Cosponsor
- Manka Dhingra · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 2 co-sponsors · 148 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Manka Dhingra Democrat
Co-sponsors (2)
- T'wina Nobles Democrat
- Keiser
Not signed on (148)
148 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 148 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 18 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 18 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 49 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (49)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Billig | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Carlyle | — | Yea |
| Das | — | Yea |
| Frockt | — | Yea |
| Hawkins | — | Yea |
| Honeyford | — | Yea |
| Keiser | — | Yea |
| Kuderer | — | Yea |
| Mullet | — | Yea |
| Padden | — | Yea |
| Randall | — | Yea |
| Rivers | — | Yea |
| Rolfes | — | Yea |
| Sefzik | — | Yea |
| Sheldon | — | Yea |
| Van De Wege | — | Yea |
| Wilson, L. | — | Yea |
| Annette Cleveland | Democrat | Yea |
| Bob Hasegawa | Democrat | Yea |
| Claire Wilson | Democrat | Yea |
| Derek Stanford | Democrat | Yea |
| Jamie Pedersen | Democrat | Yea |
| Jesse Salomon | Democrat | Yea |
| Joe Nguyen | Democrat | Yea |
| John Lovick | Democrat | Yea |
| June Robinson | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Wellman | Democrat | Yea |
| Liz Lovelett | Democrat | Yea |
| Manka Dhingra | Democrat | Yea |
| Marko Liias | Democrat | Yea |
| Rebecca Saldaña | Democrat | Yea |
| Steve Conway | Democrat | Yea |
| T'wina Nobles | Democrat | Yea |
| Victoria Hunt | Democrat | Yea |
| Yasmin Trudeau | Democrat | Yea |
| Chris Gildon | Republican | Yea |
| Curtis King | Republican | Yea |
| Jeff Holy | Republican | Yea |
| Jeff Wilson | Republican | Yea |
| Jim McCune | Republican | Yea |
| John Braun | Republican | Yea |
| Judy Warnick | Republican | Yea |
| Keith Wagoner | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Schoesler | Republican | Yea |
| Perry Dozier | Republican | Yea |
| Phil Fortunato | Republican | Yea |
| Ron Muzzall | Republican | Yea |
| Shelly Short | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 26 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 48 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 23 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 97 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 99% | 1% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (98)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Chambers | — | Yea |
| Chandler | — | Yea |
| Chopp | — | Yea |
| Cody | — | Yea |
| Dolan | — | Yea |
| Gilday | — | Yea |
| Harris-Talley | — | Yea |
| Hoff | — | Yea |
| Kirby | — | Yea |
| Klippert | — | Yea |
| Kraft | — | Nay |
| Kretz | — | Yea |
| Maycumber | — | Yea |
| McCaslin | — | Yea |
| Mosbrucker | — | Yea |
| Robertson | — | Yea |
| Sells | — | Yea |
| Sullivan | — | Yea |
| Sutherland | — | Yea |
| Vick | — | Yea |
| Wicks | — | Yea |
| Wilcox | — | Yea |
| Young | — | Yea |
| Johnson, J. | — | Yea |
| Alex Ramel | Democrat | Yea |
| Alicia Rule | Democrat | Yea |
| Amy Walen | Democrat | Yea |
| April Berg | Democrat | Yea |
| Bill Ramos | Democrat | Yea |
| Brandy Donaghy | Democrat | Yea |
| Cindy Ryu | Democrat | Yea |
| Dan Bronoske | Democrat | Yea |
| Dave Paul | Democrat | Yea |
| David Hackney | Democrat | Yea |
| Davina Duerr | Democrat | Yea |
| Debra Entenman | Democrat | Yea |
| Debra Lekanoff | Democrat | Yea |
| Drew Hansen | Democrat | Yea |
| Gerry Pollet | Democrat | Yea |
| Jake Fey | Democrat | Yea |
| Jamila Taylor | Democrat | Yea |
| Javier Valdez | Democrat | Yea |
| Jessica Bateman | Democrat | Yea |
| Joe Fitzgibbon | Democrat | Yea |
| Larry Springer | Democrat | Yea |
| Lauren Davis | Democrat | Yea |
| Laurie Jinkins | Democrat | Yea |
| Lillian Ortiz-Self | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Callan | Democrat | Yea |
| Liz Berry | Democrat | Yea |
| Marcus Riccelli | Democrat | Yea |
| Mari Leavitt | Democrat | Yea |
| Melanie Morgan | Democrat | Yea |
| Mia Gregerson | Democrat | Yea |
| Mike Chapman | Democrat | Yea |
| Monica Jurado Stonier | Democrat | Yea |
| My-Linh Thai | Democrat | Yea |
| Nicole Macri | Democrat | Yea |
| Noel Frame | Democrat | Yea |
| Roger Goodman | Democrat | Yea |
| Sharon Shewmake | Democrat | Yea |
| Sharon Tomiko Santos | Democrat | Yea |
| Sharon Wylie | Democrat | Yea |
| Shelley Kloba | Democrat | Yea |
| Steve Bergquist | Democrat | Yea |
| Steve Tharinger | Democrat | Yea |
| Strom Peterson | Democrat | Yea |
| Tana Senn | Democrat | Yea |
| Tarra Simmons | Democrat | Yea |
| Timm Ormsby | Democrat | Yea |
| Tina Orwall | Democrat | Yea |
| Vandana Slatter | Democrat | Yea |
| Alex Ybarra | Republican | Yea |
| Andrew Barkis | Republican | Yea |
| Carolyn Eslick | Republican | Yea |
| Chris Corry | Republican | Yea |
| Cyndy Jacobsen | Republican | Yea |
| Dan Griffey | Republican | Yea |
| Drew MacEwen | Republican | Yea |
| Drew Stokesbary | Republican | Yea |
| Ed Orcutt | Republican | Yea |
| Jenny Graham | Republican | Yea |
| Jeremie Dufault | Republican | Yea |
| Jim Walsh | Republican | Yea |
| Joe Schmick | Republican | Yea |
| Joel McEntire | Republican | Yea |
| Keith Goehner | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Klicker | Republican | Yea |
| Mary Dye | Republican | Yea |
| Matt Boehnke | Republican | Yea |
| Michelle Valdez | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Steele | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Volz | Republican | Yea |
| Paul Harris | Republican | Yea |
| Peter Abbarno | Republican | Yea |
| Rob Chase | Republican | Yea |
| Skyler Rude | Republican | Yea |
| Tom Dent | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 18 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 18 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 49 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (49)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Billig | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Carlyle | — | Yea |
| Das | — | Yea |
| Frockt | — | Yea |
| Hawkins | — | Yea |
| Honeyford | — | Yea |
| Keiser | — | Yea |
| Kuderer | — | Yea |
| Mullet | — | Yea |
| Padden | — | Yea |
| Randall | — | Yea |
| Rivers | — | Yea |
| Rolfes | — | Yea |
| Sefzik | — | Yea |
| Sheldon | — | Yea |
| Van De Wege | — | Yea |
| Wilson, L. | — | Yea |
| Annette Cleveland | Democrat | Yea |
| Bob Hasegawa | Democrat | Yea |
| Claire Wilson | Democrat | Yea |
| Derek Stanford | Democrat | Yea |
| Jamie Pedersen | Democrat | Yea |
| Jesse Salomon | Democrat | Yea |
| Joe Nguyen | Democrat | Yea |
| John Lovick | Democrat | Yea |
| June Robinson | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Wellman | Democrat | Yea |
| Liz Lovelett | Democrat | Yea |
| Manka Dhingra | Democrat | Yea |
| Marko Liias | Democrat | Yea |
| Rebecca Saldaña | Democrat | Yea |
| Steve Conway | Democrat | Yea |
| T'wina Nobles | Democrat | Yea |
| Victoria Hunt | Democrat | Yea |
| Yasmin Trudeau | Democrat | Yea |
| Chris Gildon | Republican | Yea |
| Curtis King | Republican | Yea |
| Jeff Holy | Republican | Yea |
| Jeff Wilson | Republican | Yea |
| Jim McCune | Republican | Yea |
| John Braun | Republican | Yea |
| Judy Warnick | Republican | Yea |
| Keith Wagoner | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Schoesler | Republican | Yea |
| Perry Dozier | Republican | Yea |
| Phil Fortunato | Republican | Yea |
| Ron Muzzall | Republican | Yea |
| Shelly Short | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 5664?
- SB 5664 is sponsored by T'wina Nobles (Democrat), Keiser, and Manka Dhingra (Democrat).
- What is the current status of SB 5664?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 05, 2022. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 5664?
- Track SB 5664 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 5664
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 5664
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →